2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTweety to Weaver just now: (David) Brock is for Hillary? ?
Was that simply a shallow or deceptive question?
Or is he really that ignorant or ill prepared?
Weaver had to educate him about Brock's Correct the Record and how it coordinates with the campaign.
Tweety immediately changed the subject.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)don't really know
floriduck
(2,262 posts)boston bean
(36,218 posts)He managed a losing campaign.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)Should we not listen to her as well?
Actually, allow me to answer that. The answer is no. No we should not.
cali
(114,904 posts)He managed a campaign that did amazingly well against huge odds. Bitter, bitter bean.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)This sounds like absolute horse shit.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)He likes to think of himself being cat and mouse.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)were getting that tingle up their leg talking about Hillary.
benny05
(5,322 posts)Tweety is still smarting from his wife's primary loss.
msongs
(67,360 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)of Tweety interviewing Brock
http://www.msnbc.com/hardball/watch/what-is-hillary-clintons-2016-strategy--561349187693
grasswire
(50,130 posts)he was being cute
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)as more people become aware of Brock and his affiliations, it has become a liability for Team Clinton. Chris Matthews act was to sow doubt in the minds of people who are not completely aware of the reality. It helps me to remember that each propaganda technique is designed to work on a small number of people that they are seeking to influence.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)The innuendo was really aimed at Hillary but it implied that Congress members receive huge speaking fees for giving speeches to the private sector. It really is a dishonest ad.
pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)if you want to talk about something different?