2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumYour #BernieBros going after (disabled) women...
People who wanted to get into the gym to see Hillary at the Town Hall had to pass by this angry mob of Bernie Supporters. Some chanting over and over *Fu**you! Parents with kids had to pass through this mob. Shame on them. Anyone who defends this vile behavior is wrong!! Sanders should put out a call for this to STOP!. This is no better than a Trump rally!
ARM ?@adirado29 3m3 minutes ago
.@ShaunKing this is something you & #Bernie should be proud of! Your #BernieBros going after (disabled) women...
SAC On Scene
?@SAConScene
Protestors yelled expletives at Clinton supporters at yesterday's @HillaryClinton rally #SOSPolitics @SOS_EnEsp
https://twitter.com/SAConScene/status/728747887383846912
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hillary Supporters give the Peace sign as they pass by Sanders fans yelling F**k YOU!!
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)He said it is okay for them to be disruptive if they are outside. They are outside so it works for him.
synergie
(1,901 posts)through a megaphone, making little boys cry and tearing up little girls signs!
And they're going all Alex Jones on the videos showing what the Bernie people were up to!
Members of Union del Barrio, MEXA of East Los Angeles College, LA Brown Berets and several other student and community-based organizations plan to march seven blocks in Monterrey Park from Belvedere Park to East Los Angeles College to protest what organizers call Clintons attacks on working-class communities of color and her 2002 vote as a senator in favor of the resolution authorizing military action against Iraq.
http://www.dailynews.com/government-and-politics/20160505/hillary-clinton-to-speak-at-east-los-angeles-college-amid-protest
dr60omg
(283 posts)Union del Barrio, MEXA and Brown Berets ALSO stood up to her colonizing neocon lies surrounding central american refugees and the coup in 2008 in Honduras
kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)I don't care what color the protestors are - it's always bullying behavior towards women or blacks.
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)his vote to dump waste in the poor working class communities and calling it a "sacrifice zone".
Loudestlib
(980 posts)for a job that required me to go online and try to tear people down for money.
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)this lousy attempt at deflection sure shoes you can't refute it.
Loudestlib
(980 posts)Goody bye.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)riversedge
(70,186 posts)LisaM
(27,801 posts)I'll wait for his statement.
glowing
(12,233 posts)This is not coming from the campaign. These people are not bused in. They are not told what to do.
#2- he does not like protestors inside the meetings; especially campaign rallies. Everyone, even Trump, has the right to hold public meetings without being inundated by interruption.
#3- yes, protestors outside of a meeting have every right by the constitution to protest. It is their right to do so. If protestors had become violent, wouldn't the police have stepped in and massive arrests also placed into the news along with these Twitter pics.
Just face it, if she becomes President, everywhere she goes, she will face protestors. Some will even go inside to disrupt. Look at how Wisconsin demonstrated when their Gov and republican controlled houses started stripping worker rights. And because the right pretty much hates her and progressives will be trying to hold her feet to flame over issues, she's going to see much, much, much more of this sort of 1st amendment action. She may have to be like Bush and implement 1st amendment zones, have everything pre-screened to the hilt, and barely tread outside of insider business or with "regular folks". Sort of as she does now, but on steroids.
From what I have seen of the actual complaints listed of the groups protesting that day, they had legitimate concerns to have heard. Showing up outside a Clinton event is a manner in which the media would cover these items.
One thing I have noticed is the picture of the gentleman, white dude, with the Liar, Liar, Liar sign. He seems overtly aggressive and seems to be shouting into the faces of passing people. Who knows what he's about; he could be a provocateur agent to sway people's opinions. He could be a Trump supprorter. Or he could just be an asshole. There are plenty I run across everyday.
Anyway, it is about to be the MOST contentious 4 years as of date since 2000 and our stollen elections. A populist, 99% pushback is occurring. The establishment is not safe on either side. I'm actually afraid that situations may become more violent. And we have way too many guns in America. See, this year we've had two strong anti-establishment candidates. I'm sure the Republicans wish they could go backwards so they could institute elite delegates into the system, but they didn't. They wanted their establishment guy by the end of March, and Trump took that cake and swallowed it whole with their majority win; take the delegates rules. The Democratic establishment has been able to manipulate the process; which is probably why Elizabeth Warren did not run, the deck was pre-stacked. Bernie was the "idea" person to excite the party for "the next time". No one inside of the political/ media bubble could have predicted just how well Bernie would do, or the amount of money he could raise without super Pacs or big money donors.
And already we are seeing her pivot to the right. She's courting Bush donors and claiming she's more conservative than Donald Trump. She will absolutely see amazing amounts of protest during her Presidency. And if contentions continue to run this high, and Sander's can't even get a fair shake at helping to set the party platform, then I doubt she's going to get all those millennials to come in, stand in 5 hr lines, and vote for her. Already in FL, the news outlets that cover local politics are explaining how Trump will win in FL over Clinton. And the only Corp-Dem we have in FL, Nelson, is saying it will be extremely hard for her to overcome Trump and the Republican machine and the voting machines that are run by the Republican Party.
BTW, I'm already getting nasty Democratic Party e-mails stating that if the voters choose to pick Grayson over their corporate establishment pick, it will be a loss for the Dems in November... So, if Grayson is the primary pick, she better hope his coat tails are popular enough to help each other out and that she remain "progressive" as her "life's work" has shown. (I know -lol- isn't that a joke). But the environment is a real issue in FL. Miami is already seeing the effects of the ocean rising. One horrific hurricane, and the state could go bankrupt with the claim damage crippling Citizens and the flood insurance program. Plus there is still much residue damage from the BP blow out from 2010. That is still a huge environmental problem most don't want to talk about or pretend is "all fixed" when it's not even close.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)Do they look ridiculous? Absolutely. But it's like those religious zealots that show up to gay pride days and the like. We all know they're there on some level, but we also realize how absolutely unbalanced they look. Protests definitely aren't what they used to be.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Response to Electric Monk (Reply #40)
Post removed
headonshoulder
(17 posts)Your signatures aren't bringing in any Bernie voters to Clinton's side either.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)On Sat May 7, 2016, 11:14 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
aw put a sock on it.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1918103
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Over the top and rude, calling another DU'er a sock.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat May 7, 2016, 11:17 AM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Great....the weekend of uber-alerting goes on.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: too mild to hide
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If you skin is so paper thin, you should take a break from DU
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is the silliest alert comment I've seen in a while.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)And the alerter gets the punishment.
DU these days...
headonshoulder
(17 posts)Put a sock in it! (informal)
an impolite way of telling someone to be quiet Put a sock in it! Some of us are trying to work around here.
See land one
See also: put, sock
Cambridge Idioms Dictionary, 2nd ed. Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006. Reproduced with permission.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)headonshoulder
(17 posts)Have a great weekend!
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Trust me.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)The idea that "put a sock on it" = "calling another DU'er a sock" is ridiculous.
You might want to put some thought into putting a sock in it, because I just don't think you are doing yourself any favors here.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)...
Fla Dem
(23,650 posts)" Some of us are trying to work around here."
headonshoulder
(17 posts)just a humdinger on the long facts of life, my friend.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)... probably be considered a mild personal attack (under old DU rules, on New DU aka The Wild WWW, it's anyone's guess).
But it's a far less egregious one than many.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)... would probably be a lot less fun if I weren't constantly accused of being a sock or a paid troll.
What is it Missy says on Doctor Who?
Say something nice.
headonshoulder
(17 posts)You are not making any new Clinton converts from Bernie supporters.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)headonshoulder
(17 posts)You brought it up, just now.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)... when I stop seeing that hurled in my direction for seven solid days by anyone here, I will consider a lovely, pro-Hillary sig file with moonbeams ... and rainbows.
headonshoulder
(17 posts)you better watch your words.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)I was not put upon this earth to shill for Hillary. However, since I am accused of of being paid by her constantly, I see no reason to alter my sig file. When I see seven days go by without "paid troll" hurled in my direction, I will happily put up something positive about Hillary.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)The real question is do we really want you. If the behavior of the demonstrators is any indication, it appears the would fit in better at a Trump rally.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)I have had like four hides in 5 years
Why is the transparency page showing on so many Hillary supporters, but not Sanders supporters?
moriah
(8,311 posts)There are people on both sides.
Still, in regard to his original point:
Whether they should keep doing it is one thing, but whether they have a legal right is another. In NYC, use of a bullhorn required a permit from the city.
In addition, notice no "free speech zone" set up for demonstrators. If they escalate, it wouldn't surprise me if Clinton security puts UP rails -- aka using protest pens. The fact she's not doing so yet is encouraging.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)So I can see for myself
moriah
(8,311 posts)But hopefully your purpose in asking for names is to ask them to quit it, not to try to suggest there are zero people claiming to support Bernie who aren't behaving as civilly as one might wish.
In exchange, if you want, feel free to PM me names of other Hillary people who are behaving badly, particularly new ones, and I will try to mentor them on what civility used to be here.
I admit that I'm familiar with this user, mainly because they self-revealed in responses to accusations of shilling -- and a long-time member dug up unflattering news articles about him, though the other person in the legal dispute that made the news sounds far crazier than our poster. (Not naming names, if that LT, normally good poster sees this and wants to give a mea culpa for doing MIRT's job publicly rather than referring someone to MIRT who they suspect of shilling, he can, or star members can search posts and probably find it).
My real life name is forever tied to my DU identity as a result of a similar self-reveal in 2008 in response to someone accusing me of working for the RNC. Fortunately I have had the good luck, despite having a name shared with, to my knowledge, only one other person in the US, to not have unflattering news stories about me written for someone to stalk me and post publicly.
And I have counseled him on sig lines, fwiw. I can't see them on mobile, and mine could be considered commentary on this election but has been part of my signature since 2008 (it's a quote from Judy Harrow's "Exegesis of the Wiccan Rede", regarding the "challenge to action" inherent in the Rede.) I rarely use graphics, unless it's my favorite animated kitteh or "Vote Democratic -- The Ass You Save May Be Your Own).
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)That's like the person who said that no Bernie supporters have anti-Hillary sig files. Then I put up a reply with numerous examples.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)And your example has nothing to do with anything we are discussing
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)You're one of the folks with an anti-hillary sig file that another omnipresent Bernie supporter says she never sees. Perhaps she has you on ignore?
And yes, there are also a number of Bernie supporters with transparency pages and I'm not going to bother getting them because bothering to get the signature files was also a waste of time. If people want to believe a lie badly enough, no amount of research I do is going to make them see the truth.
If there are fewer transparency pages, it certainly makes sense. It is far more difficult to alert on Bernie supporters than it is Hillary supporters since the will likely make up 80% of any jury called. A jury system that is based entirely on fervor for one candidate or another and has next-to-nothing to do with the actual content of what is being alerted is not really a jury system at all. But keeping shilling for it if that makes you happy. Just please don't expect me to join in the love.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)I think that is what is most scary.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...2 cents per word
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)price that that.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)Another paid troll accusation. Time to update my sig file again.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)... but I'm not one of them, and every time I am falsely accused of it, I look for an unassailable truth to add to my signature file. When I go seven days without hearing paid troll or sock directed at me, I plan to put something lovely and non-controversial and pro-Hillary in there. These false accusations are bogus and any half-baked idiot can figure out that I'm not a paid troll.
ebayfool
(3,411 posts)Guess we won't be seeing that vaunted change in their sig line any time soon ...
moriah
(8,311 posts)If your protest went off beautifully, you might get some coverage.
But that cold morning of April 7, 2003, as I drove in from my overnight job in a Long Island call center to the City, left the car with my husband, and hopped on the train to get to the planned protest (was expected to be under 100 people, no bullhorns, on the opposite side of the street from the company being protested for their war ties, so no permit needed), I wasn't expecting to participate in something that would make news even years later.
A small segment of that group planned to engage in "nonviolent direct action" -- a better word than "civil disobedience" to describe breaking the law not because the law goes against your conscience, but to prove a point -- by sitting in front of the building on its side of the street and linking arms -- about 7-10 people, all previously had jail solidarity training and expected to get arrested. Still, this wasn't expected to be major.
It was chaotic when I finally arrived near the planned protest (traffic on the Expressway was slow) but far fewer people than I anticipated, though I saw a "green hat" and got the story from him. I had missed an illegal mass arrest. Videos taken by legal observers showed police blocking routes for the non-direct action crowd to disperse, then giving an order and arresting people who couldn't obey.
I spent the rest of that day running off NLG post-arrest pamphlets and standing outside 1PP with a group of Guild folks, a few people's personal lawyers, and some volunteers with cigarettes and coffee for those who needed them along with the "You're Free -- But You're Not Done With The System Yet" as people were released. We had to negotiate NOT standing in a "protest pen" just for that even though we weren't chanting or anything -- I think they were trying to prevent released protesters from getting out and starting another immediate pop-up protest.
The city ended up paying over $2 million for their illegal activities that day, but we were overshadowed by the horrifyingly violent suppression of protest in Oakland that same day. Remember the picture of the girl with the ginormous knot on her jaw?
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)Last edited Sat May 7, 2016, 06:53 PM - Edit history (1)
You don't want PR for your cause if the takeaway message is swearing at groups of children. Look at the incident where the teacher tried to usher the guy with the camera away. That's all most people who heard that story remembered.
moriah
(8,311 posts)... flashing the peace sign were very cool, good PR for Hillary.
The people organizing protests of Hillary's events need to get better control over their people, or any of the proposed Convention protests are going to end in a lot of false arrests and injured protesters.
DNC and RNC security rarely plays. If any coordinated march is planned, the Philadelphia branch of the National Lawyers Guild needs to be contacted for advice and legal observers.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)But I hope that everyone who peacefully demonstrates is given all respect for their legal right to do so.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)... though it remains to be seen whether hurling obscenities in the direction of children is going to be seen as peaceful.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Enlighten us as to the magic date when protests were what they "used to be." Careful now, history 'n stuff...
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Every time I have researched the bullshit "Bernie-bro" accusations.
I can never find any evidence that the extreme anti-Hillary person showed any interest or connection with Bernie.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)riversedge
(70,186 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Desperation at Camp Weathervane!
moriah
(8,311 posts)... which is why if you are involved in a protest it's a good idea to watch out for people who are encouraging others to break laws, or for "walk up" protesters who start agitating others...
But the reason those tactics are successful is because even good people can get caught up in a mob mentality. Whether the people taped being jerks were plants, agitated by plants, or just agitated and caught up in the mob isn't something I can tell from the videos available.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)That kind of behavior is nonexistent at Bernie rallies.
Hillary has declared the primary over and has been sparring with Trump so it is not a shock to find Trumpites protesting her.
Trump supporters hate Hillary, and their candidate openly encourages violence and it seems to occur at every one of his rallies. Hell, Trump's campaign manager was accused of violence toward a right wing journalist.
Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #2)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)riversedge
(70,186 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)griffi94
(3,733 posts)And they wonder why voters have rejected
everything about that whole campaign.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)1) Bernie, Bernie......
2) F*ck you....
Both are repeated over and over. Classy bunch of folks.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)The other videos show clinton supporters flipping the bird yelling obscenities and one having to be physically restrained from violently attacking .
Henhouse
(646 posts)Henhouse
(646 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Nice touch with the self-censorship as well!
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)That is all I see in GDP any more.
Not that Hillary ever had anything more to offer. It is just sad.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Neither do they act like bullies around children. So, the bullshit is being thrown around by the supporters of your candidate.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Just lies.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)they show nothing at all.
Henhouse
(646 posts)Protestors chanting "bernie...bernie" and "fuck you" at people attending HRC rally....
https://twitter.com/SAConScene/status/728388122304598016
After all the claims that the BSers made (that were in fact lies) I don't believe you owe them an iota of proof.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)I'm sure that most supporters are nice and just want to cheer their candidate, but the behavior of the people outside Hillary's venue crossed the line. They were boorish and Sanders shouldn't have defended their actions.
Henhouse
(646 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)Disgusting behavior. If this is the "Bernie or Bust" crowd, they can stay home and rot on election day in November. Reasonable people will go out and vote.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)zigby
(125 posts)They seem to be going through unimpeded. And if you watch a couple videos down, the free hug guy had to restrain a Hillary supporter woman from getting physical. Looks overall pretty tame for a lively political event.
And I'm sorry, but don't take a child to any political event unless said kid can stand some salty language. This is pretty weak tea.
riversedge
(70,186 posts)harassed with vile language.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)language that frightened the child. It was more likely the noise level coupled with the potentially violent hostility and anger displayed by the mob.
And yes, it was a mob and a Bernie mob.
Cursive
(89 posts)The little boy crying and some jackass yelling "F--- you weda!" really pissed me off. This isn't the way people. Props to the "Free Hugs" guy though.
Response to Cursive (Reply #17)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)Last edited Sat May 7, 2016, 12:47 PM - Edit history (1)
The faux outrage from the Clinton camp has reached hair-on-fire levels.
What do they think a protest is...a High Tea?
And oh no! Someone said the F word! At a protest.
Yes, there are kids at rallies. No one is targeting them. I've been to rallies and political events where there was also a contingent of protesters. I wasn't fool enough to think that they were targeting me or my kids. They're protesting. This is America. It's what we do.
I have a feeling that this exercise in faux outrage will disappear as quickly as it appeared. I don't know what they think these talking points will accomplish. Will Sanders supporters suddenly defect to Clinton?
It's just bizarre.
riversedge
(70,186 posts)ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)Talk about FAIL.
Response to ohheckyeah (Reply #64)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)I'm in a wheelchair.
Response to ohheckyeah (Reply #112)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)Maybe ou shouldn't be dismissive and snarky to people that you don't know who might be going through the worse time in their life
Response to ohheckyeah (Reply #118)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)without meaning to be. Sorry.
Response to ohheckyeah (Reply #155)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to frylock (Reply #123)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
oasis
(49,376 posts)in this sort of behavior for it not to be disturbingly true.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)It would not be hard all all for me to be disgusted, if it was a bunch of Clinton supporters intimidating people minding their own business, doing their own thing. The are aggressive. The are towering over them. The are aggressively yelling fuck you and other obscenities. The are too close. TOO close.
That is very intimidating poses with angry faces, a lot of young men.
Surely Sanders has a responsibility to be informed and call these supporters of his out and demand this not happen again.
Response to riversedge (Original post)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Response to Lucinda (Reply #29)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
jillan
(39,451 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/07/us/politics/obama-jobs-economy-donald-trump.html
Hopefully they'll start reporting this kind of harassment more widely. But the look on the first woman's face says it all. Who would expect to get bullied like that at a Clinton event?
riversedge
(70,186 posts)will unfortunately see a lot more. I hope no one gets hurt.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)I get the feeling that President Obama had words with certain members of his Justice Department or at least let it be known that he's interested in cleaning up the campaign negativity ASAP. I expect the message will eventually filter down to Team Ben and Jerry but at this point they couldn't put the outrage genie back in the bottle if they wanted to.
pugetres
(507 posts)BERNIE BRO!!!11!1!!
hillary has got a LOT of work ahead of her.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)It's Latinos protesting Clinton's connections to shit in Honduras, in East LA. Some are Sanders supporters. Some probably aren't.
Clinton supporters sure do get mad when brown people don't heel when called though, don't you?
Cha
(297,137 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)funny how they have pent-up aggression, yet can't find the energy to register . . . easier to whine and complain about it than actually vote, I guess
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Did you notice that the woman in the wheelchair looks perfectly calm and composed?
Orsino
(37,428 posts)...and really bring out your hardwood floor's shine! And they're delicious!
BernieBros(tm) are the handy bugbear that can cover any candidate's shortcomings. Your candidate helped poison us with fracking? Dismiss protestors as BernieBros(tm)! Blood on her hands? Why, pointing it out is something a BernieBro(tm) would do!
Never mind that the people involved aren't all male, aren't all white, and don't seem particularly Sanders-oriented.
It's BernieBros(tm) all the way down!
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
riversedge
(70,186 posts)synergie
(1,901 posts)Trenzalore
(2,331 posts)to do some really obnoxious shit at the convention.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)So fucking ugly.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)1) There is no difference between the temperament of the Far Right and the Far Left.
2) Sanders supporters will continue to do to Hillary and her supporters what you see depicted in these pictures through the November election. This will make a Trump presidency a distinct possibility.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)The way to shut these people down to start cutting them down to the lowest possible denominator.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #75)
Armstead This message was self-deleted by its author.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)the Poor Loser award! I say forget about them. Naderites don't vote for Democrats anyway!
Response to riversedge (Original post)
Armstead This message was self-deleted by its author.
frylock
(34,825 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)and a Bernie mob anymore.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)and
kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)stonecutter357
(12,695 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)Redwoods Red
(137 posts)I especially like the bit about picking on a disabled woman...because a disabled woman happened to pass the demo.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)all of him supposedly accosting women -interesting
Prism
(5,815 posts)I love how racially privileged the double standard is among Clinton supporters. They love Latinos as long as they're supporting her, but the minute they step one inch out of line, they're bullies and thugs.
Maybe you should listen to their issues instead of trying to use them as mascots?
mcar
(42,301 posts)benny05
(5,322 posts)to accuse all of the protesters of being Bernie Bros. Most of those holding the LIAR signs are likely to be Trumpeters or GOP Hil Haters.
Stirring up **it when you can't identify everyone. It's true that some Bernie supporters who are furious at her about what happened in Honduras when she was actively heading the State Dept.
I'm surprised we haven't seen more voices about this sooner.
Bill USA
(6,436 posts)becoming harder to tell apart.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)People are smiling and give peace signs....seems friendly to me. Hillary is a Liar - nothing wrong with holding a sign that tells the truth.
Of course if you like Hillary can do what Bush did and put up an area where her supporters won't be exposed to the truth or what those who don't support her believe.
Her choice...of course if she did that you would not have these pictures to post and then she could not play the victim.
Everyone looks okay to me.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Sun May 8, 2016, 01:39 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Your #BernieBros going after (disabled) women...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511916426
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
BernieBros is a slur used to paint all Bernie supporters as sexist and racist. It should be a bannable offense on DU just as several other words are. This is teabagger behavior. DU used to be better than this.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun May 8, 2016, 01:58 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Just fucking stop it
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: ??
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: While I agree that BernieBros is a slur, I don't see that the term is "racist or sexist". If this was posted in the "General Discussion" or "LBN" forum I would have ruled it hidden on the basis of rudeness, and injecting primaries into the general forums, but since it is posted in General Discussion : Primaries, which unfortunately has become a place where rudeness is rampart from all sides, I will vote to leave it
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Since when is the truth "a bannable offense"? Leave it.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
jillan
(39,451 posts)anyone going after her
Hyperbole much?