Hey David Brock, Go F yourself! "Bernie Breakers 2016"

[pinebox]

What sort of presidential candidate launches a full on assault of online trolls in order to protect her image (which ironically is already permanently damaged)? Hillary, that's who. And before any of her supporters on here come racing in to protect her as well, please don't try to feed us shit and say "this isn't Hillary, this is Brock" because we fully know damn well that she has a play in this.

You know, shit like this is one reason why I will NEVER support Hillary.
Every week it's something new. This just adds more fuel to my conviction that Bernie is the correct choice!
Get bent and go pound sand David Brock, you're scum.

BARRIER BREAKERS 2016: A PROJECT OF CORRECT THE RECORD

TASK FORCE WILL HELP CLINTON SUPPORTERS PUSH BACK ON ONLINE HARASSMENT AND THANK
SUPERDELEGATES

[Renew Deal]

1. He will bring balance to the force

[pinebox]

4. Ya that's some balance alright. He's a scumbag

[Renew Deal]

9. So you decide. Is he pro-Hillary or anti-Hillary?

I don't like the guy or what he does, but he's a hard worker, has lots of ideas, and can execute.

Brock has been an irritant to O'Reilly. He will be an asset in the GE.

[pinebox]

13. He's scum

Lots of people work hard, Bush worked hard at selling the country into war with Iraq. Hard workers don't equate to good people.

[Renew Deal]

15. But they get things done

[pinebox]

18. All for the mighty buck

Sorry but the guy has sand castle integrity. No thanks, for there is no honor among thieves

[reddread]

41. that you Ayn?

[merrily]

2. David Brock: Mr. Right, Mr. Right Now, or Boogie Man?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280193633

[pinebox]

6. He's a rattlesnake.

And you're judged by the company that you keep. Says it all.

[merrily]

17. I know.

[reddread]

40. I like rattlesnakes

he is jock itch.

[MineralMan]

3. Tell us how you REALLY feel, pinebox. nt

[pinebox]

5. I shall. Now get my damn coffee

[JoePhilly]

7. Sorry, Hillary does not control the super PACs.

And you can jump up and down screaming with your hair on fire all you want.

That fact still does not change.

And after weeks of you posting OPs saying you'll NEVER NEVER NEVER vote for her ... we get it all ready.

[pinebox]

10. Oh please. Horseshit.

Who the hell do you think you're kidding Joe?
Do you honestly believe that? Hillary could tell her SuperPAC to "knock it off" just like she did with Wall Street & what do you think they'd do? They'd listen of course.
Don't be so obtuse, even when it's intentional.

[JoePhilly]

20. Legally, she can't tell them to do shit.

Despite your ranting.

[pinebox]

21. Like laws have ever bothered the Clinton's LMFAO

Bwahahahahahahahahahaha!

Hand my a napkin because I just spit my coffee all over my screen

[JoePhilly]

22. Must upset you that you just can't seem to pin any illegal action on the Clintons.

I mean you allege all manner of wrong doing ... and yet you just can't get any of it to stick.

Must be very disappointing.

[pinebox]

23. It's very disappointing a Dem candidate is under an FBI investigation

and yet people still support her. You would be correct in your assertion.

[Shadowflash]

27. Yup.

Sanders was invited to speak at the Vatican and Clinton was invited to speak to the FBI.

[amborin]

37. "Correct the Record Openly Coordinates with Clinton Campaign"

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/04/21/hillary-pac-spends-1-million-to-correct-commenters-on-reddit-and-facebook.html

[Tom Rinaldo]

44. Legally she can say in public that she wished they would stop it and that she doesn't approve

Of course legally they could ignore her if she did. But they wouldn't.

[jeff47]

31. Sorry, you're a year too late.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/05/12/how-a-super-pac-plans-to-coordinate-directly-with-hillary-clintons-campaign/

The FEC has explicitly ruled on SuperPACs regarding TV, radio and print. The FEC has not explicitly ruled on SuperPACs that only use the Internet to communicate.

Because there is no explicit ruling, the Clinton campaign and Correct the Record are coordinating directly.

They announced they were doing so a year ago, so I can totally understand why you'd not yet caught up.

[JoePhilly]

32. When is the trial?

And how's Bernie's donation scandal coming along?

[jeff47]

33. What part of "no explicit ruling" is so hard for you to understand?

Also, your insistence that they are not coordinating means that you are calling both the Clinton campaign and Correct the Record liars. They did, after all, say they were coordinating directly.

So why should we not believe their own words?

[JoePhilly]

34. So no trial. Got it.

[pinebox]

43. It's all they can do is deflect

[pinebox]

42. Proven wrong so you pivot to distract? LMFAO

[arcane1]

35. "How a super PAC plans to coordinate directly with Hillary Clinton’s campaign"

Hillary Clinton’s campaign plans to work in tight conjunction with an independent rapid-response group financed by unlimited donations, another novel form of political outsourcing that has emerged as a dominant practice in the 2016 presidential race.

On Tuesday, Correct the Record, a pro-Clinton rapid-response operation, announced it was splitting off from its parent American Bridge and will work in coordination with the Clinton campaign as a stand-alone super PAC. The group’s move was first reported by the New York Times.

That befuddled many campaign finance experts, who noted that super PACs, by definition, are political committees that solely do independent expenditures, which cannot be coordinated with a candidate or political party. Several said the relationship between the campaign and the super PAC would test the legal limits.

But Correct the Record believes it can avoid the coordination ban by relying on a 2006 Federal Election Commission regulation that declared that content posted online for free, such as blogs, is off limits from regulation. The “Internet exemption” said that such free postings do not constitute campaign expenditures, allowing independent groups to consult with candidates about the content they post on their sites. By adopting the measure, the FEC limited its online jurisdiction to regulating paid political ads.

The rules “totally exempt individuals who engage in political activity on the Internet from the restrictions of the campaign finance laws. The exemption for individual Internet activity in the final rules is categorical and unqualified,” then-FEC Chairman Michael E. Toner said at the time, according to a 2006 Washington Post story. The regulation “protects Internet activities by individuals in all forms, including e-mailing, linking, blogging, or hosting a Web site," said Toner, now a prominent Republican campaign finance attorney.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/05/12/how-a-super-pac-plans-to-coordinate-directly-with-hillary-clintons-campaign/

[dubyadiprecession]

8. Emotions are running extremely high in the losing BS Camp.

Pace yourself folks, it only gets worse from here.

[pinebox]

12. "Losing"

Hey we aren't the ones who bought into a modern day version of a cigarette ad from the 50s.
We're actually winning and do you know why that is? We've transformed the party, forever.
You think this is simply about Bernie? It isn't. It's a movement of the people, by the people and for the people.

That's something you can bank on.

[dubyadiprecession]

24. Movements come and they go, remember Ross Perot and Ralph Nadar?...

Ross Perot actually won 19% of the GE vote in 1992. Bernie isn't even in the same stratosphere as Ross.
Bernie will be in the same historical company as Eugene McCarthy and Gary Hart.

[pinebox]

28. Bernie's is much larger than Perot

whom I voted for BTW and who incidentally helped elect Clinton.

What you don't understand is this---the younger generation is going to rule the roost as boomers fade. They are already the largest voting block in America and never before has a generation made LESS than their parents until now.
Now you think about that. If you ignore the fire you're going to get "Berned".

Which of the candidates you mentioned had their own version of liberals challenging incumbents?
Tim Canova > DWS. And there's a LOT more. See, that's a movement.

[amborin]

38. It's HRC who has the Dismal ratings and would lose the GE to Trump

[betsuni]

11. A MILLION DOLLARS!

Oh my.

[merrily]

14. Thanks! To be fair, a million bucks just doesn't stretch as it did in Bing's day.

For just one thing, there are no more five and ten cents stores. If there were, you could maybe buy a single stick of gum for a dime. I don't even know about that.

A million or two a year, though, is a better deal.

[reddread]

19. it does if you arent paying Americans

I wonder if they figured that out and went offshore to outsource and stretch a buck?

no, I dont.

[arcane1]

36. As SoS she spent taxpayer money on fake Twitter followers from Bangladesh.

So we can expect her to be cheap when it comes to paying the troll army, and outsource those jobs too.

[reddread]

39. I wonder if they hired one or more of Putin's operations?

I dont hear any accent in these posts though.

[yourpaljoey]

16. Dirty tricks

[CorkySt.Clair]

25. I think this is all just one big misunderstanding

[JonLeibowitz]

26. Just like Bush donors' contributions to the Clinton campaign.

[pinebox]

29. Ya like the Koch's and Hillary

Yup yup, a misunderstanding.

[floriduck]

30. This is a classic case of one more poor decision on Hillarys part.

When your unfavorables are as high as hers, she should be trying to make friends and positively influence people. Instead, she associates herself with a known info sniper who has zero credibility after the Anita Hill destruction, when Brock too was a Republican.

The saying, "You are who you associate with." Speaks volumes about someone who expected to be nominated with little to no effort. But due to her own stumbles along the career path, she now had to resort to slime merchants. (And I'm not even counting Blankfein, Kissenger, and her other bros.)

[nolabels]

45. But, but, but, ah eff it

It's the ole case, if i can't have it, then nobody can.

What i notice about this election and 2008 is that it's twice as nasty and the biggest common denominator is.............

The scary thing to know is the pigs never come out of the slaughter house alive, so it might behoove a body not to go into one covered in mud