Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
Wed May 4, 2016, 09:52 PM May 2016

IT people re: the hacker's claim about HRC server.

IF

IF

IF

IF ......

......Guccifer was able to hack into HRC's server, is it possible that Guccifer or any foreign intelligence service could from there hack into State Department data?

49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
IT people re: the hacker's claim about HRC server. (Original Post) grasswire May 2016 OP
For fuck's sake. JTFrog May 2016 #1
Guccifer claims to have secreted 2GB of data. Stashed away, as it were. CentralCoaster May 2016 #2
Right. And Assange will release the banking 'poison pill' data any day now. randome May 2016 #9
LOL. And you believe that our government is working for the people. rhett o rick May 2016 #37
Why do these hackers do this? Blackmail? Barack_America May 2016 #14
Yeah, thrills and the challenge of it, and maybe the hopes of a payoff. CentralCoaster May 2016 #15
It reminds me of the mindset of a vandal. Destroy for destruction sake. nt artislife May 2016 #26
Do which? Chan790 May 2016 #19
Well... Barack_America May 2016 #22
I don't know? Chan790 May 2016 #25
Like everyone else. Money is its own reward. leveymg May 2016 #27
You might find this NY Times article from 2014 about Gruccifer of interest... PoliticAverse May 2016 #33
Good backgrounder I had missed unc70 May 2016 #42
Sorta. jeff47 May 2016 #3
some who are discussing this tonight are fearful..... grasswire May 2016 #6
Again, not directly. jeff47 May 2016 #16
I guess the NSA is tracking everything? Rosa Luxemburg May 2016 #10
Only of government systems. jeff47 May 2016 #17
I think they would make an exception for her. leveymg May 2016 #29
all the worry about homeland security and terrorists Rosa Luxemburg May 2016 #49
NSA hard to use in criminal case unc70 May 2016 #43
can you answer the question? grasswire May 2016 #4
The really skilled Land of Enchantment May 2016 #13
How would we know Travis_0004 May 2016 #5
well, he says he has 2 gb of national secrets stashed somewhere. grasswire May 2016 #8
He's not the only one. panader0 May 2016 #20
Platte River, and Datto. grasswire May 2016 #23
If he is telling the truth, Guccifer likely has the Foundation leveymg May 2016 #31
could be, could be! grasswire May 2016 #35
Maybe he has the transcripts! nt 2cannan May 2016 #34
I totally believe everything he says anigbrowl May 2016 #28
People don't generally want to get LEGAL attention . . . maybe social or cultural, but they don't pdsimdars May 2016 #46
My understanding is that Hillary's basement server was not connected to the White House network. Maedhros May 2016 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Bob41213 May 2016 #11
It's hard to say without knowing how the data stream was migrated from the State to Clinton’s server NWCorona May 2016 #12
Clap for Tinkerbell!######nt msanthrope May 2016 #18
Possibly, and depends Bob41213 May 2016 #21
She wasn't permitted to carry her Blackberry into State Dept. HooptieWagon May 2016 #24
But there are those pictures of her with her blackberry in that wood paneled hallway. pdsimdars May 2016 #47
Guccifer is to Emailgate as Curveball was to the Iraq War Tarc May 2016 #30
There is some truth to that. Tyler Drumheller. leveymg May 2016 #32
yes, that. nt grasswire May 2016 #36
He already had hacked Sidney Blumenthal's e-mail account. He used header information from Hillary's w4rma May 2016 #38
No, since the server was separate from the State Department nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #39
Based on the interview he did not use any sophisticated skills Ash_F May 2016 #40
That's what I read also. polly7 May 2016 #41
He took over an AOL account because he knew Blumenthal's dog's name Recursion May 2016 #44
The whole point of her private server was that it wasn't connected to the government. pdsimdars May 2016 #45
She transferred classified material from State to her private server Samantha May 2016 #48
 

CentralCoaster

(1,163 posts)
2. Guccifer claims to have secreted 2GB of data. Stashed away, as it were.
Wed May 4, 2016, 09:55 PM
May 2016

That's part of his statement.

I believe that, yes, Clinton's server was vulnerable and hacked, and it's her fault.

And she needs to drop out or lose.

I've already witnessed one illegitimate president, don't need to live under another, especially not under another hawk.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
9. Right. And Assange will release the banking 'poison pill' data any day now.
Wed May 4, 2016, 09:59 PM
May 2016

Man, you guys will believe anything.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A 90% chance of rain means the same as a 10% chance:
It might rain and it might not.
[/center][/font][hr]

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
37. LOL. And you believe that our government is working for the people.
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:24 PM
May 2016

And yet the people are suffering and the Wealthy are making huuuuuge profits. So who is gullible?

 

CentralCoaster

(1,163 posts)
15. Yeah, thrills and the challenge of it, and maybe the hopes of a payoff.
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:09 PM
May 2016

But with a definite "Let's see if I can hack into this" kind of personal trait.

Yeah, crazy stuff!

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
19. Do which?
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:14 PM
May 2016
  • Hack government servers?
  • take data
  • say they took data
  • release that data


Because they're activists, sometimes just because they can. I know a guy from college that used to hack alphabet-soup intelligence agencies just so he could leave filthy messages in classified data...it was his way of graffiti-tagging his accomplishments, sort of an "I was here!"

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
22. Well...
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:22 PM
May 2016

...if he released emails from all of his other targets, but not Clinton, why would that be?

I guess that's partly what I was getting at.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
25. I don't know?
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:38 PM
May 2016

Because she's the big fish? Because he held them back on the idea that they were sufficiently high-profile and contained dangerous enough information that he could parley them into a walk? Because he's an idealist?

...never underestimate this last one, it's the reason Adrian Lamo has a free pass for being one of the most prolific and damaging hackers in history and Chelsea Manning is in prison. Because they're both idealists...and their ideals led them into conflict.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
27. Like everyone else. Money is its own reward.
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:43 PM
May 2016

Assuming Guccifer is telling the truth, a copy of Hillary's server would be worth a dollar a byte. But, why pay Guccifer for something that any and every competent foreign intelligence agency probably hacked themselves.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
3. Sorta.
Wed May 4, 2016, 09:55 PM
May 2016

Hacking Clinton's server would not provide direct access to State's computers.

But hacking Clinton's server would allow for spearphishing. The hackers would be able to send an email from Clinton's account with a malicious payload to someone at State. Because the email came from the real Clinton email account, the recipient would be much more likely to trust the email and execute the payload.

More on spearphishing here: http://us.norton.com/spear-phishing-scam-not-sport/article

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
6. some who are discussing this tonight are fearful.....
Wed May 4, 2016, 09:57 PM
May 2016

....that anyone hacking her could reach classified material at state dept.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
16. Again, not directly.
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:10 PM
May 2016

The only direct access would the the classified information that was on Clinton's servers.

But as I said, it would be a great launching pad for attacks on State's computers.

Heck, clintonmail.com has been registered by someone for years (no "e" between clinton and mail). That is also a fantastic platform for launching spearphishing attacks. It's yet another angle that apparently no one on Team Clinton thought about before going this route.

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
10. I guess the NSA is tracking everything?
Wed May 4, 2016, 09:59 PM
May 2016

it spends plenty of time elsewhere so you would think it would be interested in security breaches?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
17. Only of government systems.
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:11 PM
May 2016

The NSA's defensive mandate does not extend to non-government systems. Like Clinton's server.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
29. I think they would make an exception for her.
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:51 PM
May 2016

But the question you seem to raise is interesting. What if she was bait? What really useful information would NSA gather by tracking the hackers? Would it be worth the hassle to her? Was she knowing or unknowing bait? Was the stuff on her server disinformation?

Nah. Too Hollywood. The spooks aren't that imaginative. She surely isn't.

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
49. all the worry about homeland security and terrorists
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:23 PM
May 2016

and yet the former secretary of state opened up the country's secrets to the world.

unc70

(6,110 posts)
43. NSA hard to use in criminal case
Thu May 5, 2016, 03:51 AM
May 2016

It would be difficult to introduce evidence derived from NSA activities, even sanctioned activities. You can build a much more solid criminal case starting with Guccifer and other public disclosures, and then using them to establish probable cause for further warrants.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
4. can you answer the question?
Wed May 4, 2016, 09:56 PM
May 2016

Top intel professionals are saying that if Guccifer hacked her, so did many foreign entities.

Land of Enchantment

(1,217 posts)
13. The really skilled
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:06 PM
May 2016

hackers can go in and out with leaving a trace. So far the reports are that her home brew server was not hacked but I'm doubting that because of the German guys (I'll try to find a link) and of course, Anonymous. I am not an IT person.

smartphones=computers in their estimation

here:

http://9to5mac.com/2016/04/18/ss7-hack-iphone-congressman/

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
5. How would we know
Wed May 4, 2016, 09:56 PM
May 2016

If Hillary's server was less secure than the state department, then her server would be easier to hack into.

I guess the question is. If Guccifer hacked into Hillarys server, DID he also hack into the state department? Why not?

panader0

(25,816 posts)
20. He's not the only one.
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:18 PM
May 2016

How about the tech company that backed up her server? I'm not tech savvy at all, but it was a cloud right?
Paul Thompson's article mentions their name. Two companies I believe. All of the employees had access to
classified info. Dumb, dumb, dumb.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
23. Platte River, and Datto.
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:28 PM
May 2016

yeah, and the premises there were unsecured.

I am getting the impression that the data Guccifer says he has stashed is not emails, but something else. He said there were many folders stored.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
31. If he is telling the truth, Guccifer likely has the Foundation
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:57 PM
May 2016

files and its private intel communications records with Hillary. Now that might be something even more valuable than plain Jane TS/SAP info.

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
28. I totally believe everything he says
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:44 PM
May 2016

Nobody has ever made up wild claims in order to get media attention. I'm sure h's got that but he's keeping it hidden from the goodness of his heart. I'm also sure that it's really explosive shit that's going to Change Everything.

Oh yes.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
46. People don't generally want to get LEGAL attention . . . maybe social or cultural, but they don't
Thu May 5, 2016, 04:06 AM
May 2016

generally want to draw the attention of the law.
Sorry to disrupt your fantasy world.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
7. My understanding is that Hillary's basement server was not connected to the White House network.
Wed May 4, 2016, 09:58 PM
May 2016

Thus, controlling Hillary's server would not provide any access to the official State Department servers. However, any credentials or soft tokens present on the server could be stolen and possibly used to gain access elsewhere.

Response to grasswire (Original post)

Bob41213

(491 posts)
21. Possibly, and depends
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:19 PM
May 2016

NSA level hacking is a whole new level and they'd think of crazy things to do with it...

We supposedly know Hillary didn't have a computer on her desk so that's not going to help. Some of the aides I think did and had a clintonemail account. If they had computers at their desk, it'd probably be pretty easy to inject malware into her email and when the accessed it at state....

Also, they could likely use her server to hack her phone and turn it into a bug at state.

Someone else also mentioned using it to fish. That too.

And then they probably have 5 other tricks up their sleeve that they could tailor to this situation.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
24. She wasn't permitted to carry her Blackberry into State Dept.
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:32 PM
May 2016

She wouldn't use a secure computer at her desk for email, so security set up a secure room outside her office where she could use her Blackberry.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
30. Guccifer is to Emailgate as Curveball was to the Iraq War
Wed May 4, 2016, 10:53 PM
May 2016


I am thoroughly enjoying watching a panicked & desperate Sanders camp chase this down the rabbit hole.
 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
38. He already had hacked Sidney Blumenthal's e-mail account. He used header information from Hillary's
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:30 PM
May 2016

e-mails to locate her server and hack it, too.


On March 20, 2013, USA Today reported that Guccifer had successfully hacked the e-mail account of former aide to president Bill Clinton, Sidney Blumenthal. He distributed private memos sent to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton involving recent events in Libya, including the September 11, 2012 Benghazi attack. Before distributing the memos, he copied and pasted the text into his own new documents, then reformatted them with pink backgrounds and Comic Sans font.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer#Hacking_of_politicians.27_accounts

Btw, this wouldn't be much of a scandal if Hillary hadn't made the horrible judgement call to secretly make herself solely responsible for the security of top secret information that she decided to store in her basement.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
39. No, since the server was separate from the State Department
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:33 PM
May 2016

To put it simply, could you hack into your computer from a phone, though another computer, unless they are part of the network?

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
40. Based on the interview he did not use any sophisticated skills
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:37 PM
May 2016

Just common sense and freely available web tools.

So really anybody with tech savvy could have done what he did. He is just the one that did it and got caught.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
41. That's what I read also.
Wed May 4, 2016, 11:38 PM
May 2016

He researched everything he could think of about her and kept guessing at passwords until he got in.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
44. He took over an AOL account because he knew Blumenthal's dog's name
Thu May 5, 2016, 03:53 AM
May 2016

Same thing that happened to Paris Hilton.

Clinton's email server would not have been on the SBU network, so his main vector at that point would have been that he could have spammed State employees.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
45. The whole point of her private server was that it wasn't connected to the government.
Thu May 5, 2016, 03:59 AM
May 2016

So they'd have to hack it from the outside just like anyone else because there was no connection.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
48. She transferred classified material from State to her private server
Thu May 5, 2016, 04:19 AM
May 2016

I do not know the answer to your question, but perhaps the technical types here can say if such a transfer leaves a trail for one to follow....

On another note, grasswire, please read this post I just put in another thread. It is extremely disturbing:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1903396

Sam

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»IT people re: the hacker'...