Hillary Clinton Benefited From Alleged Voter Fraud In Several 2016 Democratic Primaries? Voters Sue

[J_J_]

Hillary Clinton has the lead in the 2016 Democrat primaries, but some New Yorkers think they know why. According to Heavy, over 200 primary voters are filing a joint lawsuit against the New York State Board of Elections, saying they were denied the right to vote in the recent primary. Most were denied because someone changed the party affiliation on their voter registration cards to Independent instead of Democrat. Other voters alleged their registration had been canceled completely.

Bernie Sanders voters in Arizona can sympathize. Phoenix voters waited in line for over four hours due to nearly three-quarters of the usual polling places being closed for this year’s primaries. According to the Huffington Post, when they finally reached the end of the line, they were told they were ineligible to vote in the Democratic primary because their voter registration showed the wrong party affiliation...

Voter fraud in New York is being investigated. There has been an audit of the New York Board of Elections. Stewart McCauley, who collected and analyzed information for Exhibit I of the lawsuit, filed by Election Justice USA has found evidence in four major areas, as reported by Counterpunch.

“‘There are four broad methodologies that were used’ to disenfranchise New York voters, the first two of which were also present in Arizona. Two by hackers (possibly), and two that had to have been carried out by BoE [Board of Elections] officials and/or employees:

http://www.inquisitr.com/3088970/hillary-clinton-benefited-from-alleged-voter-fraud-in-several-2016-democratic-primaries-voters-sue-ny-board-of-elections/

[JaneyVee]

1. 200 people? Hillary would have won NY by more..

[Reiyuki]

7. You should not be cynical about vote fraud

Whether or not your candidate wins, we should all agree that every vote should count and any fraud should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

'"Voter fraud doesn't matter unless it's enough to swing the election" sets a very bad precedent

[dbackjon]

9. But when the OP LIES about who got hurt

And implies that it was the Clinton campaign and DNC behind it, it plays into the GOP's hand.

[Reiyuki]

11. Most fraud is usually from individual supporters at polling stations

You're right, the entire campaign is probably not rigging entire elections. It's probably just a few hardcore supporters losing a couple stacks of ballots, or it was a genuine mistake, like a computer crash or something.


But voter fraud should always be taken seriously, no matter how small. The post just seemed cynical and dismissive.

[dbackjon]

19. The OP implies that the Clinton Campaign was behind widespread voter disenfranchisement

Which is a lie.


All aspects of voter polling and registration are in the hands of Tea Party Republicans in Arizona, so to blame Clinton for any of it is a lie and a smear.

[Fawke Em]

33. Election fraud. Not voter fraud.

These voters did not try to defraud the government. The government allegedly defrauded them.

[Ferd Berfel]

14. Please Folks. This discussion and law suite are about ELECTION FRAUD not Voter Fraud

There is a big difference.

[Reiyuki]

15. you're right. my bad

[OwlinAZ]

2. There were many specific,

purposeful pro Clinton irregularities in NY. Brooklyn was just the most glaring example.
There should be a re-vote there.

[LonePirate]

5. Except the Brooklyn fiasco hurt her judging by how Brooklyn actually voted.

[J_J_]

13. Hillary campaign had access to Bernie's supporter list

Many people online have reported receiving emails from the Hillary camp after that happened even though they had never expressed support or signed up for the campaign.

Some people reported receiving further donations requests "thanks for the $25, would you like to send more" when they had not sent Hillary any money.

If would be very easy to use the list of Bernie supporters to specifically remove them from the voting rolls.

That is how someone would cheat, and that is why it needs to be investigated.

[LonePirate]

16. Hillary and Bernie both had access to state Dem voter rolls. That's how the contacts are made.

That's how any Dem (or Repub) voter is contacted either by phone or mail. I receive contact from all sorts of Dems running for office, the vast majority of whom I have never contacted or donated to in the past. It's not a conspiracy or evidence of fraud.

[J_J_]

22. Let's investigate then....but I don't think Bernie used his list for fraud

evidence looks to be the opposite

[artyteacher]

3. or maybe it hurt her... eom

[Faux pas]

4. Kickin' for the truth!

[dbackjon]

10. What truth? Clinton was hurt more in NY and AZ than Sanders from the GOP voter suppression.

[firebrand80]

6. The article is complete with rally attendance photos

nice touch

[dbackjon]

8. Actually Clinton was hurt worse by the GOP antics in Arizona

But don't let FACTS get in the way of a GOP-inspired smear piece

[leftynyc]

18. Same thing in Brooklyn

They're only fooling themselves.

[That Guy 888]

20. Post your info please.

Some links would help more than claiming everything and everyone who doesn't worship support Clinton is "gop inspired".

Especially when the Clinton campaign is known to have the "correct the record" rent-a-troll campaign.

[dbackjon]

21. It's been posted thousands of times already

And Google is your friend


You would find that number of polling places was set by:

GOP County Recorder Helen Purcell
Approved by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (4-1 GOP). Only CLINTON Supporter Steve Gallardo voted against the plan
Based on budget cutbacks by the GOP controlled State Senate and House


Voter Registration is done by the Secretary of State, GOP Michele Reagan



You can look up locations of the polling booths (been posted here prior) and see that the heavily black south Phoenix area had ONE location, heavily Hispanic west Phoenix had one. Both went for Clinton.

[That Guy 888]

25. "Google is your friend" that's what bush supporters used to post. Your claim - you look it up.

You would find that number of polling places was set by:

GOP County Recorder Helen Purcell
Approved by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (4-1 GOP). Only CLINTON Supporter Steve Gallardo voted against the plan
Based on budget cutbacks by the GOP controlled State Senate and House

How does that hurt Clinton more than Sanders? Limiting elections for Democratic voters is what the gop does. It wasn't to "hurt Clinton" it was to hurt Democratic voters. "Only CLINTON Supporter Steve Gallardo voted against the plan " - what does that mean? Where there other Democrats who don't support Clinton but were ok with the gop plan? It is unusual for anyDemocratic politician to stand up to the gop when they engage in election fraud regardless of who they support. The Democratic Party allowed certification of the Florida vote in the 2000 election for example, they refused to allow members of the Congressional Black Caucus to object and testify why they shouldn't be certified by the Senate.

[dbackjon]

27. Because it limited the voting in heavily Clinton-supporting areas.

And yes, it does hurt all Democrats. If you would follow the thread, you will see what I am up against is the assigning of electoral fraud to Clinton, when it needs to be on the GOP. This is a GOP tactic designed to divide us, and allow their shenanigans to go unchecked.

Steve Gallardo is the only DEMOCRAT on the County Board. He is also a Clinton Supporter - again, if this was a Clinton plot, he would have supported it. Just another proof that shows how fucking stupid the OP was.

[joshcryer]

38. There were zero polling places in Latino districts.

[mooseprime]

12. i think maybe

election fraud is what is being discussed here. voter fraud is almost nonexistent

[leftynyc]

17. Maybe someone will

answer the question I've been asking since the NY Primary. How would the person purging know that ENTIRE BLOCKS AND BUILDINGS in Brooklyn were going to vote for Bernie? Chances are MUCH better that Hillary would have simply won by more than she did since she cleaned up in the boroughs. Another fake "scandal" from the people who can't believe their candidate is losing.

[J_J_]

30. Hillary had access to a list of Bernie voters

Several Bernie supporters have reported receiving emails from Clinton shortly afterward.

Just like the media's usual big lies, the real truth was that Hillary was stealing Bernie's list not the other way around.

Once you have a list of bernie supporters, pretty easy to figure out who to scrub from the voter rolls.

[randome]

35. "Several people say..." Do you realize how weak that sounds?

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

[Fawke Em]

34. Well, when Hillary loses in November, we don't want to hear y'all squealing

about election fraud, then.

Bookmarking.

[leftynyc]

37. I can't wait for the primary

to be over so I don't have to deal with shit like your pathetic post. Like you HOPE the Democrat loses because poor you didn't get the candidate he/she wanted. Pathetic, simply disgustingly, pathetic.

[joshcryer]

39. Bookmarking my daily "Trump will win" post.

I wonder if these posts will be disallowed? Because if not I can tally them all the way up to the double digit landslide.

[uponit7771]

40. more pathetic temper tantrum

[J_J_]

23. All errors in Hillary's favor-Only Bernie voters complaining about losing their vote

They think we are really stupid.

[dbackjon]

28. If you believe that all errors were in Clinton's favor, then yes, yes you are.

[lagomorph777]

24. The correct term for this would be "Alleged Election Fraud" - the voters are not the ones alleged to

have committed the fraud. "Voter Fraud" is a Potty Party term for a virtually nonexistent phenomenon which they are pretending to "prevent" with voter suppression tactics such as voter ID.

[dubyadiprecession]

26. Were the voters asked who they supported before they were denied...

ballots to vote? That would be the only way to disenfranchise just the BS voters.
Unless Hillary's campaign has devices that can monitor brain waves and know which voter is which.

Better put on your tinfoil hat just to be on the safe side.

[Sheepshank]

29. Several? Fuck that. Bernie Supporters claim fraud on every single Primary they lost. n/t

[uponit7771]

41. +1, they sound so entitled

[J_J_]

31. kick

nt

[bigtree]

32. calling them all Sanders supporters is a lie

...it can't be determined who these voters would have cast a ballot for. If anything, given the margin Hillary won by in NY, 200 voters would not have made any significant difference in the result, and most of those votes would have likely been for Clinton.

The title is bogus.

[coco77]

36. Kicked...

[Waiting For Everyman]

42. Good! We need this investigated, and in other states too.

This is an in-depth article that I read yesterday on the same subject:

http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/16/clinton-does-best-where-voting-machines-flunk-hacking-tests-hillary-clinton-vs-bernie-sanders-election-fraud-allegations/


I also highly recommend the HBO documentary "Hacking Democracy" which I saw a few months ago when it was viewable free in a few places but I don't think it is anymore.

The main culprit to watch is the cards which go in the optical vote counters. The documentary proved and demonstrated in front of election board witnesses that those cards are PROGRAMMABLE and it is very easy for someone who knows what they're doing to manipulate the vote counts.