Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dsc

(52,155 posts)
Sat May 7, 2016, 09:22 PM May 2016

there is a difference between protesting famous people and candidates

and protesting ordinary people. Today I went to Out Raleigh, which is basically a gay festival in Raleigh. My chorus' booth was directly across from the protesters and for three or more ours I had to listen to them preach about gays going to Hell and all that. It frankly got old. I haven't participated in the threads about the protesters at Hillary's speech in LA but here is what my problem is with them. The shouting at the attendees. Protest her as much as you want. But don't shout obscenities at people who merely are attending a political event. And you really don't shout obscenities at people in front of their children.

62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
there is a difference between protesting famous people and candidates (Original Post) dsc May 2016 OP
It's not "protesting" when your one and only goal is to stop the other person from expressing... MadDAsHell May 2016 #1
Well their goal in LA was to raise the issues about Hillary's record. Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #3
No it does not make sense Demsrule86 May 2016 #42
So kind of like Hillary appears to them? Kittycat May 2016 #52
Rude obnxious Demsrule86 May 2016 #53
I wasn't protesting, nor am I trying to silence those Kittycat May 2016 #56
Here's another strategy... Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #2
you aren't going to find posts from me defending the way they protested dsc May 2016 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #8
find a post where I defended their conduct dsc May 2016 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #12
I most certainly wasn't violent dsc May 2016 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #16
Obscenities are just fine under the constitution I suppose Demsrule86 May 2016 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #54
Question is, did you condemn it? Duckhunter935 May 2016 #33
I did say they should have done a different way of protesting dsc May 2016 #59
The DU threads about Seattle were full of 'Bernie is so racist' posts from people who later Bluenorthwest May 2016 #61
Was a Clinton supporter being violent in LA? I missed that. Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #17
That's cool. I missed some of that stuff. Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #20
Bernie Bro yells Fuck you Guera at Clinton Supporter...and makes little boy cry. Video Henhouse May 2016 #22
Guero/Guera Whitey. Pale one. Honkey. Henhouse May 2016 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #24
Hug man comforts crying child.... Henhouse May 2016 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #26
I posted the video....you claimed it was doctored...I'm done with you...nt Henhouse May 2016 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author Henhouse May 2016 #29
You act like everyone supported those protesters and not the most recent ones. nolawarlock May 2016 #34
Good point. speaktruthtopower May 2016 #4
I agree with your sentiments about conducting oneself with glowing May 2016 #5
I agree, and while we're at it Urchin May 2016 #7
honestly that is a fair point dsc May 2016 #10
K&R betsuni May 2016 #11
Bernie is the candidate for swearing at children. nolawarlock May 2016 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #27
Hope? nolawarlock May 2016 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #32
Are there any children on this board? nolawarlock May 2016 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #36
I definitely don't need Brock's money. nolawarlock May 2016 #37
Oh, nolawarlock May 2016 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #40
Like they weren't all riding the same bus. nolawarlock May 2016 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #49
And OMG nolawarlock May 2016 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #41
That's fair ... nolawarlock May 2016 #44
Did you ever hear of Reagan Democrats? Demsrule86 May 2016 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #50
No those with Nader Democrats Demsrule86 May 2016 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #57
The op has a post hidden TimPlo May 2016 #21
it's called sarcasm JI7 May 2016 #46
that is technically true dsc May 2016 #58
"A post hidden"? How would you know? oasis May 2016 #62
They weren't protesting. They were bullying and harassing people. Lucinda May 2016 #48
This is America. We can protest famous people and candidates. And politicians and CEOs and jillan May 2016 #51
Yeah, that has already cost them a few more votes. nt Jitter65 May 2016 #60
 

MadDAsHell

(2,067 posts)
1. It's not "protesting" when your one and only goal is to stop the other person from expressing...
Sat May 7, 2016, 09:39 PM
May 2016

Last edited Sun May 8, 2016, 02:07 PM - Edit history (1)

their idea.

It's called cowardice.

Cowardice that you're not doing a good enough job selling your own idea and you need to shut down all opposition, remove all alternatives, just to be safe. Your idea may be shitty, but it's the only one people are actually allowed to hear, so you win, right?

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
3. Well their goal in LA was to raise the issues about Hillary's record.
Sat May 7, 2016, 09:41 PM
May 2016

A brutal record. So it made sense actually.

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
53. Rude obnxious
Sun May 8, 2016, 12:41 AM
May 2016

Supposedly this campaign is about ideas but this shows that is not true because you don't let Hillary share ideas...it's bash and bash some more...it makes you all look really bad.

Kittycat

(10,493 posts)
56. I wasn't protesting, nor am I trying to silence those
Sun May 8, 2016, 12:49 AM
May 2016

From expressing their right to assemble and protest. They seem to have a legitimate issue with her.

Do you support taking away the first Ammendment?

dsc

(52,155 posts)
6. you aren't going to find posts from me defending the way they protested
Sat May 7, 2016, 10:01 PM
May 2016

I did support their message and felt that targeting Bernie, Hillary and Martin was fine. But the fact is people who did what they did deserve to get arrested for it. I would assume they would have accepted being arrested had it come to that.

Response to dsc (Reply #6)

Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #2)

Response to dsc (Reply #9)

dsc

(52,155 posts)
14. I most certainly wasn't violent
Sat May 7, 2016, 10:22 PM
May 2016

I also didn't protest private people. I may well have raised a voice at public figures which I think is perfectly acceptable. BTW I was pretty clear in my post but you, like usual, chose to instead make a post up to respond to.

Response to dsc (Reply #14)

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
45. Obscenities are just fine under the constitution I suppose
Sun May 8, 2016, 12:21 AM
May 2016

But it makes you look bad and how does that help Bernie...I feel that the people supporting Bernie who act like this cause people to turn away from his positive message. You think the Mom of the kid reduced to tears will ever give Bernie's message a shot ever...in the future? How about the kid...not likely now is it. So what do you accomplish other than to make fools of yourself and turn people who might be allies at another time off with these sort of protest?

Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #45)

dsc

(52,155 posts)
59. I did say they should have done a different way of protesting
Sun May 8, 2016, 07:20 AM
May 2016

I had no problem with the net roots protest where they spoke their piece and then the candidates got to speak. I think in Seattle they went too far.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
61. The DU threads about Seattle were full of 'Bernie is so racist' posts from people who later
Sun May 8, 2016, 08:09 AM
May 2016

admitted to being motivated by antisemitism. That event was a rally for Social Security, full of senior citizens and disabled people who were called 'white supremacists'.
I did stuff with ACT UP. I support disruptive activism instinctively but such actions must, must, must be discussed openly that is part of the process and part of the action. DU did not allow that discussion, anyone who wanted to discuss got called racists by a bunch of Jew baiting bigots.

As a veteran of more than one such action I kept trying to point out that Bernie in Seattle and he and O'Malley at Netroots had responded better to the disruption that 99% of targeted politicians do. No one on your side including you would discuss that history. I posted Bill Clinton screaming at ACT UP disruptive activists, wagging finger and saying 'don't be so emotional' to a man with weeks to live. But that could not be discussed, no the message was 'Bernie Bad, Bernie Worst Ever Jew Candidate'.

You and your cohort took part in that. It was antisemitic, dishonest, evasive and a misused and abuse of activist history.

The way your cohort refused to discuss ACT UP history fit well with your candidate's sermon about ACT UP not doing anything at all until Ronald and Nancy Reagan got that AIDS activism started.

Hard to take any of this as informed or sincere discussion.

Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #15)

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
18. That's cool. I missed some of that stuff.
Sat May 7, 2016, 10:43 PM
May 2016

Here's another interesting video of the demonstration:

East L.A. Protests Hillary Clinton




Response to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #18)

Henhouse

(646 posts)
23. Guero/Guera Whitey. Pale one. Honkey.
Sat May 7, 2016, 11:07 PM
May 2016
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Guero%2FGuera

Guero/Guera
Whitey. Pale one. Honkey.
Guero is for guys, guera for girls. When used among friends, it's like calling someone dude. When used with people you don't know...watch your ass.

Response to Henhouse (Reply #22)

Response to Henhouse (Reply #25)

Response to Henhouse (Reply #28)

Response to TM99 (Reply #26)

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
34. You act like everyone supported those protesters and not the most recent ones.
Sat May 7, 2016, 11:52 PM
May 2016

I give Bernie all the credit in the world for having the patience to stand aside and hand those two a microphone. They would not have liked my response. Not. One. Bit. But then, I would never run for office. I don't have the patience for it. I've personally dealt with religious protesters in the past and I've dealt with them successfully, but with far different tactics that made sure they weren't going to ever do so again. And, sure enough, they are learning.

 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
5. I agree with your sentiments about conducting oneself with
Sat May 7, 2016, 09:53 PM
May 2016

some dignity. However, there is a lot of anger in America. No one is listening to those who need change, desperate change. And since this year has had really big, bold ideas presented this year. Trump wants to build walls and point fingers and blame the politicians as corrupt (and they are). Bernie has said, hey, there isn't a war anywhere that isn't funded when they need it, really building America, creating fair trade, protecting the environment, education as a right, housing as a right, access to food as a right, acces to good paying jobs a right, health care as a right... Well, it resonates. It pushes Clinton to claim she was a progressive.

People are hurting. People are fighting for a future. Survival mode is tiring and taxing and frustrating. And for many years, during the Bush years even, people have been in "struggle" mode. Remember that woman saying she had to work 3 jobs to survive, and Bush said "good for you"... Like it was something for everyone to aspire to? Do you remember 2008 campaign when Obama said wages have decreased by and avg of $2000 for real families (before the crash)?

Look, many thought they were getting Bernie when they voted for Obama. And his selections for admin posts were essentially the signal that he wasn't going to be progressive or walking picket lines. He even suggested messing with social security as a compromise to Republicans. Thank God seniors blow back on that still. Still the amt isn't enough to keep up with costs and many seniors rely on it exclusively. I think he has tried to be good to people, but walk the corporate line as well. I think the Dems blew an amazing opportunity to essentially herald in a modern day FDR type of agenda; especially with the millions of people riding high on a "new day" and opportunity to go in a different direction than Bush/ Cheney.. And that didn't happen.

Many people don't want to wait another 4 to 8 yrs. Many more kids will be priced out of education. Insurance costs are on the rise. And jobs are stagnant on wages, though costs on everything seem to increase. People have the right to be angry. Yelling profanities isn't exactly the right method... However, protestors are going to be loud... And what was up with that arrangement on entering that building? It set up some extreme optics and overbearing presence. The police should have created a better crowd controlled barrier to the entrance hall. It was like walking thru a dug out... So strange. Between the media and the protestors, the optics on the whole thing was odd. And perhaps Clinton people should think of these things in the future. They will be met with protesters more and more. They shouldn't choose facilities that create a hostile environment for all involved.

Quite literally, she may become one of the MOST protested Presidents of modern history when she had Pugs on one side and progressive on the other. She's a very decisive politician for an already very divided electorate.

dsc

(52,155 posts)
10. honestly that is a fair point
Sat May 7, 2016, 10:10 PM
May 2016

though it should be noted that unless one is reading DU publicly they have some control over who sees it.

Response to nolawarlock (Reply #19)

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
31. Hope?
Sat May 7, 2016, 11:48 PM
May 2016

My hope is that the impact that Trump has had on the political process, where it's ok to swear at children.

I don't care whether they were looking at little Sally or at little Sally's mom. The fact remains, it was not appropriate.

Response to nolawarlock (Reply #31)

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
35. Are there any children on this board?
Sat May 7, 2016, 11:54 PM
May 2016

And have you seen my swearing my brains off? If I choose to have a sense of humor about a candidate I don't like, that's hardly the same as swearing at little Dick and Jane.

Response to nolawarlock (Reply #35)

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
37. I definitely don't need Brock's money.
Sun May 8, 2016, 12:03 AM
May 2016

And my opinions are my own. And I doubt very much that the "mega church moms" are the type I've dealt with. I'm usually looking at strip mall storefront church missionaries belching forth hellfire and brimstone at anyone who walks by. What I wouldn't give to be interact with someone from one of those mega-churches. At least I might get some free swag.

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
38. Oh,
Sun May 8, 2016, 12:05 AM
May 2016

and people keep saying these weren't Bernie supporters yet I see not only a giant Bernie banner, but signs about "the transcripts," as though that's an issue anyone but Bernie supporters care about.

So much is said here about honesty. Why can't believe just tell the truth that this was orchestrated by the Bernie campaign?

Response to nolawarlock (Reply #38)

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
43. Like they weren't all riding the same bus.
Sun May 8, 2016, 12:19 AM
May 2016

Come on. And as for logic, logic puzzles are an occasional hobby of mine. But it doesn't take a stellar logician to realize what's really driving all that. Now that Bernie's on the verge of losing (and that's putting it nicely because I think he's already lost), he's pulling out all the stops.

Response to nolawarlock (Reply #43)

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
39. And OMG
Sun May 8, 2016, 12:07 AM
May 2016

Using little children who probably have no idea about any of these policies to bellow over the microphone is just plain trashy. Reminds me of the street preachers that use children to tell everyone walking by how they're sinners that are going to burn in hell. Who does that to their children?

Response to nolawarlock (Reply #39)

nolawarlock

(1,729 posts)
44. That's fair ...
Sun May 8, 2016, 12:21 AM
May 2016

... because I rarely say anything without a tinge of snark. But it really boils down to this ... do you get what you want or do you not get what you want? I nearly always get what I want and always have. I have a keen understanding of when I can be all snark and bluster, and when I have to kiss a little ass. It's all about knowing what you can get away with. And swearing at children is just never going to play well and that's exactly what most people are taking away from this.

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
47. Did you ever hear of Reagan Democrats?
Sun May 8, 2016, 12:24 AM
May 2016

Of course you try to get the other side to vote for you and with Trumps terrible remarks about women we may just do it.

Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #47)

Demsrule86

(68,539 posts)
55. No those with Nader Democrats
Sun May 8, 2016, 12:46 AM
May 2016

And they helped Bush steal the election. Of course the pure and the wealthy assured everyone it was for the best as they lived their usual high life and the rest of got to lose jobs and homes in 08.

Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #55)

 

TimPlo

(443 posts)
21. The op has a post hidden
Sat May 7, 2016, 10:51 PM
May 2016

That said "yes those black people are just too stupid to vote" So not even going to bother giving a response to someone that says that and is trying to talk about protesting others.

dsc

(52,155 posts)
58. that is technically true
Sun May 8, 2016, 07:18 AM
May 2016

but you sure left out a whole lot of context. I posted it in response to someone who literally posted an article calling for literacy tests of VA voters, and the rest of the south, because they voted for Hillary. The majority of those voters were black. Nice smear though.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
51. This is America. We can protest famous people and candidates. And politicians and CEOs and
Sun May 8, 2016, 12:36 AM
May 2016

anybody we want.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»there is a difference bet...