Fri May 13, 2016, 02:58 PM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
And now Debbie Wasserman Shultz won't debate!Just look at her arrogance while he asks her will she debate!
|
33 replies, 2304 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
ViseGrip | May 2016 | OP |
scscholar | May 2016 | #1 | |
arcane1 | May 2016 | #4 | |
panader0 | May 2016 | #5 | |
PatSeg | May 2016 | #14 | |
Attorney in Texas | May 2016 | #7 | |
RoccoR5955 | May 2016 | #20 | |
frylock | May 2016 | #22 | |
NV Whino | May 2016 | #25 | |
Warren DeMontague | May 2016 | #28 | |
Rass | May 2016 | #2 | |
GreenPartyVoter | May 2016 | #11 | |
Baobab | May 2016 | #30 | |
arcane1 | May 2016 | #3 | |
ViseGrip | May 2016 | #6 | |
Tarc | May 2016 | #8 | |
NWCorona | May 2016 | #13 | |
Tarc | May 2016 | #15 | |
NWCorona | May 2016 | #18 | |
frylock | May 2016 | #23 | |
NWCorona | May 2016 | #9 | |
MineralMan | May 2016 | #10 | |
obamanut2012 | May 2016 | #12 | |
MineralMan | May 2016 | #17 | |
RoccoR5955 | May 2016 | #21 | |
PatSeg | May 2016 | #16 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | May 2016 | #32 | |
brooklynite | May 2016 | #19 | |
-none | May 2016 | #29 | |
AgingAmerican | May 2016 | #24 | |
LWolf | May 2016 | #33 | |
onecaliberal | May 2016 | #26 | |
felix_numinous | May 2016 | #27 | |
B2G | May 2016 | #31 |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:05 PM
scscholar (2,902 posts)
1. She's busy running the party and there's a convention coming up!
Those two things are much more important.
|
Response to scscholar (Reply #1)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:09 PM
arcane1 (38,613 posts)
4. But she has time to go on TV to talk about how little free time she has.
![]() |
Response to scscholar (Reply #1)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:10 PM
panader0 (25,816 posts)
5. "She's busy running the party"
No, she's busy ruining the party. There, I fixed it for you.
Do have any idea how many Democratic seats have been lost under her "leadership"? |
Response to panader0 (Reply #5)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:22 PM
PatSeg (45,796 posts)
14. Yep, she may have broken a record for incompetence
![]() |
Response to scscholar (Reply #1)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:10 PM
Attorney in Texas (3,373 posts)
7. but not too busy to take care of the payday loan vultures.
Response to scscholar (Reply #1)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:44 PM
RoccoR5955 (12,471 posts)
20. A better manager would delegate responsibilities
to trusted people, and oversee things. DWS unfortunately has to round up money so that she can keep her seat in Congress, among other things.
Any manager that I have ever known who not had enough time is a bad manager. Good managers trust their underlings to get the things done that are asked of them, and not do them themselves. |
Response to scscholar (Reply #1)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:51 PM
frylock (34,825 posts)
22. It's hard work.
Response to scscholar (Reply #1)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:59 PM
NV Whino (20,886 posts)
25. She's busy running the party into the ground is more like it.
Response to scscholar (Reply #1)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:19 PM
Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)
28. Im sure she'll take time out to work to keep putting Florida cancer patients in prison for weed
Like she and her pal Sheldon Adelson did in 2014
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:06 PM
Rass (112 posts)
2. Use comedy
Canova should record a picture of himself in a mock debate stage with the other side empty. Visually show voters how much Schultz doesn't care.
|
Response to Rass (Reply #2)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:18 PM
GreenPartyVoter (72,320 posts)
11. Tweet that to him!
Response to GreenPartyVoter (Reply #11)
Fri May 13, 2016, 06:23 PM
Baobab (4,667 posts)
30. People should ask themselves, are these the actions of somebody who is running in a fair election?
People running in fair elections debate.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:08 PM
arcane1 (38,613 posts)
3. What a coward. Democracy was never something she was too crazy about.
The only Dems that count are incumbent Dems!!!1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:10 PM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
6. Kick....her in the butt!
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:15 PM
Tarc (10,432 posts)
8. We have our minds on other things now, bro. There is no need for another debate
Response to Tarc (Reply #8)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:19 PM
NWCorona (8,541 posts)
13. This isn't about Hillary.
At least hit play before commenting.
|
Response to NWCorona (Reply #13)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:23 PM
Tarc (10,432 posts)
15. Oh, sorry, this is about DWS and Tim-what's-his-name?
Yea, I wouldn't take time on that either.
![]() |
Response to Tarc (Reply #15)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:28 PM
NWCorona (8,541 posts)
18. This is about DWS debating her opponent not Bernie debating Hillary.
Edit: I see you get the op now.
I'm not surprised at your comment about DWS debating. |
Response to Tarc (Reply #15)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:53 PM
frylock (34,825 posts)
23. Solid 9.2 on the dismissive condescension.
![]() |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:18 PM
NWCorona (8,541 posts)
9. She'll find work as a lobbyist and be fine.
I'm so glad DWS is being challenged and will more than likely lose. She put all her chips on Hillary.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:18 PM
MineralMan (145,656 posts)
10. I imagine she has looked at how she's doing in her district,
and has decided to skip debating an opponent who has no chance to beat her in the primary.
That would be my guess. Anyone have any polling information on Tim Canova and DWS for the primary? I suspect it will be a walk-off win for her. |
Response to MineralMan (Reply #10)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:19 PM
obamanut2012 (24,787 posts)
12. Barring something odd happening, she will definitely win
Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #12)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:26 PM
MineralMan (145,656 posts)
17. That's what I'd think. It's difficult to primary a
House member in most districts. Many have tried. Many have failed. I imagine she's popular in her own district.
I couldn't find any polling, though. Maybe someone in her district could weigh in. |
Response to MineralMan (Reply #17)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:48 PM
RoccoR5955 (12,471 posts)
21. Tell that to the teabaggers
who got so many of their own elected to Congress last time around.
|
Response to MineralMan (Reply #10)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:24 PM
PatSeg (45,796 posts)
16. She could be planning
to have a place in a Clinton administration.
|
Response to MineralMan (Reply #10)
Fri May 13, 2016, 07:33 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (99,120 posts)
32. HRC won her district 70-30. That's all you need to now.
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:30 PM
brooklynite (89,516 posts)
19. This belongs in GD
GD: P is for the Presidential Primaries.
|
Response to brooklynite (Reply #19)
Fri May 13, 2016, 06:18 PM
-none (1,884 posts)
29. This is about Debbie Wasserman Shultz
So why not? She is up to her neck in the presidential primary and this may affect that.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:53 PM
AgingAmerican (12,958 posts)
24. Debbie doesn't do democracy
Response to AgingAmerican (Reply #24)
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:46 PM
LWolf (46,179 posts)
33. Nice alliteration.
![]() |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:02 PM
onecaliberal (30,567 posts)
26. She busy running the party into the ground.
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 05:16 PM
felix_numinous (5,198 posts)
27. They want complete control over the narrative
which is not a democracy. Rumors of the inevitable zombie apocalypse have certainly been inspired by 'friends' such as these.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2016, 06:26 PM
B2G (9,766 posts)
31. Marco Rubio Syndrome. Nt