2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIs Bill Clinton the only former president to campaign
...a lot during primary season?
George W. Bush did one event for Jeb Bush and I don't consider that a lot.
LuvLoogie
(7,003 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)onenote
(42,702 posts)Having a former president campaign for you only helps if the former president is popular (and by definition, a president that lost a re-election bid or didn't run for or complete a second term isn't popular enough to go on the campaign trail). In the last 50 years, there haven't been a lot of popular ex-presidents. Kennedy? Not available. Johnson? Not popular. Nixon? Not popular. Ford? Not popular. Carter? Not popular. Bush 1? Not popular. Bush 2? Not popular.
The only two ex presidents of the past 50 years that might have been viewed as an asset on the campaign trail are Reagan and Clinton, and Reagan's alzheimer's probably was a disqualifying factor in his case.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...so unpopular that he couldn't have helped anyone in Democratic primaries from 1984 to the present?
onenote
(42,702 posts)was low -- under 35 percent overall. He lost 44 of 50 states in 1980, so no one really wanted him around in 1984. While his favorability ratings improved significantly over the years, a lot of that improvement can be attributed to people feeling good about him as a person more than as a politician. To a certain extent, jumping back into electoral politics with both feet would have undercut the very thing that was leading people to view him more favorably. Among Democrats, at least, I think Carter has been rehabilitated, in part because voters who are under 40 probably have no real recollection the negative perception of his presidency. But even in 2008, he was in his mid-80s and not likely to be an full time campaigner.
LisaM
(27,811 posts)Not only is it his wife, he left office with good ratings (despite what you read here) and is still relatively young and able to do so. I can't really think of anyone else who falls into all these categories.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)for Bernie?
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)onenote
(42,702 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)they should be "above" it.Out of respect for the office. That is probably an old fashioned sentiment.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)I was just wondering if this is a unique situation regarding an ex-president.
Arkansas Granny
(31,516 posts)health issues which will make it unlikely that either will be doing any campaigning. I expect that President Obama will campaign once the nomination is finalized.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...primary seasons when he was younger, 1984, 1988, 1992? Was he that that unpopular with Democrats?
woolldog
(8,791 posts)His presidency was widely seen as a disaster. He would've done more harm than good.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Glad he's on our side.
tritsofme
(17,377 posts)Bush is probably the most toxic. Do your own math.
sofa king
(10,857 posts)Publicly supported Adlai Stevenson in 1956 and actively campaigned for Democratic Senate candidates.
Teddy Roosevelt actively campaigned against William H Taft, then broke off as a third party candidate and spoiled the election in favor of Woodrow Wilson, even delivering a speech with an assassin's bullet lodged in his chest.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)NT
sofa king
(10,857 posts)Truman did throw his weight behind Stevenson at the convention in 1952, which won it for him on the third ballot. But then he seems to have backed away from him in 1956 and while it looks as if Truman may have supported Stevenson at some point in the primaries, he actually backed off from Stevenson at that convention.
So who knows?
Realistically, there are matters of health, popularity, and party alignment which have prevented former Presidents from campaigning for another candidate. Several sitting Presidents, however, have anointed successors, including James Madison, Ronald Reagan, Teddy Roosevelt and Andrew Jackson. President Obama will certainly be considered to have similarly done so after Mrs. Clinton wins.