2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary supporters, do you consider the Bush family's acts to be criminal?
Hillary supporters, can you please honestly answer if you consider the Bush family's actions to be criminal? With respect to wars? With respect to their economic policies? Would you accept someone who is their ally as your leader?
onehandle
(51,122 posts)I speak for all of us.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Still unanimous.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Care to give them a lecture on what is sexist?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)This is absurd.
LisaM
(29,548 posts)This is typical of a lot of stuff I've seen around here recently. The OP will ask what she or he frames as an innocent enough question, but of course is waiting to pounce on almost any response. They tend to seek yes or no answers to complicated questions, but the real point seems to be to lure Hillary supporters into giving an answer that can then be turned around to "but she ______, so......"
This is not much like the DU I joined back in 2001 when it was just a lot of smart, funny people banding together. There now seems to be a concerted effort to drive a wedge through the Democratic party itself.
hamsterjill
(17,197 posts)Yesterday, it was the concept that if someone supported Hillary, they couldn't possibly care that young men and women died in a war.
No, the DU today is NOT the same as it was back in 2001 when I lurked incessantly because I was amazed at the level of intelligent discussion, which taught me a lot about politics. I officially joined in 2004.
LisaM
(29,548 posts)Yes, every day a new one. Now I'll be on the lookout!
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)My personal favorite is when you post links showing Bernie has done the same thing or that what they are saying is untrue you are "posting off topic"
LisaM
(29,548 posts)With a long response by the OP: "if she does, then why....."
LonePirate
(14,350 posts)What basis or evidence do you have for your position?
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)LonePirate
(14,350 posts)The vast majority of Dem senators voted for the IWR. Calling them Bush allies because of that is pure ignorance.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)when she found out differently, did she?
Well, here's another one -- the "Clinton Bush Haiti Fund"
http://www.clintonbushhaitifund.org
$54M that looks like it disappeared into a vast sink hole of fraud.
Of course, that happened with most of the Haiti funds...
http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/655278.pdf
LonePirate
(14,350 posts)BlueStateLib
(937 posts)IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)about him - he's smarter than Hillary!
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)He was a state senator from Illinois.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)I can only plead sleep deprivation and memory confusion on this topic because I was only paying periphery attention at the time ("opposed the war" was what stuck) because of new twins.
Apologies for the confusion (but I still think he is smarter than Hillary because he figured it out from Illinois while she couldn't figure out Bush was lying from Washington).
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Why lie?
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)He wasn't in the Senate at the time (hence he didn't vote for it) but
I can only plead sleep deprivation and memory confusion on this topic because I was only paying periphery attention at the time ("opposed the war" was what stuck) because of new twins.
Apologies for the confusion (but I still think he is smarter than Hillary because he figured it out from Illinois while she couldn't figure out Bush was lying from Washington).
synergie
(1,901 posts)the intelligence agencies?
You guys really have no clue what was going on at that time, and the actual crimes of the Bush/Cheney regime do you? No, you're obsessed with how the families get along to bother with facts.
You don't "got this one", but the lengths you will go to pretend you do is illuminating.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)their main source of intel was lying to them.
Of course they invaded anyway because WMD was never the reason for the war in the first place.
Hillary made a mistake, she has made several, still no comparison to anybody on the other side.
Also, the relationship most politicians and rich people have with each other is a huge problem, but to single out Hillary is absurd.
Once again they want to hold up an almost impossible example and if Hillary cant live up to it then everybody can fuck off, in their minds.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)make strange bedfellows so I do support Hillary.
My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)when Obama decided not to pursue convictions. Under the Geneva Convention, failing to take action to prosecute those guilty of war crimes such as the Crime against Peace (invading a country that does not pose an imminent threat to the attacker), and torture, are war crimes in and of themselves. US authorities, including President Obama, are engaged in an ongoing criminal conspiracy under international law both to cover up and protect criminals like Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld, and to continue the commission of war crimes by the US government.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-biden-are-war-criminals-under-un-charter-analyst/5316112
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)But never bothers mentioning how we owe Iraqi people an apology
synergie
(1,901 posts)cordial personal relations between people who got together AFTER they were out of office to raise money and awareness during times of disaster with "political allies".
Would you truly prefer someone as president who didn't have basic social skills and had zero ability to talk to anyone that didn't agree with them or pass their purity tests?
You do understand why that type of person would be dangerous both in domestic policy and foreign policy, right? Or do you just enjoy utter stagnation in general, not only from the regressive GOP, but ALSO from the White House?
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
pat_k
(12,827 posts)That's beyond "cordial."
Seeking out situations in which you must be "cordial" to a torturer who should be standing trial at the Hague, not to mention an unlawfully elected president, is appalling.
This is not about "disagreeing." It's about having the courage of your convictions to stand up for our national soul. Either they are cowards who won't stand up for principle, or unprincipled.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)pat_k
(12,827 posts)Last edited Wed May 11, 2016, 04:11 PM - Edit history (1)
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Seems that he and Bill Casey's chums cough Laurence Silberman met with the Iranians who were holding the hostages. Poppy later lied America into war on Iraq in 1991, like his dim son would a decade later. Swell people. In the right country club, if you get my drift..
pat_k
(12,827 posts)American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush (2004)
A very revealing book on many things -- including exposing the "October surprise."
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)acting on behalf of the Soviet Union and supporting all their fascist, human rights violations when he honeymooned there? That he was anti-American scum for sucking up to our biggest enemy at the time? Should we accept someone with so little regard for their own country and reputation as our leader?
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
pat_k
(12,827 posts)A time in which we had the opportunity to influence.
pat_k
(12,827 posts)Not to mention Moscow summit of 1988
The same year Sanders went with a 12-person delegation to Yaroslavl after his marriage.
The point is anyone can make anything look bad and if you think Bernie is any different, you really have fallen for the bullshit.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)
BootinUp
(51,039 posts)was my desire to determine if the country had gone completely insane, and to express my desire to send Dubya back to Texas in 2004.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)jzodda
(2,124 posts)What nonsense.
First off I didn't know you could not be friends with somebody you disagree with politically. The two families are part of the most exclusive club in the nation, the ex presidents.
Second we have hundreds of times of Clinton opposing the Bush administration on policy and before that we have many from her times as first lady. Its all out there- her entire Senate record including her war vote that she admits was a mistake. She was lied to with faulty intel and unlike Bernie she believed it.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Her Husband works with him at UBS in the "Weath Management" department.

Before UBS, they all worked together in Washington, where Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Texas) shepherded financial deregulation of the banks through Congress and President Bill Clinton (D-USA) signed it into law, the repeal of New Deal protections that kept Wall Street from using the taxpayers for their tab at the casino. President Bush was there, too, making sure the Banksters got away in 2008.
Forensic economist and former Fed regulator William K. Black wrote it reminds him of what happened during the Savings and Loans Crisis of the late 80s and early 90s. At the time, that was the greatest heist in history.
Lot of professional courtesy goin' on, eh?
JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,635 posts)Nice of Hill to help him stay upright.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)or the one other think you have. Your OP suggests that HRC is an *ally* of the Bush family. Please stop.
It's insulting.
