Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:01 PM May 2016

NYT: F.B.I. Director Says He Won’t Rush Inquiry on Hillary Clinton Emails

WASHINGTON — The director of the F.B.I. said on Wednesday that he would not be rushed into finishing his agency’s investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails on an election timetable. And he would not say whether the inquiry would be wrapped up by the November presidential election.

“We want to do it well and we want to do it promptly, so I feel pressure to do both of those things,” James Comey, the F.B.I. director, said.

“I don’t tether to any particular external deadline,” he said, “so I do feel the pressure to do it well and promptly, but as between the two, I always choose well.”

While Mrs. Clinton has characterized the investigation as a “security inquiry,” Mr. Comey said he was “not familiar with the term.”

The F.B.I.’s case began as a security referral from the inspectors general of the State Department and the nation’s intelligence agencies, who were concerned that classified information might have been stored outside a secure government network. But multiple law enforcement officials said the matter quickly became an investigation into whether anyone had committed a crime in handling classified information.

Mr. Comey said he was receiving regular briefings on the status of the investigation, which has included interviews with some of Mrs. Clinton’s closest aides at the State Department on her decision to use a private server for all her government business as secretary of state. Some emails that went through her server appear to have been classified at various security levels because of sensitive information."

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/05/12/us/comey-hillary-clinton-emails-fbi.html?partner=IFTTT&referer=https://t.co/yvwRKpJGTW

67 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT: F.B.I. Director Says He Won’t Rush Inquiry on Hillary Clinton Emails (Original Post) NWCorona May 2016 OP
BREAKING LINGUISTIC CLARIFICATION NEWS! nt onehandle May 2016 #1
I'm sure you want to think that but Hillary is officially under FBI investigation. nt NWCorona May 2016 #2
And some here hope she loses in November and Trump is elected and millions are harmed Actor May 2016 #32
No doubt nt NWCorona May 2016 #33
Isn't that all you need to know? pdsimdars May 2016 #3
Why do Democrats always get investigated by Republicans? Gomez163 May 2016 #4
So now Comey is a right wing hack? Please continue. morningfog May 2016 #6
Exhibit A Gomez163 May 2016 #10
First, links help. morningfog May 2016 #14
ALL REPUBLICANS ARE HACKS. Gomez163 May 2016 #16
You really think he is leading the FBI on a right wing hatchet job? Yes or no? morningfog May 2016 #17
Absolutely or it would have been over last year. Gomez163 May 2016 #19
Good to know your level of denial. morningfog May 2016 #21
Yet Hillary is so eager to bring them into her campaign. NWCorona May 2016 #20
Who? Gomez163 May 2016 #22
Republicans nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #42
Unfortunately this is a fact, they cant be trusted, not one of them. Well, maybe one Actor May 2016 #36
Exhibit B Gomez163 May 2016 #12
Good to know simply being a Republican ThirdWayToTheHighway May 2016 #62
The bigger question is why don't we go after them? NWCorona May 2016 #8
Obama appointed the investigator who brought the FBI in amborin May 2016 #13
No investigation of Powell, Rice or Albright Gomez163 May 2016 #15
How many times does this shit need to be corrected? frylock May 2016 #23
You really just like to ignore facts and context ThirdWayToTheHighway May 2016 #63
No - they didn't. Fawke Em May 2016 #66
Why would Obama fire him? Obama appointed him, unless Obama is now a member Autumn May 2016 #28
This was Obama trying to appear bipartisan. Gomez163 May 2016 #31
Agreed. Actor May 2016 #38
You know Obama likes him so he appointed him. I think Obama is a strong enough man Autumn May 2016 #40
No. He is a hack because he is a Republican. Gomez163 May 2016 #41
Hmm I can say that of a few Democrats. nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #44
Comey gave money to both McCain and Romney. Mr. 47% Gomez163 May 2016 #45
And... Even if he was an officer in the armed forces nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #50
And apparently secret. Gomez163 May 2016 #51
Nope. You can use the google nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #55
Thank God this one is here. It took long enough. nt silvershadow May 2016 #53
Oh I know some democrats who fit that to a tee. Autumn May 2016 #48
Is your understanding of the law really this shallow? Matariki May 2016 #59
Coney has had it in for Hillary since Whitewater. yodermon May 2016 #56
So then this was bullcrap inchhigh May 2016 #5
It was always bullshit that only hill shill propagandists pimped. The FBI investigates criminal morningfog May 2016 #7
Just another lie from the Clinton Crew. n/t arcane1 May 2016 #29
Euphemisms... that's public relations as usual. HereSince1628 May 2016 #61
Feels insufficient pressure to determine BEFORE elections? pat_k May 2016 #9
Why is it the FBI's problem that the Democratic Party wants to nominate someone under investigation? Bob41213 May 2016 #11
Actually, I missread "pressure" as "no pressure." Edited reply. pat_k May 2016 #18
Their first deadline was December nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #47
Thanks for insight. pat_k May 2016 #52
You welcome. nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #54
The point: this equals an EPIC FAIL in her last job as SoS. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #24
Right on. n/t Merryland May 2016 #43
She also screwed up on not reporting donations to the Clinton Foundation as she promised 2cannan May 2016 #46
Forgot to add: Plus Sid Blumenthal! nt 2cannan May 2016 #49
What kind of FBI agent is Comey? The man don't even know that he's just doing a “security inquiry,” Autumn May 2016 #25
He must not have gotten that memo lol! NWCorona May 2016 #26
The indictment fairy never arrives on time. JoePhilly May 2016 #27
But when it does... NWCorona May 2016 #30
Keep hope alive!!! JoePhilly May 2016 #35
Maybe NWCorona May 2016 #39
I don't know what to do any more! I have trouble understanding...as much as I try. Paper Roses May 2016 #34
Most Certainly a Criminal Investigation pmorlan1 May 2016 #37
Dragging it out until the election... scscholar May 2016 #57
They take their sweet time investigating. Probably just sitting around and taking naps. LiberalFighter May 2016 #58
Statement from the Inspectors General of the Intelligence Community BlueStateLib May 2016 #60
I've got every TV in my house tuned to FOX so I don't miss anything! ucrdem May 2016 #64
If that's the case. Twitter will work out better for you. NWCorona May 2016 #65
I happen to agree that it is agregious that other M$M isn't covering this. Fawke Em May 2016 #67

Actor

(626 posts)
32. And some here hope she loses in November and Trump is elected and millions are harmed
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:47 PM
May 2016

so they can say "told you so."

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
3. Isn't that all you need to know?
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:07 PM
May 2016

"Some emails that went through her server appear to have been classified at various security levels because of sensitive information."

 

Gomez163

(2,039 posts)
4. Why do Democrats always get investigated by Republicans?
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:08 PM
May 2016

Why does Obama have this jackass running the FBI??? Fire the motherfucker.

 

Gomez163

(2,039 posts)
10. Exhibit A
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:19 PM
May 2016

In April 2015, Comey spoke at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, arguing in favor of more Holocaust education. After The Washington Post printed a version of his speech, Comey was criticized by some commentators, who argued that he suggested Poles and Hungarians share responsibility on equal terms with Germans for the atrocities of Holocaust

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
14. First, links help.
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:21 PM
May 2016

And Comey is no hack.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/15/AR2007051500864.html

It's rather naive to suggest he is leading the FBI on a political witch hunt. Especially when there is no evidence of that. Contrary, two neutral federal judges have found some evidence of bad faith from the State department.

 

Gomez163

(2,039 posts)
12. Exhibit B
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:19 PM
May 2016

Comey is a registered Republican who donated to U.S. Senator John McCain’s campaign in the 2008 presidential election and to Governor Mitt Romney’s campaign in 2012 presidential election

 
62. Good to know simply being a Republican
Wed May 11, 2016, 07:32 PM
May 2016

Means you are a terrible unjust human being. I'll be sure to tell my grandpa I am disowning him. I'll also let my neighbor know that I am moving my Bernie sign into his yard and that he's not getting his lawnmower back. You are seriously misguided and it's honestly a bit embarrassing that there are democrats that are this deluded.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
66. No - they didn't.
Wed May 11, 2016, 07:42 PM
May 2016

They used their personal email a few times, but it wasn't only their own home-brew, unsecure servers.

Autumn

(45,056 posts)
28. Why would Obama fire him? Obama appointed him, unless Obama is now a member
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:44 PM
May 2016

of the Vast RW Conspiracy Or is it the Vast LW Conspiracy that is out to get Clinton? I forget.

 

Gomez163

(2,039 posts)
31. This was Obama trying to appear bipartisan.
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:46 PM
May 2016

Just fire his ass, put in a Dem party hack. Ignore the whining. They cant do anything.

Autumn

(45,056 posts)
40. You know Obama likes him so he appointed him. I think Obama is a strong enough man
Wed May 11, 2016, 05:00 PM
May 2016

to decide who he wants to appoint to a key position like the head of the FBI and then go ahead and do it. I don't believe he is the powerless wuss you seem to think he is. You just think Comey's a hack because you see him as picking on your Hill.

 

Gomez163

(2,039 posts)
41. No. He is a hack because he is a Republican.
Wed May 11, 2016, 05:01 PM
May 2016

A party whose members would stand by and laugh at you while you died of hunger on the street.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
50. And... Even if he was an officer in the armed forces
Wed May 11, 2016, 05:10 PM
May 2016

He could donate as a private citizen. I know this chaps your hide. There is a reason your democratic president chose him. It is a solid reason by the way

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
55. Nope. You can use the google
Wed May 11, 2016, 05:19 PM
May 2016

It s, for example, in statements from Obama at appointment and in testimony before the appropriate senate committee.

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
59. Is your understanding of the law really this shallow?
Wed May 11, 2016, 06:08 PM
May 2016

I'm finding it difficult believing that you aren't just trolling.

yodermon

(6,143 posts)
56. Coney has had it in for Hillary since Whitewater.
Wed May 11, 2016, 05:23 PM
May 2016

He was on the team that investigated her, and he had very critical things to say about her.
Obama was well aware of this and appointed him anyway. Wonder why.

inchhigh

(384 posts)
5. So then this was bullcrap
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:11 PM
May 2016

"While Mrs. Clinton has characterized the investigation as a “security inquiry,” Mr. Comey said he was “not familiar with the term.”

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
7. It was always bullshit that only hill shill propagandists pimped. The FBI investigates criminal
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:13 PM
May 2016

activity.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
61. Euphemisms... that's public relations as usual.
Wed May 11, 2016, 06:36 PM
May 2016

They hope people accept that and don't get too into critical thinking.

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
9. Feels insufficient pressure to determine BEFORE elections?
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:16 PM
May 2016

They've had plenty of time. The inquiry should have been "wrapped up" months ago.

And he should have been feeling sufficient pressure to finish a thorough investigation BEFORE elections.

Bob41213

(491 posts)
11. Why is it the FBI's problem that the Democratic Party wants to nominate someone under investigation?
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:19 PM
May 2016

I think the insanity is coming from somewhere else.

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
18. Actually, I missread "pressure" as "no pressure." Edited reply.
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:23 PM
May 2016

My bad. But it still seems to me they have unnecessarily drawn this out. And should have felt pressure to complete a thorough job in a timely fashion.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
47. Their first deadline was December
Wed May 11, 2016, 05:07 PM
May 2016

Then this month. We cover courts from time to time. This only tells me one thing. This is not just high profile (duh) but they are coming across a wickedly complex case.

For the record, usually this is not good for the targets. It also makes me wonder if a grand jury has been empaneled? And no, they usually do not tell you when one has.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
24. The point: this equals an EPIC FAIL in her last job as SoS.
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:36 PM
May 2016

It seems to get lost in the shuffle.

She's running for a big promotion. But this is how she handled her last job.

The fact that the FBI is even involved at all, and the fact that two IGs had to make a referral TO the FBI... that says all we need to know about her job performance.

It's one thing to have no experience (like Trump), it's another thing to have experience at completely bungling the job. She screwed up on two levels: on the military actions taken because she pushed them; and on this more bureaucratic national security whopping screw up of records for her entire 4 years as SoS.

WTH is competent about that? That's the point about this investigation. It's an "F" on her report card. It's an objective evaluation of job failure. And that's regardless of whether she's indicted or not.

And that's why she should not be running IN ADDITION TO the fact that no one under the legal jeopardy of an FBI investigation should be running either.

I thought Shrub was the most ludicrous Presidential candidate we could possibly have. But this tops that by far. This is even more ridiculous than Trump as a candidate. At least he hasn't ALREADY FAILED this badly.

And if that still isn't enough, add being Kissinger's protege. And she has the colossal nerve to use the word "dangerous" as criticism in her speeches! WTF, Dem party! This is nonsense. This is "through the looking glass" all the way. smh

2cannan

(344 posts)
46. She also screwed up on not reporting donations to the Clinton Foundation as she promised
Wed May 11, 2016, 05:07 PM
May 2016

as well as the possible pay-to-play nature of those donations.

Exclusive: Despite Hillary Clinton promise, charity did not disclose donors
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-clinton-donations-idUSKBN0MF2FQ20150319

Autumn

(45,056 posts)
25. What kind of FBI agent is Comey? The man don't even know that he's just doing a “security inquiry,”
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:38 PM
May 2016

Paper Roses

(7,473 posts)
34. I don't know what to do any more! I have trouble understanding...as much as I try.
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:47 PM
May 2016

Sick of the Hillary campaign, don't believe anything will change under her administration. My hope was to support someone who offered us a way to get beyond the same old baloney. I guess this is not going to happen but I keep the faith. I've been through this for too many years to believe the same old stuff.

You may criticize me if I say I will not support another Clinton administration. You are entitled to your opinion. I will vote in November but I may leave the most important slot---blank!

pmorlan1

(2,096 posts)
37. Most Certainly a Criminal Investigation
Wed May 11, 2016, 04:50 PM
May 2016

While Mrs. Clinton has characterized the investigation as a “security inquiry,” Mr. Comey said he was “not familiar with the term.”

The F.B.I.’s case began as a security referral from the inspectors general of the State Department and the nation’s intelligence agencies, who were concerned that classified information might have been stored outside a secure government network. But multiple law enforcement officials said the matter quickly became an investigation into whether anyone had committed a crime in handling classified information.

 

scscholar

(2,902 posts)
57. Dragging it out until the election...
Wed May 11, 2016, 05:36 PM
May 2016

proves he is politicizing this. There's still too many Bush leftovers in the FBI.

BlueStateLib

(937 posts)
60. Statement from the Inspectors General of the Intelligence Community
Wed May 11, 2016, 06:16 PM
May 2016
Statement from the Inspectors General of the Intelligence Community and the Department of State Regarding the Review of Former Secretary Clinton's Emails

IC IG made a referral detailing the potential compromise of classified information to security officials within the Executive Branch. The main purpose of the referral was to notify security officials that classified information may exist on at least one private server and thumb drive that are not in the government's possession. An important distinction is that the IC IG did not make a criminal referral - it was a security referral made for counterintelligence purposes

https://oig.state.gov/whats-new/9811

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
67. I happen to agree that it is agregious that other M$M isn't covering this.
Wed May 11, 2016, 07:58 PM
May 2016

And they're doing it to the detriment of the Democratic Party should it nominate Clinton.

This is a real issue and should be covered by all of the media - not just the right-wing ones. There has never been a time that a Party has put forth a candidate under investigation by the FBI.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NYT: F.B.I. Director Says...