2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton Campaign to Republican Donors: Hillary Shares Your Values
May 09, 2016
Clinton Campaign to Republican Donors: Hillary Shares Your Values
The Problem: It's True.
by Jake Johnson
Late last week, Politico reported that Clinton operatives have initiated efforts to "peel off establishment Republicans who might otherwise grudgingly support Trump," demonstrating their eagerness to win over big money donors previously wedded to the conservative establishment.
Specifically, Clinton supporters have been targeting the donor base of Jeb Bush, whose main super PAC raised a striking $121 million, much of it before the race for the Republican nomination began to heat up. We know how that ended.
In doing so, her campaign is signaling to Republican donors that, as Ben White puts it, Hillary "represents your values better than Trump."
So, after a campaign season in which she shifted leftward on several issues to counter the message of her more progressive opponent, Clinton is pivoting back to the center and perhaps further rightward.
The instructive point here, though, is not that Clinton would profess to share the values of Republican donors in order to garner their support. Rather, it is that she really does share their values.
On various issues, as many commentators have observed, Clinton is well to the right of much of the mainstream Democratic Party which is, itself, far to the right of the Democratic tradition represented by Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Clinton is also a veritable hawk who seems, as Kevin Drum has observed, to not have learned anything from America's most recent interventions in the Middle East, from Iraq to Libya. It comes as no surprise, then, that she shamelessly touts the support of Henry Kissinger, Jack Keane, and other figures in America's interventionist foreign policy establishment.
Read the full article at:
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/05/09/clinton-campaign-republican-donors-hillary-shares-your-values
msongs
(67,401 posts)pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)Spoken Louder Than Her Words.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)With all the incredibly-poorly thought first replies from Clinton supporters over the past 6 months, I figure there has to be some sort of bonus structure in place.
Otherwise, you'd take the time to look at more than the headline and then shouting "NUH UH!!!!!!".
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Response to imagine2015 (Original post)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
betsuni
(25,475 posts)their values? Why wouldn't politicians want all the money and votes they can get?
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)Hillary would have demanded at least that much!
Her standard fee for addressing wealthy Wall Street and corporate benefactors.
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)1. The video and transcripts of Bernie's speech at Liberty are out there for all to see.
2. He was not paid to speak.
3. He went into the Lions Den and presented the liberal view of what it means to live a moral life.
Hillary isn't capable of delivering such a speech on liberal thought, especially to those who disagree with her. She simply cannot do it. Not to mention she wouldn't even attempt it without getting paid.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)She is extremely conservative on the whole, to the extent that she any moral center at all.