2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders favorability now underwater
a full 30% of Democrats are uncomfortable with him as the potential nominee
https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalDiscussion/comments/4imtmq/bernie_sanders_favorability_is_now_underwater/
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,340 posts)As he has not been vetted, attacked, or had any kind of political colonoscopy whatsoever, this poll is only the first pebble to tumble down the hill in the great Sanders slide of 2016.
bvf
(6,604 posts)The Clinton Machine has not been sleeping, nor would it have hesitated for a second to fling even more crap (if that were even possible) than it already has, were that the case.
What next? A link to Stormfront?
No, wait: a Clinton supporter here on DU already tried that, to no small personal embarrassment.
ETA:
But the crap is certainly being flung right here in this thread, ain't it though?
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)him.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)and once gotten to know him, reject him. At least with Clinton it is a two and half decade rw smear job, with Sanders jumping in the last handful of months.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Sanders adult life was totally nonproductive. He didn't have a paying job until forties, vote until he voted for himself. Just not a productive member of society. Wanting the "free" stuff for others to pay for, while he was not contributing. Sure he would want a socialist system. Lol. We all work, while he has health care taken care of and can play in teh academics, in all his privilege. Yet, ... When he does have a paying job? He pays significantly lower taxes than most all of us, as he tells us to pay for the free. Now, I gotta tell you. I can see one hell of a commercial there. As they show the young adult, parent, Sanders without electricity, hooking it up to the landlord and stealing. Right?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Unproductive, free stuff, scommie, red menace, awful academics, a public servant and we have to pay for that moocher.......Dirty rotten hippie scum
Get off my lawn you damn pinkos
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Steal electricity from others so they had to pay, and get to run as president.
It isn't about conservative but responsible. That is what happens when stepping into adult life. Regardless of party.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)It is about conservative...you're throwing conservative Rush style language at a guy who was named one of the Best Mayors in America, and has served decades in Congresscand wins huge majorities of votes.
I don't give a sweet damn who you prefer, but your criticism sounds like stuff my cranky old conservstive grandfather used to say
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)And the first two decades of adulthood he had a degree. He chose to live poor. Again, he had the privilege of living poor while educated, white and male in the 60's and 70's. Now I am suppose to cut him slack for that?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)What kind of a life do you lead anyway? Everyone just steps into well paying jobs? Or they decide "Gee I want to be poor and struggle for a while." But I'll only be poor in a privileged way."
Life and people are a little more complicated than that. Circumstances and peoples abilities fon'y work like that.
Stop pounding dumb memes
woolldog
(8,791 posts)Not some uneducated unskilled guy who fell on hard times. No way he could not have been a productive member of society had he wanted to be. He was lazy.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)appreciate your totally asinine and Conservative dismissal of their problems.
woolldog
(8,791 posts)in the 60s and 70s? Damn near impossible not to get a job in that situation if you wanted to. He was a lazy bum.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,340 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)He was always anti establishment, he never wanted to work for someone. He always had narcissistic visions of grandeur, and that he was destined to be more than a working stiff. His low income, low accomplishment lifestyle was self imposed as a grand gesture that he is uncompromising, while looking at everyone else with disdain because in his mind they were conformists. It wasn't until he ran out of petty two bit jobs working for himself did he realize he could be self governing, in politics. He found his cash cow. He found the perpetually filled trough of public funds and laid squarely down in the middle of it with the help of the NRA.
Maru Kitteh
(28,340 posts)Talks about it ad nauseum.
Sheepshank, I am sure you've hit the nail on the head here.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Used the shampoo and toothpaste never replacing. We have all had that free loader in our life that wouldn't go out and get a job, just talked about the working drones as he lived off others. Can't get electricity, steal it.
For you to even suggest this degreed white man of all the 60's and 70's simply was on hard times and couldn't find a job is what would be ridiculous. To compare Sanders to the poor struggling truly is offensive. Ya, privilege.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)There are people who support Clinton and/or who I disagree with, but who at least make valid and debatable points.
But shallow nonsense like this is just not discussable.
I don't care whether you prefer Clinton or not. But to describe someone as "lazy" and shiftless whose adult life has included being a very effective multi-term mayor, and then ascending to a long career marked by continual reelection to Congress by huge margins is beyond the pale.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)as a mayor. He went from not working, to being a mayor. Thru 20's and 30's not being a productive member of society, to mayor in his 40's. Correct. Again, privilege.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)create a woe, poor besotten, pitiful "me" out of this. The best you can do is embrace and say, yea him he got to play, without responsibility for a couple decades in life. And move on.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)You- "i did not know i would be the type of woman that would want to be a stay at home, but after birth, my hubby and i could not see it any other way, and we could afford it. this is more, i think, an upper middle class issue, today. because without a certain pay, parents cannot do this."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025722826#post170
So you seem to allow yourself to be both 'those with so much less' and also to be the upper middle class person boasting about affluence and stating 'we can afford it' when no one asked you. Got to let us know....
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)What is your problem and what does that have to do with anything. For those two decades I stayed at home, prior two decades in the work force, and once again in the work force now I am done with my job as a parent, certainly I was working and being productive as a stay at home. Are you arguing otherwise?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)with the 60-70's?
that is the problem, people for ever giving Bernie a pass on the reality of his personal history, because they so want him to be the noble, self sacrificing, concerned person he is trying to portray today.
I've said this up thread, but will repeat it here:
He was always anti establishment, he never wanted to work for someone. He always had narcissistic visions of grandeur, and that he was destined to be more than a working stiff. His low income, low accomplishment lifestyle was self imposed as a grand gesture that he is uncompromising, while looking at everyone else with disdain because in his mind they were conformists. It wasn't until he ran out of petty two bit jobs working for himself did he realize he could be self governing, in politics. He found his cash cow. He found the perpetually filled trough of public funds and laid squarely down in the middle of it with the help of the NRA.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I don't give a damn who you support -- but this conservative bashing of a good man simply because he dared to challenge the Democratic Establishment from a slight more liberal place is shameful and not worth arguing about anymore.
You sound like Allen West
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)30 years of sell outs,and surrender by conservative Democrats who have moved the center so far to the right that moderate liberalism is branded as extreme by DEMOCRATS tends to be annoying
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Then again maybe I should question why I am here. Either way, we certainly don't all belong on the same political board.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)of hunting.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)sheshe2
(83,758 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)But he was listed as one of America's Best Mayors by US News and World Report (hardly a bastion of socialism) and others. I'm sure you'll read all ofthe links below with an open mind, .....but here you are...
http://wqad.com/2015/11/09/political-fact-check-sanders-2-million-ad-campaign/
"Real Change" is the title of Sanders' ad. It begins by highlighting the Democratic candidate's political history narrating, "He moved to Vermont and received election and praise as one of America's best mayors."
This claim is true. In 1981, Bernie Sanders was elected Mayor of Burlington, Vermont, the state's largest city. As mayor, both Republicans and Democrats praised his bi-partisan plans. Politicians on both sides of the aisle say he fought to keep corporate taxes low and middle-class wages high.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/26/us/politics/as-mayor-bernie-sanders-was-more-pragmatic-than-socialist.html
He learned how to use the levers of local government to improve peoples lives, said Peter Dreier, a professor of politics and public policy at Occidental College who studied Burlington during Mr. Sanderss mayoralty.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/10/31/socialist-even-conservative-could-love-burlington-mayor-sanders-was-able-out-republican-republicans/SCmh2TLifXxXRPFKC8NMjO/story.html
http://portside.org/2015-06-05/bernies-burlington-what-kind-mayor-was-bernie-sanders
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/metropolis/2016/01/bernie_sanders_made_burlington_s_land_trust_possible_it_s_still_an_innovative.html
griffi94
(3,733 posts)And who knows what he said or who he met with while he was there.
Lol. Those are the kinds of things he'd have to deal with
if he got the nomination.
Not an issue tho since he didn't.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Position with SAmerican leaders, embracing Cuba and food lines. It would be interesting to watch.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)He's never been under the fire because he's always
just sat on the sidelines.
The GOP smear machine would ruin him.
Then he'd lose his temper and start ranting in that
incoherent way he does.
Bernie was never ready for the national stage.
That's why Hillary crushed him.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)That is well known. How desperate can Hillary supporters get.
Hillary supporters know that Hillary is not doing well in West Virginia tomorrow or in Oregon or California. It's tough to watch your candidate losing out. Sorry, Hillary supporters. But you have to be good sports about it.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)My candidate is losing hahahaha.
Right she only has hundreds more delegates and millions more votes.
Bernie's finished.
Can't wait for the convention when he loses
on the first ballot.
Hillary's got this in the bag.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)you sound like a tea party,hee haw guy, putting down welfare queens in their Cadillac.
So funny how Bernie has brought out the conservative in many of you people.Disgusting.
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Feeling is mutual.
Response to Trust Buster (Reply #1)
Cheese Sandwich This message was self-deleted by its author.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)This PPP poll sure doesn't reflect what I am finding on the streets of California, one of the states yet to vote in the primary.
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)He is treated so well...only ones who told the truth about Bernie were the New York media.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)when we need unity to win.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Is this your GOTV effort?
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)sheshe2
(83,758 posts)She is a living breathing human being, she touches lives.
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)I kind of prefer Mr. Sanders résumé.
In the trenches with my brothers and sisters decades ago and all his life.
sheshe2
(83,758 posts)progressoid
(49,990 posts)?w=560&quality=75&strip=color&h=373
Sacramento - Today. Guess Bernie does too.
She is winning. Actually it is done.
Joob
(1,065 posts)sheshe2
(83,758 posts)Speak to me, tell me what you are referring to.
Links.
I gotta go. Late here, please leave me a link and some facts.
TIA
Joob
(1,065 posts)http://heavy.com/news/2016/05/bernie-sanders-sacramento-california-rally-pictures-bonney-field-ca-photos-pics-how-many/14/
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Yes she does, ask all those families in Honduras, Syria and Iraq.
bvf
(6,604 posts)or thousands of American casualties.
pacalo
(24,721 posts)I think I know where they're originating. I hope I'm wrong -- I really do.
bvf
(6,604 posts)The really interesting ones are those that have been around for years, with 98% of their posts made in the last few months.
pacalo
(24,721 posts)when it is done for the purpose of creating a false impression, it is cringe-worthy.
Manipulating public perception is all Clinton has -- she is not as popular as she is being portrayed & she is not likeable.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)She cannot win on the issues, all she can do is lie and smear. Desperation!
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)This must in part explain why unemployment is still "around 5%"
Go, Bernie!
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I think you've got the speed of it JUST right!
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)reading them any more. No point.
pacalo
(24,721 posts)Thanks, Colgate4.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)time will tell ...
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)So it's her own fault too?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)She has her mistakes but she has also had her fair share of unfair attacks against her and she is still standing.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Most people don't give a darn about them
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Shady stuff follows both of them around like a lost puppy. I think they thrive on it, however, because it continues.
The Foundation may be the clincher.
ebayfool
(3,411 posts)understand why.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)It's a mistake for the Democratic party to think that about Trump, too, incidentally. But Americans have proven over and over again they are perfectly willing to vote for somebody they have an unfavorable opinion of.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)riversedge
(70,215 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)uponit7771
(90,336 posts)... after PDs
Meldread
(4,213 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)I saw Rachel Maddow mention this PPP poll tonight.
Clinton and Trump have worse "favorability" than Sanders.
riversedge
(70,215 posts)LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)And it appears that Bernie Sanders unfavorable numbers are going up, and that's with only a few attacks from Donald Trump, who derogatorily called Bernie Sanders a maniac and communist.
Yet, Trump tried to float his usual garbage out that Bernie Sanders should run 3rd party, and he says he won't so I take him at his word.
Nate Silver gives PPP a B- rating the samples are: R+0.7, so it's not a laughable poll like the Rasmussen poll which showed Trump +2 over Hillary Clinton yet clearly Rasmussen over-sampled Republicans by +2.3.
But then again, it's a bit early for me to call even a poll from PPP conclusive, although I do feel that Hillary Clinton's favorable numbers are underwater, for sure Trump's and Bernie Sanders unfavorable numbers are indeed going up for whatever reason.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)And Hillary's is WORSE!
bvf
(6,604 posts)Congratulations on the expedition.
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/bernie-sanders-favorable-rating
Seeinghope
(786 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Or should that be "out-liar"?
Or even "out-and-out-liar".
riversedge
(70,215 posts)Response to riversedge (Reply #28)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)I was OK with Bernie until he started taking Tad Devine's advice and going negative. Bernie's fortunes started going backwards when he started the personal attacks
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)If Hillary gets the nomination, we're headed for the teens.
bvf
(6,604 posts)to stanch the hemorrhage with Republicans embarrassed by Trump.
After all, the Democratic party leadership today has become indistinguishable from that of the Republican party of Nixon. Hell, Reagan even.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Nixon-- expanded the war in SE Asia
Hillary-- wants to expand the wars in SW Asia
Nixon-- erased 18 1/2 minutes of a critical tape recording
Hillary-- deleted 30,000 e-mails from a private server used for government business
Nixon-- relied on Henry Kissinger as his Secretary of State
Hillary-- considers Kissinger to be her mentor at State
Nixon-- involved with regime change in Chile and elsewhere
Hillary-- involved with regime change in Libya and elsewhere
Nixon-- stonewalled on releasing his tapes
Hillary-- stonewalled on releasing her e-mail server
Nixon-- under investigation by Congressional committees
Hillary-- under investigation by the FBI
Nixon-- "I am not a crook."
Hillary-- "I am not a liar."
bvf
(6,604 posts)But in fairness, I think the actual Clinton quote was something more like a characteristically lawyerly, "Why do I have to keep proving to people that I am not a liar?"
She'll probably tighten that up a bit in the upcoming FBI interview, though.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Well, but, you know, youre asking me to say, Have I ever (lied)? I dont believe I ever have. I dont believe I ever have. I dont believe I ever will. Im gonna do the best I can to level with the American people.
Of course, the ability to lie convincingly is a *prerequisite* for a corporate defense lawyer, which Hillary was from 1977 until 1992.
bvf
(6,604 posts)Mine came from Snopes, which confirmed it as reported in Washington Post correspondent John F. Harris's book, The Survivor: Bill Clinton in the White House.
Yours is definitely better.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I also remember the one that compared Obama to Hitler
Oh, I'm sure that neither of those was word-tortured or contrived at all.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Calling her unqualified was a bad move.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)KPN
(15,645 posts)New Democrats/Third Wayers (aka moderate-right Republicans).
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)fight among the repugs is still going strong, imo.
oasis
(49,383 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Response to Maedhros (Reply #31)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Nobody in the Clinton camp is to be trusted, on any issue.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)The authoritarian zealot purist. I want NO part of that paranoid, everything is corrupt and RIGGED group.
desmiller
(747 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)It's somewhat above 50%, isn't it?
How on god's green earth is a mere 30% "underwater"?
Hillary must be deep into the earth's mantle, maybe all the way into the core.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)Is Mark Penn (the Man in the Middle) messing with the polls again?
Sam
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)infiltrator. Helping Donald is not what we want. And Donald has said that he is just using Bernie's talking points about Hillary.
Autumn
(45,082 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)See this previous PPP poll: http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/polls/ppp-d-24178
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)When one's runs on a platform of almost godlike perfection and nobility, even a little slip up seems Yuge!
Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)I confuse the two.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)even to BS supporters.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)BlueStater
(7,596 posts)I'd put their favorability ratings around that of testicular cancer.
Maru Kitteh
(28,340 posts)Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Clinton and the party keep showing him respect while he and Weaver are going around trashing any and everything.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... he's done this ALL BY HIMSELF!!
He's been getting a LOT of bad advice, in my opinion. He chose bad advisors, AND he's unable (apparently, and in my opinion) to discern the difference between good-advice and bad-advice.
Having advisors is a good thing as it allows a candidate (or a president) to hear and evaluate other options and possibilities. But ultimately, the final decision is up to the candidate (or president) after assessing and weighing the choices and calculating the benefits vs risks.
Bernie chose ... poorly.
jfern
(5,204 posts)They actually took money from Hillary's campaign. They've always had Bernie's favorables under water, while no other pollster has.
Vinca
(50,271 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)beedle
(1,235 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)good one, dude!