2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy Hillary Clinton isn't pushing Bernie Sanders to exit race
Hillary Clinton is itching to take on Donald Trump in a one-on-one contest for the White House -- but she isn't pushing Bernie Sanders off the stage yet.
Democrats close to Clinton and the man who could become a top surrogate -- President Barack Obama -- insist they won't pressure the Vermont senator to leave. That reluctance is based on fear inside the Democratic establishment that such a move would make it more difficult to unite the party later this year.
Clinton needs the excited supporters that have rallied around Sanders and hopes treating the senator's campaign respectfully will make them more likely to back her against Trump. Clinton has already started to make overtures to Sanders' supporters - pledging to support them even if they don't support her - and campaign aides have said those will continue in the coming weeks.
Clinton on Wednesday told CNN's Anderson Cooper said she isn't pushing Sanders to hurry up.
"I'm not calling myself that (the presumptive nominee), Clinton said. "I know there are some contests ahead and I respect Sen. Sanders and whatever choices he's making. And I have a lot of empathy about this, Anderson. You know, I ran to the very end in 2008."
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/05/politics/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-exit-race/
Sancho
(9,067 posts)It doesn't hurt Hillary to make stops and speeches in remaining states. You already see Bernie changing his language from attacking Hillary to Trump.
If Bernie goes to far, it will prevent him from having influence at the convention. He has laid off staff and the donations are drying up, so he knows it's silly to think he can win.
Hillary has no reason to ask for Bernie to drop out. Frankly, Bernie was perfect opposition in this primary. He caused excitement and had no real chance to win from day one. Letting him run as a Democrat may have been a good move for the DNC as it turns out.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)I think it has been net positive especially when contrasted with the Republicans.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)Which is why I don't have an issue with him staying in.
artislife
(9,497 posts)alone will give Progressives a voice. She better have Jedi skills of compromise if she is to pull off getting the party to unite.
We will be there as certified Delegates...so your reasoning is missing this one important fact.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)and that's one reason the super delegate system was put in place. Hillary will be the nominee on first vote if Bernie doesn't step down before then. It doesn't matter if Bernie yells at everyone again - and demands free tuition or something. There are lots of platform planks forgotten on the floors of political conventions! If Blemmings make a fuss, they will pay the price for years and Bernie will be appointed ambassador to Denmark.
Hillary wins on all metrics: delegates, popular vote, party endorsements, union endorsements, organization, and money raised.
She doesn't need to compromise, and if Bernie doesn't play nice he will be squashed like a bug. Not by Hillary, but by millions of Democrats and the majority of delegates.
The GOP has self-destructed by nominating Trump - and most of us are looking forward to the first woman President.
Response to Sancho (Reply #31)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Astounded to see so many Clinton supporters still think the 20th century has yet to end.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)Guess her supporters here at DU didn't get THAT particular memo, but "Camp Weathervane" has new directions now, and from the lips of the candidate herself!!!
A network television special explaining "Server Problems" to the country, and orders to be respectful in the coming weeks -- this is going to be a fun day!
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Pull the other one.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)he is pretty cool. Yours is being investigated by the FBI. Are you going to watch the NBC special interview with the hacker who read the classified national security stuff?
Poor Hillary - she didn't understand how the internets work!
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)He started out that way I guess. He didn;t stick to it though.
Yeah, Guccifer. The guy who says he found evidence of Jewish and Illuminati domination. Sounds very reliable!
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)There has been plenty of mud-slinging around here, form all sides. Neither side really has a moral high horse.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)A lot of nastiness on both sides, and I've been guilty of plenty of it, myself. Not our proudest moment here...
oberliner
(58,724 posts)There have been a few snippy comments here and there from both sides, but for the most part, I think they have treated one other respectfully.
Hillary and Bernie supporters, on the other hand, are another story
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)But to be fair, I think they were both getting a little sick of each other, and a little "political theater" is good for ratings.
Supporters, on the other hand -- yup, you nailed that one!
That Guy 888
(1,214 posts)"But I couldn't close the gap in pledged delegates. And the gap between me and Sen. Sanders is far wider than it was between me and Sen. Obama."
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/278718-clinton-i-have-a-lot-of-empathy-for-sanders
That second sentence show that Clinton just can't help herself. She really hates it when Dems don't go along with her plans.
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)all american girl
(1,788 posts)Some of the Bernie supporters just can't help themselves.
That Guy 888
(1,214 posts)That Guy 888
(1,214 posts)but the sentence I "bolded" undermines that message. It says "Why should I even have to do this?".
randome
(34,845 posts)That's what a candidate does: promote herself.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A 90% chance of rain means the same as a 10% chance:
It might rain and it might not.[/center][/font][hr]
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Bernie would make the same point in her situation, as would any candidate.
That Guy 888
(1,214 posts)If that's what she was trying to do, it undermines her message.
That Guy 888
(1,214 posts)So, no, I disagree. If any candidate were trying to make a conciliatory gesture in an attempt to unify the party and look to the general election, that particular thought might be kept in their head.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)The day she suspended then Sen Obama had 1661 pledged delegates and she had 1592. Bernie (and his supporters) can only wish it were that close. Not all of us are ignorant of history.
bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)LuvLoogie
(6,936 posts)she knows the issues in depth, is told to shut up.
bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)all american girl
(1,788 posts)That Guy 888
(1,214 posts)This is really weird. Who are you saying is sexist, bahrbearian, me or the Hill?
The portion of the Hill article I "bolded" undermines the attempt at party unity that the rest of her statement implies. It is sad when any criticism of Clinton is reduced to sexism, racism, wanting a unicorn/pony or right-wing anti-communist blather.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Over and over and fucking over again...
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)She wants to be respectful? She passed that period and chose something else. She's not saying anything because she stayed in too, while running a very racist campaign that I do remember.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)You mean by disagreeing with him in the last debate?
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)Good for her for acknowledging this. Too bad her supporters on DU can't bring themselves to acknowledge this very salient fact.