Disappearing Sanders Votes in the Delaware Primary
I had some communication with an IT computer person who detected some vote “glitches” in the running of the Delaware Democratic primary in Sussex County, and has screen shots to document it. So I looked it up and found identical findings plus more – disappearing Sanders votes.
In Sussex County Delaware the “glitch” was quite remarkable. With 16% reporting from Sussex County, Sanders was ahead of Clinton by 6,247 to 1,250. But later that evening, with almost 40% of the vote reported, Sanders’ count went DOWN to 2,383, a drop of 3,864 votes, while Clinton surged ahead of him. Even near the end of the evening, with 96% of the vote reported in Sussex County, Sanders’ vote total didn’t get back to what it was before his votes disappeared.
Sanders also experienced a decrease in Delaware votes statewide during the course of the evening. And similar findings were reported from Broome County, New York.
Of course, if these were the only such instances of vote flipping, it wouldn’t amount to much in the total picture. But everyone who knows anything about our election system knows that the electronic machines that count our votes are not monitored adequately for accuracy, and unless they are accompanied by a paper trail they cannot be verified. But even when paper trails are available, they are seldom used (as in hand counted audits) as a double check on the election results. And even when they are used and discrepancies are found between the hand counts and the machine counts, no remedial action is generally taken, as in a hand counted audit in Chicago, where public observers gave sworn testimony that the auditors found substantial discrepancies between the hand and machine counts, and then changed their own hand count to match the machine count, by subtracting Sanders votes and adding Clinton votes.
It is also worth noting that the disappearing Sanders votes in Delaware is reminiscent of the 2004 stolen Presidential election, which went to George W. Bush, though there were no screen shots available to prove what happened. I recall a group of TV news commentators discussing the Ohio vote situation near the end of the vote counting process. There was a big map of Ohio on the screen, and the commentators were giving a detailed analysis of how bleak the situation looked for Bush. The Republican commentator, whose name I can’t remember, seemed very depressed. Then suddenly the whole situation switched around and Ohio was called for Bush. Final exit polls predicted a Kerry win in Ohio, and many other states also showed huge exit poll discrepancies, all favoring Bush in the official count compared to the exit polls. But TV commentators either ignored that issue or when forced to discuss it assured us all that the exit polls couldn’t be trusted (implying that the official vote count could be trusted). Investigations in Ohio proceeded slowly, and several years later, Karl Rove’s IT guru, Michael Connor was subpoenaed to appear in court to be questioned about how he manipulated the Ohio vote electronically late on Election Night 2004 to give the election to Bush. An affidavit was signed to that effect. But shortly before Connor’s pending court appearance he died in a plane accident.
Nobody knows how extensive this kind of thing has been in the Democratic primaries this year because no systematic assessment of it has been done. But judging by the massive discrepancies we’re finding between exit polls and official vote counts, generally favoring Clinton by huge amounts in the official count, the problem is quite extensive indeed – so much so that Sanders could very well be ahead now in pledged delegates in the absence of vote flipping (not to mention voter purging, which was found to be extensive in Arizona and New York especially, but also in other states).
= new reply since forum marked as read
So what happened? "It was a vote-entry error," AP Director of Elections Services Brian Scanlon told The Post. "We quickly caught it and corrected within two minutes." In other words, the spike in support for Sanders (which would have constituted a sixth of his total support in the state) was a glitch like the Facebook outage. It is not the case that a cabal of conspirators for some reason posted real vote totals only to then change them, which would be a pretty stupid way to go about committing election fraud
The AP had a glitch, the news outlets that use their feeds reflected the glitch, for all of
TWO
FUCKING
MINUTES
It's a conspiracy!
Fuckin' ridiculous....
Around every corner, under every rock.
I think I just found one in my kitchen. Excuse me while I get the bug spray. 
National elections, local elections, caucuses and primaries: one person/one vote. Just add them up...period!
Let's trash electronic voting and its bizarre results. I'm getting tired of this!! 
Thanks. 
