Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:16 PM May 2016

Yay! The democratic frontrunner is now seeking donations from Jeb Bush Mega donors

but of course since she isn't influenced by money, this will be perfectly fine with her supporters. Their necks must be stiff beyond compare with all the overlooking they do. This will play in Peoria. Good lord can she stoop any lower? Has she asked Dubya to be a bundler yet?

66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yay! The democratic frontrunner is now seeking donations from Jeb Bush Mega donors (Original Post) timmymoff May 2016 OP
oh dear bernie better quit raising money. it seems to be an evil thing to do nt msongs May 2016 #1
I know it is hard to grasp the difference between jeb bush mega donors timmymoff May 2016 #3
Not much makes sense in Hillaryland Kall May 2016 #24
In a way, I wonder why this should even be news? The sun will come up in the morning brewens May 2016 #2
There is a name for people who sell themselves for money RobertEarl May 2016 #5
She doesn't have to promise the donors anything creeksneakers2 May 2016 #10
Right, sure RobertEarl May 2016 #15
Why do cynical people creeksneakers2 May 2016 #19
It's called history RobertEarl May 2016 #22
I'm 59 creeksneakers2 May 2016 #26
Like the Iraq invasion? RobertEarl May 2016 #27
The Iraq invasion creeksneakers2 May 2016 #28
See, that's your cynicism shining true RobertEarl May 2016 #31
You haven't been watching creeksneakers2 May 2016 #32
Now you are projecting RobertEarl May 2016 #33
creeksneakers2—You must be believing in fairy tales! CobaltBlue May 2016 #44
That's rich, coming from a BSer. n/t Lil Missy May 2016 #47
Well we saw it coming long ago timmymoff May 2016 #6
I think this is great griffi94 May 2016 #4
Yay! Big money in politics timmymoff May 2016 #7
Hey I'm all for getting big money out of politics griffi94 May 2016 #11
are you all for fracking? timmymoff May 2016 #13
It won't be a hard sell griffi94 May 2016 #18
Yes, the democratic party needs more timmymoff May 2016 #21
You work with what you have griffi94 May 2016 #23
"Hillary will appoint justices that will overturn it." arcane1 May 2016 #53
crossover appeal DonCoquixote May 2016 #51
Those rich Repubs aren't interested in voting PROGRESSIVE. Beartracks May 2016 #62
Another thought: This is gonna dilute the party... Beartracks May 2016 #63
Smart move! nt Sparkly May 2016 #8
Is it? timmymoff May 2016 #9
Apparently those "issues" ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #14
Nope, she is the best money can buy timmymoff May 2016 #16
And people complain about Bernie running on the Democratic ticket Skink May 2016 #12
Those that vote for hawkish Neo-Liberals such as Clinton are not in denial, they are worse- Dragonfli May 2016 #25
good! Will need a large donor base for the general. Lil Missy May 2016 #17
A few mega donors do not make a large donor base egalitegirl May 2016 #20
Woo! Hoo! We're all Republican-lite now! Vinca May 2016 #39
The candidate who has been influenced by the NRA is Sanders, he did not have a time where Hillary Thinkingabout May 2016 #29
Sure that's why Obama called her "Annie Oakley" in the 2008 campaign. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #37
Still waiting for the connection of influence occurred. Thinkingabout May 2016 #42
Also, More Gates! More Petraeus! What's not to like? dreamnightwind May 2016 #30
"Hillary 2016, Better than Trump ask Dick Cheney" bahrbearian May 2016 #34
The low bar has been set! n/t intheflow May 2016 #40
please clap MisterP May 2016 #35
HRC's camp doesn't care if she broke laws, so anything she does is a-ok. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #36
Like breaking campaign finance laws, yes it seems ok to take more than the $2700 from Thinkingabout May 2016 #43
how could you be so sexist!!?! FlatBaroque May 2016 #46
She has a choice to reach out to left or to the right; right has $ lostnfound May 2016 #38
Reaching out to the party that gave us Trump. intheflow May 2016 #41
The master stroke for Hillary would be a Jeb Bush VP slot. FlatBaroque May 2016 #45
I wonder what assurances she is offering in exchange. n/t Orsino May 2016 #48
Read the politico article, didn't sound like it was going terribly well for her... nemo137 May 2016 #49
That didn't take long. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #50
Attention board owners! We need a special forum entitled "Say shitty stuff about Hillary here" Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #52
Once again, her actions are an attack. timmymoff May 2016 #54
Well if the shit fits Ferd Berfel May 2016 #55
All I said was on this DEMOCRATIC message board, if you want to attack the Democrat Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #56
so 'free speech' zones - Like BUsh/Cheney/Rove ? Ferd Berfel May 2016 #57
Free speech? Since when does someone who will let Drumpf be president give one shit about that? Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #58
Don't try to back me in to a corner, put a gun to my head Ferd Berfel May 2016 #59
"Say Shitty things about Bernie" is okay though, eh? Armstead May 2016 #60
No, but since most of it goes the other way I figured it deserved a forum Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #61
If they want to give their money to a pro-choice, pro-gay rights, pro-Immigration, pro-tax Dem... brooklynite May 2016 #64
I find it delicious that Rep money will be used to roust the Rep candidate n/t Sheepshank May 2016 #65
K&R! KoKo May 2016 #66
 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
3. I know it is hard to grasp the difference between jeb bush mega donors
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:23 PM
May 2016

and $27 contributions in Hillaryland.

 

brewens

(15,359 posts)
2. In a way, I wonder why this should even be news? The sun will come up in the morning
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:19 PM
May 2016

as well.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
5. There is a name for people who sell themselves for money
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:24 PM
May 2016

I can't quite remember that name right now.....

creeksneakers2

(7,983 posts)
10. She doesn't have to promise the donors anything
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:28 PM
May 2016

Most intelligent people recognize that at Trump presidency would be a disaster for the country, both rich and poor.

creeksneakers2

(7,983 posts)
19. Why do cynical people
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:41 PM
May 2016

so firmly believe they are smarter than everybody else? I think some of the cynicism is there to create the self appraisal.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
22. It's called history
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:47 PM
May 2016

Bernie is the first to change the future. So you are in reality the cynical one if you don't support for Bernie.

Besides I figure you are quite young. amirite?

creeksneakers2

(7,983 posts)
26. I'm 59
Sun May 8, 2016, 11:23 PM
May 2016

I've followed politics my whole life. Where I become different from most other people is that I'm very skeptical of political accusations, including those against the other side. People and players get very wrapped up emotionally and dream of coming up with some dirt that will make the opposition collapse. So they seize on almost anything, no matter how bogus it is, and throw it out there. Cynical people believe most of the accusations because they believe the other side is bad so it must be true. But I've followed these accusations over the years and learned that they almost always don't turn out to be true. People remember the ones that turned into real scandals with consequences but forget all the ones that ended up just being thrown dirt.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
27. Like the Iraq invasion?
Sun May 8, 2016, 11:28 PM
May 2016

How about how the banksters drained the economy?

Racism to you is just words? Sexism, too?

War is just a big misunderstanding?

No, dude, you are living in your own little world. But you have many neighbors and that is why things are so fucked up. And here comes your friend trump!

creeksneakers2

(7,983 posts)
28. The Iraq invasion
Sun May 8, 2016, 11:37 PM
May 2016

We'll start with that one since you brought it up. How about all those who said those who were against the war were that way because they hated America or were friends with Saddam? How about all those on our side that said we would steal all of Iraq's oil? You remember the bad things that happened but forget all the predictions that didn't come true.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
31. See, that's your cynicism shining true
Sun May 8, 2016, 11:44 PM
May 2016

Talk about how a few bad predictions didn't come true instead about all the real death and destruction predictions that did and still are lied about today.

You really don't get any of this, do you?

creeksneakers2

(7,983 posts)
32. You haven't been watching
Sun May 8, 2016, 11:55 PM
May 2016

You've been seeing what you expect to see and ignoring all the rest.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
33. Now you are projecting
Mon May 9, 2016, 12:08 AM
May 2016

Your worst cynicism is being projected outwards from your head onto the real world.

And you are ignoring all the bad stuff just so you feel better.

You can't even carry on on a discussion without that awful projection.

You are now on ignore. I've no time for such nonsense.

griffi94

(3,830 posts)
4. I think this is great
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:23 PM
May 2016

Hillary is going to need a sizable warchest
to beat Trump in November.

I'm glad we have a nominee who has crossover appeal
to moderate Republicans who won't vote for Trump.

Hillary is already expanding the Big Tent.

Every dollar they give Hillary is a dollar that a Republican doesn't get.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
7. Yay! Big money in politics
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:25 PM
May 2016

something we never complained about, ever! A new ceiling has been crashed.

griffi94

(3,830 posts)
11. Hey I'm all for getting big money out of politics
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:30 PM
May 2016

But that isn't going to happen before November.

So until the rules are changed then I'm glad we have a nominee
who can use the rules to our advantage and who has
the ability to attract money and votes from people from
both parties and all demographics.

The conservative USSC gave us CU.
Hillary will appoint justices that will overturn it.

Until it's overturned you have to use every tool allowed.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
13. are you all for fracking?
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:34 PM
May 2016

you are voting for it. how about regime change? you are voting for that. Are you comfortable with aligning with GOP mega donors, I'm not. But then again, I'm sitting the presidential election out if she is the nominee, better get working you have a hard sell until November.

griffi94

(3,830 posts)
18. It won't be a hard sell
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:41 PM
May 2016

She's already pulling moderate Republicans.

For the majority of people who don't
see every issue in terms of stark black & white
Hillary is light years better than Trump.

The people you say she'll lose...well she never had those anyway.
Purists and 1 issue voters

I'm for getting more Democrats elected.
That means foregoing purity tests.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
21. Yes, the democratic party needs more
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:46 PM
May 2016

Zell Millers , Max Baucuses and John Breaux's lol

griffi94

(3,830 posts)
23. You work with what you have
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:53 PM
May 2016

and get the best outcome available.

Or walk away and leave it for the Republicans.

How you vote is up to you.
It doesn't matter to me because Hillary is going
to win regardless of what the BoB people do.

But the first rule of politics is that to change things you
have to win.

Bernie didn't win.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
53. "Hillary will appoint justices that will overturn it."
Mon May 9, 2016, 12:42 PM
May 2016




Yeah, just as soon as she is done using CU to win the presidency and simultaneously enrich herself.

DonCoquixote

(13,951 posts)
51. crossover appeal
Mon May 9, 2016, 12:39 PM
May 2016

You see, unlike liberals, these jeb types demand obedience for their money, and these are the same people who wanted Jeb Bush to DESTROY US. Do you really think they will not use their influence to get more of what they want (and less of what we want.)?

MONEY TALKS!, especially in America where all other voices are silenced or muted.

Beartracks

(14,525 posts)
62. Those rich Repubs aren't interested in voting PROGRESSIVE.
Mon May 9, 2016, 03:38 PM
May 2016

They're not having a progressive epiphany because Trump suddenly made them see the errors of their Republican ways. At best, I bet, they are voting for the status quo so they can live to fight a future Democrat in 4 years. This isn't a big tent expansion or crossover appeal; this is just some Republicans ducking under the tent flaps during a shitstorm. If Hillary was truly as progressive as some of her supporters have claimed, I think a lot of these moderate Repubs would simply plan on staying home in despair in Election Day.

On the other hand, though, at least they have enough sense to vote for the better choice, even if it's not what they REALLY wanted...

=================

Beartracks

(14,525 posts)
63. Another thought: This is gonna dilute the party...
Mon May 9, 2016, 03:45 PM
May 2016

... and we could drift even further rightward.



==============

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
9. Is it?
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:28 PM
May 2016

Courting GOP mega donors is a smart move politically when you already have issues of people trusting her?

Skink

(10,122 posts)
12. And people complain about Bernie running on the Democratic ticket
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:32 PM
May 2016

Last edited Sun May 8, 2016, 11:06 PM - Edit history (1)

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
25. Those that vote for hawkish Neo-Liberals such as Clinton are not in denial, they are worse-
Sun May 8, 2016, 11:23 PM
May 2016

They are not in denial, they are not "naive" they are simply not at all like the Democrats of the pre "intellectual leveraged buyout of the Party" by the Koch funded DLC, beginning before, but put actively into legislative practice by William J. Clinton and his DLC allies with the assist of Newt Gingrich beginning in 1992 (Welfare destruction, deregulation and tough on mostly minority crime bills) were passed with a purpose one that continues unto our present day.

They are, like the candidates they support, neo-liberals. Some are also even neocons as well, much like Hillary Clinton.

Many of us call these sort of voters limousine liberals, or latte' liberals but they are something else (more accurate and less derogatory).

I have understood this a long time, most are comfortable financially (not necessarily rich yet many are) but able to always pay their bills, save for retirement, usually live in the 'burbs and own at least two cars (plus a starter car for their teenage child old enough to drive).

They like to consider themselves politically correct, believe in equality just enough to support it verbally and feel "evolved" (while thinking they deserve a badge for doing so) but would never put themselves in harms way for the rights and equality that sound as good to them coming out of their mouths as their own flatulence smells to them coming out of their own asses (they detect a whiff of roses when they breath it in). Yet words formed of methane are insincere and they are not attractive sounds to hear even if they make children laugh at times.

They ARE moderate Republicans (like the ones that no longer exist outside the Democratic party), I remember back when most Republicans were sane and many (certainly not the Goldwater or John Birch types though) believed in civil rights, choice and other equality issues, they were different in that they believed in Republican fiscal values, the old bootstrap philosophy made popular by Ayn Rand (even if the Democratic version would never admit it).

 

egalitegirl

(362 posts)
20. A few mega donors do not make a large donor base
Sun May 8, 2016, 10:42 PM
May 2016

Must be hard to grasp. Selling herself to the mega donors who represent corporate interests of the Bush family is not the same as raising money from a large donor base.

Bush family is corrupt and anyone who gets money from the same sources as the Bush family is equally corrupt.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
29. The candidate who has been influenced by the NRA is Sanders, he did not have a time where Hillary
Sun May 8, 2016, 11:37 PM
May 2016

was influenced.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
37. Sure that's why Obama called her "Annie Oakley" in the 2008 campaign.
Mon May 9, 2016, 02:21 AM
May 2016

On one hand, most of the ridiculous comments here aren't worth the effort of correcting. On the other hand, you get sick and tired sometimes of watching the drivel float by.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
36. HRC's camp doesn't care if she broke laws, so anything she does is a-ok.
Mon May 9, 2016, 02:06 AM
May 2016

Last edited Mon May 9, 2016, 02:51 AM - Edit history (1)

They have actually created a situation where she can do whatever the hell she wants, and get away with it. Hillary has a BLANK CHECK to break laws, even be under FBI investigation for a 4-yr-long national security catastrophe and graft operation run in the State Dept., start wars, anything she wants with no charges brought and nothing to stop her. Even Bernie bought into it thus far. Because Republicans!!!

This is what is truly scary to me. That, right there. No consequences Hillary.

The law means nothing anymore. And this, brought about by two lawyers.



Not only is she not stopped, much less punished for anything she does, she's on track to be REWARDED with the Presidency for it!

Of course, she'll pick up all the big checks now, you can count on it. There is no down side for her, and she knows that, so why wouldn't she?


I used to defend her when she was attacked by Republicans, and I'm damn sorry I did.

(There's a song called "Devil In Disguise" by Yngwie Malmsteen, and another called "Judas". I won't bore others with posting them -- any interested look on YouTube -- but I'm going to go listen to both of them now as a catharsis because they remind me of what the Clintons have brought us to. Us, Dems and Americans. No I'm not exaggerating, we let this go on from here at our great peril. "I'd rather reign in hell some said, than serve in heaven." See ya all later.)

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
43. Like breaking campaign finance laws, yes it seems ok to take more than the $2700 from
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:24 AM
May 2016

A single source for some candidates. Second letter if investigation.

lostnfound

(17,473 posts)
38. She has a choice to reach out to left or to the right; right has $
Mon May 9, 2016, 07:25 AM
May 2016

The left has a little money too, but not enough to throw around on a candidate who ultimately won't serve their economic interests

The left had money to give to Bernie, because it saw that it was our best chance to disrupt the corporate control over decisions of war, climate change and neoliberal trade policies

intheflow

(30,133 posts)
41. Reaching out to the party that gave us Trump.
Mon May 9, 2016, 07:53 AM
May 2016

The party that's blocking the SCOTUS nomination. The party that wants to roll back a woman's reproductive rights. The party that gutted the EPA. Debbie Wasseman Schultz is worried about Independents voting primaries? I'm worried about the Republicans who jump ship and decide to start registering as Democrats, voting in down-ticket conservatives under our Party name.

FlatBaroque

(3,160 posts)
45. The master stroke for Hillary would be a Jeb Bush VP slot.
Mon May 9, 2016, 10:01 AM
May 2016

The Clinton's and the Bush's serving together? My God, the majesty of it all!!

nemo137

(3,297 posts)
49. Read the politico article, didn't sound like it was going terribly well for her...
Mon May 9, 2016, 11:58 AM
May 2016

A lot of "I don't like Trump, but..." and "I might vote for her, but not donate..." and the like. My guess is that it's in service of a "Hillary is a uniter!" general election message. I get it, but it still sucks.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
52. Attention board owners! We need a special forum entitled "Say shitty stuff about Hillary here"
Mon May 9, 2016, 12:39 PM
May 2016

Since more than half of all posts and threads on this message board attack Hillary Clinton, usually for non stories or made up bullshit (which given how many real things there are to not like about her and there are, diminishes them) I think it would make sense to seperate off all the hate.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
54. Once again, her actions are an attack.
Mon May 9, 2016, 12:43 PM
May 2016

How dareth you attack her and speak of which she is doing. Wow.

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
55. Well if the shit fits
Mon May 9, 2016, 12:43 PM
May 2016


Another recommendation for: Thought Police.

She's not the second coming..... She has a huge amount of baggage - it needs to be addressed.
What are you afraid of?

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
56. All I said was on this DEMOCRATIC message board, if you want to attack the Democrat
Mon May 9, 2016, 12:45 PM
May 2016

to do it in a special forum.

The TOS probably dont allow it AT ALL, based on my reading, but since it is now allowed and since it is almost all that is done here, I just had a suggestion.

I know who I will blame if Drumpf becomes president, by the way.

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
59. Don't try to back me in to a corner, put a gun to my head
Mon May 9, 2016, 01:54 PM
May 2016

and tell me I'm obligated to vote for one Republican neocon over another Republican fascist.

The DLC Blue Dog Third Way crowd has been making that argument for decades

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
64. If they want to give their money to a pro-choice, pro-gay rights, pro-Immigration, pro-tax Dem...
Mon May 9, 2016, 03:47 PM
May 2016

...who am I to complain?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Yay! The democratic fron...