Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hey does anyone know offhand how many Corporations are Superdelegates offhand? (Original Post) silvershadow May 2016 OP
None, and they don't have voting rights even under cruddy Citizens United. Hoyt May 2016 #1
That number is high. LiberalFighter May 2016 #4
None? La Lioness Priyanka May 2016 #2
Corporate lobbyists are close enough, thank you ..... tokenlib May 2016 #3
Which was, of course, my point...Thank you for being aware enough to understand. :D nt silvershadow May 2016 #5
You have a good point.. tokenlib May 2016 #8
If former presidents are included, I wonder sadoldgirl May 2016 #6
Link to the super delegate list with not one corporation. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #7
But there are Registered Corporate Lobbyists, right? nt silvershadow May 2016 #9
And registered lobbyists for union, environmental organizations, etc etc. onenote May 2016 #10
See the problem yet? nt silvershadow May 2016 #12
as someone who has lobbied for gun control, not really. onenote May 2016 #13
It is more than unseemly. nt silvershadow May 2016 #14
its unseemly for politically active members of a party onenote May 2016 #15
I draw a clear line for registered lobbyists. I can't trust they don't have an agenda. silvershadow May 2016 #16
There are other ways, too, to come at this....maybe we can make a distinction between silvershadow May 2016 #21
Some people represent both for profits and non profits, or unions and corporations onenote May 2016 #24
"The key to me is whether they have made a significant contribution, in time, in money" Dragonfli May 2016 #28
Elections cost money. I know you know that. onenote May 2016 #31
There are no corporation on the list, so your statements lacks accuracy. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #11
My thinking is expounded upon upthread. nt silvershadow May 2016 #18
There are no corporations, so your original statement is wrong. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #20
Read it again. I expanded again. Your failure to read it does not make it better, rather it silvershadow May 2016 #22
67 currently or formerly registered corporate lobbyists, bjo59 May 2016 #26
But they are not corporations, as was asked in the OP. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #29
None and Google is your friend. leftofcool May 2016 #17
My thinking is expounded upon upthread. nt silvershadow May 2016 #19
According to ABC news 67 lobbyists will attend the convention as superdelegates Dragonfli May 2016 #23
So then, the premise I floated upthread has turned out the be absolutely true, and it took silvershadow May 2016 #25
And how many "advisors" like Dean? Kittycat May 2016 #30
Lets see that socialist try to woo those lobbyists Gomez163 May 2016 #32
You are correct, the outright purchased delegates have already been bought and and paid for. /nt Dragonfli May 2016 #33
What are superdeleates? KingFlorez May 2016 #27
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
1. None, and they don't have voting rights even under cruddy Citizens United.
Sun May 1, 2016, 08:25 PM
May 2016

About 70 of superdelegates are also lobbyists, including those for civil rights groups, environmentalists, women's rights, unions, etc.

Hope that helps.

LiberalFighter

(50,940 posts)
4. That number is high.
Sun May 1, 2016, 08:47 PM
May 2016

Especially when including unions. Nearly all of them are just leaders or activists. It is likely that the number is 6 or less matching the number of states nearby that is easy travel to DC. Spots open for each state would likely be limited to one as those positions are limited.

tokenlib

(4,186 posts)
8. You have a good point..
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:16 PM
May 2016

It annoys me when people know damn well what someone means to say, and decide to be nitpicky because they are not on your side of an issue..

onenote

(42,704 posts)
15. its unseemly for politically active members of a party
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:29 PM
May 2016

who financially support the party, in some instances have represented the party in elections, to be involved in the selection of the party's candidate?

Agree to disagree.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
16. I draw a clear line for registered lobbyists. I can't trust they don't have an agenda.
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:32 PM
May 2016

For obvious reasons.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
21. There are other ways, too, to come at this....maybe we can make a distinction between
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:49 PM
May 2016

it this way: Union lobbyists can be in, since they represent people who have a voting voice (ostensibly) in our democracy. Corporate lobbyists cannot, since they aren't people as defined by voting law.

Social service organizations can have lobbyists as delegates, because they represent people who can vote. Corporate lobbyists cannot, since they aren't people, as defined by voting law.

etc.

The day corporations gain the right to vote is the only day I deem acceptable for them to have their lobbyists as voting members in our convention, due to conflict potential conflicts of interests,- and due to the mere possibility of a non-person entity gaining undue position with our democracy being so important it must be codified.

That is my position, and I now present it to whichever delegates my be here or lurking. Anyone is welcome to chime in with thoughts. But let us talk this out and see where it really goes...THat' what the primary is for! And we ARE still in a primary.

onenote

(42,704 posts)
24. Some people represent both for profits and non profits, or unions and corporations
Sun May 1, 2016, 10:48 PM
May 2016

I'm not sure that line drawing works.

The key to me is whether they have made a significant contribution, in time, in money, in other ways, to the Democratic Party. That's what should be the primary qualifying factor to be a super delegate, if we're going to have super delegates.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
28. "The key to me is whether they have made a significant contribution, in time, in money"
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:37 AM
May 2016

So one of the keys to qualify as a super delegate is to buy your way in?

I guess there will be many Banker and fossil fuel execs that "take the time to make significant donations", that will soon (if not already) be voting as such superpowered delegates, votes I might add that are equivalent to the votes of thousands of regular voters (every delegate superman ones or not represent thousands of citizen votes)

Nice sweet deal for an oligarchy in the making.

onenote

(42,704 posts)
31. Elections cost money. I know you know that.
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:44 AM
May 2016

Helping to raise money for Democratic candidates is a legitimate factor in picking super delegates, if there are going to are going to be super delegates. Not the only factor.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
20. There are no corporations, so your original statement is wrong.
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:47 PM
May 2016

Expounding doesn't add a single corporation.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
22. Read it again. I expanded again. Your failure to read it does not make it better, rather it
Sun May 1, 2016, 09:51 PM
May 2016

is decidedly unhelpful to the conversation during this primary, which goes on.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
29. But they are not corporations, as was asked in the OP.
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:39 AM
May 2016

I will stick with the goal post set by the original OP.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
23. According to ABC news 67 lobbyists will attend the convention as superdelegates
Sun May 1, 2016, 10:44 PM
May 2016
In fact, when you remove elected officials from the superdelegate pool, at least one in seven of the rest are former or current lobbyists registered on the federal and state level, according to lobbying disclosure records.

That’s at least 67 lobbyists who will attend the convention as superdelegates. A majority of them have already committed to supporting Hillary Clinton for the nomination.

And 41 lobbyist superdelegates, almost six in 10 of all lobbyist superdelegates, have already committed to supporting Clinton.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/reason-dozens-lobbyists-democratic-presidential-delegates/story?id=37289507
 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
25. So then, the premise I floated upthread has turned out the be absolutely true, and it took
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:23 AM
May 2016

40 minutes to find it out. Those 67 delegates, if they support her already over Clinton, before the convention is even held, are choosing the Third Way Corporate agenda over the people's agenda. My point has been proven. It is a rot in the system.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hey does anyone know offh...