Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

lancer78

(1,495 posts)
Sun May 15, 2016, 02:01 AM May 2016

HRC is this years Martha Coakley

A weak campaigner who feels she is "entitled" to a government post. Coakley felt that she was entitled to Ted Kennedy's seat, took the D behind her name for granted, and got beat by a guy who posed nude for Cosmo. 'Nuff said.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. So weak she has millions more votes than anyone else.
Sun May 15, 2016, 02:04 AM
May 2016

Yeah, you keep whistling through those deep dark woods, there!

thesquanderer

(11,986 posts)
7. She got more votes? You're missing the point.
Sun May 15, 2016, 10:13 AM
May 2016

In Coakley's Senate run, she got more primary votes than any other candidate in either the Dem or Republican primaries... but she lost the election to the Republican.

In Coakley's gubernatorial run, she got more primary votes than any other candidate in either the Dem or Republican primaries... but she lost the election to the Republican.

So "getting the most votes" doesn't mean you're going to win...

MADem

(135,425 posts)
11. Love that Bernie math!
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:43 PM
May 2016

Hate to tell you this, but Martha stepped on her own self in the general (look it up) with a series of idiotic misstatements (the Fenway Park ones screwed her and mobilized her MUCH BETTER FUNDED opponent's base) plus she was fighting the Commonwealth's "Bros Before..." glass ceiling. That stank stuck to her in her gubernatorial run. And, to make matters WORSE for her, on the ballot for her Senate run appeared an (I) candidate named JOE KENNEDY (and we have one here, and he has a following, but this one wasn't that guy--but he managed to steal tens of thousands of votes from her).

EW broke through (the FIRST WOMAN EVER to be sent to the Senate from the Commonwealth), but if you think that was easy sailing you are dead wrong. It took a FORTUNE in out-of-state money, (lesson learned from the Coakley-Brown contest, where Brown's campaign floated on out-of-state dollars) and it took old farts like me coming out of canvassing/precinct walking/smiling-and-dialing retirement to deliver bodies to the polls. And even at that -- it was neck-and-neck. It should have been a cakewalk.

Getting the most votes does mean you're going to win--provided you don't commit seppuku in the general contest and provided you can compete with that (waaaah!) Big, Ugly, Corporate Money like Warren enjoyed when she smacked down Brown.

#FeelTheMath.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
3. most people who achieve a majority of votes are 'entitled'
Sun May 15, 2016, 02:05 AM
May 2016

...to the office they aspire to.

Earn the votes and gain office. Is that too hard for your revolution? Must not be meant to be.

pansypoo53219

(20,969 posts)
5. i sense FEAR in some reporters as more questions about hillary are just NOW being asked.
Sun May 15, 2016, 05:15 AM
May 2016

they see what i saw MONTHS AGO. she is NOT gonna win.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
9. I'm pretty sure that if Scott Brown had called for "some form of punishment" for women
Sun May 15, 2016, 11:41 AM
May 2016

who have abortions, and said a female reporter had "blood coming out of her wherever", even Coakley would have beaten him.

Hillary is a much better candidate than Coakley was, and Trump is a much worse one than Scott Brown.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»HRC is this years Martha ...