2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMillions will sit out the election no matter what Bernie says/does if Hillary is the candidate.
Just a fact of political life.
Bernie doesn't control his supporters like unthinking robots.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)That's their right.
Bernie still isn't going to be our nominee.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)griffi94
(3,733 posts)Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)griffi94
(3,733 posts)The future is bringing Hillary as our nominee.
That's based on real things like delegate count and votes cast.
Hillary crushed Bernie.
Hundreds more pledged delegates and millions more votes.
Real life isn't like DU.
The majority of Democratic primary voters
took a look at Bernie and said No Thanks.
The pipedream that the SDs will somehow flip to Bernie
and hand him the nomination over the choice of the
majority of the voters, voters who include
women and POC, which are 2 of the Democratic Parties strongest pillars,
to appease the candidate who lost and has the support mostly of white males.
That's just ludicrous.
The Democratic voters prefer Hillary.
That's why Bernie lost
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)a good nominee.
You can say I'm in a bubble too, but the truth is, we're in it so far until at least when California votes, if not till the convention. If you don't like it, you know what you can do with it.
i can't account for the delusion that has Democrats voting for Corporatacrats, but I can still exercise my right to vote and donate and organize and volunteer and phonebank and register people and canvas, etc. In fact, I will do that for as long as Bernie is in the race.
I don't care a whit for what you feel is ludicrous.
Enjoy your day.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)Keep working.
I don't care you support.
I don't personally care who you vote for.
I hope Bernie does stay in til the convention.
That way when he loses on the first ballot we won't have to
hear a lot of hypothetical theories that he'd have won if he'd have just stayed in.
Take it to Philly.
Then when the first ballot puts her over the top
there won't be any doubt that Democrats chose Hillary.
She'll get decisive no question victory.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)griffi94
(3,733 posts)If by all options you mean finishing the primaries
and nominating Hillary in Philly
then yes those options are still on the table.
But Bernie winning the majority of pledged delegates
is now a statistical impossibility since the states aren't
winner take all.
Feel the reality.
Bernie lost.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)"reality". Some of what you say is true, and some is unknown. Perhaps your predictions and laughing fits are a way to deal with anxiety. In which case, I guess you'll have to keep them up for a while longer.
My take on reality. If it goes down as you say I won't be entirely surprised. Disappointed, yes. No longer a Democrat, possibly
griffi94
(3,733 posts)Scoreboard
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)griffi94
(3,733 posts)Lots of people used to really believe the earth was flat.
They didn't buy a bunch of that new fangled science
that proved it was round.
Scoreboard.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)griffi94
(3,733 posts)Yes math is reality based.
It doesn't take into account what you
really really really want to happen.
It's just math.
More votes means more delegates.
More delegates means winning the nomination.
It's all about the scoreboard
Response to highprincipleswork (Reply #142)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)a candidate of such questionable personal and political "character.... "
brooklynite
(94,517 posts)Skink
(10,122 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)and yet you still support her candidacy...
Nobody wants Trump. It seems the Dem party bet on the wrong horse.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)She's going for Republicans instead. She's doing nothing to earn votes from Bernie's supporters but somehow Bernie's people are 'obligated' to vote for her?
griffi94
(3,733 posts)I only speak for myself.
But I don't care what the BoB people do.
I really don't think there are very many of them.
They're the same Bernie fans that show up at rallies
but don't turn out and vote.
They weren't ever really present in the process anyway so they won't be missed.
What they really seem to like is to tell everybody
over and over that they're Bernie or Bust.
I get it.
They're very angry.
I personally couldn't care any less.
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)Loud doesn't = large numbers.
I think Trump's shtick will get old when the GE campaigning really gets going and those in BoB will be as relevant as the Tea Party Patriots are today.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)But when you guys try to downplay Bernie's amazing rallies by claiming the participants don't vote, you just sound dumb.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)It's the Bernie fans that keep insisting Bernie should
get the nomination due to the awesome awesome attendance
at his rallies.
The fact that in big heavily populated diverse states
he keeps getting blown out seems to escape their attention.
This seasons BoBers are 2008s PUMAs
Small, loud, angry group that vastly overestimates their
influence.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)griffi94
(3,733 posts)were the same old tired perpetually disgruntled
that you see every elction.
Whoever our nominee is. They want somebody else.
Somebody that they're convinced is the only candidate that can win.
And if they don't get their candidate then they'll sit out.
So to the BoBers I say.
Do what you want. They don't have the numbers to make a difference any more than the PUMAs did.
The majority of Bernie fans will feel disappointed and then get over it.
The perpetually disgruntled won't.
I personally don't care who they vote for or if they're angry or fed up or
whatever else they are.
Bernie isn't going to be our nominee.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)griffi94
(3,733 posts)The same way I'm sure you'll continue to post that
Hillary can't win and Bernie has a realistic path and if
he doesn't get the nomination it'll be gloom despair and agony
for the Democratic party in November.
The reality of the situation seems to suggest that the Democratic primary voters
are willing to take that chance.
That's why Bernie lost.
ablamj
(333 posts)That means you won't be blaming us when Hillary loses in November.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)You don't have enough power for that.
You're one vote.
There aren't enough BoBers to matter.
Bernie lost. Period.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)The point that's been missed on nearly all Clinton supporters is that many of Bernie's voters only joined the party to vote for him. They don't really care about the party to care whether it's unified and they don't much care which party wins or loses. They were voting for issues.
If she loses, they'll be part of the, "Meh," Movement: Make Excuses Hillary.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)Then they weren't ever reliable Democrats anyway.
Why worry about them.
Nothing's been lost. They were never the parties to lose.
Bernie lost.
Now they'll go back to whatever they were before.
It'd be silly to pick their candidate over ours since
theirs didn't get the most delegates or the most votes.
Democratic primary voters chose Hillary.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)griffi94
(3,733 posts)I'm confident that Hillary will win in November.
If she doesn't I'll be very disappointed.
Alas life can be full of disappointments.
Hillary is our nominee.
Mz Pip
(27,441 posts)Then why not court people who will? She needs all the votes she can get, and yes, a lot of money. Unfortunately, that's how political campaigns work. Maybe that will change some day but until it does it makes no sense to limit your options.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)The upcoming merger between the DLC, BlueDog Third Way crowd, and the "centrist' republicans, will be the culmination of the CLintons 40 year push to the right. One party to the right of center (pragmatic) with the insane fascists on the right and the Progressive Liberal and Democrats on the left. The Clintons are working towards a new party - something submissive to corporate and 1% interests but not as racist as the Trump crowd, but just as corporatist as republican have ever been. We will have to form a new party of the PEOPLE after the abortion of democracy that is about to occur. Once they push through the TPP they will be the government.
SylviaD
(721 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Why would they stop now?
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)but others apparently do not.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)But nothing else? You can't win without them? Guess what...it is not on them if she loses ok
Actor
(626 posts)Unfortunately it will mean tremendous harm to many millions, but as long as they can say "told you so"
that is all that matters.
As a supporter of Bernie, someone who has supported him for longer than most, I find this very disturbing behavour.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Screw themselves. Screw their ideals. Screw the country.
If they dont give a shit why should anyone care about them. Grow the fuck up and is my advice to them. And stop with the baby temper tantrums.
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)imagine2015
(2,054 posts)peggysue2
(10,828 posts)Standing ovation on that advice!
I'm clean out of patience for the threats and whines. If the Bernie Brigade want to screw themselves? Let 'em. The rest of us have more important things to consider like defeating the Talking Yam Who Would Be King.
Donald Trump is the enemy to progress. He and his vile usurpers are an existential threat to everyone & anyone with a brain and pulse.
Bernie Brigade cannot see that? Well then, get out of the way for those of us who can. And yes, enough of the temper tantrums.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)BoBers think Hillary and Trump are equally horrifying but for different reasons.
BTW, many think Hillary is also an enemy to progress.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)we'll embrace Bernie with open arms.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)I'm glad you're not one of them.
griffi94
(3,733 posts)Can you imagine the blowback
if that were even considered.
Setting aside the rightful winner and the overwhelming choice
of women and POC to appease a group made up primarily
of angry white males.
The Democratic Party would cease to exist.
But the party leaders know that.
The talk about the SDs flipping is just a desperate fantasy
of Bernies fans now that his winning is a statistical impossibility.
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)Bernie Supporters will get no FREE STUFF. I on the other hand was not counting on a bunch of FREE STUFF with a Clinton win. Just good governance.
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)imagine2015
(2,054 posts)No more "free" government hand-outs and entitlements to the poor and working class people.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)in already. How's that for an "entitlement"?
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Channeling your inner Ron Paul today?
Typical Hillary Dempublican talking point. "Free stuff!" but let's invade another country & build another aircraft carrier because screw the people.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)The 1950s called by the way...Senator McCarthy would like it back
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Jitter65
(3,089 posts)Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)PufPuf23
(8,771 posts)the Democrats that crossed over and voted GWB are the same "values" segment of the Democratic party that support Hillary Clinton today.
Neo-liberals and shock doctrine are just dandy to them.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)You need to give people a reason to vote for, not against. The latter always leads to much lower voter turnout
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Besides, those "millions" have mostly never participated in our democracy, even though they could have. They mostly have just complained and never voted or even registered. Which means that they really don't care about the country. To paraphrase Ray from the movie Field of Dreams, they all ask "What's in it for me?" instead of doing what is best for the country. To be honest, they wouldn't turn out to vote for Bernie in November either. They will have lost all interest by then.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)We have won without them and can win again. My kids loved Bernie ...not so happy with him now...but still like him. However, those of voting age will vote Hillary because they have a brain.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)But, what makes you think the people who don't turn out would be hardest hit by Trump?
I would think the people hardest hit aren't even American citizens.
I'm interested in reading how you think that people who choose not to vote would be hardest hit.
NewImproved Deal
(534 posts)From U.S. Senator to Dogcatcher.
If I wanted a Neo-Con, Warmongering, Wall Street President I'd just switch to GOP...
[link:|
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Vincardog
(20,234 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Others will write-in Sanders or vote for Jill Stein. In any case, down-ticket Democrats are the ones who will really pay for being on a ballot headlined by Clinton.
Response to HooptieWagon (Reply #11)
potisok This message was self-deleted by its author.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)Last edited Tue May 10, 2016, 08:36 PM - Edit history (1)
Tantrums are not impressive...being the mother of four I know where this is headed...why next time they will know how important I am...no they won't just like your candidate, you will be irrelevant. We win ; we did it without you. We lose; with five justices for the GOP it doesn't matter. Your revolution will be remembered as what stopped the progressive movement in its tracks.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)If HRC is the candidate and she loses, she will be
considered the reason for the loss.
After all it is up to the candidate to get the
citizen energized to vote.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)And does not cause trouble at the convention. I think she will win anyway.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)don't understand that no one will appreciate their purity and if you think next time anyone will take you seriously, they won't. We have one chance to stop the GOP and save the courts. If we lost that chance, kiss your revolution goodbye.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Just be sure to take responsibility for where you end up after insisting on Clinton.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)However, I would have though such fine Bernie supporters would not overturn the will of the voters by selecting a nominee who lost the primary.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)But it is, and so you don't.
LexVegas
(6,060 posts)masmdu
(2,536 posts)Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)Hopefully reasonable people who understand the threat Donald Trump poses will save them from their bad judgement.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)endorse it, but many Sanders supporters will likely NOT support a Hillary-{fill-in-generic-NeoLib-Lieberman2.0} ticket even if Sanders endorses that ticket.
People get sick of "I'll adopt whatever core beliefs you want me to have." Hillary wants to appeal to Bush Republicans as well as Sanders-Warren-FDR Democrats. That ain't gonna happen. She should pretend to have core values and then run on those values. No one with true values can appeal to Bush Republicans and Sanders-Warren-FDR Democrats, and she should be old enough to realize that.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Unless I had drop-dead-certain inside information Hillary was going to be impeached and convicted (and obviously I don't), no VP pairing could possibly get me to vote for Princess Weathervane. This was likely true before, but now that she's already cynically lurched back to the right, it's a certainty.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)TwilightZone
(25,470 posts)Evidence would seem to be lacking. Plenty of evidence to the contrary is available, however.
Besides, party unity is usually reserved for the general election, once we have a nominee. It's been like that for time immemorial.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)He talked about it being the party of FDR, the importance of the platform, the importance of defeating Trump. Meanwhile, Hillary courts Jeb Bush donors.
Sorry Bernie, unless the FBI does its job and you win the nomination, it is no sale on the corrupt, corporatist Democratic Party of Hillary Clinton. Particularly after they've done everything possible to keep the nomination process from being a fair competition.
SusanLarson
(284 posts)If she is on the ticket, we will not vote for her. It is not about who her running mate is. She could put Warren or Sanders as VP and/or cabinet members; if Clinton is on the ticket the answer to the question will I vote for her is still a big nope!
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Dunno what you are talking about.
basselope
(2,565 posts)imagine2015
(2,054 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)We've been told we are irrelevant.
basselope
(2,565 posts)No matter what letter they have next to their name on a piece of paper.
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)The presidential election can be won with only non-liberal pure Democratic Party registered voters!
Sure it can.
leeroysphitz
(10,462 posts)imagine2015
(2,054 posts)Laffin out loud!
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)About the worst case is the Greens get a few more votes from unimpressed Ds, but Libertarians get a few more from unimpressed Rs. Who cares? No EVs will go to either fringe. I guarantee D+R EVs will still equal 538, and there is absolutely not a fucking scintilla of difference in realpolitik between a 51-47 popular vote win with 2 on the fringes and a, say, 50-46 with 4 going to them.
Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)Control Congress
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)I'm an adult and I listen to what people ask or encourage me to do and then make
the decision that's right for me. Nobody controls me, especially someone who I've
never met and doesn't give a crap about me the day after election day.
Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)then vote for the only candidate who can beat him in the GE - Bernie Sanders!
Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)Before Bernie Sanders is nominated. He has lost. You are from Ohio...you know Bernie can't win Ohio...never ever. I live in Ohio.
Peace Patriot
(24,010 posts)You really don't know your state that well, apparently.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)Once the swiftboating began...some of you wouldn't vote for him. I live in Trumbull County if he can't win here he can't win Ohio. I know my state too. I saw the polls that were within the margin of error for Ohio...only state that had a larger win for Sanders was PA...and PA went for Hillary. There were polls showing Hillary beating McCain too and not Obama...how can he win if he can't take Ohio was the meme? He took Ohio twice. We don't pick nominees based on mostly worthless polls. She has the most delegates; she wins.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Poo slinging isn't vetting
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)is swiftboating. And if they can destroy a fine man like Kerry, they can destroy Bernie. There is a reason they want him in the general.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Poo flinging isn't vetting
Poo flinging doesn't translate into votes, particularly in the Democratic Party
Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)Loudestlib
(980 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)all they can hope for is a dead-cat bounce for November--Clinton's even taking the money she said would go to downticket races because she's so spenthrift
meanwhile Sanders attracts new voters and independents by the millions: the GE won't be a closed primary no matter how hysterically DWS tries to bar the door
TwilightZone
(25,470 posts)She's also up nearly 20% (51-33) on Trump with Independents, according to a CBS poll.
Trump has a serious electoral college problem, regardless of our nominee. If the election were held now, Clinton would thump him.
I think your version of reality could use a little work.
Sources: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbs-poll-hillary-clinton-leads-donald-trump-but-voters-view-both-unfavorably/
www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/05/04/upshot/electoral-map-trump-clinton.html
Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)No matter how much you want it. You have to win a primary ...which makes me think he can't win a general either. Bernie would end up just like McGovern after the swiftboating began.
dana_b
(11,546 posts)Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)Care what he said
dana_b
(11,546 posts)care what he says/thinks than who care what SHE says/thinks.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)They have shown time and time again that they are not a reliable voting block. So wooing them is a waste of time. The Far Left relegates themselves to the margins.
Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)Tack to the right to get votes . Then the left spends the next 4 years bitching about our centrist politicians. Short-sighted , stubborn and stupid
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)YOu guys keep insisting on a candidate who polls show cannot beat him in the GE.
Maybe running a candidate who is more in touch with the left wing of the party would
eliminate this problem in the future.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Do Sanders supporters or are there just fewer of them?
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)of my Democratic party.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)There, I fixed it for you.
Sid
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Lots of important stuff downballot, though, from other races to ballot measures.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)Do you think that is meaningful. It is not.
onenote
(42,700 posts)I don't think that's true.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]"Everybody is just on their feet screaming 'Kill Kill Kill'! This is
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)There is no limit to selfish idiocy.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)would sit on their ass and let a fascist pig like Trump take over just because their fav didn't win?
I would have crawled on my belly across broken glass to vote for Bernie against Trump if he had gotten the nomination.
No real leftist/progressive/liberal is going to sit back and let Trump and the republican evil party take over.
Only the fake ones on message boards like DU. And they can all FO, as far as I'm concerned!
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)petulant, entitled adults in that tent for sure.
randome
(34,845 posts)Think of it as more of a tarp. A tarp for Independence! Now there's a rallying cry!
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"Everybody is just on their feet screaming 'Kill Kill Kill'! This is -hockey- Conservative values!"[/center][/font][hr]
Andy823
(11,495 posts)But I bet a large majority of those who "will sit home" are controlled by Karl Rove! Many of them never voted for a Democrat in their life, and they never will. Pushing the "millions will stay home" crap is bullshit. Anyone with half a brain will get out and vote, because they know that if they don't things will be really shitty once Trump gets in the WH.
msongs
(67,401 posts)TwilightZone
(25,470 posts)None. DU and other similar sites aren't even remotely representative of reality. They really don't "prove" anything other than that a small group of people can commandeer a web forum.
In the real world, most of us will do - and are doing - pretty much anything we can to ensure that we do not end up with President Donald Trump. Equally important, we will be working on down-ticket races to get the next president, regardless of whether it's Bernie or Hillary - a Congress more amenable to a better agenda.
You can do that. Or you can stay home and rant on DU. Your choice.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)Disaffection with the thought of a Hillary nomination goes far beyond DU.
TwilightZone
(25,470 posts)Especially that of an individual.
Facebook. lol
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)than Hillary's supporters think. I hope I'm wrong, although I'm not thrilled by her candidacy.
PDittie
(8,322 posts)That's false based on sheer absolutism. The "Latest Breaking News" forum for example, is based in reality.
TwilightZone
(25,470 posts)LBN is only one small part of DU.
See how easy that was? Being pedantic only works if your pedantry is accurate.
PDittie
(8,322 posts)Your own words make a mockery of you.
"DU and other similar sites aren't even remotely representative of reality"
"LBN is only one small part of DU."
Who's a pedant again?
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"Bernie doesn't control his supporters like unthinking robots..."
Both self-validating and a slap at those who vote other than as you do. Quite the little win-win for petulance and peevishness you've accomplished. Bravo, little fella. Bravo.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)I do not take it for granted. I am part of the process however jaded, bizarre and surreal it has become.
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)Too many of his supporters just don't get it. There are real consequences to nonresident immigrants, women, gays, blacks, and others if the White House is run by Republicans. The problem with Bernie is that he's from a state that is less than 1% black, and too many of his supporters simply do not care. They cannot be trusted. Too many of them are passive bigots, as the OP's warning attests to.
We should not cave to passive bigots, and should instead focus on the Democratic Party as a large inclusive party that is much bigger than Bernie Sanders and his supporters.
That said, most of his supporters will come around and vote for Hillary. Those that do are probably the same ones who allowed Republicans to get control of Congress in 2010, when only 22% of milennials voted and Democrats won by only a 55-44% margin. They did that even though Obama passed two of the most sweeping pieces of legislation since the New Deal, Obamacare and the Stimulus Bill, among other smaller pieces of progressive legislation.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)I always vote but can see why people have given up on the two party system corrupted by money and power.
The abuse of buying and selling votes crept in and money began to play an important part in determining elections. Later on, this process of corruption spread in the law courts and to the army, and finally, when even the sword became enslaved by the power of gold, the republic was subjected to the rule of emperors. Plutarch
Buns_of_Fire
(17,175 posts)Should Hillary be the nominee (likely) and should she lose to the Orange Rump (possibly), the leftish part of the party (the Sanders branch) is gonna be blamed. Oh, yes you are. You didn't clap loud enough, you said mean things, you didn't swoon at the mere mention of her name, whatever.
Your protests that you DID vote for her after all, even though you might have had to grit your teeth down to the gumline to do it, will be ignored. You weren't supportive enough. You actually made up your own mind, and were brazen enough to say so out loud.
You see, this isn't "Politician A" vs. "Politician B" anymore. It's become the Crusades. It's Godzilla vs. the Smog Monster -- somebody's gonna wind up stepped on, and you've been selected.
Just letting the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party know what might be coming. Plan accordingly. You're welcome.
P.S. You'll also be blamed for Halitosis, ingrown toenail, and terminal flatulence. I know you had nothing to do with any of them, but you committed thoughtcrime and must suffer for your lack of faith.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)TwilightZone
(25,470 posts)He's not running as an independent. To "continue" to do something, you have to start that something.
He's running as a Democrat and has indicated that he plans to remain a Democrat. He's not going to run as an independent. I think he's made that pretty clear.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)would hope Ralph Nader would have taught you all a lesson. Never allow a GOP to be elected president, and Trump is so crazy...even George W won't have anything to do with him.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)They will have themselves to blame when it all goes bad....no one else but themselves
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Is always above the fray
SusanLarson
(284 posts)She knows she has no chance to get them so is attempting to charm her base Republicans. She's already taking millions from Ted Cruz's fundraisers. She is not a democrat, and never has been. She is the poster child for DINO.
oasis
(49,379 posts)So stay home and prepare for 2 to 3 decades of pure hell.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)She is not going to 'voter', and I don't mind republicans donating and supporting her. You need both sides to win. BUT SHE IS GOING TO THE BAS-TURDS BUNDLERS! REPUBLICAN SPECIAL INTERESTS. Wow....that is not like Bernie having 'republican supporters'.
He does not go to Bush's 'bundlers'.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)This year might be a little different, but apathy is a thing we're used to.
Response to imagine2015 (Original post)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
samrock
(590 posts)If I don't get my way" defense. I gave that up when I turned 7
agracie
(950 posts)Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)Trump wins...we don't get the Senate...they will have all three branches of government. Of course, I think Hillary has a good shot with or without your sort.
agracie
(950 posts)Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)they would help unleash a Trump presidency on folks. Sorry, I have no affection for those of you who pout and won't vote. What you describe is the same as voting for Trump.
Rass
(112 posts)Anyone following politics understands that Hillary is not going to rock the boat. She is a right-winger after all. I 'd rather write in Bernie or vote for Jill Stein (Green Party). No republican-lite.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)that Trump as president and a right-wing SCOTUS is the change that you need...indeed.
Rass
(112 posts)Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)He will never be president.
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)So they'll return to their apathetic mode concerning participating in elections. A loss for sure, but their votes are their own.
shanti
(21,675 posts)because i want to vote for rec cannabis here in CA. however, i'll not vote for a conservative, so if bernie isn't on the ballot, i'll write him in, and my brother has stated the same. the lesser of two evils is still evil!
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)We have truly abysmal voter turnout in this country. It's even worse in years where a President isn't elected.
People stay home for all sorts of reasons. They will stay home for all sorts of reasons this year, too.
The ones who show up are the ones who decide. That is, and always has been, true. And so it will be again in 2016.
The lesson? Show up and vote. It's that simple.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)Because if you think any 'revolution ' can survive Trump and five picks for SCOTUS then I have a famous bridge in Brooklyn to sell you... Why did you do it Bernie...we had demographics and momentum...now we have division and a potential GE loss. Trump is a tyrant in the making; we will be lucky if we get to vote again if he is elected. I wonder how many will die under Trump? Ah well,any movement has collateral damage, right? Hopefully...we won't all be glowing in the dark as he uses nukes on someone anyone...because he is crazy.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)Big waves rolling in.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)Eko
(7,281 posts)Why should we expect anything different this time around? Independents and the young, helping republicans incrementally.
Eko
(7,281 posts)"So long and thanks for all the fish!"
A Little Weird
(1,754 posts)Until you start running candidates people can get behind. The dems on the ticket in my state were republican-lite. The party leaders pushed them heavily. When given a choice between a pretend republican and a real one, voters will choose the real one every time.
Eko
(7,281 posts)Another way is that independents and young people just dont like politics very much as a whole. They may like some politicians every once in a while, but not politics. They genuinely believe that both parties are the same for the most part, and being ignorant of politics they cant see how that is drastically wrong. They are a product of the republican narrative that has been foisted onto people for a long time and for them politics is a game you win not an actual process. Not all are like this, but the majority is. You can blame the leaders all you want, its not them. They are the product of us, and we suck.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Bill USA
(6,436 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)dana_b
(11,546 posts)ecstatic
(32,699 posts)if a group of politically inactive people stay inactive?
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)They give no fucks about the country under Trump. Hey, maybe we should just all throw a tantrum and not vote if our preferred candidate doesn't win.
Fuck That and anyone who would threaten that. They are self-obsessed assholes.
apcalc
(4,465 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)if it comes to that.