Some highlights from #DropOutHillary

[pinebox]

A few gems

[LexVegas]

1. #DropOutHillary tweeted by #CheetoFingerz.

[polly7]

4. Speaking of CheetoFingers ...

[pinebox]

26. Isn't that the truth

[SwampG8r]

110. Is that the childporn on Facebook guy?

[polly7]

111. Yep. nt.

[pinebox]

9. Oh? Bernie supporters have Cheet-o fingers?

back at ya.

[JaneyVee]

29. Why are you posting this here instead of freeperville?

[Phlem]

52. ooh, good one! Maybe next time try something original that

hasn't been used a bajillion fucking times over.

[CoffeeCat]

79. When you make comments like that, all you do

is highlight the fact that your candidate of choice and her policies are deeply, deeply despised by a majority in our country.

"No major party nominee before Clinton or Trump had a double-digit net negative “strong favorability” rating. Clinton’s would be the lowest ever, except for Trump."

No past candidate comes close to Clinton, and especially Trump, in terms of engendering strong dislike a little more than six months before the election.

"?w=575&h=528

[bettyellen]

112. You failed to notice every POTUS (good and bad) elected has the highest unfavorable numbers?

This seeming anomaly is explained again and again every time a well researched article posts these numbers.
Maybe read one and find out- the numbers actually bode well for HRC's chances in November.

[firebrand80]

2. Some Highlights from the delegate count

Clinton 2,202, Sanders 1,455

[pinebox]

10. Some highlights from America

[firebrand80]

13. and Bernie is still losing nt

[pinebox]

20. And Hillary will lose a GE

We need the strongest candidate to beat Trump.
That is NOT Hillary.

[JaneyVee]

24. Bernie is not strong.

Bernie is losing to Trump and cant even garner core Dem base demographics.

[ReRe]

43. Uhh.......

I won't get hidden for laughing, will I?

The Political Revolution is not being televised.

Bernie can beat the pants off Trump. And will.

Just wait and see, JaneyVee.

[JaneyVee]

47. LOL. Newsflash: he trails Trump by millions.

[Stallion]

51. If Sanders Can Keep His Momentum, He Might Be Able to Get ZERO Votes in the Electoral College

he's no longer a viable candidate to appear on the General Election Ballot

[Phlem]

56. The lack of critical thinking is Super fucking strong in this one.

Just because she makes the nominee, that equals her beating Trump?

Wow. OK.

[ReRe]

80. Tell Indiana that. n/t

[firebrand80]

25. Maybe, maybe not

We know for a fact Bernie won't win, because he won't be in the contest.

[pinebox]

28. Uh huh

tell us more.

[firebrand80]

31. I don't need a crystal ball

The math tells the story

[pinebox]

35. The reality tells the story

[firebrand80]

40. and Bernie is still losing nt

[pinebox]

42. And Hillary is underwater in numbers

Tell us how that bodes well for Dems when they are facing a populace RW candidate who is NOT a politician in an age where America is sick of them?

Have fun with that.

[firebrand80]

45. RCP Average = Hillary +6.5

Going pretty well so far.

She's actually doing even better than that, because that number includes the Rasmussen propaganda poll.

[Phlem]

64. JFC!

Just because she wins the nomination does not fucking equal the crushing of trump.

Try a fucking logic class.

[firebrand80]

68. She's +6.5 over Trump nt

[Phlem]

70. Say's you. Do you believe everything you read?

Oh of course, only if it's something you want to hear.

Logic class 101, if they'll let you in.

[jzodda]

88. You are failing at Logic

Your critique is that "don't believe everything you read"

That's somehow a more logical answer then somebody pointing out to you the real clear politics average about the polling that shows she is clearly ahead of Trump?

That is emotion talking, not logic.

Logic=Math

Do you deny she is ahead in both pledged and unbound delegates? Do you deny she has won all the big states and has millions more total votes?

You people don't ever consider what would happen if knowing the above facts the convention gives it to Bernie anyway. I would not vote in November at all. Many would also do so. Why should I vote when my NY primary vote is then deemed to be worthless? Ill sit it out. Maybe even vote for Trump. Is that logical? Nope...Its emotional and a reaction to feeling like I was cheated.

There's two sides to everything.

[Phlem]

91. Logic is also knowing the subtleties of the situation chief else

your conclusion is incomplete.

If it was math alone then I wouldn't have a problem.

But It's not just math because our voting system is rigged.

So math cannot compute the honest outcome can it? Just what your being told it is.

So go on with yo bad ass math.

I've been working with math programmers for 20 + fucking years. Please.



If you really understood logic you would know that the election is not being run honestly. You would also know that we're getting ready to elect a thirdway corporatists for the third time expecting different results.

How's that fucking math adding up?

[Kittycat]

57. And Hillary still listens to Kissenger.

Heck of a job she's doing there.

We came, we saw, he died. If I had read that as an unattributed quote, I would have sworn it fell out of Bush's mouth instead of hers. Utterly disgusting!

[ReRe]

49. Like GWB said...

"math death."

[LanternWaste]

86. Prophecies and magical thinking.

"And Hillary will lose a GE..."

Prophecies and magical thinking.

[Phlem]

54. Which means the shit is rigged.

Both nominees are the most disliked of each party?

Yea, that's fucking Democracy in action.

[Scurrilous]

48. LOL

[VulgarPoet]

3. PATRIOT Act's a big one for me.

Authoritarian senator, authoritarian bill.

[JaneyVee]

5. Sexism.

Only a woman with a huge lead would be asked to drop out. Meanwhile, Bernie is in 3rd place.

[JudyM]

8. Your sexism glasses blind you to her actual failings. Gender ain't one of them for any of us.

[JaneyVee]

14. Your biased glasses blind you...

To her decades of numerous accomplishments.

[JudyM]

83. Don't presume I'm not seeing her accomplishments, I am not biased in that way. But many

feminists find it extremely harmful to our credibility when cries of sexism without basis are tossed around.

You claim sexism, but you are destroying feminist credibility by continuing to do so when there is no basis for it. If somethings sexist, by all means call it. If not, you are anti-feminist by your false claim.

[timmymoff]

119. I loved her accomplishing the creation of Isis

she managed to tell the world 50 times that TPP was the gold standard of trade, that's quite an accomplishment. Her Libya regime change policy was such and accomplishment Obama called that particular accomplishment his worst mistake. Yes, it's her accomplishments that scare us, well and her terrible judgment, as stated.

[Chan790]

122. Clintons have never met a bad-for-America trade deal that they don't love.

As for Hillary creating Daesh...let us remember that she's buddies with Kissinger and Kissinger was an vocal supporter of Charlie Wilson and Scoop Jackson. All the bloody Democrats draw their foreign policy bona-fides from Nixon's favorite war-criminal.

[Chan790]

121. Some of us view those "accomplishments" as the strongest argument for why she's unqualified.

How many times does Hillary have to get caught lying before it's simply established fact that she's a chronic liar?

How many times does Hillary get to support Cheneyesque regime change before it's simply established fact that she's a warmonger?

How many times does Hillary have to sell the middle class and poor people down the river before it's simply established fact that she's an elitist working to enrich her elitist buddies?

Once was plenty. After that, it was just reminders that she's unfit to serve as President.

[polly7]

11. Did you cry sexism when this was used on Sanders first?

Probably started by the Brock machine.

[JaneyVee]

16. Bernie is in 3rd place behind Trump.

If anyone should consider dropping out it aint Hillz.

[polly7]

21. Did you cry sexism then or not?? nt.

[bvf]

22. How about a woman connected to

an FBI investigation, with a propensity to fabricate complete crap (see "Bosnian sniper fire&quot , and who fondly remembers how Nancy Reagan was at the vanguard of the battle against the AIDS crisis?

You mean that woman?

Enough with the sexism bull. No legs there, and continually trotting it out only makes you look desperate and panicky.

[JaneyVee]

27. Politifact rated her the most honest candidate of 2016.

[vintx]

33. Yeah, by weighting their metrics with bullshit.

Not everyone is that gullible.

[bvf]

60. Indeed, that might explain the absence of a link.

Even the term "Truth-O-Meter" is worth a chuckle, all by itself. It fairly shouts, "If you're six years old, this might interest you!"

[ReRe]

50. asdlkhg q9uhna*%@_&%(%&^$!!!!!

... Whaaaaaaaaaaatttt? My foot! Not 2016.

Honesty = truth = Bernie Sanders!

[Phlem]

71. Really. Well then refute this, Especially the very last one.

But OK here are a few.

Well there's the lying:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x109944

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/mar/25/hillary-clinton/video-shows-tarmac-welcome-no-snipers/

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/lists/people/fact-checking-2016-democratic-presidential-candida/

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1017&pid=355426

There her IRAQ war vote:

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/article/2015/sep/02/11-examples-hillary-clinton-and-bernie-sanders-hol/

There's the fact that she's moved right:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tony-brasunas/there-is-a-moderate-republican-in-this-race_b_9704194.html

How about the Corporate friendly nominee's donors.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/jul/07/facebook-posts/meme-says-hillary-clintons-top-donors-are-banks-an/

Here's one fact about Bernie:

http://www.politifact.com/california/article/2016/apr/19/bernie-sanders-has-never-felt-burn-politifacts-pan/

There's a whole lot more where that came from, but I'm done doing your homework for you.

Refute it.

[Phlem]

67. That's what I heard from other female Hillary Supporters.

Is it all about the vagina?



Your bringing sexism into this?

That's absolutely disgusting.

Is that your reason for voting for her, because she's female?

Here's a clue, corruption, greed, lying does not require a human sex organ.

Last I checked both sexes are equally fucking awesome at both.

JFC.

[Joob]

6. The best one I saw when it was around 220k tweets

(way above that now, it's still "live" )

Probably enough tweets for 3 speeches now...

[pinebox]

17. Now THAT is an epic tweet

[vintx]

23. OUCH

[JaneyVee]

7. "Unfavorables". Yes, being a powerful woman...

In a country where the opposition just nominated a misogynist woman hater is no surprise. Good news: shes got millions of more votes than the woman haters.

[JudyM]

12. Janey, you always revert to sexism as a shield when it has nothing to do with it. It's her character

that is disturbing.

[JaneyVee]

19. Mmm hmm. Sure.

[Phlem]

74. Hypocrisy Alert!

[Phlem]

73. +1

Let's ponder what would happen here if a male did that?

[CoffeeCat]

87. She stole her way across this country, from primary to primary

with an endless cache of dirty tricks and rigging.

Everyone knows she cheated and that's why she's ahead.

She can't get more than 500 to a rally and she has less than half of the individual campaign contributions that Bernie has--but somehow she's winning. Oh! And the exit polls are all wrong, as well.

Joe Scarborough said, as he left my state--the night Hillary "won" the Iowa Caucuses--that reporter after reporter approached him and said, "You know Bernie won. You know he did."

[eridani]

117. So what has she used power for?

Other than promoting fracking, talking Obama into trashing Libya, approving the Honduras coup and private prisons.

[obamanut2012]

18. Appalling this is allowed on here

Just appalling.

[GreatGazoo]

30. not everyone is as authoritarian as you seem to be

hence the phrase "general discussion"

[pinebox]

36. I know it's scary isn't it?

[ReRe]

63. Uh...

Will I get hidden if I say I didn't see a darn thing wrong with your hidden post back there? What's up with that? Oh well, upward and onward>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on to fighting the good fight.

[arcane1]

89. Yeah, that was a chickenshit hide. One of many we see here lately when the truth hurts n/t

[ReRe]

95. Exactly...

... we know we're in real trouble when they hide the effing the truth. It's plain old censorship right here on DU. This ain't Church, damn'it. This is the rough and tumble DemocraticUnderground, where passions and tempers and minds wrestle out loud.

[Electric Monk]

114. +1

[Ed Suspicious]

102. You got a bullshit hide. I tell you this in protest of bullshit hides.

[Phlem]

78. !

appalling that your voting with blinders on.

you should check post #71. Now that's appalling.

[Trust Buster]

32. I just don't think Sanders supporters have the ability to see behind their blind hatred for

all things Hillary long enough to consider what a Trump presidency would mean to them. The Left should no longer ask why middle class Republicans vote against their own interests. We have our own. They're called Sanders supporters.

[still_one]

58. Well it took some time, but they finally convienced me. I view sanders and trump

with the same disdain, and would NEVER vote for either one.

When the primaries started I initially viewed Sanders in a very favorable light. No more. I can't even stand to watch him when he is on TV. I have to turn the channel. Ironically, that is the same thing I do with the trump, and the former republican candidates.

[Turin_C3PO]

77. That's ridiculous.

I'm sorry but Bernie is nowhere near being as bad as Trump, just as Hillary isn't. Don't let this primary cloud your reason. This shit about Dropout Hillary as well as some of the other juvenile stuff that's come out of Sander's supporters is because many young millennials are posting stupid shit (because they're young). Don't blame Sanders for that.

[still_one]

90. You are entitled to your view, and ironically when this started last year up to a month ago I would

have agreed with you

[ReRe]

93. Nuh unh...you did not have to turn your TV that often...

... because Bernie Sanders wasn't on there that much. M$M only covers the Donald or Republican candidates. Then Hill, then Bernie.

[still_one]

96. You are right on about the trump coverage

[Fawke Em]

59. Just like Hillary supporters can't see how very serious the FBI investigation in to her

handling (mishandling?) of national security data is.

You guys continue to think that an FBI investigation is some partisan congressional committee or you think the country's biggest single criminal investigation team does "security reviews." You tell yourselves this in order to ignore that merely NOT following protocol when it comes to handling information pertaining to the nation's defense is a crime, intentional or not.

[Bobbie Jo]

34. Oh look

cranking out the rude and obnoxious on social media.

We've been watching this shit show for months.

New material, get some...

[pinebox]

37. Last I heard #DropOutHillary was new

it's ok though, it appears most Hillary supporters don't use social media. Wouldn't expect you to know that.

[Bobbie Jo]

38. None of this behavior is "new."

More of the same...

[pinebox]

39. Well when you have 40 years of baggage

What do you expect?

It's the 2016 version of K-Tel and Ronco!

[JTFrog]

41. We expect DUers not to act like ratfuckers.

Is that too much to ask?

[Hiraeth]

92. Then quit acting like one.

[JTFrog]

97. Nice try.

You won't find me posting any right wing bullshit here. You won't find me gleefully standing hand in hand with the Republicans in their witch hunts against Democrats.

Words have meaning and apparently you don't understand this one. But maybe that's the problem here these days. Maybe folks just don't really understand what they are doing when they regurgitate right wing propaganda here. And maybe they do and just don't care. Those types have been trolling DU for over a decade.

[Hiraeth]

98. as opposed to posters who haven't been a month and already have a transparency page showing yet

are still allowed to post.

yeah.

right.

double standard DU.

[JTFrog]

100. There is a double standard alright.

The volume of trolls pretending to be Bernie supporters and stacking DU juries is probably well documented. Skinner has pointed out the bias in the jury system a while back. Hence the new rules coming soon to DU.

There are always assholes on both sides, but the influx of new posters who wear their hatred for Hillary like a badge and spam the forum with right wing propaganda exceeds just about any other type of trolling I've seen on DU.

It is what it is.

[Hiraeth]

101. Hence the new rules coming soon to DU. ... oh BOY!! MORE NEW RULES !!!

[Bobbie Jo]

44. .

[JaneyVee]

46. Baggage:

[KittyWampus]

55. We use social media, just not for bullying and posting inflammatory crap

that serves no purposed except to incite a negative emotional response. Like your OP, for example.

Alas, BernieBro behavior is not new at this point. It's gotten quite old.

[Ed Suspicious]

103. You guys started it with the dropoutbernie one.

[pdsimdars]

105. That's called 'the people speaking', I know you know it all and don't want to hear it but . . . . .

there they are, loud and clear. . . are you EVER going to listen?

[Bobbie Jo]

109. lol

It's called something, alright. "Speaking," not so much...

If these people want to be "heard" or taken seriously, perhaps they shouldn't sound like a bunch of 12 year olds whipping up a throw down after 3rd period.

This pack of cyber-bullies stopped being interesting months ago.

[pdsimdars]

118. I guess that means you never actually read them. I did. And by your response you didn't.

Or you are purposely mischaracterising them.

[KingFlorez]

53. It's stunning how people are stupid enough to ask the winner to drop out

This is not some third world republic where the loser wins.

[still_one]

65. I dispise sanders because of this garbage, and that is a 180 degree turn from where I used

to be.

[Phlem]

81. Really?

Well I despised Hillary from the very 1st moment the establishment took my choice away and shoved her down our throats.

She was a fucking awful the first and and even more so this time.

Try refuting anything in post #71 because those are a few reasons HILLARY SUCKS!

[Mike Nelson]

61. I know something about this...

...when you are winning, you don't "drop out" of the contest! Also, Hillary's approval ratings are extraordinarily high, given the negative media she gets.

[Hiraeth]

104. She shouldn't drop out but, then again, neither shoud he. The democratic process needs to play out.

[hertopos]

62. Posting #DropOutHillary is plain disrespectful.

Acting like teenager.

I do not support some of Hilary's judgment.

However, this is so insulting. This is something that should happen at Freeperville.

Surely, DU became a High-school bully social media.

It is just so sad.

Hertopos

[basselope]

66. Oh yeah, b/c Hillary is deserving of "respect".

[hertopos]

72. Yes she does.

Much more than these high school bullies. DU is now taken over by BS/ Freeper.

Shame on you.

It really does not reflect well on your candidate.
I fully support Sanders intent to go to contested convention.
However, post like this does not deserve on DU.

Be civil.

hertopos

[Phlem]

82. !

your asking Bernie supporters to be civil!?



You first!

[basselope]

84. I don't respect her.

I don't respect people who are for war.

I don't respect people who are so easily bought/sold.

I don't respect people who will do/say anything to get elected with no plans to follow through.

I don't respect people who try and hide behind their gender to cover up their flaws.

I don't think she has earned a morsel of respect.

I am being very civil by simply saying she doesn't deserve respect, far more civil than she was when she twice plunged the middle east into chaos.

[pdsimdars]

107. And more civil than when her campaign spread lies, smears and swift boated Bernie.

At least the issues these people have are about substance, like her love for war

[Waiting For Everyman]

116. Respect is long gone, the question now is whether she is even tolerable.

That is looking iffy.

But I'll hang in there as best I can until the FBI gets back to us.


Back in 2007 this was "waiting on the world to change", and it did, and Bernie ran, and now I substitute the lyrics for "waiting on the shoe to drop".

[ReRe]

76. Huh? Last time I looked...

... it's election time and we are in a dead heat nearing the end of a primary.

[pdsimdars]

106. Most of what I have read is about issues people have, not ad hominem, like the Clinton campaign

has been doing to Bernie.

[FSogol]

69. Congrats! You found a way to post RW garbage on DU.

You must be very proud!

[Phlem]

85. Well and congrats to you for firmly planting your head

in the sand.

[pdsimdars]

108. In the sand? Or up . . . . never mind, don't want to get hidden

[bettyellen]

113. In the sand? Every elected POTUS had higher unfavorable numbers. All of them.

It is what it is. Educate yourself.

[obamanut2012]

99. +1

[MisterP]

75. oh, that last one--and without a single 50-Center needed

[zappaman]

94. ok. n/t

[Number23]

115. Juvenile, not even the slightest bit clever or witty and led to a hidden post for the one who

dragged it here. Another day in GDP.

[bigwillq]

120. These are awesome.

#DropOutHillary

#ForTheGoodOfTheCountry

#WeCanDoBetter

#NotWithHer