Democrats see Hillary Clinton-Elizabeth Warren dream ticket

[cal04]

Democrats are openly pulling for Hillary Clinton to pick Elizabeth Warren as her running mate.

Amid concerns that supporters of Bernie Sanders will stay home on Election Day, writes the Hill, a number of Democrats see a Clinton-Warren alliance as an all-woman dream team capable of igniting enthusiasm in the progressive base. Jamal Simmons, a Democratic strategist, told the Hill the longer Sanders stays in the race, the more likely Clinton will select Massachusetts Sen. Warren. He said Warren “solves so many problems: enthusiasm, women, young liberals, older white liberals.” The Hill writes Clinton insiders have been asked about their thoughts on Warren, among other possible vice presidential picks.

It would also eliminate the pro-Wall Street storyline that has haunted Clinton’s campaign throughout the primary season, Clinton allies believe.

Democratic strategist and presidential campaign veteran Jamal Simmons said the longer Sanders stays in the race, the more likely Clinton will select Warren.


http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/279306-dems-see-clinton-and-warren-as-dream-team

[VulgarPoet]

1. Not only does that neutralize Warren, it's going to give more gullible Sanders supporters

the idea that Clinton actually gives a fuck about the issues they find the most pressing. Pass.

[Renew Deal]

11. If they believe Bernie can accomplish his agenda they'll believe anything.

[MrMickeysMom]

39. Here's another one who never listened...

that BERNIE accomplishes his agenda.... Yep! NOBODY ELSE is involved.

You haven't listened to a God Damned Thing he has been saying. Pure exposure of ignorance there.

[Renew Deal]

40. Where is that list of accomplishments?

I'm listening

[Baobab]

41. My prediction is that Hillary will find it hard finding a VP. Elizabeth Warren won't rescue Hillary.

Hillary will have trouble finding a running mate. She is already at the Nixon stage of dysfunction.

Nobody in their right mind would want to tie their future to hers.

[Renew Deal]

46. You also predicted Bernie would win.

[Baobab]

47. Hillary has not won, and for her to get the nomination is suicide for the Democratic Party.

Does the Party want to commit seppaku? Ritual self-disembowelment?

You likely are a better judge of THAT than I.

[Renew Deal]

54. The Democratic Party has weighed the options and chosen the candidate they feel is better.

I look forward to working with you to advance a Democratic agenda.

[libdem4life]

78. They certainly did...all in for Hillary. And she's clearly just the

choice of The Democratic Establishment. But not the General Public. Bit of a disconnect, but I'll grant that she's likely to draw it out to the bitter end.

[workinclasszero]

72. LOL

Good point!

[AgerolanAmerican]

109. There are always plenty of people with more ambition than sense

I'm sure she'll find someone suitably craven.

[MrMickeysMom]

51. See if you can keep a few thoughts separated with this...

I'm sure someone has wasted your time before trying to deliver you the information in the form of an engraved invitation. I'm done doing that with baiters. You either prepare yourself as a Democrat as I did by examining the candidates, or you don't. You shouldn't need more than that, unless you want to purposely fuck with someone. I'm not one to suffer fools...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280193468

For his full resume, go here: http://www.sanders.senate.gov

Be sure and ask the waitress for extra napkins and location of the restroom.

[Renew Deal]

52. Speeches

That's pretty much what I expected. Still waiting for Single Payer to be enacted in VT. How's it going?

[MrMickeysMom]

59. I am done that final attempt...

Speeches rhymes with beaches... I suggest you get some fresh air, cause it ain't helping you on this thread. Maybe you'll "renew" yourself!

[Renew Deal]

62. That's the extensive list I expected

And maybe that's Bernie's problem. He has an admirable list of proposals, but he has no plan to enact them and no track record of accomplishment.

[highprincipleswork]

66. He could easily accomplish his agenda if Progressives really voted for what they want instead of

what they are told is "realistic". And by Progressives I mean most of the American people, who hold Progressive ideas and only need someone to actually represent them. If we're not careful, for some of them that will mean Trump, at least on issues like trade and the economy.

Wouldn't want to be on a sports team with any of the severe doubters around here, because all we'd do is lose, lose, lose.

[Demsrule86]

2. It would be a great ticket

I admire both women tremendously.

[Armstead]

38. Would you if she had run against Clinton in the primary?

Just askin'

[JaneyVee]

3. Historic! Or more like Herstoric!

[SheenaR]

58. It causes the word to make no sense. But sure. Go for it n/t

[libdem4life]

81. left out Hysteric.

[liberalnarb]

4. Not all Democrats

[brooklynite]

15. I guess you're gonna have to work on that top part...

Clinton: 1,704 Pledged Delegates
Sanders: 1,421 Pledged Delegates

[liberalnarb]

16. Ok, we'll work on it in...

West Virginia
Kentucky
Oregon
The Virgin Islands
Puerto Rico
California
Montana
New Jersey
New Mexico
North Dakota
South Dakota
and DC

[brooklynite]

50. Might want to pick up the pace on NJ and CA

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511931002

[Sunlei]

5. must be why Republicans 'presidential' choice Trump mocked Senator Warren recently.

Imagine where America would be today if our President Mocks everyone like only a Republican Bagger can mock countries, religions, Mexicans and even our own Senators and Congress.

[Skwmom]

6. Sorry, but that would say a lot more about Warren than Clinton.

Also, the fact that she praised Clinton's bogus plan for the big banks was really telling.

[yourpaljoey]

53. I believe THIS is the fact people are missing

"the fact that she praised Clinton's bogus plan for the big banks was really telling."

[JTFrog]

63. Yeah, she would definitely be under that bus in a heartbeat. n/t

[NCTraveler]

7. As much as I would love it.

I think EW will be her greatest strength in the senate. Different than Sanders, she understands human nature and the complexities of the issues. Both important qualities in a legislator.

[TCJ70]

8. I give Warren more credit...

...than to team up to be used by Hillary. I also doubt she'd want her name associated with whatever stupidity Hillary might try to do militarily.

[CanadaexPat]

104. Agreed. Warren wouldn't want it. n/t

[CTyankee]

9. sorry, but there is too much fucking misogyny out there for such an idea. It's going

to be hard enough to get a woman elected president in the first place.

[djean111]

10. Um, nope. It would just be massively obvious pandering, with the bonus, for Third Way Hillary, of

neutralizing Warren - getting Warren out of the Senate, where the Third Way whines she is "getting out of hand".

Not voting based on gender. Voting based on issues. So very hard to understand for some.

[seabeyond]

19. Warren would be a massively good Vp, no pandering. Two women, you betcha. I would prefer Castro

and Warren in a cabinet or stay in Senate. But, it would be an awesomely powerful ticket of women.

[Baobab]

42. Warren would make a great President. Which is exctly why Hillary wont pick her.

Nor would Hillary's new backers let her pick EW.

[seabeyond]

45. You people are a hoot. Clinton so stupid she is gonna make sure she picks a lousy VP.

And you wonder why you are ridiculed.

[Fawke Em]

57. We're ridiculed because we're challenging the status quo. Period.

[seabeyond]

68. Nu uh. No way is Clinton going to pick a good VP, she is Clinton after all. Whatever.

[Fawke Em]

101. She's not known for a good decision making. eom

[BlueStater]

110. Well, if she picks empty suit Castro, she'll accomplish the "lousy" part.

If she puts that untested lightweight on her ticket, it will only prove what many of us have long suspected of her: she's a craven, pandering politician who would do anything to win and puts what she thinks is best for her ahead of what's best for the country.

[seabeyond]

118. Just a whole post of snotty insults of Dems.

[Baobab]

117. She doesn't want one thats smarter than her.

Nor one who is going to have opinions.

[seabeyond]

119. You are just making up shit to insult Clinton. Who does that?

[Vote2016]

12. Warren's honesty, her trustworthiness, her progressivism, her selflessness mitigate Hillary's flaws

[seabeyond]

20. Your perceived Clinton flaws that are not reality. I think Warren respects Clinton and they would

work really well together. I think so many comments on this thread are bogus, hence speaking up. I prefer Warren elsewhere, but she would be a kick ass Vp and they would be an even better team. I prefer Castro. But Warren would be great and fun, too.

[Vote2016]

121. Warren's level of respect for Hillary shows. Castro is ideologically what you would expect from a

Texas Democrat, but I'd like to see a young Hispanic on the ticket (I'd prefer a young PROGRESSIVE Hispanic, but 2 out of 3 ain't bad)

[Baobab]

120. Fast Track runs for SIX YEARS and FTAS sign away rights forever

For six years America is in mortal danger. One corrupt Presidential pen stroke could sign away everything worth stealing forever.

Look at how GATS has screwed up health care.

At least a million Americans have died unnecessarily in these 20 years.

[CobaltBlue]

13. cali—Elizabeth Warren should be at the top of the ticket! Lead, not supporting, role.

[Baobab]

43. I would vote for an Elizabeth Warren Presidency in a second.

If the Democratic Party would pick her, but unless something has changed for the better, they wouldn't.

There are a number of other women who would make great VPs.

I would LOVE to see a ticket with two women on it.

I do not see Hillary Clinton as being a good first female President. I do want to see a female President.

One who represents the best qualities of all women and who is in fact supportive of the interests and values of American women .

Which is not Clinton. She is not a person who is helpful to American women - she is for corporations.

[Go Vols]

115. +1

[Autumn]

14. Yeah that's the ticket

Hills pro-Wall Street leaning will never go away.

[Lizzie Poppet]

17. Words can scarce express how disappointed I'd be in Warren if she accepted.

Particularly after Princess Weathervane's (expected) hard lurch to the right now that she thinks she has the nomination locked up...

Real or just for show, Liz?

[ieoeja]

18. That makes no sense. We Bernie supporters are misogynist, homophobic racists.

They've spent the entire race throwing our misogyny in our face, and now they think we would vote for an all female ticket? That only makes sense if they were lying about our misogyny this whole time.

And surely they wouldn't have done something that despicable.

[seabeyond]

21. And look at the replies from Sanders supporters. Warren, under the bus you would go.

[ieoeja]

23. Of course, I'm anti-Warren. She is a woman. I am a Bernie supporter. I hate women.

I know that's true because DU told me so.

[seabeyond]

25. Hey, I am a believer we get to define ourselves. So go at it haus.

[TCJ70]

61. Where do you see that?

I see people giving Warren more credit than to be used by Hillary.

[seabeyond]

70. Warren appears to respect Clinton, and Clinton respects Warren. That is a good thing our

representatives are like... adults. Respectful, valuing each other. Makes working together a productive endeavor. Not the immature, childish dissing for nothing else but pettiness.

[TCJ70]

71. So you're making stuff up...

...ok.

[seabeyond]

74. I at least have evidence the two seems to be respectful of each other. You though, have nothing.

[TCJ70]

85. I asked you where you see Sanders supporters trashing her...

...you responded with something about mutual respect. Your response had nothing to do with my post. Whether they respect each other has nothing to do with anything or the potential reasons she may or may not be comfortable being her VP.

[1StrongBlackMan]

33. I know you think you are being sarcastic; but, some of you have show to be just that.

[ieoeja]

37. Yes, Bernie does have some bigoted supporters. So does Hillary. Remember 2008? Hillary actually ...

... appealed to their bigotry.

Do you seriously think Hillary is not getting a ton of support this year from people who love her because she tried to stop the n***** in 2008?

[DemocratSinceBirth]

48. Actually if you looked at exit polls she is losing the white working class voters she won in 08

Actually if you looked at exit polls you will see she is losing the white working class voters she won in 08. Some of my fellow Democrats will support a white female Democrat when she runs against an African American male Democrat but will not support her when she runs against a white male Democrat:

Once you get past places in Vermont on the list of the worst counties for Hillary Clinton so far in the primaries, you quickly arrive at Coal County, Okla., where she won just 19 percent of the vote.

Mrs. Clinton’s profound weakness in a county named “Coal” is not because of her comments about shutting down coal mines, as one might expect. Those comments came after the Oklahoma primary.

It’s because Coal County, like much of the traditionally Democratic parts of the South, has a huge number of registered Democrats who now vote Republican in presidential elections. In the states with closed or semi-closed contests — like Oklahoma — these registered Democrats can participate only in the Democratic primary.

When they do, they have tended to vote against Hillary Clinton (and for Bernie Sanders, the senator from Vermont).


Coal County, Okla., is one of the most extreme examples. There, 80 percent of voters are registered Democrats, yet President Obama won just 27 percent of the vote in 2012. Mrs. Clinton has performed very poorly where the share of voters who are registered Democrats is much greater than the share of voters who supported Mr. Obama.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/10/upshot/where-democrats-like-hillary-clinton-the-least-besides-vermont.html?smid=tw-upshotnyt&smtyp=cur

[ieoeja]

56. True.As some undoubtedly support her now simply because she *tried* to stop the Black guy in 2008.nt

[DemocratSinceBirth]

64. The data...

The data suggests they embraced her in 08 because she was running against an African American. Now that she is running against a white candidate they are eschewing her.

When this primary season started I thought Clinton would win handily because she would win all the demographic groups she won in 08 and add African Americans. It became more difficult for her because she is losing the white working class voters she overwhelmingly won in 08. In retrospect it wasn't so much they liked her but they they didn't like her opponent.

[ieoeja]

67. True. As some undoubtedly support her now simply because she is trying to stop the Jewish guy.

And props to her for not actually appealing to religious bigotry this time.

[1StrongBlackMan]

60. Yes. I remember 2008.

Do you seriously think Hillary is not getting a ton of support this year from people who love her because she tried to stop the n***** in 2008?

No ... I do not think HRC is not getting support this year from people who love her because she tried to stop the n***** in 2008.

Where do you come up with this crap?

[ieoeja]

65. I think you have an unintended double negative in there.

I assume you mean you do not think HRC is getting support from racist Democrats this year mostly because she tried to stop Obama in 2008.

If so ... well ... okay then.

I can absolutely assure you that a lot of racist Democrats really love Hillary for that reason. But if you for some odd reason can not believe that, I don't know what more to say.


"Where do you come up with this crap?"

The real world where real people have really said it. I am White. Most racist White guys keep their racism to themselves around African-Americans. You only hear a small fraction of the racist crap I hear on a regular basis.

[1StrongBlackMan]

69. Yes ... that is correct ...

I do not think HRC is getting support from racist Democrats this year mostly because she tried to stop Obama in 2008.

I can absolutely assure you that a lot of racist Democrats really love Hillary for that reason. But if you for some odd reason can not believe that, I don't know what more to say.

You could tell the truth and say you made that up ... unless, perhaps, you are projecting your 2008 feelings onto some unidentified others.

The real world where real people have really said it. I am White. Most racist White guys keep their racism to themselves around African-Americans. You only hear a small fraction of the racist crap I hear on a regular basis.

You have heard white people saying they support HRC this year because she failed 8 years ago? Cool Story, Bro.

ETA: There is no question in my mind that there are white Democrats that voted for HRC in 2008 because she was running against the Black guy.

[ieoeja]

73. You just called me a liar. It would seem to be that you are the one who is projecting.

For there is no way you can possibly be so naive as to believe that there are no racist Democrats who view Hillary as their hero because of her fight against Obama in 2008. Or that none of them would vote for her this election because she is their hero for that reason.

You at least admit she was a hero to those people in 2008. Why would she not still be so to some?

Why is it so important to you that this obvious reality to everyone but you not be true?

Because it doesn't make a bit of fucking difference. Some racists support Hillary. So what? Does that somehow make her tainted in your eyes?

A lot of racists probably love the same beer/food/car/etc that you do. Does that make that beer/food/car/etc bad?


Or does it piss you off because makes it more difficult to tar Bernie because some of his supporters are racist too?

[1StrongBlackMan]

75. If that is the way you wish to interpret it; then, I can't help that ...

For there is no way you can possibly be so naive as to believe that there are no racist Democrats who view Hillary as their hero because of her fight against Obama in 2008.

I, clearly, stated that there is no question in my mind that IN 2008, there were Democrats that supported HRC because she was running against the Black guy.

Or that none of them would vote for her this election because she is their hero for that reason.

This is so far fetched as to be laughable.

Why is it so important to you that this obvious reality to everyone but you not be true?

Obvious reality? Wow ... we have differing understandings of "obvious" and "reality".

Because it doesn't make a bit of fucking difference. Some racists support Hillary. So what? Does that somehow make her tainted in your eyes?

A lot of racists probably love the same beer/food/car/etc that you do. Does that make that beer/food/car/etc bad?


Or does it piss you off because makes it more difficult to tar Bernie because some of his supporters are racist too?

Okay. I'm going to bow out, now. I'm not going around the bend with you.

[ieoeja]

77. DU has its share of really stupid people. But you don't seem stupid enough to believe your posts. nt

[1StrongBlackMan]

83. I'm not going to crazyville with you ...

and thinking/believing that the racists that voted for HRC because she went against (and lost to) the Black guy in 2008 ... are supporting her in 2016 because she went against (and lost to) the Black guy in 2008 is crazytown!

[JustAnotherGen]

86. I'm not even sure what to do with this 1strong

Like - eh? I dunno. I think you are taking the right approach.

[1StrongBlackMan]

89. Perhaps, this is the "gaslighting" that we hear so much about.

[JustAnotherGen]

96. Yep - however your

Memory, Perception and Sanity are AOK.

[1StrongBlackMan]

98. Phew ... I was becoming concerned!

[JustAnotherGen]

102. No - you are fine

And handled that well for being referred to as stupid. Don't attack back. Just let them be what they are - and be glad you don't go home to it!

[1StrongBlackMan]

103. I know ... This past year has taught me such restraint ...

Just let them be what they are - and be glad you don't go home to it!

[ieoeja]

106. He called me "crazy" and a liar before I called him stupid.

So I guess you also believe that no racists are voting for Hillary this year because they like what Hillary did to Obama in 2008?

While DSB clearly believes that to be a very small number, at least he does not deny the truth of that. And I still don't see why this is such a big problem for 1SBM. Could you explain that to me since all I get from 1SBM is snark?

[JustAnotherGen]

111. Let me think about it . . .

I can't read 1Strong's mind - but I will consider the task.

[ieoeja]

91. No, you're going to stupidtown.

Perhaps it escaped your attention, but racists are fucking idiots. What you call "crazy", they call "wicked smart".

White racists believe that all White people are racist. They believe many bury it under feelings of guilt. They believe most pretend not to be racist in public because they are afraid.

So where does Hillary fit? Before 2008 the White racist would have probably credited her with "Liberal guilt" making her their opponent. But "Liberal guilt" does not countenance her dog-whistling campaign in 2008.

She gave them a wink-and-a-nod. They now believe her to be one of them. They believe she is just pretending to like African-Americans for political reasons.

[1StrongBlackMan]

92. The more you post the more unhinged you appear ... Let's call it a day. The drinks are on me.

[ieoeja]

97. "Racists really are that stupid" = "unhinged"? n/t

[DemocratSinceBirth]

93. Can you point to data that indicates

Can you point to data that indicates that primary voters in 2016 are rewarding her for opposing Barack Obama in 2008?

In 2008 Hillary's best demographics were working class whites and Latinos. In 2016 her best demographics are African Americans, Latinos, and more affluent whites. Working class whites have abandoned her campaign in droves.

That fact would seem to suggest the argument that folks are voting for her now for opposing the African American candidate in 2008 was incorrect.

It seems like they liked Hillary enough when she was running against an African American candidate but don't like her nearly as much as when she is running against a white male candidate.

[ieoeja]

94. I can introduce you to some people I know who are doing that.

You want numbers. I can't give you that. But I have no doubt there are plenty more out there.

As I said to 1SBM, "so what". It doesn't mean anything. It makes it harder to tar Bernie, but to deny this reality is silly.

Does Hillary have to be so pure that no bad person would ever vote for her?



Heck, I'll bet at least one guy who killed his mother voted for Hillary this election. And at least one voted for Bernie.

But I don't have the data on that one either.

[1StrongBlackMan]

99. See there's that crazy again ...

As I said to 1SBM, "so what". It doesn't mean anything. It makes it harder to tar Bernie, but to deny this reality is silly.

Who is trying to tar Bernie? ... Who even mentioned him?

Heck, I'll bet at least one guy who killed his mother voted for Hillary this election. And at least one voted for Bernie.

I take that back ... that's the crazy, right there ... violent crazy, at that.

[ieoeja]

105. Care to give straight, non-snarky answers for a change?

Heck, I'll bet at least one guy who killed his mother voted for Hillary this election. And at least one voted for Bernie.

I take that back ... that's the crazy, right there ... violent crazy, at that.

Do you believe that no person who killed his mother will have voted in this election? Why?

Do you believe that no such person has voted for Hillary this election? Why?

Do you believe that no such person has voted for Bernie this election? Why?

[1StrongBlackMan]

107. I'm too stupid to do that ... Remember? ...

Do you believe that no person who killed his mother will have voted in this election? Why?

Do you believe that no such person has voted for Hillary this election? Why?

Do you believe that no such person has voted for Bernie this election? Why?

This is getting really weird. Excuse me while I, quietly, back out the door.

[Orsino]

22. Warren is a dream candidate...

...but I would hate to see her nerfed in the Senate.

A Hillary Clinton that can woo her as a running mate would, however, be a Hillary Clinton more to my liking.

[Ino]

24. They assume Warren would sell her soul to be Hillary's shadow?

It's rather arrogant.

[seabeyond]

26. You assume Warren would have to sell her soul to work with Clinton; all indications shows otherwise.

[libdem4life]

87. Can see it now...Elizabeth, you go tell those guys to cut it out. K?

They are so fond of you...they will listen. Sorry, but I don't have Warren pegged as a flip flopper on her primary issue. But like Hillary, Elizabeth used to be a Republican, as I recall. So, there's that.

Thinking Clinton, like Trump, may have a hard time finding someone credible to chance teaming up with such high unfavorables. Also, the VP role is largely ceremonial, so little political bump.

[Trajan]

27. Sloppy verbiage

'Democrats' are pulling for this?

WHICH Democrats? ...

Fucking lazy ass writers . .

[farleftlib]

28. Only the braindead and the hopelessly disingenuous

would not see this harebrained idea for what it is. HRC riding the coattails of the ethical, principled
and highly effective Warren into the WH, thereby neutralizing Warren of all the good she could
accomplish in the Senate so that instead she can go to ribbon-cutting ceremonies while Clinton
crashes and burns the ship of state into the ground. What an idea!!

[BeyondGeography]

29. Whomever she picks should shore her up with the base/likely D voters

Moving to the center and trying to get more moderate white male votes is an utter waste of time.

[oldandhappy]

30. clinton needs to be not out-shone.

[demmiblue]

31. I prefer her in the Senate... she has a much stronger voice there. n/t

[tularetom]

32. Clinton would never accept a VP that would outthink, outspeak, and generally outclass her

I also doubt that Warren wants to spend four years biting her tongue.

I get that the thought of a Clinton-Warren ticket makes some people all giddy, but these two have basically nothing in common, other than gender.

It doesn't matter who the nominal VP candidate is, the true running mate will be Bill Clinton. We've already seen some disturbing indications of that.

[FreakinDJ]

34. Not a Freaking Chance

Hillary's 3rd Way has been attacking Warren for years

[hueymahl]

35. I'd vote for that ticket

Agree with the article. Clinton-Warren would be unstoppable.

[NorthCarolina]

36. Warren would not agree to such a matchup, this is just Hillary trying to woo

the Democratic base to her side by name dropping Warren. The reality is she's far more likely to pick someone like Kasich than EW, but dropping a name is ok if it wins a few extra votes.

[whatchamacallit]

44. Half dream (Warren), half nightmare

[Attorney in Texas]

49. This would unite the party but Hillary is too selfish to nominate a running-mate who is better liked

[Fawke Em]

55. Never happen.

Hillary will absolutely never pick the following:

1. A liberal
2. A person who will outshine her
3. Someone who will fight Wall Street
4. Someone who isn't a war hawk


Look for Hillary to pick the most boring, milquetoast candidate that might draw in a group or region.

Her candidacy will be the biggest yawner since Dukakis/Bentsen.

[wendylaroux]

76. Exactly nt

[Maedhros]

80. Someone like Bloomberg would fit her to a "T". [n/t]

[Juicy_Bellows]

84. Absoultely, it won't happen.

If it did, I'd forever wonder wtf happened to Warren.

[notadmblnd]

79. Warren has a say in this and I think if selected, Warren will say no.

She's not going to kow-tow to Hillary. No way- no how.

[Mike Nelson]

82. If...

...she needs a "shore up the base" VP, Warren's got it. But most think she will need to move to the center (yes, I know many Bernie supporters believe Hillary Clinton already is a far-right Republican).

[3hummingbirds]

88. Elizabeth Warren

A Warren/Clinton would be even better. My own personal belief is, Senator Warren can be more powerful where she is and accomplish more than being Hillary Clinton' mouthpiece.

[libdem4life]

90. Maybe while she's over in the Republican Donor Waiting Room

she'll run into someone who shares her values.

[lagomorph777]

95. So...Hillary would choose her polar opposite? Sure...makes sense...

That's as logical as pretending that the primaries are over before 23% of the voters have voted.

[Ferd Berfel]

100. Warren isn't that stupid but Clinton is that desperate

[PATRICK]

108. To unite the party

it might seem a simple answer, but it might just be impossible for both women.

[Ferd Berfel]

114. VP is a 'shut up and do as you're told' position

Warren ain't gonna do that - bless her socks!

She would be significantly more valuable to the Nation, in the Senate, where she can help progressives and liberals counter her chick-hawk corporate neocon agenda

[Hiraeth]

112. HRC will not offer it, if she did, EW would not accept. Take it to the bank.

[pdsimdars]

113. I'd say . . . A FEW Democrats MIGHT see Hillary-Warren as a dream ticket

I think most wouldn't

[Punkingal]

116. I'm a Democrat and that is not my dream ticket.