Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
2. The fraud seems to be on the part of Sanders people
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:18 AM
May 2016

If they weren't registered and refused to verify their information, that implies some sort of fraud. I remember during the caucus that some man posted on Facebook that he was getting on a bus from Long Beach, CA to go caucus for Sanders in Nevada, so it is possible that there was fraud on that side.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
5. 58 weren't following rules, even given opportunity to. Why does Sanders not have to follow rules?
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:33 AM
May 2016

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
6. It seems the Sanders people
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:33 AM
May 2016

tried to get people that were not registered ...who's addresses was unknown into the process...looks like Bernie supporters were trying to play games with the vote...bottom line, they lost Nevada and didn't deserve the delegates anyway.

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)
7. Looks like a bunch of them changed back to unaffiliated.
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:36 AM
May 2016

And of course unaffiliated can't be a delegate at the convention (it's literally the first rule). Redditor complaining: https://www.reddit.com/r/NevadaForSanders/comments/4jd7nq/where_is_everybody/d35vi8d

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»About those Sanders deleg...