Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,281 posts)
Tue May 10, 2016, 09:29 AM May 2016

The current state of the primary race is hurting media coverage.

Now that Donald Trump is the presumptuous nominee of the GOP, the media is covering him even more than they did before. Meanwhile, since the media knows that Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee, but since the primary race continues to go on, coverage of Hillary Clinton isn't keeping up. She's not the nominee, even though it's clear that she will be.

The Democratic primary race isn't news so much any more, so it's not being covered heavily. That gives Trump vastly more news coverage in all media. Until the Democrats have a nominee for certain, this situation will continue. The primary race is boring, since everyone know the eventual outcome, but we still don't have a nominee to hold up against Trump.

For that reason alone, it would be helpful if Bernie Sanders suspended his campaign in recognition that Hillary Clinton will be the nominee after the convention. Trump is getting all of the coverage, because there's no Democratic nominee. This is not a good situation and benefits Trump.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The current state of the primary race is hurting media coverage. (Original Post) MineralMan May 2016 OP
That would mean less attention for Sanders and less $$ for Tad and Jeff. nt LexVegas May 2016 #1
I suppose. It's frustrating, frankly. MineralMan May 2016 #2
TDS + WDS frylock May 2016 #16
True, but it will be over in a month firebrand80 May 2016 #3
I disagree. A month of dominating the media is a very big deal MineralMan May 2016 #6
Lack of media attention didn't seem to be much of a concern to folks last summer and fall.. frylock May 2016 #18
Democracy is messy. Fawke Em May 2016 #4
The Media knows the future? Wowser, like Sybil the Soothsayer in the film 'Network'... Bluenorthwest May 2016 #5
Everyone knows the future of the democratic primary. NCTraveler May 2016 #12
HRC supporters... HumanityExperiment May 2016 #7
Her supporting ardents are not exactly charmers.... Bluenorthwest May 2016 #8
Maybe "it's over" shouldn't have been chanted so many times. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #9
That's just silly. Trump has always had the lion's share of coverage mikehiggins May 2016 #10
+1 Punkingal May 2016 #14
That doesn't make any sense. Dems should receive more coverage since the primary is ongoing. ieoeja May 2016 #11
The GE race really doesn't begin until the conventions bigwillq May 2016 #13
Two of these in one day? frylock May 2016 #15
I wish you would suspend your campaign of dumb posts. panader0 May 2016 #17
+ a brazilian whatchamacallit May 2016 #21
Just like she did for Obama SheenaR May 2016 #19
Deal with it. whatchamacallit May 2016 #20

firebrand80

(2,760 posts)
3. True, but it will be over in a month
Tue May 10, 2016, 09:37 AM
May 2016

Not really a big deal in the grand scheme of things. The conventions and the debated will frame this race.

MineralMan

(146,281 posts)
6. I disagree. A month of dominating the media is a very big deal
Tue May 10, 2016, 09:43 AM
May 2016

in this election year. The Democratic Party is getting second-fiddle coverage right now, and it needs to be competing with Drumpf head to head. The GOP has a nominee. We do not. We need to have a nominee.

The longer Bernie Sanders continues to insist that he has a chance, the more the boredom of this primary race will block substantial coverage of the Democratic nominee. Actual nominees are always more interesting news-wise than possible nominees. We need some closure on this primary season and we need it sooner than later.

If Sanders takes it to the convention, it's not just another month. It's almost three months. Too long for the GOP to dominate the news.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
18. Lack of media attention didn't seem to be much of a concern to folks last summer and fall..
Tue May 10, 2016, 02:19 PM
May 2016

when Sanders supporters were complaining about debate schedules. In any case, why doesn't Hillary just hold a press conference rather than avoiding reporters?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
5. The Media knows the future? Wowser, like Sybil the Soothsayer in the film 'Network'...
Tue May 10, 2016, 09:42 AM
May 2016

Paddy Chayefsky calls it yet again....

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
12. Everyone knows the future of the democratic primary.
Tue May 10, 2016, 10:12 AM
May 2016

Lester Holt: We are calling the Indiana primary for Sanders but he wasn't able to gain on Clintons insurmountable lead.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
7. HRC supporters...
Tue May 10, 2016, 09:44 AM
May 2016

OR HRC and her supporters should make their campaign WORTHY of media attention, there is that, so why is her campaign and her supporters failing in that regard?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
8. Her supporting ardents are not exactly charmers....
Tue May 10, 2016, 09:54 AM
May 2016

Currently they are actively dampening interest in upcoming primaries which are important to both Bernie and Hillary as well as to all the down ticket Democrats. While several States work to get out the vote, they are working to keep those voters disinterested and inactive.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
9. Maybe "it's over" shouldn't have been chanted so many times.
Tue May 10, 2016, 10:04 AM
May 2016

Who could've seen that coming? Hillary surrogates and supporters deflated the Dem primary, and now it's Sanders' fault.

We told you that would happen, and you didn't care. You had your way, now you're stuck with it. He's not folding.

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
10. That's just silly. Trump has always had the lion's share of coverage
Tue May 10, 2016, 10:07 AM
May 2016

even when he was faced with 16 opponents. Hillary got the lion's share of coverage left over on the Democratic side, especially when there was juice to the story (Benghasi hearings, for example). Sanders got practically zero coverage, even when the other three Democratic aspirants backed out.

The idea that Trump is getting so much coverage because HRC's coronation may have been derailed is fatuous. Trump gets coverage because he "sells column inches" in the old vernacular. Hillary, essentially, is a boring, overly well known candidate with standard, cookie cutter policies going up against a mini-celebrity who knows well how to dominate the news cycle.

Will Bernie's dropping out mean more coverage for Hillary? Not at all.

So why bother? Let the campaign go through to the end, whatever it might be. None of it will make any difference on how obsessed the media crows are with that bright, shiny object with the orange hair.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
11. That doesn't make any sense. Dems should receive more coverage since the primary is ongoing.
Tue May 10, 2016, 10:10 AM
May 2016

On Meet The Press this past weekend "Bernie" and "Sanders" were mentioned exactly zero times. I kept watching and waiting for them to switch to the ongoing Democratic primary. They never did.

A couple of the Sunday morning pundits remarked on the fact that the media keeps treating Donald like an entertainer rather than a politician.


 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
13. The GE race really doesn't begin until the conventions
Tue May 10, 2016, 10:14 AM
May 2016

Folks are going to remember more what happens in Aug-Sept-Oct than in May, imo

frylock

(34,825 posts)
15. Two of these in one day?
Tue May 10, 2016, 02:15 PM
May 2016

Are things not going as swimmingly in Hillaryland as we've been led to believe?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The current state of the ...