Federal Election Commission releases huge list of illegal contributions to Bernie's campaign

[Cali_Democrat]

http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/847/201605100300045847/201605100300045847.pdf

[Gomez163]

1. I WANT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR AND JAIL TIME.

[elleng]

2. Right,

send Abdelmeguid, Ahmed and Abramowitz, Jeremy to jail.

[TheCowsCameHome]

3. Why? What did you do, Gomer?

[Gomez163]

5. For Bernie. I cannot abide corrupt politicians.

[hobbit709]

13. Then why do you support one of the most venal since Nixon?

[Gomez163]

14. I have no idea who you are talking about.

[hobbit709]

15. Her initials are HRC.

[Gomez163]

17. Human Rights Commission???? That makes no sense.

[hobbit709]

18. Deliberate obtuseness is not a good thing.

[Gomez163]

20. Sure it is

[NurseJackie]

4. OMG! This is NOT GOOD! (Can you imagine the hysteria and outrage if this had been Hillary?)

[Gomez163]

6. She would be in an orange jumpsuit yesterday

[TheCowsCameHome]

8. Pant Suit.

[KingFlorez]

7. Clear violations of donation limits

It's easy enough to fix this through refunds, but it doesn't look like that option was utilized.

[hellofromreddit]

10. Take a look at the Belinda Barcock entries. Lots of refunding happening there.

More of the same throughout the list.

[TheBlackAdder]

9. I am laughing at the vapors being expressed on this thread, it's quite comical.

.


Sure, there seems to be a grouping of people who have contributed dozens upon dozens of times, within a short time span. If it were me, I'd think that some of them had psychological problems. But this is stuff that will get resolved during standard audits, and the window is open to rectify this matter.

SBS should have had automated payment processing system in place, but he's not a professional campaigner that generates high-volume donations like this, and does not have the multi-year infrastructure in place to have such a construct installed.


But, whatever floats the boat, because if it's not this it will be some other hair-on-fire whine tomorrow.


.

[pat_k]

19. Report says nothing about how much over limit. Most could be over by small amts.

The report doesn't provide any info on how far over limit the people listed are. Most could be something like $30 or $60 over. Can't know without adding up. And as for length meaning something, the length is not surprising given the number of individual, small, contributions on each page. (And also given that Sanders' monthly filings are something like 20,000 pages long.

I have very little doubt that if the Clinton campaign were juggling reporting on little donations coming through multiple avenues, they'd have the same problem.

Apparently this is a problem that's quite common:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1944280

[Dawson Leery]

11. k/r

[hobbit709]

12. I see the memo went out to post this as any times as possible this afternoon.

[pat_k]

16. A single problem, easily remedied.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1944280

[hrmjustin]

21. Look at that.

Mr. Pure ain't so pure.