Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

runaway hero

(835 posts)
Thu May 5, 2016, 11:47 AM May 2016

Five Thirty Eight: Sanders Shouldn’t Drop Out For Clinton’s Sake

We’re getting to the point in the primary season when people turn their focus to the general election. Since Hillary Clinton tore through the Northeast on April 26, the Bernie Sanders campaign has laid off staff and suffered fundraising setbacks. But Sanders has intimated that he will keep fighting, even contesting the Democratic convention in July. So, could Sanders damage Clinton’s chances in the general election? Do long, hard-fought primaries weaken the candidate who emerges from them victorious?

That question, which is probably even more pressing for Republicans this year, has preoccupied political scientists for decades. The hypothesis that divisive primaries are detrimental is intuitive: Candidates attack one another, dividing the party and alienating supporters. But research findings have been mixed.

In a 1998 study of presidential elections, University of New Mexico political scientist Lonna Atkeson challenged the theory by suggesting that divisive primaries occur when the party is already divided. In other words, divisive primaries are the symptom, not the disease. We’re in the midst of an open primary, but take recent incumbent presidents as an example: Gerald Ford in 1976, Jimmy Carter in 1980 and George H.W. Bush in 1992 ran into trouble in the general election, but not because they were challenged in the primaries. They attracted challengers in the primaries because they were already in political trouble. Controlling for factors that account for this political trouble — the strength of the economy and the president’s popularity — Atkeson found that the effect of divisive primaries on how well the nominee does in the general election drops out. In other words, divisive primaries don’t make the incumbent party vulnerable; the causation runs the other way.


And more here: http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/sanders-shouldnt-drop-out-for-clintons-sake/

Hopefully both sides can knock it off and realize that we should let him finish the race, then unite behind Hillary. No need for this sniping constantly.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Five Thirty Eight: Sanders Shouldn’t Drop Out For Clinton’s Sake (Original Post) runaway hero May 2016 OP
Now Hillary supporters since you feel that Nate is ALWAYS right maybe you can now stop bkkyosemite May 2016 #1
Like I said. runaway hero May 2016 #2
Nate Silver didn't write the article. Garrett78 May 2016 #5
Most of us haven't been. Agschmid May 2016 #6
After the blatant and partisan hatchet job Nate did beedle May 2016 #3
Nate Silver didn't write the article. Garrett78 May 2016 #4
the excerpted part makes perfect sense. BootinUp May 2016 #7

bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
1. Now Hillary supporters since you feel that Nate is ALWAYS right maybe you can now stop
Thu May 5, 2016, 11:50 AM
May 2016

calling Bernie a loser, his supporters gnats, and just flow with it. Although I do believe there will be surprises at the convention..but we shall see.

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
3. After the blatant and partisan hatchet job Nate did
Thu May 5, 2016, 11:58 AM
May 2016

making dishonest excuses for the exit polls results showing obvious fraud, a methodology used the world over to expose such election fraud, I am more inclined to tell Nate to go fuck himself with the disingenuous "let's all hold hands" bullshit.


Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
4. Nate Silver didn't write the article.
Thu May 5, 2016, 12:07 PM
May 2016

But Nate Silver did write an article about exit polls. *8* years ago, long before the Sanders-Clinton race. Exit polls are notoriously misleading for numerous reasons: http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/ten-reasons-why-you-should-ignore-exit/

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Five Thirty Eight: Sander...