Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,376 posts)
Fri May 13, 2016, 11:44 AM May 2016

LA Times endorsement: For all her faults, Hillary Clinton is vastly better prepared

A year ago, Hillary Clinton seemed to be on her way to a serene, obstacle-free coronation as the 2016 Democratic nominee for president. In an April 14, 2015, editorial, The Times bemoaned the fact that the Democratic race consisted of “exactly one candidate with a truly national profile” — the former secretary of state and U.S. senator from New York. The editorial did mention Sen. Bernie Sanders, but only as one of a group of second-tier figures that also included former Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee and former U.S. Sen Jim Webb of Virginia (remember them?).

Today, as California prepares for its primary on June 7, Clinton is again on the verge of victory. But what a difference a year has made. In the intervening months, so many Democrats and independents have felt the Bern that the self-described democratic socialist from Vermont acquired the national stature that seemed improbable a year ago. His passionate excoriation of a “rigged economy” and his call for a sweeping political revolution energized millions of Americans, especially young voters, and he put Clinton on the defensive about her ties to Wall Street, her support for the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the trade policies of her husband’s Bill Clinton’s administration.

Yet even though he has proved a far more formidable challenger than we — or Clinton — expected, Sanders lacks the experience and broad understanding of domestic and (especially) foreign policy that the former secretary of state would bring to the presidency. Although Sanders has tapped into very real and widespread anxieties about economic inequality, deindustrialization and stagnant economic growth, his prescriptions are too often simplistic, more costly than he would have us believe and unlikely to come to pass.

The Vermont senator has made the race more substantive and has forced his opponent to address issues that might otherwise have gone undiscussed, but in the end he has offered little reason to believe that he would be able to enlist recalcitrant Republicans in Congress in accomplishing his priorities. Rather, he told the editorial board of the Los Angeles Times, he would say to Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell: “Hey, Mitch, look out the window. There’s a million young people out there now. And they’re following politics in a way they didn’t before. If you want to vote against this legislation, go for it. But you and some of your friends will not have your seats next election.” If only it were that simple


http://www.latimes.com/opinion/endorsements/la-ed-democratic-presidential-endorsement-20160426-story.html

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
LA Times endorsement: For all her faults, Hillary Clinton is vastly better prepared (Original Post) brooklynite May 2016 OP
Bernie is not bought and paid for and will work for the people. Skwmom May 2016 #1
And I wonder what are the salaries of the editors of the LA Times? AZ Progressive May 2016 #2
Probably in the same ballpark as the Editors of the Seattle Times... brooklynite May 2016 #3
"Must be a lot higher than the average population." NCTraveler May 2016 #12
Bernie has a long track record of standing up for regular Americans AZ Progressive May 2016 #16
The magic pony rides on. procon May 2016 #4
Better a magic pony than a corrupt mule ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #5
LA Times Senior Editor salary: $124,000 a year AZ Progressive May 2016 #6
What's the salary of a Senator? Hav May 2016 #10
So, $50k less than Sanders, not counting Congressional benefits. TwilightZone May 2016 #14
Bernie was poor and has fought for regular Americans AZ Progressive May 2016 #15
Well, since you're so sure, feel free to provide proof. TwilightZone May 2016 #17
LOL! Michael Ferro, Major Owner of LA Times, Is HUge Clinton Donor amborin May 2016 #7
"for all her fault".....exactly why I'm not voting for her. They all are better, sans Trump. ViseGrip May 2016 #8
PS. and there are others! ViseGrip May 2016 #9
"I made a Mistake . I made a Mistake..." bahrbearian May 2016 #11
I support Hillary for the same reasons every editorial board in America has. JaneyVee May 2016 #13
This endorsement is spot on Zorro May 2016 #18
Major endorsement. nt oasis May 2016 #19

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
2. And I wonder what are the salaries of the editors of the LA Times?
Fri May 13, 2016, 11:47 AM
May 2016

Must be a lot higher than the average population.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
16. Bernie has a long track record of standing up for regular Americans
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:04 PM
May 2016

The L.A. Times editorial board on the other hand make 4 times the median income and are most likely out of touch with average Americans. They most likely have a house in the rich hills around the Santa Monica mountains or near the beach.

procon

(15,805 posts)
4. The magic pony rides on.
Fri May 13, 2016, 11:56 AM
May 2016

Simplistic.

That's been the heart and soul of Bernie's campaign. Hard to get around that.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
6. LA Times Senior Editor salary: $124,000 a year
Fri May 13, 2016, 11:59 AM
May 2016

at least according to careerbliss.com

Like they really give a fuck about the average American (or Angeleno for that matter)...

TwilightZone

(25,429 posts)
14. So, $50k less than Sanders, not counting Congressional benefits.
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:51 PM
May 2016

If you thought you were making a point, you did. Just not the one you thought you were making.

TwilightZone

(25,429 posts)
17. Well, since you're so sure, feel free to provide proof.
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:40 PM
May 2016

Equating income to some kind of level of morality - but only when you feel like it - is pretty disingenuous.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
13. I support Hillary for the same reasons every editorial board in America has.
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:05 PM
May 2016

She is supremely qualified.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»LA Times endorsement: For...