Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProgressiveEconomist

(5,818 posts)
Wed May 11, 2016, 10:29 AM May 2016

LINK to Politico Delegate Tracker: HRC needs 14% of remaining delegates to clinch; Bernie 86 percent

http://politi.co/2176fPm

2383 delegates are needed to clinch the nomination, and 1057 remain to be chosen. Hillary needs 144 to get to 2383, while Bernie needs 914.

What would you say are Hillary’s chances of getting to 2383? Bernie’s?
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
LINK to Politico Delegate Tracker: HRC needs 14% of remaining delegates to clinch; Bernie 86 percent (Original Post) ProgressiveEconomist May 2016 OP
You mean Bernie isn't going to get those supers to switch? tonyt53 May 2016 #1
IMO Bernie has been running AGAINST the Democratic Party for a year ProgressiveEconomist May 2016 #2
The supers will have to respect their states' voters; most of them are elected in their states. lagomorph777 May 2016 #4
Hmm...Whom to believe...a mainstream media outlet with ProgressiveEconomist May 2016 #8
??? Making up rules ??? lagomorph777 May 2016 #11
Every time I read one of these posts, I'm ProgressiveEconomist May 2016 #18
Even if all the supers Demsrule86 May 2016 #12
Sure if you tell CA OR NJ and DC to go to hell - but perhaps you need those 50 million voters lagomorph777 May 2016 #15
What a seriously ridiculous reply LoverOfLiberty May 2016 #21
It's all about the bern enid602 May 2016 #3
That math is wrong. The race is to 2,026 pledged delegates. Bernie needs 589 more, HIllary needs 309 morningfog May 2016 #5
In other words, Bernie is toast. CorkySt.Clair May 2016 #7
Ew. You sig line is disgusting and should be hidden. morningfog May 2016 #9
Thank you. I HATE it when they dana_b May 2016 #16
On the pledged only side of the equation: Buzz Clik May 2016 #6
Are you falling into the Bernie Bros "new rules" trap? ProgressiveEconomist May 2016 #14
I think the point is that no matter which selective rules they wish to assert, Bernie is losing synergie May 2016 #17
I didn't mention 2383 or the supers at all. Buzz Clik May 2016 #19
No--you said "needs ... to win" ProgressiveEconomist May 2016 #26
You win the semantics game. Buzz Clik May 2016 #27
Math still doesn't work for sanders beachbumbob May 2016 #10
It's been over for more than a month, maybe longer. George II May 2016 #13
LINK to Politico Delegate Tracker: HRC needs 14% of remaining delegates to clinch; Bernie 86 percent jmousso75 May 2016 #20
To stop wasting, time, resources and energy on a race that is over Sheepshank May 2016 #25
Not progressive but Bull Shit. . . . pdsimdars May 2016 #22
I haven't played with any math. I just turned ProgressiveEconomist May 2016 #24
2026 for majority of pledged delegates. Tiggeroshii May 2016 #23
 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
1. You mean Bernie isn't going to get those supers to switch?
Wed May 11, 2016, 10:36 AM
May 2016

the biggest problem Bernie has is his rationale. He says he can get those supers to switch. Those supers are lifelong Democrats, and many are running for political offices now and November. Bernie, and his supporters, have done nothing to help them at all. Bernie will be lucky to have a seat at the back of the room at the convention.

ProgressiveEconomist

(5,818 posts)
2. IMO Bernie has been running AGAINST the Democratic Party for a year
Wed May 11, 2016, 10:40 AM
May 2016

A Party is a team, while a McGovern or a Sanders is a clueless ego-tripper whose nomination would result in Democrats losing most every national or statewide contest in November.

IMO, it was very wise to institute the superdelegate system, in order to prevent an "anti-Establishment" candidate from bringing down the party by boring frm within.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
4. The supers will have to respect their states' voters; most of them are elected in their states.
Wed May 11, 2016, 10:43 AM
May 2016

Bernie doesn't need to beg them to switch; he intends to show them the folly of voting against their states' voters.

And to correct Politico's math, the relevant numbers are in the PDs.

Total Clinton Sanders
4051 1716 1430

To reach 2026, Bernie needs 596 more PDs. That is 66% of remaining delegates, same as before WV.

ProgressiveEconomist

(5,818 posts)
8. Hmm...Whom to believe...a mainstream media outlet with
Wed May 11, 2016, 10:49 AM
May 2016

millions of regular readers... or anonymous Bernie Bros making up their own rules for the Democratic National Convention?

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
11. ??? Making up rules ???
Wed May 11, 2016, 10:52 AM
May 2016

Simply pointing out common sense. Don't buy into the ridiculous meme that Bernie is trying to illegitimately flip supers. That's a provable lie. Here are his actual statements.

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/05/01/bernie-sanders-says-superdelegates-should-follow-voters-will-in-landslide-states/

ProgressiveEconomist

(5,818 posts)
18. Every time I read one of these posts, I'm
Wed May 11, 2016, 10:57 AM
May 2016

reminded of Bill Maher's "New Rules" show segment, from what I remember of him, back before I cut the cord to HBO.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
12. Even if all the supers
Wed May 11, 2016, 10:53 AM
May 2016

voted with their states which would include supers moving to Hillary in states she won...Bernie still loses.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
15. Sure if you tell CA OR NJ and DC to go to hell - but perhaps you need those 50 million voters
Wed May 11, 2016, 10:54 AM
May 2016

in the GE? Just possibly?

LoverOfLiberty

(1,438 posts)
21. What a seriously ridiculous reply
Wed May 11, 2016, 11:22 AM
May 2016

If CA, NJ or DC go to Trump in the general, the contest would already be long over.

What you responded to still stands. If all of the SDs go with the states won, Clinton still wins the nomination.

The only way Sanders can win with SDs is if states won by him choose him and states won by Clinton choose him.

Not very democratic, is it?

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
5. That math is wrong. The race is to 2,026 pledged delegates. Bernie needs 589 more, HIllary needs 309
Wed May 11, 2016, 10:44 AM
May 2016

65.7% needed for Bernie.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
6. On the pledged only side of the equation:
Wed May 11, 2016, 10:47 AM
May 2016

HRC needs 34% of the remaining pledged delegates to win. She can lose 65-35 in every state (including Wash DC) and still win.

ProgressiveEconomist

(5,818 posts)
14. Are you falling into the Bernie Bros "new rules" trap?
Wed May 11, 2016, 10:54 AM
May 2016

I doubt anyone is going to get to 2383 without superdelegates. The bogus 2026 PD target set by Bernie Bros is a completely meaningless and irrelevant figure, IMO. Let's use the official DNC rules to project the winner.

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
17. I think the point is that no matter which selective rules they wish to assert, Bernie is losing
Wed May 11, 2016, 10:56 AM
May 2016

on every front.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
19. I didn't mention 2383 or the supers at all.
Wed May 11, 2016, 11:09 AM
May 2016

The calculation is, as I stated, for pledged delegates only. It provides a barometer of how the individual states voted.

 

jmousso75

(71 posts)
20. LINK to Politico Delegate Tracker: HRC needs 14% of remaining delegates to clinch; Bernie 86 percent
Wed May 11, 2016, 11:12 AM
May 2016

So why are the Hillary supporters still whining and complaining and calling for Bernie to get out?

Seems to me........she's not that strong of a candidate..........

she didn't get out until the convention in 2008........

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
25. To stop wasting, time, resources and energy on a race that is over
Wed May 11, 2016, 12:05 PM
May 2016

except for the eccentric, ego stroking, spittle throwing, angry man...who insists on marching and collecting $27

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
22. Not progressive but Bull Shit. . . .
Wed May 11, 2016, 11:22 AM
May 2016

You've played with the math to confuse the issue. Why not just play it straight?

You can't count the Super Delegates in until the convention and neither candidate will likely get the required number of PLEDGED delegates, which is what is required now.

Dis-Information. Must be a Hillary supporter, what else? Trying to push lies and disinformation.

ProgressiveEconomist

(5,818 posts)
24. I haven't played with any math. I just turned
Wed May 11, 2016, 11:28 AM
May 2016

Politico's numbers into percentages of 1057.

It's either Politico or you who have "played with the math", and I don't think it's Politico.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»LINK to Politico Delegate...