2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPOLITICO: Pagliano's Missing Emails Were Not Because He Didn't Use His .GOV Account
However, a State spokeswoman said Monday the agency has located some emails belonging to the computer specialist, Bryan Pagliano, although the messages were found in other people's accounts.
We also know today that State has no emails from Pagliano, which means he deleted them all on his side. We also know that there were none found in the released emails (that were not deleted) from her server.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511929154
It's looking more and more like Hillary deleted Pagliano's emails...
We also know that Russian hackers knew of the server as (and made attacks on it) as early as 2011, predating Guccifer's attack and refuting the unnamed sources that her server contained no signs of hacking.
It's looking more like Hillary's guilty of obstruction which is a charge that was also raised today ( http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511928297 )
Bob41213
(491 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)in other peoples accounts.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)We must remember that the FBI investigation was supposedly was going on much earlier that first thought and came through seizing all kinds of stuff.
Still doubtful but definitely something to think about.
Thanks!
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)oasis
(49,326 posts)reporter. We will be getting up to the minute details of every aspect of the "investigation" right up to the day Bernie finally gives his concession speech.
Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)Bernie is way ahead of Clinton beating Trump in all polls.
oasis
(49,326 posts)Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)Clinton even loses one recent poll to Trump (Rasmussen)! Bernie demolishes Trump!
oasis
(49,326 posts)Arneoker
(375 posts)Short story, Bernie hasn't been vetted nearly as much as Hillary in the media (people will really be interested in other things than the size of his rallies) but will be, and there will be plenty to attack him on. Ads would practically write themselves. "Bernie Sanders will raise your taxes and..."
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Fascism on the march here!
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)LOL.
The State Department maintains that it cannot find any text messages sent to or from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and cannot locate any emails received or sent by a key information technology staffer during her tenure, lawyers for the Republican Party said in a court filing Monday.
However, a State spokeswoman said Monday the agency has located some emails belonging to the computer specialist, Bryan Pagliano, although the messages were found in other people's accounts.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/05/hillary-clinton-texts-bryan-pagliano-emails-222973#ixzz48C8zKtSY
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
global1
(25,224 posts)What was reported was coming right from the State Dept.
Response to berni_mccoy (Original post)
Post removed
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)I'm a life-long Democrat with blue collar roots.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)is all over this message board.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)point
frylock
(34,825 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)I heard that group used to to cattle futures contracts in Arkansas back in the late '70's.
2cannan
(344 posts)There is an almost empty cookie jar on a counter near a very young Chelsea and Hillary. Chelsea's hands have chocolate all over them and she also has some around her mouth. Hillary asks Chelsea who took the cookies from the cookie jar and Chelsea says, "Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy, Mommy!"
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)Kittycat
(10,493 posts)haikugal
(6,476 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts):shakesfist:
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)No need for help from anyone else.
frylock
(34,825 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)This is an issue that could upend our entire Democratic Party!
You gives a flying fuck about the Republicans?!?
Our Democratic nominee and the use of her unsecure, private server has been under FBI investigation for a year. Clinton doesn't have to be indicted for her to be out of the race. If the FBI finds evidence of criminal activity--she's done.
What then? Is it still a "right-wing" or a "Reoublican" problem then?
Are good Democrats supposed to sit around--not discussing this? Not asking questions when our frontrunner could be indicted as soon as June?
What exactly ARE you talking about?
This is a serious problem within the Democratic Party that could cause unprecedented chaos for our party and our election. We have the right to discuss this and to wonder what in the hell is going to happen.
Stop with the nonsense!
Matariki
(18,775 posts)If we don't talk about it the Republicans will never know...
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)our frontrunner and the FBI investigation that surrounds her--while we're in the throes of a Presidential election--are also the same people who started 150 threads about Bernie's trip to the Vatican?
Do I have that right?
Our party may be in peril and our frontrunner may be indicted before our Democratic Convention =
Bernie's Vatican trip =
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)And whether there were any backup processes that could have retained a copy. There was some talk about a cloud backup, but I don't know for sure.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)needed someone to do that for her.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)The problem with email tends to come with it being sent AND received. If you dig deeply enough on both sides, you of course have double the chance that one or the other will have gone through a backup process somewhere along the line even if the original source has been cleared.
Land of Enchantment
(1,217 posts)when first we practice to deceive...
Blue Meany
(1,947 posts)He could have communicated by phone or face-to-face communication or even using paper documents, which are not as easy to search. It does suggest some concern for discretion about this, though not necessarily criminal intent. Lot's of people in the business world avoid putting things in writing and only keep emails for a short time because this is the first things lawyers look for in discovery for litigation.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Kendall should tell her to shut up and plead the 5th, before she adds perjury to the other charges.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)immense hubris. The more guilty they are, the less common sense they exhibit. This is true of all who flaunt the law...in one way or the other.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)can you sort of get the story straight before posting all this stupid shit?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1929154
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)or the investigators. But we can read, deduce and make our own decisions. And this has as many tentacles as an octopus that even the Clinton Suffle can't hold out forever.
LonePirate
(13,408 posts)I don't think Hillary the Luddite would even know to purge them from the server, let alone know how to purge them.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Don't worry though the FBI has recovered them.
LonePirate
(13,408 posts)There is no way she did it herself. The question is if she was aware they were deleted by either asking someone to delete them or being told after the fact without her knowledge.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)let Hillary sort out her legal matters.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)ensure Bernie wins the remaining primaries!
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)That's no different from State not having Clinton emails because Clinton didn't use email through a State Dept computer.
I don't see why the guy who set up and maintained Clinton's private server and its email service and archive wouldn't also have almost all his stuff stuck on that private server.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)The state department can't find the PST file containing the emails from Clintons tenure as SoS. But the found emails from him to other users. That can really only mean one thing.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I'm not sure what one thing you think this -really- means. I don't know what it means beyond the obvious... State doesn't have emails to Clinton from Pagliano on the "PST" file they thought they should have. Means little to me as I don't know what the content of a PST file should be.
The concept of a missing record I think I understand. And I don't understand why the absence couldn't mean Pagliano never communicated with Clinton via email using a system that would generate a record in a State Dept PST file.
AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)If there's evidence the address was used, and the PST is not in the archives, it was removed by someone.
Zynx
(21,328 posts)Babel_17
(5,400 posts)
The State Department says in a new court filing that it can find no emails to or from a former Hillary Clinton aide who worked for the agency and also managed Clinton's private computer server during her stint as secretary of state
May 9, 2016, at 3:35 p.m.
By STEPHEN BRAUN, Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) The State Department can find no emails to or from a former Hillary Clinton aide who worked for the agency and also managed Clinton's private computer server while she served as secretary of state, the government said in a new court filing on Monday.
The government said as much in U.S. District Court in Washington in answer to a lawsuit by the Republican National Committee. The committee had sued over its public records request for all work-related emails sent to or received by Clinton's former aide, Bryan Pagliano, between 2009 and 2013, the years of Clinton's tenure. The lawsuit also pressed for other State Department records from the Clinton era.
The RNC's filing said lawyers for the agency had informed them in discussions that, "the State Department has represented that no responsive records exist" for any Pagliano emails. Pagliano was hired at the agency after reportedly setting up Clinton's server in 2009, but the lack of any official State Department emails raises the question whether he limited his email traffic using a private account, much like Clinton did during her four years as secretary, or whether his government emails were deleted.
amborin
(16,631 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Emails From Hillary Clintons IT Director at State Department Appear to Be Missing
By JUSTIN FISHEL
May 9, 2016, 4:05 PM ET
The State Department said today it cant find any of Bryan Paglianos emails from the time he served as Secretary of State Hillary Clintons senior information technology staffer during her tenure there.
Pagliano would have been required to turn over any official communications from his work account before he left the government. State Department officials say he had an official email account, but that they can't find any of those records and continue to search for them.
The Department has searched for Mr. Paglianos email pst file and has not located one that covers the time period of Secretary Clintons tenure, State Department spokesman Elizabeth Trudeau said today, referencing a file format that holds email.
To be clear, the Department does have records related to Mr. Pagliano and we are working with Congress and [Freedom of Information Act] requesters to provide relevant material. The Department has located a pst from Mr. Paglianos recent work at the Department as a contractor, but the files are from after Secretary Clinton left the Department," Trudeau added.
Edit: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/09/vanished-emails-from-hillary-s-top-geek-are-m-i-a.html
Gone, Girl 05.09.16 4:33 PM ET
Mystery: Emails From Hillarys Top Geek Are M.I.A.
Youd think the man who set up Clintons private server might have sent Hillary an email while they were in government together. But thats not what the court documents show.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)GreenPartyVoter
(72,377 posts)ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)Do you save all of them?
The OP is carrying water for the RNC, IMO.