Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopbush

(24,395 posts)
Wed May 4, 2016, 07:19 PM May 2016

Politico: It's mathematically impossible for Bernie to win with pledged delegates

There’s one more reason for Bernie Sanders focus his energy on winning over super delegates — it's now mathematically impossible for him to reach the magic number for the Democratic nomination by winning the remaining pledged delegates alone.

Here's how it works: After winning Indiana, Sanders has 1,399 pledged delegates and super delegates to his name, according to the Associated Press' count. That means he needs 984 more to reach the threshold of 2,383 needed to win.

The remaining contests, however — Guam, West Virginia, Kentucky, Oregon, Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, California, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, and the District of Columbia — only have 933 pledged delegates to offer.

So even if Sanders were to win 100 percent of the pledged delegates in each of those states, he wouldn't make it past the mark. Hence his efforts to win over superdelegates, the party leaders and elites who can choose their candidate regardless of how their states vote. That strategy is a long shot at best for Sanders: of the 719 super delegates, Clinton leads 520 to 39.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/05/math-says-bernie-sanders-is-finished-222775#ixzz47jSKFCfU

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Politico: It's mathematically impossible for Bernie to win with pledged delegates (Original Post) stopbush May 2016 OP
Gee, the media and corporate Dems have OwlinAZ May 2016 #1
Last anyone looked, it's the system Sanders agreed to be a part of stopbush May 2016 #2
but he's special and above all that nt msongs May 2016 #8
Bogus argument....Hillary isn't going to reach 2383 with pledged delegates either virtualobserver May 2016 #3
... MrWendel May 2016 #4
Hillary DU is a one trick pony---and that pony is named Ridicule. virtualobserver May 2016 #7
It's so easy to ridicule the ridiculous Stuckinthebush May 2016 #9
Whatever makes you feel good about yourself. virtualobserver May 2016 #12
Winning the Nomination... MrWendel May 2016 #20
so "good" it motivates you to ridicule others virtualobserver May 2016 #21
Motivation? MrWendel May 2016 #26
You spelled doody wrong. virtualobserver May 2016 #27
At no time during our conversation... MrWendel May 2016 #28
you just did virtualobserver May 2016 #29
Yes. MrWendel May 2016 #30
I thought it was named Liar lagomorph777 May 2016 #32
It's over... Mike Nelson May 2016 #5
Don't waste your breath. Beacool May 2016 #6
IN Bernie math, "majority" means ">50%" lagomorph777 May 2016 #33
Terrified? Please......... Beacool May 2016 #35
So relax. Your candidate is juuust fine... nothing to see here.. lagomorph777 May 2016 #36
K & R Scurrilous May 2016 #10
So quit whining and let the Primaries finish! whistler162 May 2016 #11
The only person whining is Sanders. stopbush May 2016 #13
Spelling correction: "The only person WINNING is Sanders" lagomorph777 May 2016 #34
And it's also mathematically impossible for Clinton to win with pledged delegates. jeff47 May 2016 #14
Wrong. It is highly improbable that Hillary would win stopbush May 2016 #15
So you're gonna claim she could get every single delegate from here out jeff47 May 2016 #19
It's not my fault that you don't know what the phrase stopbush May 2016 #22
No, it's your fault for excluding a large portion of math jeff47 May 2016 #23
Here ya go: stopbush May 2016 #24
K&R CajunBlazer May 2016 #16
Debbie Wasserman Schultz called the election for Hillary last September AgingAmerican May 2016 #17
There's plenty of uncommitted Superdelegates left though NorthCarolina May 2016 #18
About 151. Sanders is getting about 6% of the supers, so stopbush May 2016 #25
No matter how many times we debunk this lie, it keeps coming back today. lagomorph777 May 2016 #31
 

OwlinAZ

(410 posts)
1. Gee, the media and corporate Dems have
Wed May 4, 2016, 07:23 PM
May 2016

been saying that for the past 4 months.
If that is our system - it dam well needs changing. Now

Mike Nelson

(9,951 posts)
5. It's over...
Wed May 4, 2016, 07:29 PM
May 2016

...Hillary wins by any count. Super-delegates will likely switch from Bernie to Hillary. But, it's his choice to pick the moment to exit.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
6. Don't waste your breath.
Wed May 4, 2016, 07:31 PM
May 2016

The Sanders' side of the aisle is now living in a mirror world where pledged delegates and majority of votes don't count at all. It's all about the "yutes" and how he should be the nominee because the young have voted for him in larger numbers than for Hillary. Ditto for Independents. Registered Democrats don't seem to count in this parallel world. Why should the will of actual Democrats be taken into account when deciding a Democratic nominee??? Nahhh, ignore them. What do they know anyway? It's only their party.......





I need a drink.....

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
33. IN Bernie math, "majority" means ">50%"
Thu May 5, 2016, 03:40 PM
May 2016

In Hillary math, apparently 41.5% counts as a majority.

Are you happy to say "FU" to all the remaining voters? You think that's democratic?

Or are you so terrified of them that you desperately want Bernie to quit? You wouldn't be bothering to talk about him if you weren't worried.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
35. Terrified? Please.........
Thu May 5, 2016, 04:01 PM
May 2016

It's become tiresome reading post after post on how Sanders still has a path at the nomination. He doesn't.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
36. So relax. Your candidate is juuust fine... nothing to see here..
Thu May 5, 2016, 04:07 PM
May 2016

California is a shoe-in. Hillary can stay home, kick back, have a martini...

Pay no attention to the FBI... pay no attention to the polls...

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
14. And it's also mathematically impossible for Clinton to win with pledged delegates.
Wed May 4, 2016, 08:07 PM
May 2016

Unless you're going to claim she will win the remaining primaries by about 80-20. And if you're going to make that claim, you better have something stronger than wishful thinking to back it up.

stopbush

(24,395 posts)
15. Wrong. It is highly improbable that Hillary would win
Wed May 4, 2016, 08:13 PM
May 2016

enough pledged delegates alone to reach 2383, but it is not mathematically impossible. It could be done. Hillary has 1635 pledged delegates. She needs 748 of the remaining 933 pledged delegates to hit 2383.

But it is mathematically impossible for Sanders. There are not enough delegates available to him. He needs 984 pledged delegates to hit 2383.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
19. So you're gonna claim she could get every single delegate from here out
Wed May 4, 2016, 08:45 PM
May 2016

and not call that "impossible".

Yeah. Sure. Next, all you have to buy is every possible combination of powerball numbers, and you'll surely win!!

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
23. No, it's your fault for excluding a large portion of math
Wed May 4, 2016, 09:41 PM
May 2016

Probability is math too.

So, you need to show that Clinton is likely to win all of the remaining primaries by 80-20 or more. Otherwise math shows she can't get enough unpledged delegates to clinch the nomination either.

stopbush

(24,395 posts)
24. Here ya go:
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:17 PM
May 2016

Sanders drops out, supports Hillary and tells the electorate to vote for her in the remaining primaries. She ends up reaching 2383 in pledged delegates. If she got the remaining 933 delegates, she'd end up around 2600 pledged delegates. It's possible.

Hillary drops out. She tells the remaining electorate to cast their votes for Sanders. He wins the remaining 933 pledged delegates. He's still 50 delegates short of reaching 2383 in pledged delegates, because it's mathematically impossible for him to reach 2383 with only 933 delegates remaining.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
17. Debbie Wasserman Schultz called the election for Hillary last September
Wed May 4, 2016, 08:33 PM
May 2016

Why are we still talking about it?

stopbush

(24,395 posts)
25. About 151. Sanders is getting about 6% of the supers, so
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:26 PM
May 2016

based on the current percentage, he might get 9 supers out of what's left.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
31. No matter how many times we debunk this lie, it keeps coming back today.
Thu May 5, 2016, 03:36 PM
May 2016

No, we are not falling for this nonsense.

We are not talking about differential equations or calculus here. Simple arithmetic.

Delegates Clinton Sanders Delegate
Delegates+Supers 4763 2205 1401
Delegates Won 4051 1683 1362
Superdelegates (712) 522 39

Counting only elected delegates (i.e. the legitimate delegates):

To get a majority of PDs (2026):
Hillary needs 343 more PDs
Bernie needs 664 more PDs

There are 1006 PDs still available. Absolutely it is a narrow path for Bernie. But it is a complete lie to say it's "mathematically impossible" for Bernie. Not an opinion, not a perception. A complete, mathematical, provable LIE.

As for supers, Bernie has pointed out that the ones who choose to defy the popular vote in their states do so at their political peril. Most of them are also elected officials!

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/democratic_delegate_count.html

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Politico: It's mathematic...