2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumYay! The democratic frontrunner is now seeking donations from Jeb Bush Mega donors
but of course since she isn't influenced by money, this will be perfectly fine with her supporters. Their necks must be stiff beyond compare with all the overlooking they do. This will play in Peoria. Good lord can she stoop any lower? Has she asked Dubya to be a bundler yet?
msongs
(73,496 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)and $27 contributions in Hillaryland.
Kall
(615 posts)brewens
(15,359 posts)as well.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I can't quite remember that name right now.....
creeksneakers2
(7,983 posts)Most intelligent people recognize that at Trump presidency would be a disaster for the country, both rich and poor.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Welcome to real politic. Much for you to learn, grasshopper.
creeksneakers2
(7,983 posts)so firmly believe they are smarter than everybody else? I think some of the cynicism is there to create the self appraisal.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Bernie is the first to change the future. So you are in reality the cynical one if you don't support for Bernie.
Besides I figure you are quite young. amirite?
creeksneakers2
(7,983 posts)I've followed politics my whole life. Where I become different from most other people is that I'm very skeptical of political accusations, including those against the other side. People and players get very wrapped up emotionally and dream of coming up with some dirt that will make the opposition collapse. So they seize on almost anything, no matter how bogus it is, and throw it out there. Cynical people believe most of the accusations because they believe the other side is bad so it must be true. But I've followed these accusations over the years and learned that they almost always don't turn out to be true. People remember the ones that turned into real scandals with consequences but forget all the ones that ended up just being thrown dirt.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)How about how the banksters drained the economy?
Racism to you is just words? Sexism, too?
War is just a big misunderstanding?
No, dude, you are living in your own little world. But you have many neighbors and that is why things are so fucked up. And here comes your friend trump!
creeksneakers2
(7,983 posts)We'll start with that one since you brought it up. How about all those who said those who were against the war were that way because they hated America or were friends with Saddam? How about all those on our side that said we would steal all of Iraq's oil? You remember the bad things that happened but forget all the predictions that didn't come true.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Talk about how a few bad predictions didn't come true instead about all the real death and destruction predictions that did and still are lied about today.
You really don't get any of this, do you?
creeksneakers2
(7,983 posts)You've been seeing what you expect to see and ignoring all the rest.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Your worst cynicism is being projected outwards from your head onto the real world.
And you are ignoring all the bad stuff just so you feel better.
You can't even carry on on a discussion without that awful projection.
You are now on ignore. I've no time for such nonsense.
CobaltBlue
(1,122 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)the shift and courtship of the wealthy right.
griffi94
(3,830 posts)Hillary is going to need a sizable warchest
to beat Trump in November.
I'm glad we have a nominee who has crossover appeal
to moderate Republicans who won't vote for Trump.
Hillary is already expanding the Big Tent.
Every dollar they give Hillary is a dollar that a Republican doesn't get.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)something we never complained about, ever! A new ceiling has been crashed.
griffi94
(3,830 posts)But that isn't going to happen before November.
So until the rules are changed then I'm glad we have a nominee
who can use the rules to our advantage and who has
the ability to attract money and votes from people from
both parties and all demographics.
The conservative USSC gave us CU.
Hillary will appoint justices that will overturn it.
Until it's overturned you have to use every tool allowed.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)you are voting for it. how about regime change? you are voting for that. Are you comfortable with aligning with GOP mega donors, I'm not. But then again, I'm sitting the presidential election out if she is the nominee, better get working you have a hard sell until November.
griffi94
(3,830 posts)She's already pulling moderate Republicans.
For the majority of people who don't
see every issue in terms of stark black & white
Hillary is light years better than Trump.
The people you say she'll lose...well she never had those anyway.
Purists and 1 issue voters
I'm for getting more Democrats elected.
That means foregoing purity tests.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Zell Millers , Max Baucuses and John Breaux's lol
griffi94
(3,830 posts)and get the best outcome available.
Or walk away and leave it for the Republicans.
How you vote is up to you.
It doesn't matter to me because Hillary is going
to win regardless of what the BoB people do.
But the first rule of politics is that to change things you
have to win.
Bernie didn't win.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Yeah, just as soon as she is done using CU to win the presidency and simultaneously enrich herself.
DonCoquixote
(13,951 posts)You see, unlike liberals, these jeb types demand obedience for their money, and these are the same people who wanted Jeb Bush to DESTROY US. Do you really think they will not use their influence to get more of what they want (and less of what we want.)?
MONEY TALKS!, especially in America where all other voices are silenced or muted.
Beartracks
(14,525 posts)They're not having a progressive epiphany because Trump suddenly made them see the errors of their Republican ways. At best, I bet, they are voting for the status quo so they can live to fight a future Democrat in 4 years. This isn't a big tent expansion or crossover appeal; this is just some Republicans ducking under the tent flaps during a shitstorm. If Hillary was truly as progressive as some of her supporters have claimed, I think a lot of these moderate Repubs would simply plan on staying home in despair in Election Day.
On the other hand, though, at least they have enough sense to vote for the better choice, even if it's not what they REALLY wanted...
=================
Beartracks
(14,525 posts)... and we could drift even further rightward.
==============
Sparkly
(24,876 posts)Courting GOP mega donors is a smart move politically when you already have issues of people trusting her?
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... haven't stopped her from winning the nomination.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)and she is showing it.
Skink
(10,122 posts)Last edited Sun May 8, 2016, 11:06 PM - Edit history (1)
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)They are not in denial, they are not "naive" they are simply not at all like the Democrats of the pre "intellectual leveraged buyout of the Party" by the Koch funded DLC, beginning before, but put actively into legislative practice by William J. Clinton and his DLC allies with the assist of Newt Gingrich beginning in 1992 (Welfare destruction, deregulation and tough on mostly minority crime bills) were passed with a purpose one that continues unto our present day.
They are, like the candidates they support, neo-liberals. Some are also even neocons as well, much like Hillary Clinton.
Many of us call these sort of voters limousine liberals, or latte' liberals but they are something else (more accurate and less derogatory).
I have understood this a long time, most are comfortable financially (not necessarily rich yet many are) but able to always pay their bills, save for retirement, usually live in the 'burbs and own at least two cars (plus a starter car for their teenage child old enough to drive).
They like to consider themselves politically correct, believe in equality just enough to support it verbally and feel "evolved" (while thinking they deserve a badge for doing so) but would never put themselves in harms way for the rights and equality that sound as good to them coming out of their mouths as their own flatulence smells to them coming out of their own asses (they detect a whiff of roses when they breath it in). Yet words formed of methane are insincere and they are not attractive sounds to hear even if they make children laugh at times.
They ARE moderate Republicans (like the ones that no longer exist outside the Democratic party), I remember back when most Republicans were sane and many (certainly not the Goldwater or John Birch types though) believed in civil rights, choice and other equality issues, they were different in that they believed in Republican fiscal values, the old bootstrap philosophy made popular by Ayn Rand (even if the Democratic version would never admit it).
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)egalitegirl
(362 posts)Must be hard to grasp. Selling herself to the mega donors who represent corporate interests of the Bush family is not the same as raising money from a large donor base.
Bush family is corrupt and anyone who gets money from the same sources as the Bush family is equally corrupt.
Vinca
(53,738 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)was influenced.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)On one hand, most of the ridiculous comments here aren't worth the effort of correcting. On the other hand, you get sick and tired sometimes of watching the drivel float by.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)intheflow
(30,133 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Last edited Mon May 9, 2016, 02:51 AM - Edit history (1)
They have actually created a situation where she can do whatever the hell she wants, and get away with it. Hillary has a BLANK CHECK to break laws, even be under FBI investigation for a 4-yr-long national security catastrophe and graft operation run in the State Dept., start wars, anything she wants with no charges brought and nothing to stop her. Even Bernie bought into it thus far. Because Republicans!!!
This is what is truly scary to me. That, right there. No consequences Hillary.
The law means nothing anymore. And this, brought about by two lawyers.
Not only is she not stopped, much less punished for anything she does, she's on track to be REWARDED with the Presidency for it!
Of course, she'll pick up all the big checks now, you can count on it. There is no down side for her, and she knows that, so why wouldn't she?
I used to defend her when she was attacked by Republicans, and I'm damn sorry I did.
(There's a song called "Devil In Disguise" by Yngwie Malmsteen, and another called "Judas". I won't bore others with posting them -- any interested look on YouTube -- but I'm going to go listen to both of them now as a catharsis because they remind me of what the Clintons have brought us to. Us, Dems and Americans. No I'm not exaggerating, we let this go on from here at our great peril. "I'd rather reign in hell some said, than serve in heaven." See ya all later.)
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)A single source for some candidates. Second letter if investigation.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)lostnfound
(17,473 posts)The left has a little money too, but not enough to throw around on a candidate who ultimately won't serve their economic interests
The left had money to give to Bernie, because it saw that it was our best chance to disrupt the corporate control over decisions of war, climate change and neoliberal trade policies
intheflow
(30,133 posts)The party that's blocking the SCOTUS nomination. The party that wants to roll back a woman's reproductive rights. The party that gutted the EPA. Debbie Wasseman Schultz is worried about Independents voting primaries? I'm worried about the Republicans who jump ship and decide to start registering as Democrats, voting in down-ticket conservatives under our Party name.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)The Clinton's and the Bush's serving together? My God, the majesty of it all!!
Orsino
(37,428 posts)nemo137
(3,297 posts)A lot of "I don't like Trump, but..." and "I might vote for her, but not donate..." and the like. My guess is that it's in service of a "Hillary is a uniter!" general election message. I get it, but it still sucks.
TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Since more than half of all posts and threads on this message board attack Hillary Clinton, usually for non stories or made up bullshit (which given how many real things there are to not like about her and there are, diminishes them) I think it would make sense to seperate off all the hate.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)How dareth you attack her and speak of which she is doing. Wow.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Another recommendation for: Thought Police.
She's not the second coming..... She has a huge amount of baggage - it needs to be addressed.
What are you afraid of?
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)to do it in a special forum.
The TOS probably dont allow it AT ALL, based on my reading, but since it is now allowed and since it is almost all that is done here, I just had a suggestion.
I know who I will blame if Drumpf becomes president, by the way.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)perfect

Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)and tell me I'm obligated to vote for one Republican neocon over another Republican fascist.
The DLC Blue Dog Third Way crowd has been making that argument for decades

Armstead
(47,803 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)...who am I to complain?