and we both know why that is happening. Take the foundation for instance, I know a lot of people in non-profit and they say it is a model non-profit, and their focus has been on bringing kids out of poverty as well as raising the health standards and economic opportunities in impoverished areas. Because they facilitate their own programs, they get more bang from the buck. In Africa, they are not just folk heroes because if it, they are known because they go over every year to check in on their programs and see what needs to be expanded, what's not working, etc. They have been supporting older Masai villages that promise to stop FGM, and I think all of this is amazing work. I am dismayed at how people here are calling it a slush fund. She has immediately started putting together resources to help Flint- while SBS only called for someone to get fired. That is a difference that matters to me.
And honestly, the other fund raising is something every candidate in the history has done- suddenly it is the devils work. Trump will be claiming that too. I don't buy this sudden rule change that benefit the two only. I get why they are doing it. I also get Sanders knows he can have the Hillary Victory fund for himself, if he was to win. And I do think he would take that money.
Jeeze, looking at the map, they won;t know anything for hours. Going to step out and check in later! Peace, sister!
= new reply since forum marked as read
