Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

fred v

(271 posts)
Sun May 1, 2016, 10:50 PM May 2016

Remember, 'Bernie or Bust'ers, the Donald is Counting on You!

Stay ideologically pure! Do not vote for a flawed candidate! Luxuriate in your moral superiority! And don't forget to build fallout shelters for when the orange-haired nutcase you help elect starts a nuclear war!

196 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Remember, 'Bernie or Bust'ers, the Donald is Counting on You! (Original Post) fred v May 2016 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author Ed Suspicious May 2016 #1
Thank the gods there is still a chance TM99 May 2016 #2
I think Fred's doing it wrong. CentralCoaster May 2016 #6
FUD is all they got. TM99 May 2016 #7
But's it's okay to use the fear card against Democrats who don't care so much for Bernie Arneoker May 2016 #123
"Fear card?" You're invited to think about Hortensis May 2016 #132
I am presenting you with reality. TM99 May 2016 #168
That's not a fear card. That's democracy. cui bono May 2016 #188
When crap thread after crap thread is created by the BS cheerleaders ... SFnomad May 2016 #8
And yet, you do. You sure care a lot about how we're going to vote. JimDandy May 2016 #45
I don't care how you vote ... I care that the crap you're spewing will have an SFnomad May 2016 #64
That's what everyone on here does. Politics is about affecting the opinions and actions of others. JimDandy May 2016 #73
Crap being spewed = Hillary's record timmymoff May 2016 #76
Every time you say "BS cheerleaders", an angel gets its wings! Warren DeMontague May 2016 #111
TO Hillary: Rockyj May 2016 #152
I'm not worried about any of that griffi94 May 2016 #3
Sorry, but she doesn't have a prayer. basselope May 2016 #9
Sorry but I find your judgement suspect griffi94 May 2016 #14
I'm not insisting anything of the sort. basselope May 2016 #93
Sanders would be... MarianJack May 2016 #115
You don't understand history. basselope May 2016 #153
I understand history VERY WELL,... MarianJack May 2016 #163
No you don't basselope May 2016 #166
You go ahead and believe what you want to believe. MarianJack May 2016 #173
Your reality contains NO FACTS. basselope May 2016 #175
Nonsense, but... MarianJack May 2016 #182
No, you don't. basselope May 2016 #187
You REALLY Think Trump Will Beat Hillary? fred v May 2016 #15
Does not Crooked Hillary just make your stomach sink? Biaviians May 2016 #34
No, but DUers using Trump's epithet for Hillary does. nt SunSeeker May 2016 #72
Trump repeating Crooked Hillary day after day makes my skin crawl too. Biaviians May 2016 #99
It's even worse coming from a DUer. nt SunSeeker May 2016 #150
Trumps going to say Crooked Hillary every time he refers to her everyday until November. Biaviians May 2016 #189
Isn't that the entire underlying premise of your goofy OP? AzDar May 2016 #36
Easily. basselope May 2016 #94
Hands down. KPN May 2016 #104
They won't vote for Sanders Demsrule86 May 2016 #119
I can't wait for the debates! pandr32 May 2016 #158
If Hillary can't over come that , Bernie certainly can't. nt puffy socks May 2016 #47
Of course he can... basselope May 2016 #95
You haven't any idea how the Independent vote will go in the general puffy socks May 2016 #101
Actually many of us Bernie supporters are Indy's pinebox May 2016 #117
You haven't any cliue how many Independents will vote for Hillary puffy socks May 2016 #143
Actually I do know pinebox May 2016 #144
Actually, you don't. puffy socks May 2016 #146
As long as suppress the vote by keeping independents out, she does fine. basselope May 2016 #154
Again, you dont know hiow many Independents will vote for Hillary. puffy socks May 2016 #169
Very few basselope May 2016 #172
If that were true Demsrule86 May 2016 #121
Open the primaries and let's have a REAL vote and see who wins. basselope May 2016 #155
Wait, are you saying too many Hillary supporters won't vote for Bernie if he gets the nomination? KPN May 2016 #105
On this site we are firmly committed to electing Democrats...Hillary supporters that is. Demsrule86 May 2016 #124
She is already at 269 lancer78 May 2016 #63
LOL basselope May 2016 #96
Warner lancer78 May 2016 #191
LMAO!!! basselope May 2016 #193
Sorry, delusion isn't pretty is it? Loki May 2016 #130
No, Clinton supporters thinking she has a chance aren't pretty. basselope May 2016 #164
lol. She's got 3 million more votes than berrnie has misterhighwasted May 2016 #159
Amazing what happens when you have closed primaries and vote in a bubble, eh? basselope May 2016 #165
Yup. Amazing when repubs & other nefarious usurpers aren't misterhighwasted May 2016 #167
Remember those brakes when you are crying in your cornflakes in Nov basselope May 2016 #171
haaaahaaha misterhighwasted May 2016 #181
You know it is true. basselope May 2016 #186
Harder time, yet she has refused to answer questions... peace13 May 2016 #23
Hasn't sunk her yet griffi94 May 2016 #26
LOL basselope May 2016 #98
Yeah, 'cause Bernie is such a big meanie....... Amaril May 2016 #174
Cause People really consider Bernie griffi94 May 2016 #177
. FlatBaroque May 2016 #4
+1 artislife May 2016 #10
+1 n/t Bjornsdotter May 2016 #46
Word. mahina May 2016 #61
Yup /nt Dragonfli May 2016 #86
How far does a million bucks go, anyway? Warren DeMontague May 2016 #112
... Zorra May 2016 #140
+1 Amaril May 2016 #176
+1 lostnfound May 2016 #185
Actually.. he is counting on Hillary supporters basselope May 2016 #5
Remember h supporters artislife May 2016 #11
I'm a Pragmatist fred v May 2016 #22
Pragmatist? BernieforPres2016 May 2016 #33
... AzDar May 2016 #39
I live in the real world too, and it is dying because we artislife May 2016 #40
Let me just snap my fingers and all will be well. nt fun n serious May 2016 #51
You aren't powerful and sadly, not funny either. nt artislife May 2016 #79
You really think she could get more done then Bernie? Duckhunter935 May 2016 #54
Yes, and if those choices result in a lot of dead and maimed people, you can merrily laugh and say djean111 May 2016 #128
Sure we do Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2016 #87
Against the IWR, thinks the govt & the parties a corrupt, thinks Clinton is unqualified... baldguy May 2016 #12
Yes because Hillary cast the deciding vote that sent us to war Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2016 #88
This all reminds me of the petty, petulant, childish PUMAs of 2008 ... and the BS cheerleaders that SFnomad May 2016 #13
You sure are excited this evening! Avalux May 2016 #16
THE CONDESCENSION SHALL CONTINUE UNTIL UNITY IMPROVES hellofromreddit May 2016 #17
lol, thank you for that. RichVRichV May 2016 #24
Until Bernie suspends or until Skinner calls it. NurseJackie May 2016 #38
"It is intolerable when *you* do it! It's fine when *I* do it." hellofromreddit May 2016 #62
Take heart gentle soul ... NurseJackie May 2016 #120
You had an interesting response, Nurse Jackie! CobaltBlue May 2016 #83
Hillary supporters aka those who adore corporate masterhood. timmymoff May 2016 #91
Skinner should call it and turn the timeouts back on at the same time Warren DeMontague May 2016 #114
Do as you say, not do as you do. sixersixersixer May 2016 #18
You could have a constitutional crisis with Trump. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #19
YOu know who talks in that tone? TRUMP himself Armstead May 2016 #20
You've obviously not been reading the comments of Sandersnistas fred v May 2016 #32
Bush league.......yes that describes it. SwampG8r May 2016 #134
This worked whatchamacallit May 2016 #21
... PowerToThePeople May 2016 #25
In my view it is just not worth arguing the primary for me. hrmjustin May 2016 #27
Of course we also Duckhunter935 May 2016 #31
Thanks justin, I want to see how many more votes and delegates Hillary will get, three million Thinkingabout May 2016 #84
You don't need anybody except your own faction, remember? Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #28
Jury resiults zappaman May 2016 #29
I'm watching the news and they just showed a clip of Trump using Sanders words Beacool May 2016 #30
Trump called sanders unqualified? SwampG8r May 2016 #136
No, he called Hillary unqualified and made a point of mentioning that Sanders had called her that. Beacool May 2016 #178
bernie or busters are saying that if hillary wins the nomination, they will vote for trump Fresh_Start May 2016 #35
If you don't believe that Hillary can beat Donald, then don't vote for her. Luminous Animal May 2016 #37
Absolutely. tonyt53 May 2016 #41
Oh, please. I don't see Clinton as "flawed," I see her as being bjo59 May 2016 #42
You do realize Bernie voted for regime change in 1998, yes? puffy socks May 2016 #80
Hillary supporters have already given him what he wanted... Joe the Revelator May 2016 #43
HRC voted many X for border wall; sends children back to violence she had role in creating; reckless amborin May 2016 #44
what drivel Viva_La_Revolution May 2016 #48
poofie doo doo go fa fa! Wooop! CentralCoaster May 2016 #49
Threads like this are the natural result of the way the Bernie camp is behaving K & R nt BootinUp May 2016 #50
Not going the way you wanted Duckhunter935 May 2016 #52
Lol,my begging for recs, desperate? Logical May 2016 #53
Desperate? fred v May 2016 #56
Never seen someone ask for recs. Interesting. Nt Logical May 2016 #59
Ha shenmue May 2016 #55
Deleted message mahina May 2016 #57
No, this is on you for supporting a horrible candidiate Joob May 2016 #58
Give up your vote, your voice & the issues that matter, join the unity club! Kittycat May 2016 #60
This OP reminds me of the title of an older sadoldgirl May 2016 #65
Her loss would be as a result of her flaws; her win would be as a result of Trump's flaws. Leave me Vote2016 May 2016 #66
I've been Informed that my OP was Alerted On fred v May 2016 #67
Hillary isn't, so we're cool. HooptieWagon May 2016 #68
Thank you, fred! Cha May 2016 #69
Trump's even planning on using Bernie's talking points for the GE... wysi May 2016 #70
Hyperbole aside, you have heard of the Electoral College, right? Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #71
Bernie is Donald's only hope. nt SunSeeker May 2016 #74
Hello, fred v! CobaltBlue May 2016 #75
thank you for the effort towards unity!! oldandhappy May 2016 #77
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #78
The people are counting on Bernie Sanders Urchin May 2016 #81
The people are counting on Bernie Sanders Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2016 #90
oh puh-leeze, quit with this dishonest meme ffs. 2banon May 2016 #82
according to what I read in HRC group, Bernie is plenty flawed. Hiraeth May 2016 #85
Hillary has zero crossover appeal. Supposedly her supporters were backing her for her ability to win w4rma May 2016 #89
I don't know how many times I have heard hillary timmymoff May 2016 #92
It's going to be so awesome when the "orange haired nutcase" loses to Hillary! Cha May 2016 #97
No. If Hillary is such an awesome candidate, then she will win over SheilaT May 2016 #100
Please do some resesrch before the "hair on fire" tome. libdem4life May 2016 #102
I'm beginning to think that all these new vitriolic posters are GOP shills grasswire May 2016 #103
I think it's quite possible. lovemydog May 2016 #106
either that or someone(s) is trying to destroy DU. nt grasswire May 2016 #108
Interesting theory. lovemydog May 2016 #109
If Elizabeth Warren had decided to run for president we wouldn't be having this conversation. Kalidurga May 2016 #107
Don't know where you get that BernieforPres2016 May 2016 #135
Yeah, but I doubt that Hillary supporters would be acting the same way. Kalidurga May 2016 #179
Actually, he is counting on you to give us a candidate that people can't vote for. Live and Learn May 2016 #110
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #113
This message was self-deleted by its author Th1onein May 2016 #116
she's more of a war monger than him. Cobalt Violet May 2016 #118
I've read here more than once bvf May 2016 #122
Remember Hillary Fans: ONLY ALL OF YOU... Herman4747 May 2016 #125
When We Stand Together No Citizen Need Settle For The Lessor Of Two Corporate Evils cantbeserious May 2016 #126
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #127
If Hill can't beat Trump, that's on her. CharlotteVale May 2016 #129
And since Bernie can't beat Hillary, that's on *him*. nt LaydeeBug May 2016 #133
Thats true. Doesnt matter how entitled he claims he is misterhighwasted May 2016 #160
Bullshit LadyHawkAZ May 2016 #131
So glad to know that you aren't. nt LWolf May 2016 #137
Bernie & Bust are a minority Her Sister May 2016 #138
Trump would be a horrible POTUS Gothmog May 2016 #139
"Lesser of two evils buddy, deal with it. Take your endless foreign military adventures and like em" Kurska May 2016 #141
I imagine that the courage of one's own convictions is an alien concept to you LanternWaste May 2016 #142
Your daily dose of Hill-bully emotional blackmail has arrived. Betty Karlson May 2016 #145
Haaahaaa. From the bernie bully's to the hill bully's misterhighwasted May 2016 #161
projection: still a thing in Hill-bully land. Betty Karlson May 2016 #184
Got any thoughts on issues or just these nonsense side issues? pdsimdars May 2016 #147
Will this post get hidden if I say greiner3 May 2016 #148
Republicans first choice was Bernie getting the Democratic nod workinclasszero May 2016 #149
I love it when people demanding we vote for the party call us "purists". Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #151
Sec Clinton will win the GE in a landslide ... LannyDeVaney May 2016 #156
Amen! leftofcool May 2016 #157
This OP deserves a big K & R misterhighwasted May 2016 #162
Clintonistias - THe Global Corporate Elite are Counting on YOU! Ferd Berfel May 2016 #170
Thank you for pointing out the unpleasant consequences Vogon_Glory May 2016 #180
Thank you fred v.. disillusioned73 May 2016 #183
You mean the PUMA's of 2016? seabeyond May 2016 #190
This message was self-deleted by its author seabeyond May 2016 #192
but, but, the indictment fairy is coming! and PURITY! Maru Kitteh May 2016 #194
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #195
Lloyd Blankfein thanks you. Broward May 2016 #196

Response to fred v (Original post)

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
2. Thank the gods there is still a chance
Sun May 1, 2016, 10:54 PM
May 2016

for the better candidate to win.

But if he doesn't I am sure all of these threats, insults, and childish bullshit will go a long way towards helping to secure the necessary votes on the unaffiliated left that she sorely needs in order to win.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
7. FUD is all they got.
Sun May 1, 2016, 10:58 PM
May 2016

It is a tried and true conservative tactic.

New Dems are not liberals to say the least.

Arneoker

(375 posts)
123. But's it's okay to use the fear card against Democrats who don't care so much for Bernie
Mon May 2, 2016, 07:04 AM
May 2016

As in, give us what we want or we stay home. And some Sanders supporters have the chutzpah to accuse Hillary supporters and the "establishment" of "blackmail tactics!"

It really comes down to what's important. If what's important is getting at least some progress, or at least holding the line, the choice in November will be very clear, whether it's Hillary or Bernie.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
132. "Fear card?" You're invited to think about
Mon May 2, 2016, 08:02 AM
May 2016

an extremely important issue. This is not a stupid game. Trump exemplifies the "card" mentality regarding issues, playing his cards, countering the opponents'.

We all need to do, must do, what a dysfunctional Trump cannot: Care about the issues.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
168. I am presenting you with reality.
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:13 PM
May 2016

With 47% of the electorate now unaffiliated, yes, you have to compromise and build a coalition with us if you want our votes.

That isn't blackmail. That is trying to force y'all to see and accept reality. You can not win without us. Period.

What is important to y'all maybe 'at least some progress' or 'holding the line' (which is exactly what the status quo is!) but that isn't for us.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
188. That's not a fear card. That's democracy.
Mon May 2, 2016, 06:10 PM
May 2016

If the people aren't given someone they can vote for in good conscience, someone they think is going to be on their side, fighting for them, it's not their fault if they don't come out and vote. It's the fault of the party who put forth such a person that people can't bring themselves to vote for because they are for so many things that are simply unacceptable.

Now, those people could put forth a candidate that is not as flawed that all Dems could get behind since that other candidate embodies all that the Dem Party has stood for and then many more people will feel good about voting and will come out. Particularly the new voters who don't identify as Democrats but will if this candidate is the Dem nominee.

So if Hillary is the Dem nominee and she can't get people to come out and vote for her, for good reason, then it's her fault and the fault of all her supporters for not understanding that that's how politics works and that you cannot take anyone's vote for granted.

.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
8. When crap thread after crap thread is created by the BS cheerleaders ...
Sun May 1, 2016, 10:59 PM
May 2016

why should anyone care about them and their temper tantrums? It really would be nice if they'd take a Time Out for a little while.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
64. I don't care how you vote ... I care that the crap you're spewing will have an
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:54 PM
May 2016

affect on other people.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
73. That's what everyone on here does. Politics is about affecting the opinions and actions of others.
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:15 AM
May 2016

$1,000,000 was recently paid for Brock's astrotufers to do just that for Clinton. Buck up there, bud. We're dealing with it-you can too.

ETA: SBS supporter who hasn't decided yet on exactly how to use my presidential vote, except that I won't be voting Clinton or any Republican, especially Trump.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
76. Crap being spewed = Hillary's record
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:18 AM
May 2016

Many people aren't as interested in Her Corporateness once they learn her record, is that your true fear?

Rockyj

(538 posts)
152. TO Hillary:
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:57 AM
May 2016

If you want Bernie supporters to come to the dark side, YOU MUST release the transcripts of your big money speeches.

griffi94

(3,830 posts)
3. I'm not worried about any of that
Sun May 1, 2016, 10:56 PM
May 2016

Hillary is going to win easily.

She's had a harder time with Bernie than she'll have with anybody the GOP puts up.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
9. Sorry, but she doesn't have a prayer.
Sun May 1, 2016, 10:59 PM
May 2016

Everyone seems to want to forget how much work the GOP has put into fixing the vote in critical swing states like Florida, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Ohio.

Clinton would need OVERWHELMING turnout to overcome this.

She isn't going to see overwhelming turnout.

griffi94

(3,830 posts)
14. Sorry but I find your judgement suspect
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:04 PM
May 2016

since you seem to still be insisting that Bernie will
be our nominee.

Hillary will be the next president.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
93. I'm not insisting anything of the sort.
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:27 AM
May 2016

I am saying I HOPE he will be the next nominee.

B/c Hillary doesn't have a prayer in the general election.

MarianJack

(10,237 posts)
115. Sanders would be...
Mon May 2, 2016, 06:27 AM
May 2016

...the Goldwater/McGovern/Mondale of 2016.

He lacks the self discipline, the mental toughness and the brains to ever be competitive in a national election against non Vermont Republicans/teabaggers. His entire life story is tailored to the exact kind of smear campaign the rightists love to run. If he is the nominee, than I'll vote for him while holding my nose, but election night would make 1972 & 1984 look like squeakers!

PEACE!

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
153. You don't understand history.
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:58 AM
May 2016

In November of 1972 Nixon had over a 60% approval rating and his disapproval hovered around 30%

Reagan enjoyed similar numbers in November of 1984.

FURTHER 1984-1986 happens to be some one of the few years in history where the majority of people though the country was "on the right track".

So in the case of McGovern and Mondale they were running against POPULAR presidents during times when MOST people felt fairly good about the country.

Sanders is walking into a completely different situation. Obama has a very stale approval rating, bouncing between 45-51% with disapprovals in the same area. Right Track/Wrong track. Those numbers hovering VERY CLOSE to the where they were during the crash of 2008.. close to 70% of the people not happy with the way things are going.

I don't give much credence to polls this far out, except for the fact that Sanders preforms better than Clinton every way possible. No smear campaign is going to change that.. no amount of "vetting".. none of it. Clinton is their dream candidate, because she gets to represent the very establishment people don't like.

She won't win. She doesn't have a prayer.

MarianJack

(10,237 posts)
163. I understand history VERY WELL,...
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:44 PM
May 2016

...especially the history of 2 campaigns that I actually worked in. Sanders is a DISASTER waiting to happen. Hillary is a President.

No amount of pro Sanders blather changes that. In 1988, Michael Dukakis was substantially ahead going into the Republican convention, also. Within a week of Labor Day everyone knew he was toast. And he was a better candidate than Sanders.

Vetting won't change things? Please!!!

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
166. No you don't
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:58 PM
May 2016

Which is exemplified by the two examples you brought up and then completely bungling the 1988 election.

You don't seem to even be able to research exactly how short Dukakis held the lead and how, once he stopped trying to play to the middle, he actually cut bush's lead in half on election day, but it was far too little, far too late.

It wasn't "vetting" that doomed Dukakis, it was Dukakis playing not to lose instead of to win.

This has NEVER been Sanders MO.

No amount of "vetting" or negative ads is going to change it.

MarianJack

(10,237 posts)
173. You go ahead and believe what you want to believe.
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:39 PM
May 2016

I lived through those campaigns, so I'll stick to reality.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
175. Your reality contains NO FACTS.
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:42 PM
May 2016

There are actual numbers you can look, but you have created your own narrative for why things happened the way they did.

You don't understand history.

MarianJack

(10,237 posts)
182. Nonsense, but...
Mon May 2, 2016, 03:13 PM
May 2016

...again, you go ahead and believe what you choose to believe.

I understand history a lot better than you do!

AMF!

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
187. No, you don't.
Mon May 2, 2016, 05:33 PM
May 2016

Your "history" ignores all the actual FACTS and based on your belief.

You had no clue Nixon had 60% approval or Reagan had the same or that the majority of the country thought we were on the right track in 1984.. you are just trying to chalk it up to the democrats choosing the wrong candidate.

You think it was all vetting and negative ads and fail to consider what the actual FACTS were.

You can't even acknowledge how poorly Dukakis bumbled his campaign or that he changed his strategy in the last 2 weeks, embraced his liberalism and significantly outpreformed the polls.. but it was too little too late.

Facts make up history.. not your deluded memory of it.

Biaviians

(167 posts)
34. Does not Crooked Hillary just make your stomach sink?
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:23 PM
May 2016

Hillary could lose in a variety of ways.

Biaviians

(167 posts)
189. Trumps going to say Crooked Hillary every time he refers to her everyday until November.
Mon May 2, 2016, 07:04 PM
May 2016

Not very nice guy.

KPN

(17,377 posts)
104. Hands down.
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:59 AM
May 2016

You think many Independents will vote for her despite their animus for and distrust of her? Some, but not a majority by a long shot.

Demsrule86

(71,542 posts)
119. They won't vote for Sanders
Mon May 2, 2016, 06:59 AM
May 2016

He could not even win the primary. I will tell you...pigs would fly before Sander won Ohio or Florida or Virginia for that matter.

pandr32

(14,272 posts)
158. I can't wait for the debates!
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:21 PM
May 2016

Somehow, though, it wouldn't surprise me if he tried to avoid them--maybe a fundraiser for some shady charity that promises to give all the proceeds to veterans, and then doesn't again.
Trump would not like publicly debating a brainy woman, especially one as accomplished as Sec. Clinton. Thanks to Bernie, though, he is already going to accuse her of being "unqualified" and "having poor judgement", along with a whole lot of other right-wing smears that Bernie has polished off and recycled.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
95. Of course he can...
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:29 AM
May 2016

He actually APPEALS to independents who are the ones who decide the election.

He will help drive turnout, where Hillary cannot.

 

puffy socks

(1,473 posts)
101. You haven't any idea how the Independent vote will go in the general
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:47 AM
May 2016

regardless of who wins the nomination.

Hillary has more votes than all the candidates so apparently she helped drive turn out plenty.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
117. Actually many of us Bernie supporters are Indy's
Mon May 2, 2016, 06:51 AM
May 2016

and that's what you don't get. We vote for progressives, not party's.

Hillary has more votes? Pop quiz time! How many GOP candidates were running vs how many Dem candidates were running?

 

puffy socks

(1,473 posts)
143. You haven't any cliue how many Independents will vote for Hillary
Mon May 2, 2016, 10:08 AM
May 2016

I am one of them.

Hillary is a Progressive . The Sanders supporters can try for a "pure Progressive" in your own eyes, and you'll all have zero voice like the Tea Party is. Tghe T party is the result of not forming a team because their individual gripes aren't being instantly addressed. Too bad you didnt learn from the T bags who are now defunct from continuing on in their Conservative purity quest.

Yes HC has more votes than ANY candidate GOP or Dem, that is a fact.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
144. Actually I do know
Mon May 2, 2016, 10:35 AM
May 2016

According to polls, Hillary polls very low with indy voters and no she isn't progressive, sorry but you can't be progressive while upholding moderate values. I guess you missed her describing herself as a moderate didn't you?



Sorry but you can't be progressive while defending DOMA, DADT, KXL, TPP and not fight for things like a living wage and health care for all. I'm quite sick of this little game you and your ilk play trying to redefine your candidates tarnished and permanently damaged image. History has already written her legacy and she is not trusted by the majority of America.

Hillary has more votes than anybody? #HillaryMath = 4 Dems vs 17 GOP candidates. Gee, I wonder why she does.
Spin cycle in full effect in order to control the reality that your candidate has more baggage than Samsonite can produce suitcases.
 

puffy socks

(1,473 posts)
146. Actually, you don't.
Mon May 2, 2016, 10:38 AM
May 2016

I'm an Independent and a Progressive.
You don't get t define who is Progressive.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
154. As long as suppress the vote by keeping independents out, she does fine.
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:59 AM
May 2016

You can't do that in the general election

and her numbers are paltry compared to what she will need to win in November... and the votes just aren't there for her.

 

puffy socks

(1,473 posts)
169. Again, you dont know hiow many Independents will vote for Hillary.
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:29 PM
May 2016

She didn't suppress votes. Uninformed voters locked themselves out of the election process, and you don't know how many of those would have voted for Clinton. Give it up.
She beats every single candidate running in votes. Period.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
172. Very few
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:37 PM
May 2016

She doesn't have the appeal and she isn't winning against all candidates and barley out of the MOE against others.

Although we only need to look back to 1988 to see what will happen.

She doesn't have a chance.

Demsrule86

(71,542 posts)
121. If that were true
Mon May 2, 2016, 07:01 AM
May 2016

He would have won the primary. There are Democrats who will not vote for Sanders. I would ...because I would vote for any Democrat on the ticket. But my sister and brother said they would stay home first. You think this guy is so great, judging by the primary results...others don't.

KPN

(17,377 posts)
105. Wait, are you saying too many Hillary supporters won't vote for Bernie if he gets the nomination?
Mon May 2, 2016, 02:01 AM
May 2016

Is that what you're saying? After all the crap you Hillary supporters have been spewing at Bernie supporters about VOTING DEMOCRAT!!! Too much!!!

Not to worry though. Not a problem, Bernie's got a vast majority of the Independents wrapped up.

Demsrule86

(71,542 posts)
124. On this site we are firmly committed to electing Democrats...Hillary supporters that is.
Mon May 2, 2016, 07:05 AM
May 2016

However, you would be overturning the will of the voters...and yeah. I think there are plenty of Hillary supporters who would not vote for Sanders if he did something so unethical. Also, after they swiftboated him into the second coming of Stalin, he would lose independents as well. if he was electable, he would have won the primary.

 

lancer78

(1,495 posts)
191. Warner
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:41 PM
May 2016

was asleep at the switch in 2014, yet still won in that Republican Wave year. Nevada, with its demographics, is a cakewalk.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
193. LMAO!!!
Tue May 3, 2016, 12:21 AM
May 2016

Keep on dreaming.

The GOP ran a unpopular LOBBIEST and BARELY lost

VA goes red in November with Hillary on the ticket.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
165. Amazing what happens when you have closed primaries and vote in a bubble, eh?
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:48 PM
May 2016

You don't have that advantage in the general election.

She would actually NEED turnout. Which she won't have.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
167. Yup. Amazing when repubs & other nefarious usurpers aren't
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:03 PM
May 2016

allowed to choose the Dem candidate in the Dem primary process.
Too bad.
DEMS da breaks man!

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
171. Remember those brakes when you are crying in your cornflakes in Nov
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:35 PM
May 2016

B/c everyone knows Clinton has no viable path to victory.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
23. Harder time, yet she has refused to answer questions...
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:12 PM
May 2016

....made a platform out of saying that she will do what Bernie's doing (even when that is not what she is proposing) and failing to reveal the transcripts to her paid meetings. Any one of these issues could likely sink her. My best to you and your candidate. This thing has gone to far down the road for me. If you can't see the pitfalls I don't know what to say.

griffi94

(3,830 posts)
26. Hasn't sunk her yet
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:14 PM
May 2016

She's got more votes than all candidates from either party.

She's got this.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
98. LOL
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:32 AM
May 2016

This old silly talking point again.

Ignoring the fact that she is in a 2 way battle while the other side has had more candidates, they also have some states that don't vote.

In short, her getting a small number of votes in the democratic primary means NOTHING.

She can't win the GE

griffi94

(3,830 posts)
177. Cause People really consider Bernie
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:53 PM
May 2016

a possibilty.
Trump is a caricauture.

She'll have a much easier time agains Cruz or Trump.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
5. Actually.. he is counting on Hillary supporters
Sun May 1, 2016, 10:57 PM
May 2016

They desperately want to give him a race he can easily win.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
11. Remember h supporters
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:00 PM
May 2016

You can call yourselves progressives, but that doesn't mean you actually support a progressive agenda.

 

fred v

(271 posts)
22. I'm a Pragmatist
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:10 PM
May 2016

I live in the Real World, where people (myself included) are light-years away from perfection, and choices have to be made.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
33. Pragmatist?
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:23 PM
May 2016

Is that the term for people who support corrupt neocons? I call them Republicans.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
40. I live in the real world too, and it is dying because we
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:25 PM
May 2016

have been pragmatic and incremental in any change that would have helped her.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
54. You really think she could get more done then Bernie?
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:47 PM
May 2016

I guess she will when she evolves back to the right

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
128. Yes, and if those choices result in a lot of dead and maimed people, you can merrily laugh and say
Mon May 2, 2016, 07:40 AM
May 2016

you made a mistake! Maybe write a book about it! What fun!

Which is what will happen, again and again, if Hillary is president.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
12. Against the IWR, thinks the govt & the parties a corrupt, thinks Clinton is unqualified...
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:03 PM
May 2016

Trump must be a "Progressive"*.

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(135,713 posts)
88. Yes because Hillary cast the deciding vote that sent us to war
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:15 AM
May 2016

Any other fairy tales you want to tell?

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
13. This all reminds me of the petty, petulant, childish PUMAs of 2008 ... and the BS cheerleaders that
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:04 PM
May 2016

insist on being 'Bernie or Bust'ers' will find out that they are just as immaterial as the PUMAs. Those PUMAs were saying the same or similar type things that the BoB'ers are saying today ... Obama needed their votes; Obama was a weak candidate; it would bring out the GOP racists; etc. But in the end, the PUMAs didn't have the power they thought they did and ended up being irrelevant when the votes were counted.

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
24. lol, thank you for that.
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:12 PM
May 2016

Remember it's always the voters fault that don't vote for them, never the candidate or parties fault that they can't earn the vote. What a wonderful racket we have going on.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
38. Until Bernie suspends or until Skinner calls it.
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:25 PM
May 2016

After all the shit you guys put us through, WTF do you expect? The aggressors are losing the primary, and now they're complaining that Hillary supporters are elbowing, needling and verbally striking back? Pity.

 

hellofromreddit

(1,182 posts)
62. "It is intolerable when *you* do it! It's fine when *I* do it."
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:52 PM
May 2016

"Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster... for when you gaze long into the abyss. The abyss gazes also into you."

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
120. Take heart gentle soul ...
Mon May 2, 2016, 07:01 AM
May 2016

... considering the short amount of time remaining and comparing that to the months and months of fun you've already had ... well, you're really getting quite a bargain, aren't you?

It's a small price to pay, so ... suck it up.

 

CobaltBlue

(1,122 posts)
83. You had an interesting response, Nurse Jackie!
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:34 AM
May 2016

Hello, Nurse Jackie!

“The aggressors,” as you describe them, are not winning Bernie Sanders the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination.

The voting supporters for Hillary Clinton are, as you mention, “elbowing, needling” the voting supporters for Bernie Sanders.

It just goes to show that, sometimes, two sides cannot, and will not, come together.

I guess there could be other tactics.

One of them is, if your preferred candidate is leading a party’s primaries—and is on pace to win that party’s presidential nomination—it may be wise for those on the “winner’s” side to actually move on and not participate on an Internet discussion forum thread expressing why they feel “pity” for the individual voters on the losing side.

I think you, Nurse Jackie, would have no problem filling in for David Brock if he ever has to miss a day’s work on the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
114. Skinner should call it and turn the timeouts back on at the same time
Mon May 2, 2016, 02:58 AM
May 2016

For everyone with a glowing transparency page.

now there is your recipe for unity, right there.

 

sixersixersixer

(17 posts)
18. Do as you say, not do as you do.
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:08 PM
May 2016

Or whatever gobbledydoo you came up with.

My vote is my decision. Not yours or Hillary's or anyone else. Get it?

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,852 posts)
19. You could have a constitutional crisis with Trump.
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:08 PM
May 2016

He might give the military unlawful orders that they refuse to carry out.

 

fred v

(271 posts)
32. You've obviously not been reading the comments of Sandersnistas
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:23 PM
May 2016

The holier-than-thou preaching is relentless, and the insults hurled at anyone who dares profess support for Secretary Clinton are beyond the pale! My op was bush-league by comparison.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
27. In my view it is just not worth arguing the primary for me.
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:15 PM
May 2016

Hillary is going to win and Sanders will not. Some people here need the time to get used to it and I will back off.

The anti-Hillary threads have kicked up a bit and it is a buzzkill. Ever since the hard fought NY battle things have taken a desperate turn among the Bernie or Bust crew here and I want no part of it.

Hopefully people will see the folly of not voting for the nominee.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
31. Of course we also
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:22 PM
May 2016

Know that the Bernie bashing and especially the bernie supporter bashing has skyrocketed lately and has been helped by the general amnesty so over the top insults have no repercussions to the poster.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
84. Thanks justin, I want to see how many more votes and delegates Hillary will get, three million
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:42 AM
May 2016

and counting. So far she is handling Trump the Rump well.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
28. You don't need anybody except your own faction, remember?
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:16 PM
May 2016

Well if you get what you wanted, then we'll see how this great decision of yours works out.

zappaman

(20,627 posts)
29. Jury resiults
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:17 PM
May 2016

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Sun May 1, 2016, 10:07 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Remember, 'Bernie or Bust'ers, the Donald is Counting on You!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511878725

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Nasty broadbrush personal attack on half the board, accusation of helping to elect Trump

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun May 1, 2016, 10:14 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Too many rightwing themes as it is.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Half the board is "Bernie or Bust"? I should hope not. Sorry, but this alert is clearly personal. Oh, and Bernie or Bust members deserve derision if not outright PPRing.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Beacool

(30,518 posts)
30. I'm watching the news and they just showed a clip of Trump using Sanders words
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:21 PM
May 2016

and giving him credit for them. Yes, that's a winning strategy for both of them. Call the most qualified person in the race, unqualified.

SwampG8r

(10,287 posts)
136. Trump called sanders unqualified?
Mon May 2, 2016, 08:35 AM
May 2016

He is the most qualified so that .ust be what you mean.

Beacool

(30,518 posts)
178. No, he called Hillary unqualified and made a point of mentioning that Sanders had called her that.
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:53 PM
May 2016

Fresh_Start

(11,365 posts)
35. bernie or busters are saying that if hillary wins the nomination, they will vote for trump
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:23 PM
May 2016

so it would make the most sense for trump to ask bernie to be his VP.
And bernie can make the same offer the the Donald to keep the 30% of the bernie voters who won't vote for Clinton

 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
41. Absolutely.
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:26 PM
May 2016

Plus all of GOP candidates running for the Senate are too. They know, as strongly evidenced by looking at the WI polls, that Bernie's supporters do not vote the down ticket candidates. They only voted for Bernie because most have no idea that it will take a Democrat majority in the Senate to get anything moving.

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
42. Oh, please. I don't see Clinton as "flawed," I see her as being
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:27 PM
May 2016

pro-corporate and highly militaristic. I will not vote for anyone who favors the well being of mega banks and corporations over the people and I will not vote for anyone who is so supportive of the U.S. "regime-change" foreign policies that have caused so much misery and destruction around the world. Hillary Clinton is not a "flawed" candidate - she's a candidate whose record is in direct opposition to what I am looking for in a candidate for president.

 

puffy socks

(1,473 posts)
80. You do realize Bernie voted for regime change in 1998, yes?
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:24 AM
May 2016

For military action in Libya, Somalia, Yugoslavia.

 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
43. Hillary supporters have already given him what he wanted...
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:28 PM
May 2016

....an easy path to the Whitehouse.

amborin

(16,631 posts)
44. HRC voted many X for border wall; sends children back to violence she had role in creating; reckless
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:30 PM
May 2016

regime change, speaks derisively of "illegal immigrants," her biggest donor dislikes Muslims (doesn't want to "torture" them, exactly); even Axlerod called Trump a sheep in wolf's clothing

if you don't want Trump, don't nominate Hillary

BootinUp

(51,323 posts)
50. Threads like this are the natural result of the way the Bernie camp is behaving K & R nt
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:43 PM
May 2016
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
52. Not going the way you wanted
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:44 PM
May 2016

Had to run to the Hillary group for backup. You know this not your bubble of a safe haven

Kittycat

(10,493 posts)
60. Give up your vote, your voice & the issues that matter, join the unity club!
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:51 PM
May 2016

How about letting voters enjoy having the chance to finish voting, and voicing the issues important to them up through the party process before threatening everyone about joining the Unity Club? Until then, it feels a bit like that club is a bat over the head.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
65. This OP reminds me of the title of an older
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:57 PM
May 2016

book:"Fear and loathing on the campaign trail"

 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
66. Her loss would be as a result of her flaws; her win would be as a result of Trump's flaws. Leave me
Sun May 1, 2016, 11:59 PM
May 2016

out of it so I can focus on getting down ballot Democrats elected.

 

fred v

(271 posts)
67. I've been Informed that my OP was Alerted On
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:02 AM
May 2016

So, Bernie supporters, what kind of cheese would you like with it?

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
68. Hillary isn't, so we're cool.
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:02 AM
May 2016

She burned the bridge, so we're down with going our own way, whatever it may be.

wysi

(1,514 posts)
70. Trump's even planning on using Bernie's talking points for the GE...
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:08 AM
May 2016

... since they worked so well in the primary.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
71. Hyperbole aside, you have heard of the Electoral College, right?
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:11 AM
May 2016

It doesn't matter in the least who I vote for in the GE...my state's not remotely in play.

 

CobaltBlue

(1,122 posts)
75. Hello, fred v!
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:17 AM
May 2016

I appreciate your opening post.

I don’t feel the same as you do.

I believe your thread, with no disrespect intended, does not help in any way you may have been hoping.

Response to fred v (Original post)

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
89. Hillary has zero crossover appeal. Supposedly her supporters were backing her for her ability to win
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:17 AM
May 2016

elections. Yet her supporters consistently attack independent voters as if they were loyal Democrats. Hillary hasn't even attempted to campaign for the independent vote.

Hillary's supporters were conned. She is the weakest candidate in my lifetime. And they are attacking the strongest general election candidate.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
92. I don't know how many times I have heard hillary
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:26 AM
May 2016

supporters claim they don't need our votes. They don't need our efforts. Which is it ? You need them or not?

Cha

(319,074 posts)
97. It's going to be so awesome when the "orange haired nutcase" loses to Hillary!
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:31 AM
May 2016

Mahalo, fred~

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
100. No. If Hillary is such an awesome candidate, then she will win over
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:39 AM
May 2016

everyone. She's made it clear she doesn't really need independents, or the Bernie supporters, so IT IS NOT ON THE BERNIE PEOPLE IF SHE LOSES.

Got that? It's her and her supporters and surrogates who are responsible for her win or loss. DO NOT for one minute try to shift the blame.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
102. Please do some resesrch before the "hair on fire" tome.
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:51 AM
May 2016

Bernie does much better against the Republicans than Hillary. Post after post on DU has given the numbers as provided by an array of pollsters.

Fear Trump is, well, trumped up hoopla. We have absolutely No Reason to fear him. That's the Republican' s mess.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
103. I'm beginning to think that all these new vitriolic posters are GOP shills
Mon May 2, 2016, 01:53 AM
May 2016

Because they sure aren't for unity.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
106. I think it's quite possible.
Mon May 2, 2016, 02:05 AM
May 2016

I'm wary of any folks trying to sow too much disunity among the left and / or disunity among democrats.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
109. Interesting theory.
Mon May 2, 2016, 02:32 AM
May 2016

Another is that sometimes a poster may really feel as vitriolic as what they type, lol. I'm wary of the ones who seem pissed off with every post day after day on some exact same subject.

Fortunately DU has a lot of great groups, so there's places to discuss other things. I've gotten some great advice in the mac users group, shared info in the video games & sports groups, and had wonderful times in the aa group.

So in that regard DU seems fairly resilient. That is, if people keep enjoying posting on boards like this one. I enjoy it a lot.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
107. If Elizabeth Warren had decided to run for president we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Mon May 2, 2016, 02:20 AM
May 2016

She would have pretty close to 100% support. But, what we have is Hillary and she is a crappy candidate. Donald might not even get the nomination so that threat is empty unless he gets the nomination. Your problem is if the Cons don't nominate him because their elite hate him as much as our peons hate Hillary.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
135. Don't know where you get that
Mon May 2, 2016, 08:34 AM
May 2016

I think Warren would have had the same outcome. The Dem establishment was going to line up 99% behind Hillary no matter who ran against her.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
179. Yeah, but I doubt that Hillary supporters would be acting the same way.
Mon May 2, 2016, 02:04 PM
May 2016

I seriously doubt it.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
110. Actually, he is counting on you to give us a candidate that people can't vote for.
Mon May 2, 2016, 02:48 AM
May 2016

You are doing his bidding well.

Response to fred v (Original post)

Response to fred v (Original post)

Cobalt Violet

(9,976 posts)
118. she's more of a war monger than him.
Mon May 2, 2016, 06:56 AM
May 2016

Better build a fallout shelter if the faux yellowed hair nutcase wins too.


Go Bernie! At least he's not trying to fool us with his hair color!

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
122. I've read here more than once
Mon May 2, 2016, 07:03 AM
May 2016

that Clinton don't need no stinkin' votes of Sanders supporters.

OK.

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
125. Remember Hillary Fans: ONLY ALL OF YOU...
Mon May 2, 2016, 07:05 AM
May 2016

...working together, can persuade Hillary to drop her duplicitous, insincere campaign, in favor of someone who would NEVER RUN FROM THE TERM, "LIBERAL"!!!

Response to fred v (Original post)

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
160. Thats true. Doesnt matter how entitled he claims he is
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:26 PM
May 2016

He never had a chance of beat Hillary.
He doesn't have to worry about beating Trump.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
131. Bullshit
Mon May 2, 2016, 07:59 AM
May 2016

He doesn't want the job. He's only running to make his buddy look palatable.
It isn't working and neither is this tactic. Just stop.

 

Her Sister

(6,444 posts)
138. Bernie & Bust are a minority
Mon May 2, 2016, 08:53 AM
May 2016

but Trumpie sure LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVES them!

KnR!

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
141. "Lesser of two evils buddy, deal with it. Take your endless foreign military adventures and like em"
Mon May 2, 2016, 09:30 AM
May 2016
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
142. I imagine that the courage of one's own convictions is an alien concept to you
Mon May 2, 2016, 09:33 AM
May 2016

I imagine that the courage of one's own convictions is an alien concept to you, regardless of how we cower behind implication-- further illustrating it as such.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
145. Your daily dose of Hill-bully emotional blackmail has arrived.
Mon May 2, 2016, 10:37 AM
May 2016

Today's offer includes an extra heavy wallop of foregone conclusions.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
184. projection: still a thing in Hill-bully land.
Mon May 2, 2016, 04:20 PM
May 2016

criticising wrongly forgone conclusions does not equate to "racist sexist keyboard-warring and complacent easily duped hell-bound slut lusting for Berniebros". Nor does it compare to false intimations of Trump-humping.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
147. Got any thoughts on issues or just these nonsense side issues?
Mon May 2, 2016, 10:51 AM
May 2016


Let's hear it, what on this list do YOU support? And if not, why are you supporting Hillary?
All you guys have are side issues.
 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
149. Republicans first choice was Bernie getting the Democratic nod
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:14 AM
May 2016

Because they knew when they unleashed 24/7 attack ad hell against him he would wither like a daisy in the desert.

But Sanders revolution left him high and dry at the ballot box so the fascist republicans second choice is now in play.....#bernieorbust!

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
151. I love it when people demanding we vote for the party call us "purists".
Mon May 2, 2016, 11:31 AM
May 2016

The irony is delicious.

 

LannyDeVaney

(1,033 posts)
156. Sec Clinton will win the GE in a landslide ...
Mon May 2, 2016, 12:01 PM
May 2016

Bigger margin than Obama's victory in 2012 in my opinion. She won't lose a single swing state and will take at least one red state, topping the Democratic electoral vote from 2012.

Vogon_Glory

(10,297 posts)
180. Thank you for pointing out the unpleasant consequences
Mon May 2, 2016, 02:29 PM
May 2016

Thank you for pointing out at least one of the unpleasant consequences of a Trump presidency. Let us add giving a green light to bigotry directed at American Hispanics, further gutting of voting rights, polluted air, polluted water, and "privatized" national parks and wilderness. The recession with no benefits is just the cherries on top.

I'm not particularly left, and I'm certainly not a Marxist. Nevertheless, there's an old Marxist-Leninist term that applies to far too many Bernie fan-boys and fan-girls who want the Great Jubilee in January and who ignore what happened in places like Wisconsin, Kansas, North Carolina, and Texas when Democratic "purists" act out their tantrums and stay home: "politically immature." And I believe that "politically immature" is a dead-an accurate descriptor of all too many Bernie-philes who ought to be old enough to know better.

Response to fred v (Original post)

Response to fred v (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Remember, 'Bernie or Bust...