48 countries signed the ITO agreement. FDR's idea was for the governing of trade cooperatively between nations. To take trade rules out of the hands of national governments who, in his eyes, always found reasons to restrict trade rather than expand it. To further promote trade, he introduced he concept of neutral arbitration to resolve trade disputes rather than each national government always resolving disputes in its own favor.
Again, who opposes trade deals now? Labor, progressives and the working class.
In the US those groups are joined by the republican base which has opposed all forms of international agreements for decades. Any poll will show that the republican base opposes trade agreements much more than the Democratic base.
Who supports them? The big corporations, the republican establishment and the conservaDems.
Again, polls show that Democrats support them while the republican base opposes them. (I don't consider our base to be more 'conservative' than the republican base. Quite the opposite. Perhaps we disagree on that.) Perhaps their base is just 'better informed' than ours though I doubt it. In Europe it is liberals who are trying to keep the EU together with its open trade. It is the far-right that is trying to destroy it in order to raise tariffs and create immigration barriers.
If you would like to see the polls that show the attitudes of liberals and conservatives towards trade agreements I will be happy to provide them. I have posted them many times before.
As I said things change.
Indeed they do. FDR had a Great Depression and historic income inequality to deal with as well as Nazi aggression in Europe and Japanese aggression is Asia. If a true liberal like FDR could promote trade and the governing of it cooperatively among nations during difficult times like those that is good enough for me.
If you can't understand that, that's your problem.
= new reply since forum marked as read
