Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNebraska is proving the problem with caucuses.
The non-binding primary is going to have far more people vote in it and it looks like Hillary is going to win it by a wide margin.
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nebraska is proving the problem with caucuses. (Original Post)
Zynx
May 2016
OP
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)1. here is a link for the vote count.
dchill
(42,660 posts)2. Does anybody know what kind of voting machines they've switched to...
from the paper ballots in the caucus?
Zynx
(21,328 posts)3. Why bother with fraud in a nonbinding election?
dchill
(42,660 posts)4. Same reason you're posting an OP.
Optics.
Zynx
(21,328 posts)5. You caught me. I'm in on the fraud.
:-O
dchill
(42,660 posts)6. Seriously, why would anyone vote in a non-binding primary?
Something to prove? It's not a new election. Bernie already won. Are we gonna do a revote in AZ?