2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMessage auto-removed
nini
(16,824 posts)LOLOL
Response to nini (Reply #1)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Response to seabeyond (Reply #5)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to nini (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)...and the person who is losing more states?
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)
senz
(11,945 posts)Like Bernie, he makes them acutely aware of some fundamental quality they're missing.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)from the DNC. The public will fund the campaigns of progressives. Goldman-Sachs funds Clinton, the 99% funds Sanders. How do people not get that Sanders and Clinton are fighting on different sides of the class war. And guess which side Clinton is on with her $150,000,000.
Response to rhett o rick (Reply #22)
Name removed Message auto-removed
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)the Clinton Retirement Foundation Plan.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Many are in safe seats or aren't even in elected office. Most importantly, there are a number of them who are not pure ideologically pure.
Response to KingFlorez (Reply #6)
Name removed Message auto-removed
synergie
(1,901 posts)and actually understands the importance of cultural and gender equality in ways that Bernie keeps demonstrating that he does not. It's why so many surged to endorse her, while Bernie is stuck having to harass, abuse and threaten violence to force them to violate their principles to switch their votes to him.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)While she pretends to be friends of some social justice issues, he primary objective is to amass hundreds of millions.
synergie
(1,901 posts)your information cannot be trusted. How much more wrong can you get?
The sheer ridiculousness of your post would be funny it were not in deadly, willfully ignorant earnest.
Please stop repeating what your buddies in Freeperville tell you. Either you know you are not telling the truth or you're truly ignorant enough to believe whatever Right Wingers tell you, in either case, spreading such obvious fiction reflects poorly on you.
Her history proclaims to you be not telling the truth here, and your primary objective seems to be riling up people when they're at the height of emotion due to the utter failure of Bernie to win many votes or behave with any sort of propriety or integrity here.
Can you at least TRY to be serious or factual?
synergie
(1,901 posts)Response to synergie (Reply #8)
Name removed Message auto-removed
synergie
(1,901 posts)Goldman Sachs and other firms will be happy to invite you to speak and pay your fees.
Here is a list of their speakers:
http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/talks-at-gs/?session=all
Note that since you're not a political celebrity, were not a successful and popular Senator, Secretary of State or Fomrer First Lady, you're going to do a heck of a lot of earn your fee.
That's why no one wants to pay Bernie or Jane these fees, they've accomplished few things, Hillary is underpaid compared to comparable MALE speakers of her stature.
Also, is this confirmation that you're pro-Bribery?
Response to synergie (Reply #11)
Name removed Message auto-removed
synergie
(1,901 posts)It's not an hourly wage, its a fee for services rendered, and Hillary is underpaid as a speaker compared to men of her stature. You might want to go learn a bit about how speaking fees work, why they're not an hourly wage and how much people of her stature get per speech. There are many resources you can access so that you might educate yourself, posting out of ignorance isn't making you look very good.
Have fun learning stuff!
Response to synergie (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
synergie
(1,901 posts)If you did your homework and didn't just spout right wing talking points helpfully served up to you by "helpful" Ratfckers, you'd have realized that. I guess doing your homework is too difficult, so instead you advocate bribery, which is totes cool if Bernie is doing the bribing and benefits, no wonder you don't want to see his taxes, you know what's there, don't ya?
Dear Veronique, no such person as "billary" just a lot of seething RWers who think there is, why do you wish to ally yourself with them?
Response to synergie (Reply #26)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)Yahtzee!
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... she does donate her speaking fees to charity.
Secondly, she was not an "elected official" when she made the speeches; she was a private citizen.
Thirdly, the term "billary" is a RW term, and its usage is usually seen as indicative of someone who IS a RWer. You might want to keep that in mind for future reference.
Response to Name removed (Original post)
iandhr This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to iandhr (Reply #15)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Name removed (Reply #19)
iandhr This message was self-deleted by its author.
synergie
(1,901 posts)things that are uncomfortable and inconvenient.
Response to synergie (Reply #27)
Name removed Message auto-removed
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)He's been in this race for a year now. Don't you think that was ample time for any SD who had second thoughts about supporting HRC to switch their allegiance? Any one of them can do so at any time - and yet they haven't.
And no, SDs are not bound by "the will of the people". And yet they have never overturned that will, once it was apparent which candidate the people had chosen via their votes and their delegates.
Renew Deal
(84,762 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)onenote
(46,054 posts)Those superdelegates that are elected Democratic office holders aren't fools. They are well aware that the moment they cast one vote, give one speech, endorse one candidate that doesn't meet the test of some of the more singleminded Sanders' supporters, they will be thrown under the bus,no matter what they do at the convention.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)my vote for those in my state and district
will go as they deserve for representing
us.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Most off the Superdelegates are the "establishment" "DINOS" the Sanders supporters claim to hate. I suspect they're under no illusion that supporting Sanders would gain them any additional support.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)This, right after Bernie Bros complain that Super Delegates have been bought off by Hillary!
Hypocrisy much?
Or perhaps you are offering a threat?
In which case, I wonder how well that works for Bernie Bwaaah haa haa haaaaaa.
Renew Deal
(84,762 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)or state, then the citizen has a right to vote
as they feel is appropriate.
I won't vote in Ohio or in Florida, but in
my state I can and will vote as I see fit.
rusty fender
(3,428 posts)BootinUp
(51,030 posts)nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)Goodness knows, it's a heck of a lot nicer than what Bernie supporters normally say to super delegates.
And these screen captures were taken before that one Bernie supporter threatened to cut out a super delegates tongue.


senz
(11,945 posts)It's pure frenzy.
More like fun amusement. I needed some reason to learn how Photoshop's timeline features work to make animated gifs.
I don't see this guy as a serious candidate anymore. Heck, I never really considered him that serious a candidate. My sig file is more of a question of how anyone can.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)He draws a lot of HATE.
senz
(11,945 posts)It has driven the miserables to insanity!
Oh well, so be it.
