Hillary Supporters, surely you agree that...

[masmdu]

It ends after everyone’s had a chance to vote. It’s going to be up to the Democratic party, all of the delegates, most particularly those who are still uncommitted, to make their determination as to who they think would be the best president and the better candidate.

Super-delegates are there for a purpose to determine who they think would be the stronger candidate and the best President.

Super-delegates are not bound to vote any way, they can change their minds. They can go to the convention and change their minds, there is no guarantee— and in fact, it’s equally true for pledged delegates for most states.

[bkkyosemite]

1. they've been bought. But if Bernie can get the Supers from the states where he won by yuge

margins then he has a chance to court the rest of them. These supers chose Clinton well before Bernie was even in the race. That is unfair and should not be allowed.

[hrmjustin]

2. If Hillary has more votes and pledge delegates than she should be the nominee.

Anything else is theft and I would not vote for the one who steals it from her.

I hope this makes my position clear.

[randome]

3. Surely you agree it's next to impossible that super-delegates will support a 2nd place candidate.

[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]

[Tarc]

4. This is the last, best gasp of the Sanders supporters

The same people who have trashed the superdelegate system since Day One are now crossing their fingers and hoping they will make an unprecedented decision to all jump to Sanders side.

[qdouble]

5. Bernie supporters are now hoping that supers flip the math towards the

candidate with less popular votes, less pledged delegates, less states won and who thinks they are all corrupt. Good luck with that.

[NV Whino]

10. Fewer, damn it. Fewer, not less.

[LonePirate]

6. These are some crazy times we live in now.

People siding with Sanders against the elites now want the elites to overthrow the will of the people.

Was it ever really about the people or democracy for those who want a de facto coup by the supers?

[randome]

7. No, it was about supporting the 'revolution' with the least amount of effort.

Working for the Democratic Party or for Democracy is so hard! Let's type on our keyboards and transform the world!
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]

[NurseJackie]

8. Bargaining. This is bargaining, right?

[Maru Kitteh]

11. ding!

[COLGATE4]

12. Absolutely! Maybe after tomorrow we can

(finally) get to Acceptance.

[Squinch]

14. It looks like stupidity to me. But you might be right.

[JaneyVee]

9. Yes, I agree it will be over after everyone votes.

[NurseJackie]

15. Except for the post-mortem conspiracy theories. That oughta be a barrel of monkeys! (See: Fig. 1)

Fig. 1: A Barrel of Monkeys

[nolawarlock]

13. I agree with this to a point.

Yes, let everyone vote but then I think the person with less pledged delegates should bow out before the convention and I say that whether it's Hillary or whether it's Bernie. Yes, that person has the right to go there and show the world the fractures in our party, but then that will help the Republicans win if they don't also have a war at their own convention. The nominee is going to need time to really sell it, again, whether it's Hillary or Bernie. I would rather have either of them than Trump or Cruz and my fear is that those who want this contested convention will sit out if their candidate doesn't win and Trump and Cruz are just too scary to let that happen. I don't like Bernie, but I'll be the biggest Bernie supporter going if it means keeping Trump out of the oval office.