Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

egalitegirl

(362 posts)
Wed May 11, 2016, 01:48 PM May 2016

Hillary supporters, do you consider the Bush family's acts to be criminal?

Hillary supporters, can you please honestly answer if you consider the Bush family's actions to be criminal? With respect to wars? With respect to their economic policies? Would you accept someone who is their ally as your leader?

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary supporters, do you consider the Bush family's acts to be criminal? (Original Post) egalitegirl May 2016 OP
We love the Bushes! onehandle May 2016 #1
Excellent reply! (A response befitting the question.) NurseJackie May 2016 #11
I just checked with them all again. NCTraveler May 2016 #26
Hey! Someone used the word boy here in a post notadmblnd May 2016 #36
No. Nt NCTraveler May 2016 #37
LOL Sparkly May 2016 #40
Are you now suggesting Hillary is responsible for what the Bush klan does? Lil Missy May 2016 #2
Gotcha question much, right? LisaM May 2016 #7
Boy, you got that right. hamsterjill May 2016 #14
Ha ha! LisaM May 2016 #25
A typical passive-aggressive tactic. puffy socks May 2016 #27
Today's version is whether Hillary believes in climate change... LisaM May 2016 #46
Why are you implicating Hillary is an ally of Bush with respect to his policies? LonePirate May 2016 #3
I've got this one -- IdaBriggs May 2016 #6
One speech for one vote based on false evidence from Bush/Cheney? That's all you've got? LonePirate May 2016 #9
And yet she didn't throw a hissy fit/demand his impeachment IdaBriggs May 2016 #12
Perhaps being the spouse of a former impeached president she didn't think she should make that claim LonePirate May 2016 #15
Barack Obama 26 October 2002: BlueStateLib May 2016 #10
Yet he still voted NO on the IWR. One of the many awesome things IdaBriggs May 2016 #13
No he did not. JackRiddler May 2016 #16
You are correct/my apologies. As I have stated down thread... IdaBriggs May 2016 #33
No he didn't leftynyc May 2016 #20
I'm not - although I was apparently confused a bit. IdaBriggs May 2016 #32
So, what is this thing you've got? Proof that Bush and the cronies lied to the Senate via synergie May 2016 #19
Hillary was not told, as Bush and Cheney were, a few weeks prior to invading that Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #29
i do consider the bush acts to be illegal. i do not like bill palling around with them. Politics MariaThinks May 2016 #4
The democratic party condoning the war crimes of the Bush administration was a done deal My Good Babushka May 2016 #5
Hillary is excited about "opportunities" in Iraq laserhaas May 2016 #8
Do you understand how politics works? They are not allied to the Clintons, you seem to mistake synergie May 2016 #17
You're on a roll. randome May 2016 #22
GWB: Bill is "brother from another mother" pat_k May 2016 #23
Yes. If more people vote for the good guys, the good guys run things. It's not overly complicated. lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #47
GWB: War Criminal and Election thief pat_k May 2016 #18
Poppy: War Criminal and Election Thief Octafish May 2016 #41
Yes. Kevin Phillips, "American Dynasty:...Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush" pat_k May 2016 #43
Do you think Bernie was leftynyc May 2016 #21
Why, when he saw Putin, he should have spit in the man's face! That would have taught him! randome May 2016 #24
In 1988, it was Gorbachev -- a time of "Reagan-Gorbachev reprochement. pat_k May 2016 #30
Gorbachev, Reagan, and Bush in New York City, December 1988. pat_k May 2016 #28
So what? leftynyc May 2016 #39
And another strawman heads off into battle!!!!! JoePhilly May 2016 #31
The main reason I got online and then found DU BootinUp May 2016 #34
honest question? y-e-a-h sure Sheepshank May 2016 #35
Ally? jzodda May 2016 #38
No kidding. Professional Colleagues. Octafish May 2016 #42
That looks like good Irish whisky in that cup. JustABozoOnThisBus May 2016 #44
I think you have to play the hand you're dealt, not the hand you think you should have had LaydeeBug May 2016 #45

LisaM

(29,548 posts)
7. Gotcha question much, right?
Wed May 11, 2016, 02:12 PM
May 2016

This is typical of a lot of stuff I've seen around here recently. The OP will ask what she or he frames as an innocent enough question, but of course is waiting to pounce on almost any response. They tend to seek yes or no answers to complicated questions, but the real point seems to be to lure Hillary supporters into giving an answer that can then be turned around to "but she ______, so......"

This is not much like the DU I joined back in 2001 when it was just a lot of smart, funny people banding together. There now seems to be a concerted effort to drive a wedge through the Democratic party itself.

hamsterjill

(17,197 posts)
14. Boy, you got that right.
Wed May 11, 2016, 02:35 PM
May 2016

Yesterday, it was the concept that if someone supported Hillary, they couldn't possibly care that young men and women died in a war.

No, the DU today is NOT the same as it was back in 2001 when I lurked incessantly because I was amazed at the level of intelligent discussion, which taught me a lot about politics. I officially joined in 2004.

 

puffy socks

(1,473 posts)
27. A typical passive-aggressive tactic.
Wed May 11, 2016, 03:30 PM
May 2016

My personal favorite is when you post links showing Bernie has done the same thing or that what they are saying is untrue you are "posting off topic"

LisaM

(29,548 posts)
46. Today's version is whether Hillary believes in climate change...
Thu May 12, 2016, 10:25 AM
May 2016

With a long response by the OP: "if she does, then why....."

LonePirate

(14,350 posts)
3. Why are you implicating Hillary is an ally of Bush with respect to his policies?
Wed May 11, 2016, 01:53 PM
May 2016

What basis or evidence do you have for your position?

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
6. I've got this one --
Wed May 11, 2016, 02:05 PM
May 2016
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001." -- (more at link) http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/01/12/435624/-A-golden-oldie-Hillary-s-floor-speech-to-invade-Iraq

LonePirate

(14,350 posts)
9. One speech for one vote based on false evidence from Bush/Cheney? That's all you've got?
Wed May 11, 2016, 02:13 PM
May 2016

The vast majority of Dem senators voted for the IWR. Calling them Bush allies because of that is pure ignorance.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
12. And yet she didn't throw a hissy fit/demand his impeachment
Wed May 11, 2016, 02:32 PM
May 2016

when she found out differently, did she?

Well, here's another one -- the "Clinton Bush Haiti Fund"

http://www.clintonbushhaitifund.org

$54M that looks like it disappeared into a vast sink hole of fraud.

Of course, that happened with most of the Haiti funds...

http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/655278.pdf

BlueStateLib

(937 posts)
10. Barack Obama 26 October 2002:
Wed May 11, 2016, 02:17 PM
May 2016
Barack Obama 26 October 2002: "I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity". He"s a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
33. You are correct/my apologies. As I have stated down thread...
Wed May 11, 2016, 03:39 PM
May 2016
He wasn't in the Senate at the time (hence he didn't vote for it) but

He was not in the U.S. senate when President Bush invaded Iraq, but as a state senator in Illinois, he expressed his vocal opposition to the war. And when he was elected in 2004, he became one of the few who voted against the surge and against expansion of the war. Later, in 2008, as a presidential candidate, he promised that if elected, he would end US involvement in Iraq. And that is exactly what he did. http://www.answers.com/Q/How_did_Barack_Obama_vote_on_the_Iraq_war


I can only plead sleep deprivation and memory confusion on this topic because I was only paying periphery attention at the time ("opposed the war" was what stuck) because of new twins.

Apologies for the confusion (but I still think he is smarter than Hillary because he figured it out from Illinois while she couldn't figure out Bush was lying from Washington).

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
32. I'm not - although I was apparently confused a bit.
Wed May 11, 2016, 03:38 PM
May 2016

He wasn't in the Senate at the time (hence he didn't vote for it) but

He was not in the U.S. senate when President Bush invaded Iraq, but as a state senator in Illinois, he expressed his vocal opposition to the war. And when he was elected in 2004, he became one of the few who voted against the surge and against expansion of the war. Later, in 2008, as a presidential candidate, he promised that if elected, he would end US involvement in Iraq. And that is exactly what he did. http://www.answers.com/Q/How_did_Barack_Obama_vote_on_the_Iraq_war


I can only plead sleep deprivation and memory confusion on this topic because I was only paying periphery attention at the time ("opposed the war" was what stuck) because of new twins.

Apologies for the confusion (but I still think he is smarter than Hillary because he figured it out from Illinois while she couldn't figure out Bush was lying from Washington).

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
19. So, what is this thing you've got? Proof that Bush and the cronies lied to the Senate via
Wed May 11, 2016, 03:02 PM
May 2016

the intelligence agencies?

You guys really have no clue what was going on at that time, and the actual crimes of the Bush/Cheney regime do you? No, you're obsessed with how the families get along to bother with facts.

You don't "got this one", but the lengths you will go to pretend you do is illuminating.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
29. Hillary was not told, as Bush and Cheney were, a few weeks prior to invading that
Wed May 11, 2016, 03:34 PM
May 2016

their main source of intel was lying to them.

Of course they invaded anyway because WMD was never the reason for the war in the first place.

Hillary made a mistake, she has made several, still no comparison to anybody on the other side.



Also, the relationship most politicians and rich people have with each other is a huge problem, but to single out Hillary is absurd.

Once again they want to hold up an almost impossible example and if Hillary cant live up to it then everybody can fuck off, in their minds.

MariaThinks

(2,495 posts)
4. i do consider the bush acts to be illegal. i do not like bill palling around with them. Politics
Wed May 11, 2016, 01:55 PM
May 2016

make strange bedfellows so I do support Hillary.

My Good Babushka

(2,710 posts)
5. The democratic party condoning the war crimes of the Bush administration was a done deal
Wed May 11, 2016, 01:58 PM
May 2016

when Obama decided not to pursue convictions. Under the Geneva Convention, failing to take action to prosecute those guilty of war crimes such as the “Crime against Peace” (invading a country that does not pose an imminent threat to the attacker), and torture, are war crimes in and of themselves. US authorities, including President Obama, are engaged in an “ongoing criminal conspiracy under international law” both to cover up and protect criminals like Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld, and to continue the commission of war crimes by the US government.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-biden-are-war-criminals-under-un-charter-analyst/5316112

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
17. Do you understand how politics works? They are not allied to the Clintons, you seem to mistake
Wed May 11, 2016, 02:59 PM
May 2016

cordial personal relations between people who got together AFTER they were out of office to raise money and awareness during times of disaster with "political allies".

Would you truly prefer someone as president who didn't have basic social skills and had zero ability to talk to anyone that didn't agree with them or pass their purity tests?

You do understand why that type of person would be dangerous both in domestic policy and foreign policy, right? Or do you just enjoy utter stagnation in general, not only from the regressive GOP, but ALSO from the White House?

pat_k

(12,827 posts)
23. GWB: Bill is "brother from another mother"
Wed May 11, 2016, 03:12 PM
May 2016
http://time.com/3584031/george-bush-bill-clinton/."

That's beyond "cordial."

Seeking out situations in which you must be "cordial" to a torturer who should be standing trial at the Hague, not to mention an unlawfully elected president, is appalling.

This is not about "disagreeing." It's about having the courage of your convictions to stand up for our national soul. Either they are cowards who won't stand up for principle, or unprincipled.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
41. Poppy: War Criminal and Election Thief
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:05 PM
May 2016

Seems that he and Bill Casey's chums cough Laurence Silberman met with the Iranians who were holding the hostages. Poppy later lied America into war on Iraq in 1991, like his dim son would a decade later. Swell people. In the right country club, if you get my drift..

pat_k

(12,827 posts)
43. Yes. Kevin Phillips, "American Dynasty:...Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush"
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:10 PM
May 2016

American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush (2004)

A very revealing book on many things -- including exposing the "October surprise."

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
21. Do you think Bernie was
Wed May 11, 2016, 03:05 PM
May 2016

acting on behalf of the Soviet Union and supporting all their fascist, human rights violations when he honeymooned there? That he was anti-American scum for sucking up to our biggest enemy at the time? Should we accept someone with so little regard for their own country and reputation as our leader?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
24. Why, when he saw Putin, he should have spit in the man's face! That would have taught him!
Wed May 11, 2016, 03:12 PM
May 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

pat_k

(12,827 posts)
28. Gorbachev, Reagan, and Bush in New York City, December 1988.
Wed May 11, 2016, 03:33 PM
May 2016
https://history.state.gov/milestones/1981-1988/u.s.-soviet-relations

Not to mention Moscow summit of 1988

The same year Sanders went with a 12-person delegation to Yaroslavl after his marriage.
 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
39. So what?
Wed May 11, 2016, 03:59 PM
May 2016

The point is anyone can make anything look bad and if you think Bernie is any different, you really have fallen for the bullshit.

BootinUp

(51,039 posts)
34. The main reason I got online and then found DU
Wed May 11, 2016, 03:42 PM
May 2016

was my desire to determine if the country had gone completely insane, and to express my desire to send Dubya back to Texas in 2004.

jzodda

(2,124 posts)
38. Ally?
Wed May 11, 2016, 03:51 PM
May 2016

What nonsense.

First off I didn't know you could not be friends with somebody you disagree with politically. The two families are part of the most exclusive club in the nation, the ex presidents.

Second we have hundreds of times of Clinton opposing the Bush administration on policy and before that we have many from her times as first lady. Its all out there- her entire Senate record including her war vote that she admits was a mistake. She was lied to with faulty intel and unlike Bernie she believed it.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
42. No kidding. Professional Colleagues.
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:08 PM
May 2016

Her Husband works with him at UBS in the "Weath Management" department.



Before UBS, they all worked together in Washington, where Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Texas) shepherded financial deregulation of the banks through Congress and President Bill Clinton (D-USA) signed it into law, the repeal of New Deal protections that kept Wall Street from using the taxpayers for their tab at the casino. President Bush was there, too, making sure the Banksters got away in 2008.

Forensic economist and former Fed regulator William K. Black wrote it reminds him of what happened during the Savings and Loans Crisis of the late 80s and early 90s. At the time, that was the greatest heist in history.

Lot of professional courtesy goin' on, eh?

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
45. I think you have to play the hand you're dealt, not the hand you think you should have had
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:26 PM
May 2016

or the one other think you have. Your OP suggests that HRC is an *ally* of the Bush family. Please stop.

It's insulting.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary supporters, do yo...