Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
Tue May 3, 2016, 02:08 PM May 2016

Another problem for Hillary in a potential Hillary vs. Donald election

Thom Hartmann has been talking about this for a few days now. These trade deals have decimated the manufacturing and the middle class. When the "free trade" first came out about 20% of the people voted for Ross Perot who popularized his phrase of a "vast sucking sound" of jobs leaving the country. . . He called it and people voted for him.

Today it is 80+% of the public who knows they have been bad for the US. Donald is AGAINST them. If he makes his campaign on that, he will be to the LEFT of Clinton and on the side of the public sentiment.

That could be a big problem.

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another problem for Hillary in a potential Hillary vs. Donald election (Original Post) pdsimdars May 2016 OP
It's also a problem for the Donald because his ties and other crap are made in China. Vinca May 2016 #1
Of which he can say, because of Clinton's shitty trade deals. I had no choice but to manufacture Katashi_itto May 2016 #2
I agree, he has consistently been against them and she has been for them pdsimdars May 2016 #5
And I just saw on VICE that Trump uses migrant slave labor to build his hotels. JaneyVee May 2016 #3
There is already some of that L-1 visa labor going on in the US. Baobab May 2016 #10
Actually, a majority of both party's favor trade deals... JaneyVee May 2016 #4
Which is why a clear majority of America's registered voters are totally truedelphi May 2016 #28
She will be pushing for tougher enforcment of trade agreements already in effect BootinUp May 2016 #6
Yeah and all he has to do is bring up NAFTA GATT, and the fact she is one of the architects of TPP Katashi_itto May 2016 #7
Where do you get this she is one the architects bullshit? Not from a reputable source. nt BootinUp May 2016 #9
Of course nothing I come up with is reputable. But here is one source. Katashi_itto May 2016 #13
But even if that is reported accurately, it does not make her an architect of the agreement BootinUp May 2016 #15
Whatever dude. I can come up with more stuff that shows it. Katashi_itto May 2016 #18
Hillary Clinton, TPP architect as Sec State (cornerstone of her Pivot to Asia & "Economic Statecraft Katashi_itto May 2016 #19
I get that some people have decided to tag her with that label, but it is quite inaccurate. BootinUp May 2016 #22
Well if someone tweeted it- it must be true! bettyellen May 2016 #23
Gosh hope you didnt strain brain cells to much for that comment Katashi_itto May 2016 #24
Twits don't strain anything but credulity, ha ha. bettyellen May 2016 #25
Agree, you would certainly be the expert. Katashi_itto May 2016 #32
Lotsa twits tweets here to laugh at- yep! bettyellen May 2016 #33
Well said, well spoken! Truly twitness is your forte! Katashi_itto May 2016 #34
Plus, TPP was classified, and there's no evidence she received classified docs via email... scscholar May 2016 #31
Really, were do they come up with that stuff? She's been fighting NAFTA since its inception. bahrbearian May 2016 #14
This............. Ferd Berfel May 2016 #16
You folks need to read your own source material again. No where does it indicate she BootinUp May 2016 #17
no one will believe her.... virtualobserver May 2016 #30
they created his constituency--their jobs went to China and then their houses did, MisterP May 2016 #8
Don't worry "Me Too! will evolve bahrbearian May 2016 #11
And showing the reality of all of Donald's failed business deals Sheepshank May 2016 #12
The guy that makes his clothes overseas firebrand80 May 2016 #20
80+%? Is that a poll number, or just a guess? YouDig May 2016 #21
BOOM! Hammer....meet nail. ViseGrip May 2016 #26
Link for the 80 percent claim? onenote May 2016 #27
NO, he is not against them, that is a lie he is telling the idiots. Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #29

Vinca

(50,269 posts)
1. It's also a problem for the Donald because his ties and other crap are made in China.
Tue May 3, 2016, 02:15 PM
May 2016

His daughter's clothing line (made in China) just had a recall because the fabric was flammable. When it comes to Clinton vs. Trump on trade, they about even out since she's been promoting the trade deals he's been taking advantage of.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
2. Of which he can say, because of Clinton's shitty trade deals. I had no choice but to manufacture
Tue May 3, 2016, 02:19 PM
May 2016

overseas. It's not a level playing field. I had to do this or go out of business.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
5. I agree, he has consistently been against them and she has been for them
Tue May 3, 2016, 02:36 PM
May 2016

He knows how the system works and is against it. She knows how it works and is for it.
The public is against it.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
10. There is already some of that L-1 visa labor going on in the US.
Tue May 3, 2016, 02:51 PM
May 2016

Its in TiSA, TTIP and likely TPP and its also in the 1995 GATS we all should know.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
28. Which is why a clear majority of America's registered voters are totally
Tue May 3, 2016, 06:00 PM
May 2016

fed up with both parties. And are not willing to vote for anyone who has crapped on the middle class.

BootinUp

(47,143 posts)
6. She will be pushing for tougher enforcment of trade agreements already in effect
Tue May 3, 2016, 02:36 PM
May 2016

and talking about how to protect workers from these. She will kick The Donalds's butt on this issue.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
7. Yeah and all he has to do is bring up NAFTA GATT, and the fact she is one of the architects of TPP
Tue May 3, 2016, 02:38 PM
May 2016


Yep, her stance will be convincing.
 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
13. Of course nothing I come up with is reputable. But here is one source.
Tue May 3, 2016, 03:04 PM
May 2016

But at a congressional hearing in 2011, Clinton told lawmakers that "with respect to the TPP, although the State Department does not have the lead on this -- it is the United States Trade Representative -- we work closely with the USTR." Additionally, State Department cables reviewed by International Business Times show that her agency -- including her top aides -- were deeply involved in the diplomatic deliberations over the trade deal. The cables from 2009 and 2010, which were among a trove of documents disclosed by the website WikiLeaks, also show that the Clinton-run State Department advised the U.S. Trade Representative’s office on how to negotiate the deal with foreign government officials.

In recent months, labor, environmental, public health and consumer advocacy groups have campaigned against the TPP, saying the pact is a stealth attempt by corporations to tilt the rules of international commerce in their favor. They have specifically criticized provisions in the deal -- which are secret but have periodically leaked -- that they say would empower corporations to use international tribunals to attempt to overturn public interest laws. The groups represent many core Democratic Party constituencies that Clinton has been courting in her White House bid, which explains why in the lead-up to the party's primary she has suddenly depicted herself as a critic of the deal. But the cables show that the Clinton-run State Department was indeed a major player in pushing the initiative.


http://www.ibtimes.com/cables-show-hillary-clintons-state-department-deeply-involved-trans-pacific-2032948

BootinUp

(47,143 posts)
15. But even if that is reported accurately, it does not make her an architect of the agreement
Tue May 3, 2016, 03:08 PM
May 2016

All it says is the State Department advised USTR on matters of diplomacy. Calling her an architect suggests that she was responsible for designing it and that is nonsense.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
19. Hillary Clinton, TPP architect as Sec State (cornerstone of her Pivot to Asia & "Economic Statecraft
Tue May 3, 2016, 03:27 PM
May 2016
https://twitter.com/ianbremmer/status/651874603569164288

Ian Bremmer is another

Hillary Clinton, TPP architect as Sec State (cornerstone of her Pivot to Asia & "Economic Statecraft&quot , today opposes TPP trade deal.




Retweets
148

Likes
78

LilianaNM Giovanni Sanchez Robert Philip Balson Armando Biondi Marc Starvaggi Mark Anthony Foster Chris Kilpack

BootinUp

(47,143 posts)
22. I get that some people have decided to tag her with that label, but it is quite inaccurate.
Tue May 3, 2016, 03:33 PM
May 2016

Again, the State Department supported the USTR on diplomatic issues.

 

scscholar

(2,902 posts)
31. Plus, TPP was classified, and there's no evidence she received classified docs via email...
Tue May 3, 2016, 06:10 PM
May 2016

so there' evidence she didn't see the agreement.

bahrbearian

(13,466 posts)
14. Really, were do they come up with that stuff? She's been fighting NAFTA since its inception.
Tue May 3, 2016, 03:05 PM
May 2016

She's been a fighter of the middle class since she was on the WalMart Board.

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
16. This.............
Tue May 3, 2016, 03:10 PM
May 2016
Cables Show Hillary Clinton's State Department Deeply Involved in Trans-Pacific Partnership

http://www.ibtimes.com/cables-show-hillary-clintons-state-department-deeply-involved-trans-pacific-2032948

SHe has triangulated to basically say that it needs to be tweaked (after she helped write it)

Only 5 chapters are about trade, the other 20+ are about installing corporate sovereignty over ELECTED Government sovereignty

It's an abortion of Democracy. It needs to die.

BootinUp

(47,143 posts)
17. You folks need to read your own source material again. No where does it indicate she
Tue May 3, 2016, 03:13 PM
May 2016

was an architect of the TPP.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
8. they created his constituency--their jobs went to China and then their houses did,
Tue May 3, 2016, 02:40 PM
May 2016

and then they saw Democrats laughing and laughing at those straight white male losers who worked all their lives and then lost it all

now the Angry White Male lives and breathes on ungrounded rage, and the more He earns the more He fears he'll lose it--Trump's followers are mostly the gentry benefiting from the fire-sale of America and are driven by not wanting "those people" to get any money, sure

but his message wouldn't go beyond these people, wouldn't set up this dangerous contrast with Clinton that could sink her: Trump's a bigmouth and is basically America's Palpatine, but he's pure right-populist instinct and that means pointing out the distractions that the "globalists" have used to snooker voters of both parties while they pop the champagne once the doors are shut

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
12. And showing the reality of all of Donald's failed business deals
Tue May 3, 2016, 03:03 PM
May 2016

bankruptcies, underhanded maneuverings, massive job losses, demolishing the little guy to build his empire. His public embarassment of his ties made in China were a big wake up call to his hypocrisy.

He is only appears successful and have super human business savvy because he has the financial clout to start 20 business and hope one flies.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
29. NO, he is not against them, that is a lie he is telling the idiots.
Tue May 3, 2016, 06:02 PM
May 2016

Some will believe his lie but most can be shown that he is lying, is easy to prove.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Another problem for Hilla...