2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIf Hilllary becomes the nominee
and then loses in November, she will have earned that loss like she earned her lack of trust. Hillary supporters get out there and sell your candidate, you have a ton of work and I wouldn't expect much help from the liberal democrats. Get to work, you have a hard sell.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)and votes of the Democratic Party.
Clinton will have won the trust and votes and will win in November.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Wall St. and other people who fight us, but not her. Wall St. loves them some Corporate Hillary. Enjoy. Oh btw I'd say he did pretty good considering he hasn't been running for president since 2006.
griffi94
(3,830 posts)You're right. He did pretty well considering.
He still fell far short tho.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Yay those who support Corporate Masterhood! God bless the eternal oligarchy!
griffi94
(3,830 posts)Majority of the voters so far feel like
Hillary will be a good president.
That's why they voted for her in the primary
in overwhelming numbers.
They didn't seem to buy Bernies message.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Remember that.
Sanders has just not managed to win the Trust and votes of Democrats.
She'll pull from a lot of demographics.
And states that are usually red will be in play for her.
Like NC
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)It's going to be fine.
She'll win in November easily.
With a Democratic senate she'll be great.
The majority of Americans like her message and trust her to
continue the progress that President Obama started.
moriah
(8,312 posts)But really look at this graphic.
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/superpacs.php
Add more nodes, zoom out. Look at the net of SuperPAC donors for the eventual RNC warchest, and compare how much has gone to Repukes compared to Democrats. And that's just SuperPACs officially endorsing a primary candidate, not all the ones that have already spent money against Hillary. Look at how much each of them has to play with.
If anyone is being bought by corporate money, it's the Republicans. And Hillary's biggest donor from Wall Street has been George Soros, the one who previously spent millions to fight Bush and support Obama.
Just saying.
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)Bernie didn't. She's just either too lazy to work for it from the small donors, or she's comfy snuggled up with the corporate SOBs dumping on poor & working-class Americans.
She made her bed.
moriah
(8,312 posts)... delegates voted.
Hillary is smart enough to know how the game is played by the current rules, and smart enough to realize that in order to change those rules you have to work with the sucky ones and win the General Election.
In addition, look at outside spending for Bernie.
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/indexp_indiv.php?cycle=2016&id=N00000528
The only outside spending against Bernie from Democratic sources has been $10k spent by Martin O'Malley. The rest of the money spent against him, $44k, was by Republicans.
You can see that "Hillary's SuperPAC" hasn't spent a dime against Senator Sanders, and is actively attacking Republicans now. They spent $5 million supporting Hillary, but have held onto the vast majority of that warchest for the General Election.
http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/indexpend.php?cmte=C00495861&cycle=2016
Until Citizen's United is actually repealed, it's the law. Criticizing realistic left-leaning wealthy donors for making donations to counter the massive GOP fundraising, or Hillary for accepting Priorities USA Action's endorsement when they all knew the majority of that money was going to be for the GE....
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)Bernie had to fight a "complicit media" - along with media blackouts, debates always scheduled at the wrong time on the wrong night, closed primaries, interviewers asking questions he couldn't answer, colleagues who couldn't endorse him because they were "afraid" of the Clintons, vote fraud in every state he didn't win, losses in "Confederate states" that shouldn't really count, yadda, yadda, yadda.
Poor Bernie - he only lost because the entire world conspired against him. There couldn't possibly be any other explanation.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)It's not poor Bernie, he elevated his position and strength. It's poor Hillary come November, you will eventually apologize for the bad choice. Get busy, you have an oligarchy to sell.
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)Bernie lost because not enough people bought what he was selling.
If you think the vast majority of Bernie supporters out in the real world are rabid Bernie-or-Busters who will not vote for HRC in November, you are either extremely naive or just plain delusional.
Hillary IS the Democratic nominee and she WILL BE the next president. And all the "you'll all be sorry" whinging in the world isn't going to change that.
But by all means, keep posting the same old bullshit 24/7, if it makes you feel better.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)I started posting so the third wayers and DLC had to look at themselves. So no need to attempt to "splain things to me. I'm not into corporate masterhood.
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... deluding yourself - and hoping that delusion is contagious.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)I do not think that, others do. They are very misinformed.
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)Everyone who disagrees with you is very misinformed.
Got it.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)I do not know you. I do know your ilk. Your ilk is the kind who thinks fracking and free trade agreements are good for Americans. Your ilk think taking money from corporations and lobbyist's are good for America. While we are 'splaining some things. It is your ilk that loves the rightward shift of a candidate who has more flip flops than a prison shower. So as stated, get out and support her, I won't and know many others who feel the same. -1 in Illinois.
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)Don't get yourself in a tizzy.
It is quite apparent that you know nothing of what you call "my ilk" - but please continue to delude yourself that you do.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)You don't mind if I call you " the ilk" do you?
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... no, I don't mind a bit.
But if I am a member of that "ilk", it stands to reason that I know them better than you do. And your posts indicate that your ignorance about what "the ilk" stands for, believes in, or hope to achieve are clear examples of your ignorance thereof.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)but if you vote for her, you actually support it. You may oppose fracking, you vote for her , you support it. Own it. I am owning my position of leaving president blank.
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... "I am owning my position by not taking a stand."
Ya know, after reading your posts, this is one of those instances where I'm happy knowing you won't be having a say in who the next POTUS will be.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)I will vote for liberal candidates. You can say thank you as necessary.
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)you are not alone. Many people support the status quo, most of them are called conservatives.
Response to timmymoff (Reply #40)
Name removed Message auto-removed
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)It's an upHill battle for you all. Not a moment to lose! There's not a single vote moveable on DU-we're all locked in. It's all on you. Good luck out there
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)All the votes on DU are "locked in" - which makes me wonder why the anti-HRC stuff still gets posted day after day. It's not going to change any minds, and yet some posters still feel a NEED to try.
Yes, it's an upHill battle - we're only 300+ delegates and millions of voters ahead - just another sign of imminent defeat in the general!
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Why would you make excuses for his failures?
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)we knew we were fighting a coronation. You need to get busy you have a hard sell. Selling Americans that corporations are our masters will be a tough job.
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... that corporations ARE their masters was the tough job - and it didn't sell.
annavictorious
(934 posts)a spot on the ballot, it's a "coronation".
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Orangepeel
(13,979 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I couldn't turn on the nes without hearing about Nernie's huge crowds, and people "feeling the Bern," or hearing about the latest manufactured Clinton "scandel."
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)I mean, seriously.
chwaliszewski
(1,528 posts)'becasue'. Spell check, use it.
HubertHeaver
(2,539 posts)Both "looses" and "loses" are spelled correctly.
chwaliszewski
(1,528 posts)but it would correct 'because' being misspelled.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)Its not just hubris.. and many who support her often seem to be arrogant too.
> If Sanders looses the primary, he will have earned that loss, becasue he failed to earn the trust
> and votes of the Democratic Party.
> Clinton will have won the trust and votes and will win in November.
What's different? Other candidates don't act like that.
I can't put my finger on it exactly.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)So far, he is behind 3 million Democratic votes and about 11% of pledged delegates because he did not earn the trust of a large majority of the Democratic Electorate.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)The problem is what you can trust her to do.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)That is why he is losing the Primary.
It is simple as that.
akbacchus_BC
(5,830 posts)thrash Trump. Thing is - Mr. Sanders has given a lot of young Americans hope as to what America can be for them, that is why the younger generation is supporting him. Mr. Sanders will lose the nomination for sure but the awakening that he has built up in America will serve to make Mrs. Clinton move to the center and that is a good thing.
Just my humble opinion. I could be wrong.
BootinUp
(51,322 posts)PredictWise column combines fundamental, polling, and prediction market-based forecasts. PredictWise column is my overall forecast.
2016 President Winner (Individual)
Potential Candidate Party PredictWise PredictWise (Nom) Derived Market Price
Hillary Clinton DEM 70 % 98 % $0.727
Donald Trump GOP 28 % 89 % $0.206
Ted Cruz GOP 1 % 9 % $0.016
Bernie Sanders DEM 1 % 2 % $0.015
Marco Rubio GOP 0 % 0 % $0.001
John Kasich GOP 0 % 0 % $0.003
http://predictwise.com/politics/2016-president-winner
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)BootinUp
(51,322 posts)griffi94
(3,830 posts)Hillary has more votes than any candidate in eithe party.
She has an insurmountable lead over Bernie of 3 million votes and 300 delegates.
She' won blowout victories in all the swing states.
She's got this easy.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)griffi94
(3,830 posts)with Democrats, women, POC.
Bernie was the favorite of the youth vote.
The ones that voted anyway.
Just not enough people wanted Bernie.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Her Corporate Majesty. Enjoy your choice.
griffi94
(3,830 posts)Enough will vote for her.
Plus she'll pull some Republican women and moderate Republicans
who think Trump is a joke.
The Bernie supporters who won't vote for her mostly aren't Democrats
and were never going to vote for any Democrat that wasn't Bernie anyway.
She'll easily win the GE
oasis
(53,693 posts)They'd just be a hindrance.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)We have also heard if the GOP wins it is our fault. How is it our fault if you don't need us? Better get to working, you have a hard sell to the American people, not just the democratic party.
oasis
(53,693 posts)are of no help to anyone.
CobaltBlue
(1,122 posts)The eventual nominee of the Democratic Party is the No. 1 person responsible for his/her effort to win election to the presidency of the United States.
Since the opening post in this thread specifically addresses Hillary Clinton
I will trust that Hillary Clinton knows this. I also believe the same is true of everyone who is, and/or will be, working on her campaign. And I think everyone on Democratic Underground is also aware of this.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)will flock to her. They recognize those with similar views on the world.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Lincoln chaffee
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)tokenlib
(4,186 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)loyalsister
(13,390 posts)and left their party when it became war hungry and corrupt. She is leading Dems into the abyss they left. The fact that she is a Democrat does not make it okay, and I fear we may see some Democrats go independent like Jim Jeffords and Lincoln Chaffee.
annavictorious
(934 posts)arrow on the B point to the past?
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Back to where we were before Third Way took a sledgehammer to it all. Back to functioning government of, by, and for the people. Not of, by, and for the Corporations. President Jimmy Carter has stated very publicly we no longer have a functioning democracy. I believe him. Not because he said it. Because I already knew it, saw it unfold. Am living it. I just happen to agree with him. He is the only one of his high profile status with the guts to say it, besides Bernie (has at least intimated).
It also could mean "Run AWAY from whatever direction Hillary is moving".
Could mean lots of things. I am not sure what it meant to whomever made it. It isn't my graphic.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)republican women Trump the Rump is pissing off were not able to vote for her in the primaries. It has been exciting to follow her through the primaries and then on to the GE and further.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)this isn't a sport's game. We already won the message shown easily by her rapid evolutions towards Senator sanders policies. But when the lurch back to the right happens, she will lose more voters than the Sanders people. I know I won't be working for her, or donating, or canvassing, or phone banking, or even speaking positive about her. She hasn't earned it, but you don't need us anyway, unless you want someone to blame for her loss she will earn.
annavictorious
(934 posts)in his 28 years in Congress, Sanders has done nothing to advance his agenda (unless you count the most incremental of all incremental measures, innocuous amendments appended to the legislation that others wrote and fought for.)
Sanders has taken corporate and financial sector money to run his congressional campaigns.
Sanders has tailored his gun votes to align with what is acceptable to the NRA.
Sanders has hidden his assets under his wife's name.
Sanders has made deals to keep Vermont's garbage out of white neighborhoods by dumping it in brown neighborhoods, a rare feat for a man who has spent his career doing nothing.
There's a reason why none of his colleagues endorse or support him.
Now he's trying to exploit an organization that he neither believes in or belongs to for his personal gain.
Strong-arming a nomination against the will of the voters is the only strategy he has left, so that's what he'll do.
It doesn't get anymore entitled than that.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Oh, universal health care, her policy also, her policy on Dodd Frank on breaking up the banks, its okay he has arrived on her policies, we don't hold it against him.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)
msongs
(73,754 posts)if he only took the corporate money at $353,000 a plate then it wouldn't look like he was ripping people off. At least those people know they will be getting their money's worth huh? Wall St. , Big Pharma, MIC, and various donors of the Cliton foundation recognize money well spent.
griffi94
(3,830 posts)The GOP will be well funded
so she's going to need a big war chest.
Sorry you're so bothered by it but the majority
of the voters aren't.
That's why she's leading Bernie by such a huge deficit
even tho he's out spending him.
She's got this.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)She will obviously fight them tooth and nail once the election is over.
griffi94
(3,830 posts)with a Democrat in the oval office.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)those he he has spent his whole life advocating for, the poor, the downtrodden. The veterans. Women. On and on. The people in his state know him best and the overwhelmingly love him.
RandySF
(84,275 posts)Smells like........victory.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)msongs
(73,754 posts)Simple Definition of oligarch
: a person who belongs to a small group of people who govern or control a country, business, etc.
source - merriam webster
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Hillary is the one opening doors for vampires. Big difference. Unless you support the corporate masterhood .
BootinUp
(51,322 posts)asuhornets
(2,427 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)not many others have the same interest. But enjoy. As stated, own the win own the loss.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)you can find the positives yourself. Many liberal democrats are voting for Hillary, myself included. You appear to me too self-defeatist to listen. I don't do 'hard sell.' Good luck on your journey to find positives about why to vote for her in November. By the way, that 'lack of trust' thing is a massive right wing meme. She's actually far more trustworthy than any republicans. Most everyone who has ever worked with her say she's very trustworthy.
You must be joking.
That's like saying Joe McCarthy was far more trustworthy than Father Coughlin.
And attributing her high negatives to "a massive right wing meme" doesn't much wash, either. How many links would you like?
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)And no, I wouldn't like any links.
bvf
(6,604 posts)because you know your post was pure nonsense.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)as voting FOR trump....and the lives of "liberals" will be as impacted as the rest of us....but THEY would be responsible
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Vincardog
(20,234 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)The names and issues change but not the sentiment. The GOP will be dealing with it again - though they are better at 'coming together' during the GE (only to 'fall apart' again afterwards).
MisterP
(23,730 posts)they tell her it's in the bag already--remember when DUers were saying she'd win VT? now just think, that's how her campaign must be like 24/7
this same spirit of genius has lost us 11 Governors, 13 Senators, 69 Reps, 913 state seats, and left with 26% of the electorate, because it can always deny that they were the ones who lost it: in fact they just rely on things getting so bad under GOP rule that the Dems pick up some seats eventually
vintx
(1,748 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)is if people get sick enough of the Pubs to turn back to them--note how excited they are over those 5 Senate seats that are swinging because of precisely this
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Better to let Trump win and destroy the country so a new socialist utopia can rise from the ashes!!!!
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Feathery Scout
(218 posts)Hillary will have some incredible Democrats campaigning with *and* for her...
Bill Clinton
Elizabeth Warren
Joe Biden
Bernie (I hope
And of course....rock stars Michelle and POTUS!
These are huge advantages!
Pastiche423
(15,406 posts)Bernie and Elizabeth campaigning for her?
May I have some of what you are smoking?
Feathery Scout
(218 posts)I think the entire Dem team will pull together to defeat Trump.
I truly hope everyone will. He is too horrible to be elected.
Pastiche423
(15,406 posts)Will the Clinton supporters pull together so that Bernie can beat Trump?
Feathery Scout
(218 posts)I will fully support our Dem nominee.....to beat Trump/Cruz.
Whoever it is. Full and absolute support.
Trump is mortifying to me. Cruz is worse.
The America those 2 men envision is so terrifying....I fear for the future.
So yes!! A thousand times yes!!! I will support our Dem nominee.
dubyadiprecession
(7,450 posts)a cake walk for Hillary. All she has to do is saturate the airwaves with trump running his s***hole mouth.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)brush
(61,033 posts). . . of the time the same way. And yes we will work with the Obama coalition sensible progressive whites who don't want a repug appointing the next 3 SCOTUS justices, African Americans, Latino Americans, women, gays, Asian Americans and Native Americans who elected Obama twice to elected Hillary against that racist, sexist, anti-immigrant Trump.
Also, remember we, the demographic segments mentioned above, outnumber the angry whites who support Trump.
And one more FYI: depending on whites only to get elected to national office doesn't work anymore. 2012 proved that as Romney got a huge majority of the white vote and lost handily.
It doesn't work in the Democratic Party either apparently as Sanders has won in the mostly white, least diverse states and is trailing badly.
The demographics of the country is browning as we speak.
always note that 7% difference is the game changer for me and others, but sell neo liberalism however you wish. I wish you luck in November if Clinton is the nominee, get to work, I won't be helping the cause of continuing to destroy the middle class.
brush
(61,033 posts)As if the repugs and those foolish enough to have voted for Reagan and the two Bushes and their "trickle down" fraudulent economic theory aren't the ones who destroyed the middle class starting with clobbering the union movement under St. effing Ronnie and almost sending the country, jobs and housing over the cliff in 2008 during the great recession (Cheney/Bush).
Those are your enemies.
And btw, Sanders voted along with them on their war and arms authorizations more times than anyone else still in the race.
Look it up if you don't believe me. He's been in office for nearly 30 years and went along routinely, but now is seen somehow as this great pacifist vs Clinton the warmonger.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)I will be leaving president blank, get to selling the shit sandwich we've been offered.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Shit I missed it.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)And now is the time for the hard lurch to the right of Nixon. I will save my told you so's for later. Nothing quite like getting the choice between a conservative and a conservative. No thank you. Enjoy , get to work, You don't want a Trump presidency, and only Hillary supporters can prevent that.