2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWould you like to see the West Virginia coal mines shut down?
11 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes | |
11 (100%) |
|
No | |
0 (0%) |
|
Not sure | |
0 (0%) |
|
Other | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
k8conant
(3,030 posts)REPOWERING APPALACHIA
WITH HOMETOWN ENERGY
For the first time, libraries, affordable housing organizations, non-profits and churches across West Virginia are going solar. Using Solar Holler's innovative financing programs, all an organization needs is interest and public support to save money with clean hometown energy.
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)You can't board up a major employer of thousands of Americans - essentially by government edict - without implementing a detailed, robust, well-funded program to employ those workers in other occupations at similar wages. That would include education & training, possible construction of facilities/infrastructure etc. IMO, it wouldn't have to be isolated to only clean energy projects, but the goal should be 100% re-employment of affected workers. That may not be possible, but certainly it should be the goal.
My problem is the initial comments re: shutting down WV coal opeartions was just sort of tossed out there to garner some cheap support with green voters. No consideration was given to the people who would lose their jobs or even how to moderate the probable increase in utility costs to moderate & low income customers.
FSogol
(45,484 posts)joshcryer
(62,270 posts)Which is rare from equivocating Clinton. She actually wants to see it gone.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)Tragically, EPA's emissions restrictions, enacted by executive order, were not accompanied by any sort of investment to offset the devastating consequences to "coal towns." As much as we might applaud the new restrictions, there's a problem with doing it outside congress. As part of a bill, such new rules would be part of a deal that included investment to mitigate the consequences.
Shutdown of 150th coal plant reminder that so-called 'war on coal' must not be war on coal workers
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/13/1245351/-Shutdown-of-150th-coal-plant-reminder-that-miners-and-related-workers-need-a-just-transition
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Not sure how it can be avoided. If we're saying end the use of coal, then logically the mines have to be closed.
FSogol
(45,484 posts)We should speed their closing, but closing them suddenly is probably poor energy policy.
There is no reason we couldn't transition from coal in 25 years as a national goal.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)an alternative to coal, but something to keep in mind is that the coal workers would be without jobs if they shut down, and as it stands, coal is a major part of the state's economy.