Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

One of the 99

(2,280 posts)
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:44 AM May 2016

Now that Trump has won, Clinton vs. Sanders will be the story.

This is a good thing, not a bad thing for Democrats regardless of who is the eventual nominee. In 2008, McCain won the nomination early while Clinton and President Obama battled it out until June. This kept the country's attention on the Dems and away from the GOP. Now both Bernie and Clinton will get a majority of the coverage. This can only help them in the fall.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Now that Trump has won, Clinton vs. Sanders will be the story. (Original Post) One of the 99 May 2016 OP
The 2008 Dem contest was still in doubt firebrand80 May 2016 #1
Maybe true One of the 99 May 2016 #4
There's not much to say about the Dem race firebrand80 May 2016 #5
Maybe, maybe not. nt One of the 99 May 2016 #6
No, One of the 99. You'll see. Hortensis May 2016 #2
Not talking about the future of the nation but of media coverage One of the 99 May 2016 #3
All of the conversation on the morning shows was Trump vs. Hillary CorkySt.Clair May 2016 #8
Umhm. Newspapers too. Hillary starts with a Hortensis May 2016 #9
And possible VPs for both. Nt Raissa May 2016 #12
Theoretically yes. But I doubt if it works that way. Smarmie Doofus May 2016 #7
That is because everyone knows except Sanders and his supporrters Demsrule86 May 2016 #14
I disagree. Trump is no McCain. mikehiggins May 2016 #10
the story will be whoever Trump attacks GreatGazoo May 2016 #11
No way Demsrule86 May 2016 #13

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
2. No, One of the 99. You'll see.
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:50 AM
May 2016

Bernie is going to be seen as increasingly de trop.

The future of our nation does not depend on Bernie versus Hillary, it depends on Democrats versus Republicans.

One of the 99

(2,280 posts)
3. Not talking about the future of the nation but of media coverage
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:53 AM
May 2016

which will now be focused on the Dems. And that will only help in the fall.

 

CorkySt.Clair

(1,507 posts)
8. All of the conversation on the morning shows was Trump vs. Hillary
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:09 AM
May 2016

Bernie was barely mentioned and when he was it was in the context of how he cannot catch up.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
9. Umhm. Newspapers too. Hillary starts with a
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:19 AM
May 2016

double-digit lead against Trump, but of course things are going to get very nasty.

The NY Times did put a shockingly dishonest "Bernie Rebound" header in large type, followed by another article in smaller type, "Even with the loss to Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton has enough delegates for a victory."

Also on the hidden finger subject, when I google "Bernie" "concede" to see what the web has on that, the top half of the screen is filled with articles calling for Hillary to concede to Bernie (!), with a HufPost article from several days ago frozen at the top. Some money has been invested obviously, but to what point?

 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
7. Theoretically yes. But I doubt if it works that way.
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:05 AM
May 2016

Front page of today's hard copy NY Times : you have have to have a magnifying glass at the ready if you want to know:

A . There was a DEM primary in Indiana yesterday.
B. Sanders won it.
C. Clinton lost it

Wall-to-wall coverage ( news, analysis,) above the fold re. Cruz, Trump, GIANT pic of Trump w. Melania at the celebration.

Ok.... slow down .... after the sub-headers, we get to THIS monumental development ( last column; far rigtht end) : "Kasich Remains" And only THEN, there's this: " ----Sanders in Rebound"; tacked on to the monumental news re. Kasich.

In the middle of the second paragraph down there's one, single, lonely photo related to the Indiana Dem Primary: a one-inch X 3/4 inch mugshot of Sanders looking liking he's about to ... on the very *verge* of... throwing-up.

Point: they'll find other, newer, ways to marginalize the Sanders campaign. It's what they do. And they're pretty good at it!

Demsrule86

(68,703 posts)
14. That is because everyone knows except Sanders and his supporrters
Wed May 4, 2016, 02:32 PM
May 2016

that he has lost the primary...not if he gets out but when.

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
10. I disagree. Trump is no McCain.
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:21 AM
May 2016

He gets antsy if his name isn't up front all the time.

Expect all sorts of lunacy from the Trump campaign in order to keep control of the news cycle.

Hillary and Bernie are like a high school debating team compared to him.

He is not going to let a minute go by without doing something outrageous enough to grab the stage.

Hey! Maybe he can get the Panama Canal back for us.

That'd be worth a couple of Hillary/Bernie debates in the MSM.

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
11. the story will be whoever Trump attacks
Wed May 4, 2016, 12:34 PM
May 2016

if Trump doesn't attack Sanders then the MSM will continue the blackout

Demsrule86

(68,703 posts)
13. No way
Wed May 4, 2016, 02:31 PM
May 2016

Not with Trump...Bernie needs to concede now...Hillary is attacked from both sides. Today, Bernie sent something repeating the politico bull shit which concerning Hillary's victory fund which I refuted with a chart. Bernie has crossed the line ...he needs to go or his Senate career is over...not good for Democrats at all. The BS crowd and righties have sent twitter nonsense through that Hillary should drop out...nope Sanders supporters, Sanders and Trump are now on the same page attack attack and attack our nominee Hillary Clinton.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Now that Trump has won, C...