Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
146 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders favorability now underwater (Original Post) LoverOfLiberty May 2016 OP
And the guy hasn't even been the recipient of attack ads. That's why those polls are bunk. Trust Buster May 2016 #1
All except this one, you mean. bvf May 2016 #10
No, ESPECIALLY this one Maru Kitteh May 2016 #73
What trash. bvf May 2016 #85
From your post it would seem that Bernie started way ahead and Hillary came from no where to catch Dustlawyer May 2016 #103
Sheeeit, Sanders has not even been vetted. They have see the very least of the man.... seabeyond May 2016 #13
Trump and his supporting PACS would have had a field day with "their communist friend Bernie" LOL Trust Buster May 2016 #19
I mean. Merely in the history of his adult life. Socialist (communist), the first two decades of seabeyond May 2016 #40
Sounding more conservative every day Armstead May 2016 #43
Isn't it really nifty he was privilege enough to go 2 decades not being a productive adult... seabeyond May 2016 #46
Jesus christ the guy was lower middle class Armstead May 2016 #47
Yes Armstead. You jumped in a sub thread talking about Republican attack ads. seabeyond May 2016 #48
That's ridiculous..."choosing to live poor" Armstead May 2016 #95
He was a University of Chicago graduate. woolldog May 2016 #97
That's a totally stupid response. I'm sure many college educated people who are struggling would... Armstead May 2016 #100
What was the unemployment rate for college degrees white men woolldog May 2016 #104
That is a trollish post that i won't dignify with a response Armstead May 2016 #106
LOL. You just did. Maru Kitteh May 2016 #143
I think Lazy was only a small part of it. Sheepshank May 2016 #119
Getting a job meant contributing to "the system." He is rather immodest about his "modesty." Maru Kitteh May 2016 #145
He was the man that slept on the couch, ate the lunchmeat in one sandwich that needed to last a week seabeyond May 2016 #102
I'm done with you. Armstead May 2016 #105
Hence me talking about only his first TWO decades of adult life. By the third, he got a paying job seabeyond May 2016 #107
I'm sure many college educated people who are struggling would appreciate your insulting dismissal Armstead May 2016 #109
No way Armstead. Those of us with so much less have managed to pay our way. You just can't get seabeyond May 2016 #112
I'm not biting anymore. Not worth debunking if you really see the world in that way. Armstead May 2016 #114
You can't. It is what it is. seabeyond May 2016 #115
You regularly describe yourself as upper middle class and a stay at home Mom... Bluenorthwest May 2016 #134
Having a conversation about a family unit, choices made, repercussions with divorce is boasting? seabeyond May 2016 #135
are you really trying to compare post Bush (losing 600K jobs each month) era Sheepshank May 2016 #120
I'm done with you too Armstead May 2016 #122
and you sound like someone who's extreme idealism has completely clouded all sense of reality. n/t Sheepshank May 2016 #124
Uh huh....More like a moderate liberal who is pissed Armstead May 2016 #137
Exactly. You said it well. Not fooling anyone. Lol. Nt seabeyond May 2016 #125
+ a gazillion. You have to wonder why some are even here. Live and Learn May 2016 #108
Right. Because in the 60's/70's it was that hard for a white man to find a paying job, two decades seabeyond May 2016 #113
No idea what you are talking about. nt Live and Learn May 2016 #146
Do you have a link to him being the best Mayor ever? sheshe2 May 2016 #81
They don't give awards for "best mayor ever" Armstead May 2016 #96
Went to the USSR on his honeymoon griffi94 May 2016 #51
Not an issue but to be an observer of that race would be interesting. seabeyond May 2016 #52
Yes there is all that griffi94 May 2016 #53
He went to a sister city in Russia on his honeymoon. JDPriestly May 2016 #77
Hahaha griffi94 May 2016 #117
omg!!! the horror!!!!! did he receive food stamps too??!! WHAT are you? wendylaroux May 2016 #89
Got that right! tonyt53 May 2016 #126
I am a democrat. He doesn't like democrats so he doesn't like me fun n serious May 2016 #71
This message was self-deleted by its author Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #24
Wow! You Hillary supporters must really be scared of Bernie! JDPriestly May 2016 #76
Are you kidding Demsrule86 May 2016 #99
He is sowing discord... scscholar May 2016 #2
lol AgingAmerican May 2016 #4
The bullshit is going to start getting DEEEEEEEP! reddit. lol. CentralCoaster May 2016 #11
Reality sheshe2 May 2016 #38
I'm sure she's a very nice lady. CentralCoaster May 2016 #41
Stellar! sheshe2 May 2016 #44
So a picture = reality? progressoid May 2016 #42
Reality Joob May 2016 #75
Reality. sheshe2 May 2016 #78
lol k, guess those 21,000 people missed that Joob May 2016 #80
What 21k missed that, Joob? sheshe2 May 2016 #83
the people at his rally today Joob May 2016 #84
Hillary touches lives? pinebox May 2016 #101
Not to mention 4,000+ American war dead bvf May 2016 #141
All these new names with low post numbers... pacalo May 2016 #35
Yeah, but you're probably not. It's obvious. bvf May 2016 #58
I agree; this has been on my radar for years but pacalo May 2016 #62
It is sad and desperate. . . manipulating public perception is all she has. pdsimdars May 2016 #110
Nah, I'm pretty sure you're right... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #65
... pacalo May 2016 #69
Wow! MrMickeysMom May 2016 #131
LOL! n/t bvf May 2016 #142
No, you're not. I don't bother even COLGATE4 May 2016 #128
I'm glad others are noticing, too. pacalo May 2016 #140
And what are Hillary supporters sowing in this thread? JDPriestly May 2016 #79
I think I detect a hint of sarcasm, maybe ... ? Hiraeth May 2016 #138
His own fault. hrmjustin May 2016 #3
Hillary's is worse left-of-center2012 May 2016 #12
The emails were a mistake and she is paying for it. hrmjustin May 2016 #14
I don't think its the emails Armstead May 2016 #45
After 25 or so years, it's called Clinton Fatigue for many of us. libdem4life May 2016 #82
They have two poll questions and neither supports the other. Still looking for methodology to ... ebayfool May 2016 #5
You're making an unwarranted assumption that unfavorables matter Recursion May 2016 #93
When your unfavorables pass 55% as Clinton's has... surely there are better nominees. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #129
Hillary's smears at work Vattel May 2016 #6
oh yeah--blame it on Hillary as your group always does. ha ha. riversedge May 2016 #15
LOL your friends are already making excuses for her loss in November. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #21
I concede that some of her smears didn't work and that it is hard to assess their effectiveness. Vattel May 2016 #33
Nah, nothing to do with his GE poll bullshit and telling the dem electorate to fuck off by going... uponit7771 May 2016 #60
It's higher than Hillary's at 21%. That's interesting. -nt- Meldread May 2016 #7
Doesn't tell the whole story left-of-center2012 May 2016 #8
What is important to note is that Sanders favorability is going DOWN. riversedge May 2016 #18
A friend sent me a link to the polling... LenaBaby61 May 2016 #54
"Sanders favorability is going DOWN" left-of-center2012 May 2016 #133
One poll? bvf May 2016 #9
If you look hard enough you can find anything I suppose. Seeinghope May 2016 #17
Wow-- talk about an outlier poll Art_from_Ark May 2016 #25
It is what it is--a signal of a continued downward trend for Bernie riversedge May 2016 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #32
The more I got to know Bernie, the less I liked him redstateblues May 2016 #56
^^^^^^^^^^^ Amen! ^^^^^^^^^^^ pdsimdars May 2016 #111
Democrats. LOL Luminous Animal May 2016 #16
Totally agree! LoverOfLiberty May 2016 #20
28% of potential voters. Luminous Animal May 2016 #23
And falling Art_from_Ark May 2016 #26
The DNC is probably hoping bvf May 2016 #67
I'm finding the parallels between Nixon and Hillary to be... interesting Art_from_Ark May 2016 #68
Very interesting, yes. bvf May 2016 #86
Here's what she said Art_from_Ark May 2016 #87
Thanks, almost forgot about that one. bvf May 2016 #88
Belief is a wondrous thing. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #130
you know, there is a similar list to be had comparing Bernie to Christ. Seen it here on DU Sheepshank May 2016 #121
Those attacks on Clinton didn't help him KingFlorez May 2016 #22
That's when it started going backwards. Ruined his brand redstateblues May 2016 #57
Most likely because at least half of that 30% of all Democrats are KPN May 2016 #27
The 61% against Trump means that the sadoldgirl May 2016 #29
Getting to know you , getting to know all about you oasis May 2016 #30
+1 uponit7771 May 2016 #61
Then 30% of Democrats are far too right-wing for me. [n/t] Maedhros May 2016 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #34
Oh, I know. There is no lie small or big enough for the Hillary Campaign not to tell. Maedhros May 2016 #39
Join the purity party fun n serious May 2016 #72
Fear mongering huh? Oh well. Bring it. desmiller May 2016 #36
glug glug MisterP May 2016 #37
As compared to what percentage of voters view Hillary unfavorably? SheilaT May 2016 #49
I point blank do not believe this Samantha May 2016 #50
Oh, no not St. Bernie! It's about time. Demi are finally getting tired of being trashed by an Jitter65 May 2016 #55
30% huh? Sounds like Hillary supporters. Autumn May 2016 #59
Not to mention the OP is a lie.... JonLeibowitz May 2016 #64
Cranky, negative, story telling, thieving, lying....it's finally caught up Sheepshank May 2016 #63
I thought you were talking about Barbara Bush/Hillary Clinton Sky Masterson May 2016 #91
seems clear that in the end you figured out who I was talking about....it's becoming obvious Sheepshank May 2016 #118
I'm sure you're shaking hard... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #66
Still more popular than Hillary and the orange one. BlueStater May 2016 #70
K&R Maru Kitteh May 2016 #74
They hate Bernie. Proof from last night in California Sky Masterson May 2016 #90
And he has been treated with kid gloves. NCTraveler May 2016 #92
And this is WITHOUT his having to deal with nasty smears and attack ads ... NurseJackie May 2016 #116
PPP has been a Hillary hack pollster this whole election jfern May 2016 #94
Isn't that special? Now he's got something in common with Hillary. Vinca May 2016 #98
Even I would be uncomfortable with nominating the candidate with fewer votes/delegates. n/t Orsino May 2016 #123
if -30% is "underwater" what is -54%? Maybe she's prospecting for undersea oil? lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #127
-54% means she should run for the president of China. nt. beedle May 2016 #132
If his mumbers are underwater, then Clinton's have been drowning for months. arcane1 May 2016 #136
I like how your name is spelled: LOL Hiraeth May 2016 #139
Hillary supporters are horrible at projection AgingAmerican May 2016 #144

Maru Kitteh

(28,340 posts)
73. No, ESPECIALLY this one
Tue May 10, 2016, 02:31 AM
May 2016

As he has not been vetted, attacked, or had any kind of political colonoscopy whatsoever, this poll is only the first pebble to tumble down the hill in the great Sanders slide of 2016.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
85. What trash.
Tue May 10, 2016, 03:48 AM
May 2016

The Clinton Machine has not been sleeping, nor would it have hesitated for a second to fling even more crap (if that were even possible) than it already has, were that the case.

What next? A link to Stormfront?

No, wait: a Clinton supporter here on DU already tried that, to no small personal embarrassment.


ETA:

But the crap is certainly being flung right here in this thread, ain't it though?


Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
103. From your post it would seem that Bernie started way ahead and Hillary came from no where to catch
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:19 AM
May 2016

him.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
13. Sheeeit, Sanders has not even been vetted. They have see the very least of the man....
Mon May 9, 2016, 10:26 PM
May 2016

and once gotten to know him, reject him. At least with Clinton it is a two and half decade rw smear job, with Sanders jumping in the last handful of months.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
40. I mean. Merely in the history of his adult life. Socialist (communist), the first two decades of
Mon May 9, 2016, 11:10 PM
May 2016

Sanders adult life was totally nonproductive. He didn't have a paying job until forties, vote until he voted for himself. Just not a productive member of society. Wanting the "free" stuff for others to pay for, while he was not contributing. Sure he would want a socialist system. Lol. We all work, while he has health care taken care of and can play in teh academics, in all his privilege. Yet, ... When he does have a paying job? He pays significantly lower taxes than most all of us, as he tells us to pay for the free. Now, I gotta tell you. I can see one hell of a commercial there. As they show the young adult, parent, Sanders without electricity, hooking it up to the landlord and stealing. Right?

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
43. Sounding more conservative every day
Mon May 9, 2016, 11:29 PM
May 2016

Unproductive, free stuff, scommie, red menace, awful academics, a public servant and we have to pay for that moocher.......Dirty rotten hippie scum

Get off my lawn you damn pinkos

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
46. Isn't it really nifty he was privilege enough to go 2 decades not being a productive adult...
Mon May 9, 2016, 11:37 PM
May 2016

Steal electricity from others so they had to pay, and get to run as president.

It isn't about conservative but responsible. That is what happens when stepping into adult life. Regardless of party.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
47. Jesus christ the guy was lower middle class
Mon May 9, 2016, 11:43 PM
May 2016

It is about conservative...you're throwing conservative Rush style language at a guy who was named one of the Best Mayors in America, and has served decades in Congresscand wins huge majorities of votes.

I don't give a sweet damn who you prefer, but your criticism sounds like stuff my cranky old conservstive grandfather used to say

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
48. Yes Armstead. You jumped in a sub thread talking about Republican attack ads.
Mon May 9, 2016, 11:49 PM
May 2016

And the first two decades of adulthood he had a degree. He chose to live poor. Again, he had the privilege of living poor while educated, white and male in the 60's and 70's. Now I am suppose to cut him slack for that?

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
95. That's ridiculous..."choosing to live poor"
Tue May 10, 2016, 07:42 AM
May 2016

What kind of a life do you lead anyway? Everyone just steps into well paying jobs? Or they decide "Gee I want to be poor and struggle for a while." But I'll only be poor in a privileged way."

Life and people are a little more complicated than that. Circumstances and peoples abilities fon'y work like that.
Stop pounding dumb memes

 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
97. He was a University of Chicago graduate.
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:02 AM
May 2016

Not some uneducated unskilled guy who fell on hard times. No way he could not have been a productive member of society had he wanted to be. He was lazy.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
100. That's a totally stupid response. I'm sure many college educated people who are struggling would...
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:05 AM
May 2016

appreciate your totally asinine and Conservative dismissal of their problems.

 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
104. What was the unemployment rate for college degrees white men
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:20 AM
May 2016

in the 60s and 70s? Damn near impossible not to get a job in that situation if you wanted to. He was a lazy bum.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
119. I think Lazy was only a small part of it.
Tue May 10, 2016, 10:04 AM
May 2016

He was always anti establishment, he never wanted to work for someone. He always had narcissistic visions of grandeur, and that he was destined to be more than a working stiff. His low income, low accomplishment lifestyle was self imposed as a grand gesture that he is uncompromising, while looking at everyone else with disdain because in his mind they were conformists. It wasn't until he ran out of petty two bit jobs working for himself did he realize he could be self governing, in politics. He found his cash cow. He found the perpetually filled trough of public funds and laid squarely down in the middle of it with the help of the NRA.

Maru Kitteh

(28,340 posts)
145. Getting a job meant contributing to "the system." He is rather immodest about his "modesty."
Tue May 10, 2016, 06:16 PM
May 2016

Talks about it ad nauseum.

Sheepshank, I am sure you've hit the nail on the head here.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
102. He was the man that slept on the couch, ate the lunchmeat in one sandwich that needed to last a week
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:12 AM
May 2016

Used the shampoo and toothpaste never replacing. We have all had that free loader in our life that wouldn't go out and get a job, just talked about the working drones as he lived off others. Can't get electricity, steal it.

For you to even suggest this degreed white man of all the 60's and 70's simply was on hard times and couldn't find a job is what would be ridiculous. To compare Sanders to the poor struggling truly is offensive. Ya, privilege.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
105. I'm done with you.
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:21 AM
May 2016

There are people who support Clinton and/or who I disagree with, but who at least make valid and debatable points.

But shallow nonsense like this is just not discussable.

I don't care whether you prefer Clinton or not. But to describe someone as "lazy" and shiftless whose adult life has included being a very effective multi-term mayor, and then ascending to a long career marked by continual reelection to Congress by huge margins is beyond the pale.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
107. Hence me talking about only his first TWO decades of adult life. By the third, he got a paying job
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:25 AM
May 2016

as a mayor. He went from not working, to being a mayor. Thru 20's and 30's not being a productive member of society, to mayor in his 40's. Correct. Again, privilege.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
109. I'm sure many college educated people who are struggling would appreciate your insulting dismissal
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:31 AM
May 2016
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
112. No way Armstead. Those of us with so much less have managed to pay our way. You just can't get
Tue May 10, 2016, 09:35 AM
May 2016

create a woe, poor besotten, pitiful "me" out of this. The best you can do is embrace and say, yea him he got to play, without responsibility for a couple decades in life. And move on.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
134. You regularly describe yourself as upper middle class and a stay at home Mom...
Tue May 10, 2016, 11:24 AM
May 2016

You- "i did not know i would be the type of woman that would want to be a stay at home, but after birth, my hubby and i could not see it any other way, and we could afford it. this is more, i think, an upper middle class issue, today. because without a certain pay, parents cannot do this."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025722826#post170

So you seem to allow yourself to be both 'those with so much less' and also to be the upper middle class person boasting about affluence and stating 'we can afford it' when no one asked you. Got to let us know....

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
135. Having a conversation about a family unit, choices made, repercussions with divorce is boasting?
Tue May 10, 2016, 11:36 AM
May 2016

What is your problem and what does that have to do with anything. For those two decades I stayed at home, prior two decades in the work force, and once again in the work force now I am done with my job as a parent, certainly I was working and being productive as a stay at home. Are you arguing otherwise?

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
120. are you really trying to compare post Bush (losing 600K jobs each month) era
Tue May 10, 2016, 10:12 AM
May 2016

with the 60-70's?

that is the problem, people for ever giving Bernie a pass on the reality of his personal history, because they so want him to be the noble, self sacrificing, concerned person he is trying to portray today.

I've said this up thread, but will repeat it here:

He was always anti establishment, he never wanted to work for someone. He always had narcissistic visions of grandeur, and that he was destined to be more than a working stiff. His low income, low accomplishment lifestyle was self imposed as a grand gesture that he is uncompromising, while looking at everyone else with disdain because in his mind they were conformists. It wasn't until he ran out of petty two bit jobs working for himself did he realize he could be self governing, in politics. He found his cash cow. He found the perpetually filled trough of public funds and laid squarely down in the middle of it with the help of the NRA.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
122. I'm done with you too
Tue May 10, 2016, 10:29 AM
May 2016

I don't give a damn who you support -- but this conservative bashing of a good man simply because he dared to challenge the Democratic Establishment from a slight more liberal place is shameful and not worth arguing about anymore.

You sound like Allen West

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
124. and you sound like someone who's extreme idealism has completely clouded all sense of reality. n/t
Tue May 10, 2016, 10:32 AM
May 2016
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
137. Uh huh....More like a moderate liberal who is pissed
Tue May 10, 2016, 01:16 PM
May 2016

30 years of sell outs,and surrender by conservative Democrats who have moved the center so far to the right that moderate liberalism is branded as extreme by DEMOCRATS tends to be annoying

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
108. + a gazillion. You have to wonder why some are even here.
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:30 AM
May 2016

Then again maybe I should question why I am here. Either way, we certainly don't all belong on the same political board.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
113. Right. Because in the 60's/70's it was that hard for a white man to find a paying job, two decades
Tue May 10, 2016, 09:36 AM
May 2016

of hunting.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
96. They don't give awards for "best mayor ever"
Tue May 10, 2016, 07:58 AM
May 2016

But he was listed as one of America's Best Mayors by US News and World Report (hardly a bastion of socialism) and others. I'm sure you'll read all ofthe links below with an open mind, .....but here you are...


http://wqad.com/2015/11/09/political-fact-check-sanders-2-million-ad-campaign/

As Sanders prepares for the Iowa Caucuses, he's releasing a two million dollar ad campaign in Iowa and New Hampshire. The new ad began airing last week. It showcases Sanders as a successful mayor, representative, and senator determined to fight for lower and middle class Americans. News 8 put Sanders to the test; continue reading to learn how his ad stood up to our fact check.

"Real Change" is the title of Sanders' ad. It begins by highlighting the Democratic candidate's political history narrating, "He moved to Vermont and received election and praise as one of America's best mayors."

This claim is true. In 1981, Bernie Sanders was elected Mayor of Burlington, Vermont, the state's largest city. As mayor, both Republicans and Democrats praised his bi-partisan plans. Politicians on both sides of the aisle say he fought to keep corporate taxes low and middle-class wages high.


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/26/us/politics/as-mayor-bernie-sanders-was-more-pragmatic-than-socialist.html
Under his watch, Burlington, Vermont’s largest city, cropped up on lists of the best places to live. U.S. News and World Report named him one of the nation’s 20 top mayors in 1987, crediting him with preserving affordable housing, holding the line on property taxes and making a serious push for home rule in a state where cities had little autonomy.

“He learned how to use the levers of local government to improve people’s lives,” said Peter Dreier, a professor of politics and public policy at Occidental College who studied Burlington during Mr. Sanders’s mayoralty.


https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/10/31/socialist-even-conservative-could-love-burlington-mayor-sanders-was-able-out-republican-republicans/SCmh2TLifXxXRPFKC8NMjO/story.html

http://portside.org/2015-06-05/bernies-burlington-what-kind-mayor-was-bernie-sanders

http://www.slate.com/articles/business/metropolis/2016/01/bernie_sanders_made_burlington_s_land_trust_possible_it_s_still_an_innovative.html

griffi94

(3,733 posts)
51. Went to the USSR on his honeymoon
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:03 AM
May 2016

And who knows what he said or who he met with while he was there.

Lol. Those are the kinds of things he'd have to deal with
if he got the nomination.

Not an issue tho since he didn't.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
52. Not an issue but to be an observer of that race would be interesting.
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:06 AM
May 2016

Position with SAmerican leaders, embracing Cuba and food lines. It would be interesting to watch.

griffi94

(3,733 posts)
53. Yes there is all that
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:17 AM
May 2016

He's never been under the fire because he's always
just sat on the sidelines.

The GOP smear machine would ruin him.
Then he'd lose his temper and start ranting in that
incoherent way he does.

Bernie was never ready for the national stage.
That's why Hillary crushed him.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
77. He went to a sister city in Russia on his honeymoon.
Tue May 10, 2016, 03:02 AM
May 2016

That is well known. How desperate can Hillary supporters get.

Hillary supporters know that Hillary is not doing well in West Virginia tomorrow or in Oregon or California. It's tough to watch your candidate losing out. Sorry, Hillary supporters. But you have to be good sports about it.

griffi94

(3,733 posts)
117. Hahaha
Tue May 10, 2016, 09:53 AM
May 2016

My candidate is losing hahahaha.

Right she only has hundreds more delegates and millions more votes.

Bernie's finished.

Can't wait for the convention when he loses
on the first ballot.

Hillary's got this in the bag.

wendylaroux

(2,925 posts)
89. omg!!! the horror!!!!! did he receive food stamps too??!! WHAT are you?
Tue May 10, 2016, 04:52 AM
May 2016

you sound like a tea party,hee haw guy, putting down welfare queens in their Cadillac.

So funny how Bernie has brought out the conservative in many of you people.Disgusting.

Response to Trust Buster (Reply #1)

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
76. Wow! You Hillary supporters must really be scared of Bernie!
Tue May 10, 2016, 02:59 AM
May 2016

This PPP poll sure doesn't reflect what I am finding on the streets of California, one of the states yet to vote in the primary.

Demsrule86

(68,565 posts)
99. Are you kidding
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:05 AM
May 2016

He is treated so well...only ones who told the truth about Bernie were the New York media.

 

CentralCoaster

(1,163 posts)
41. I'm sure she's a very nice lady.
Mon May 9, 2016, 11:15 PM
May 2016

I kind of prefer Mr. Sanders résumé.

In the trenches with my brothers and sisters decades ago and all his life.

sheshe2

(83,758 posts)
83. What 21k missed that, Joob?
Tue May 10, 2016, 03:12 AM
May 2016

Speak to me, tell me what you are referring to.

Links.

I gotta go. Late here, please leave me a link and some facts.

TIA

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
35. All these new names with low post numbers...
Mon May 9, 2016, 11:01 PM
May 2016

I think I know where they're originating. I hope I'm wrong -- I really do.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
58. Yeah, but you're probably not. It's obvious.
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:26 AM
May 2016

The really interesting ones are those that have been around for years, with 98% of their posts made in the last few months.


pacalo

(24,721 posts)
62. I agree; this has been on my radar for years but
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:41 AM
May 2016

when it is done for the purpose of creating a false impression, it is cringe-worthy.

Manipulating public perception is all Clinton has -- she is not as popular as she is being portrayed & she is not likeable.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
110. It is sad and desperate. . . manipulating public perception is all she has.
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:36 AM
May 2016

She cannot win on the issues, all she can do is lie and smear. Desperation!

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
65. Nah, I'm pretty sure you're right...
Tue May 10, 2016, 01:13 AM
May 2016

This must in part explain why unemployment is still "around 5%"

Go, Bernie!

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
14. The emails were a mistake and she is paying for it.
Mon May 9, 2016, 10:27 PM
May 2016

She has her mistakes but she has also had her fair share of unfair attacks against her and she is still standing.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
82. After 25 or so years, it's called Clinton Fatigue for many of us.
Tue May 10, 2016, 03:07 AM
May 2016

Shady stuff follows both of them around like a lost puppy. I think they thrive on it, however, because it continues.

The Foundation may be the clincher.

ebayfool

(3,411 posts)
5. They have two poll questions and neither supports the other. Still looking for methodology to ...
Mon May 9, 2016, 10:19 PM
May 2016

understand why.





Recursion

(56,582 posts)
93. You're making an unwarranted assumption that unfavorables matter
Tue May 10, 2016, 05:55 AM
May 2016

It's a mistake for the Democratic party to think that about Trump, too, incidentally. But Americans have proven over and over again they are perfectly willing to vote for somebody they have an unfavorable opinion of.

uponit7771

(90,336 posts)
60. Nah, nothing to do with his GE poll bullshit and telling the dem electorate to fuck off by going...
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:39 AM
May 2016

... after PDs

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
8. Doesn't tell the whole story
Mon May 9, 2016, 10:22 PM
May 2016

I saw Rachel Maddow mention this PPP poll tonight.
Clinton and Trump have worse "favorability" than Sanders.

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
54. A friend sent me a link to the polling...
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:19 AM
May 2016

And it appears that Bernie Sanders unfavorable numbers are going up, and that's with only a few attacks from Donald Trump, who derogatorily called Bernie Sanders a maniac and communist.
Yet, Trump tried to float his usual garbage out that Bernie Sanders should run 3rd party, and he says he won't so I take him at his word.

Nate Silver gives PPP a B- rating the samples are: R+0.7, so it's not a laughable poll like the Rasmussen poll which showed Trump +2 over Hillary Clinton yet clearly Rasmussen over-sampled Republicans by +2.3.
But then again, it's a bit early for me to call even a poll from PPP conclusive, although I do feel that Hillary Clinton's favorable numbers are underwater, for sure Trump's and Bernie Sanders unfavorable numbers are indeed going up for whatever reason.

Response to riversedge (Reply #28)

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
56. The more I got to know Bernie, the less I liked him
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:23 AM
May 2016

I was OK with Bernie until he started taking Tad Devine's advice and going negative. Bernie's fortunes started going backwards when he started the personal attacks

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
67. The DNC is probably hoping
Tue May 10, 2016, 01:22 AM
May 2016

to stanch the hemorrhage with Republicans embarrassed by Trump.

After all, the Democratic party leadership today has become indistinguishable from that of the Republican party of Nixon. Hell, Reagan even.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
68. I'm finding the parallels between Nixon and Hillary to be... interesting
Tue May 10, 2016, 01:30 AM
May 2016

Nixon-- expanded the war in SE Asia
Hillary-- wants to expand the wars in SW Asia

Nixon-- erased 18 1/2 minutes of a critical tape recording
Hillary-- deleted 30,000 e-mails from a private server used for government business

Nixon-- relied on Henry Kissinger as his Secretary of State
Hillary-- considers Kissinger to be her mentor at State

Nixon-- involved with regime change in Chile and elsewhere
Hillary-- involved with regime change in Libya and elsewhere

Nixon-- stonewalled on releasing his tapes
Hillary-- stonewalled on releasing her e-mail server

Nixon-- under investigation by Congressional committees
Hillary-- under investigation by the FBI

Nixon-- "I am not a crook."
Hillary-- "I am not a liar."

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
86. Very interesting, yes.
Tue May 10, 2016, 04:10 AM
May 2016

But in fairness, I think the actual Clinton quote was something more like a characteristically lawyerly, "Why do I have to keep proving to people that I am not a liar?"

She'll probably tighten that up a bit in the upcoming FBI interview, though.



Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
87. Here's what she said
Tue May 10, 2016, 04:15 AM
May 2016

“Well, but, you know, you’re asking me to say, “Have I ever (lied)?” I don’t believe I ever have. I don’t believe I ever have. I don’t believe I ever will. I’m gonna do the best I can to level with the American people.”

Of course, the ability to lie convincingly is a *prerequisite* for a corporate defense lawyer, which Hillary was from 1977 until 1992.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
88. Thanks, almost forgot about that one.
Tue May 10, 2016, 04:25 AM
May 2016

Mine came from Snopes, which confirmed it as reported in Washington Post correspondent John F. Harris's book, The Survivor: Bill Clinton in the White House.

Yours is definitely better.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
121. you know, there is a similar list to be had comparing Bernie to Christ. Seen it here on DU
Tue May 10, 2016, 10:22 AM
May 2016

I also remember the one that compared Obama to Hitler

Oh, I'm sure that neither of those was word-tortured or contrived at all.



KPN

(15,645 posts)
27. Most likely because at least half of that 30% of all Democrats are
Mon May 9, 2016, 10:54 PM
May 2016

New Democrats/Third Wayers (aka moderate-right Republicans).

Response to Maedhros (Reply #31)

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
39. Oh, I know. There is no lie small or big enough for the Hillary Campaign not to tell.
Mon May 9, 2016, 11:08 PM
May 2016

Nobody in the Clinton camp is to be trusted, on any issue.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
72. Join the purity party
Tue May 10, 2016, 02:25 AM
May 2016

The authoritarian zealot purist. I want NO part of that paranoid, everything is corrupt and RIGGED group.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
49. As compared to what percentage of voters view Hillary unfavorably?
Mon May 9, 2016, 11:53 PM
May 2016

It's somewhat above 50%, isn't it?

How on god's green earth is a mere 30% "underwater"?

Hillary must be deep into the earth's mantle, maybe all the way into the core.

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
55. Oh, no not St. Bernie! It's about time. Demi are finally getting tired of being trashed by an
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:23 AM
May 2016

infiltrator. Helping Donald is not what we want. And Donald has said that he is just using Bernie's talking points about Hillary.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
63. Cranky, negative, story telling, thieving, lying....it's finally caught up
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:45 AM
May 2016

When one's runs on a platform of almost godlike perfection and nobility, even a little slip up seems Yuge!

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
118. seems clear that in the end you figured out who I was talking about....it's becoming obvious
Tue May 10, 2016, 09:54 AM
May 2016

even to BS supporters.

BlueStater

(7,596 posts)
70. Still more popular than Hillary and the orange one.
Tue May 10, 2016, 02:15 AM
May 2016

I'd put their favorability ratings around that of testicular cancer.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
92. And he has been treated with kid gloves.
Tue May 10, 2016, 05:52 AM
May 2016

Clinton and the party keep showing him respect while he and Weaver are going around trashing any and everything.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
116. And this is WITHOUT his having to deal with nasty smears and attack ads ...
Tue May 10, 2016, 09:46 AM
May 2016

... he's done this ALL BY HIMSELF!!

He's been getting a LOT of bad advice, in my opinion. He chose bad advisors, AND he's unable (apparently, and in my opinion) to discern the difference between good-advice and bad-advice.

Having advisors is a good thing as it allows a candidate (or a president) to hear and evaluate other options and possibilities. But ultimately, the final decision is up to the candidate (or president) after assessing and weighing the choices and calculating the benefits vs risks.

Bernie chose ... poorly.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
94. PPP has been a Hillary hack pollster this whole election
Tue May 10, 2016, 05:56 AM
May 2016

They actually took money from Hillary's campaign. They've always had Bernie's favorables under water, while no other pollster has.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders favorability now ...