2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (Cheese Sandwich) on Sun May 15, 2016, 08:41 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I would vote for Bernie but Hillary has not earned my vote.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)that promotes such CRIMINAL SYSTEMIC ELECTION FRAUD IS PATENTLY INTOLERABLE AND IS CAUSING DEMOCRATS TO RE-THINK THEIR LOYALTY TO A PARTY STRUCTURE THAT ENGINEERS SYSTEMIC DISENFRANCHISEMENT!
Apparently the party "leader's" foresight does not extend beyond a Hillary bumper sticker.
Response to CorporatistNation (Reply #23)
Post removed
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)"The supporters of HRC have been the more educated and the better off financially than the typical Bernie supporter, and I'm one of those very HRC supporters. Why are Bernie's supporters so damned uppity when they have no real reason to be?"
There are many many professionals i.e., doctors, lawyers, psychologists, IT, Managers, CEO's etc WHO ARE BERNIE SUPPORTERS...if you meant that comment, how uppity dare you! Bernie supporters from ALL WALKS OF LIFE are voting for the only candidate that TELLS THE TRUTH!
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)many educated people couldn't have become increasingly doubtful as the season went on. It's one thing to want the change Bernie calls for (who on the left doesn't!?), another to continue to support him after it becomes clear that he has no plan for accomplishing what experts say couldn't be done anyway.
Then there are all the ethics issues. Many who were initially attracted by a belief in his probity must have become aware that their hero has flat feet. We are talking about educated and presumably relatively intelligent people, such as the professionals mentioned, after all.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)The broken and rigged system. Hillary was anointed and the super delegates tilted the scale before one ballot was cast.
Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)Nobody ever loses elections anymore they were stolen or rigged all of them all the time
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Starts with a 500 "delegate" lead prior to one ballot cast. When the establishment limits debates and schedules them for the least audiance. Yes, the establishments choice has an advantage and it is rigged from the start.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)CompanyFirstSergeant
(1,558 posts)Right there.
HDSam
(251 posts)what your post suggests, my wife and I should be supporting Hillary.
We're not.
One of my co-workers comes from a wealthy and conservative family - they're very well educated and voting for Hillary because they see her as more conservative than a progressive based on some of her past positions (anti-gay rights for example) and likely won't do anything to raise taxes on the 1%. My co-worker, however, even though he's a well-educated employed trust fund recipient, is voting for Bernie.
So here we have examples of conservatives voting for Hillary and the well-educated and secure voting for Bernie.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I think you need to read Thomas Frank's, "Listen, Liberal" to understand why what you just said is the very reason the party is splitting to its core.
http://billmoyers.com/story/author-thomas-frank-talks-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-and-his-new-book-listen-liberal/
Merryland
(1,134 posts)for not realizing how very educated and cultured Hillary supporters are in comparison to Bernie Sanders supporters. Did you get straight A's? Are you Phi Beta Kappa? Exactly how much "better off financially" are you than me? I can feel the air of superiority seeping out of your post, but would advise you it's not a widely held opinion, tonyt53.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)If she is the nominee, that is.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I know my state and what my vote is worth for the top of the ticket. What is it with some of you and the outright lies? That really wants me to vote for her, NOT!!!
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)Loudestlib
(980 posts)If Hillary wants those votes, she should champion some of the issues that they care about.
Jackilope
(819 posts)I will participate and vote for down ticket items. I haven't decided whether to leave presidential blank or write in. In my red state, it doesn't matter. I change to Ind. following that, though it appears even registration is tampered with. DNC did this to voters, if you want to push blame and "loyalty".
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)and those who voted to leave this crap up
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Bernsters are (mostly) finally forced to realize that Sanders is not going to win.
Bernsters are acting out.
All seems to be as expected.
The poseurs were always leaving eventually. Once the new rules kick in, once the Bernie-cum-Trump conservatives head off to badmouth us where that's allowed, and once the terminal antagonistas head off to wherever they came from, things will calm down a bit.
Those who genuinely want progressive change will stick, and that's most.
The personality cultists are unclear, but likely what they do will depend on Bernie. Somewhat. The bus, of course, always awaits.
The reason for the "trend" is too obviously true to deny.
As for what the various Bernsters will do,
1. Most Bernie supporters are progressive change supporters first and will continue. It was never all about Bernie for them, and they will accept efforts to woo them. Hopefully, this does not disgust you.
2. Some Bernie supporters are conservatives or just "anti-establishment" "populist" economic and/or social malcontents who will now move on to the OTHER anti-establishment candidate. This is just reality. They were never on our side of the ballot, and we all knew it all along, just not that there were so many of them.
3. The "antagonistas" are consumed with antagonism and resentment, and even hate against you-know-who, and I'm putting them in their own group because they are ruled by it. Same as #2. Good riddance, and if it's not them you're finding disgusting you're free to find my statement disgusting instead.
4. The personality cultists? Is the suggestion that some found a Leader in Bernie and that following their Leader is their primary motivation what disgusts? Authoritarianism is unfortunate and unadmirable, yes, and depending on the leader can be a serious problem, yet it's extremely common, and there is a left-wing strain. Is this the reality that is too disgusting to be mentioned? I'd say we need to always keep a careful eye out and "mention" it whenever it arises, but of course you may feel different.
Beowulf
(761 posts)and wrong. Not to mention arrogant and insulting.
Yes, Bernie supporters are progressives in the whole. And in the whole they recognize that Hillary is no progressive option. She clearly is a neoliberal in social and economic policy and neoconservative in foreign policy. Bernie supporters hold that neoliberalism and neoconservatism are primary causes of so many of our most significant problems plus are major obstacles to real change. Voting for Hillary is a vote for fear (of Trump.). Many of us have vowed never to cast another vote in fear of the opposition. If anything this primary season has made clear that the establishment of the Democratic Party views progressives with as much contempt as Republicans.
Chezboo
(230 posts)45% of democrats don't want ->Her and I'm one of them. I have been a dem all 46 years of my voting life and, like JFK, am not afraid to say I'm a liberal. That knocks out points 1 and 2. I am antagonistic toward "you-know-who" because of her record, history pertaining to that record, what she says and her actions and I've seen it since the 90's. I don't like her, but if I didn't like her and agreed with her stances I'd still vote for her. But she's so off the mark of what my belief system is she's an intolerable choice. I will never vote for a neocon and that's what she is... again, I pay attention to what I listed above, not republican points, not msm, but my own research. That knocks out point 3. Point 4 has me puzzled because my first reaction is what you are describing is the "I'm with -> Her" contingent. Or is that too disgusting to be mentioned?
amborin
(16,631 posts)Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)But if she's the nominee, I won't be voting for the Democrat this year. That said, I will vote in November. I always do. Sitting out the process won't help and would only hurt.
However, registering a protest vote for the Green Party to show the (formerly) Democratic Party that it's FDR base is tired of their rightward shift has to be done at some point or else they'll never stop shifting that direction.
And, when many of us think Clinton is as bad as Trump (for different reasons, mind you), this year seems like the year to do that. I think we'll be screwed with either candidate, so there's really nothing to lose.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I always will vote down ticket, but Hillary will not get my vote
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Well you are wrong. I have voted since 1974 and will vote this election as well.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)attacking Hillary and it has worked beautifully.
People are so gullible and often dumb.
I think it is time for the planet to flick us off it's surface, we are annoying and harmful and we dont deserve this earth.
Drumpf will see to that, his actions will end up being the end of all life.
We deserve it, we really do.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)and too many selfish people.
I will focus my efforts on GOTV
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)she may choose to be either....
Watch... Starting at 2:09 Progressive? or .................. Oop... Moderate?%^#$@&*%
snort
(2,334 posts)Somehow. It's hurting my gullible brain.
Sejon
(109 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)And it's a narrative that serves Hillary very well. But it's kinda transparent. Just demonize the fuck out of "the other" to spread the meme that it's unconscionable to vote for anyone but your preferred candidate. Never mind that there's not really all that much difference between your preferred candidate and "the other", just keep on demonizing. Hillary is fortunate that her presumptive opponent is very good at self-demonizing, but that doesn't excuse the tactic.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)and the mouse in your pocket, in which case I agree 100% with your statement.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)I thought that was only something Berners subscribed ....
apcalc
(4,528 posts)A whole ton of stuff posted here has been inciteful garbage.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Hillary damages herself - there is no need for a "concerted" effort. Nor is it a right-wing conspiracy as Hillary would like you to believe. Hell the GOP can barely keep their own party together and are dying the death of one hundred cuts which they self-inflicted.
The real issue with Hillary is Hillary and then Bill.
I am neither dumb nor gullible - but I was alive and watched the Clintons and their actions and those are burned into my memory. I will NOT vote for that Woman!
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Joob
(1,065 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Live by the H, die by the H.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)all life as well as others
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)I didn't think it was possible to cram so much bullshit hyperbole into such a small space.
You're awesome!
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Beowulf
(761 posts)Someone just posted that Hillary supporters are more affluent and educated. For the rest there is fear. Except a portion of the progressive movement headed by Bernie understands that to get the change we need, first the Democratic Party must be reformed. Failing that, a new party or migration to a different party will be necessary.
If Hillary supporters/party leaders are so afraid of Trump, they'd switch to the candidate who has the best chance of beating him instead of forcing a candidate so many see as the embodiment of what's wrong and must be changed. Or perhaps with Hillary at the head of the ticket, their privilege is safe win or lose. My status is certainly threatened by a President Trump AND a President Clinton. Neither will address the issues and conditions that matter most to me.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)It's amazing what they'll say.
Thanks!
Response to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)
m-lekktor This message was self-deleted by its author.
monmouth4
(10,711 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)people to make the same silly choice.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Until the next "trend" comes along.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)one does not necessarily lead to the next. it is a fallacy.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)I don't plan on voting for Trump or any GOP member, but I will be voting for an actual progressive, and dem candidates down the ticket.
HRC's baggage just crosses the line to get my vote.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Their posts only tend to alienate Sanders supporters than encourage them. A rather stupid strategy based on their own ire.
I plan on voting for a candidate I can believe in, not one who has a "D" beside their name, but who I not only think can't win, but even if they did win who I think will do more damage than good. I cant' vote for that.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)I am not sure that is what Bernie wants but, if he can not win the nomination within the confines of the Democratic Party then I don't think his supporters will see any other recourse.
Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)Bernie's loss. Which is pretty insulting to everything he's done
Uben
(7,719 posts)People get pissed that their candidate isn't winning. The only option they see is to not vote for the nominee. Been happening forever. Some will vote despite their denial that they will, others will stay at home and forever bitch that their candidate did not win.
They choose to stick to their guns even though the result is the opposing party gains by their lack of voting. It's called spite.
Ignorant? Yes, but at this point, its all the ammunition they have.
Not voting? No griping. You at least have to vote for someone to acquire that right.
Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)I only rejoined the Democratic Party to vote for Sanders, because he best represents my interests. If he is not the nominee, I will again leave the Democratic Party and, when the General Election comes, I will vote for the candidate that best represents my interests.
It has nothing to do with spite.
Uben
(7,719 posts)The result will remain the same.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Thus we will get to complain all we like. Mostly we will be pointing out to the Hillary supporters the things she does if she is elected that are as we predicted!
AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)This primary season was SO bad that the results can't be respected.
If we are a "democratic" party in the slightest, we need a re-vote - free and fair this time.
If you believe in democracy you are honor-bound to oppose what Clinton and her allies have done - to name a few:
- rigging superdelegates
- buying out state parties in a campaign money-laundering scheme
- registration-switching of Bernie voters as in NY
- convention hijinks as in NV
- whatever the hell happened in AZ
- and the DNC's openly partisan bias
These elements together are a damning indictment of this year's primary process. None of them should ever have been allowed to happen. Clinton and her allies did everything to cut democracy out of the Democratic Party - there's no way in hell any person who believes in democracy should ever certify this result.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)Even my wife.
But like you, I will vote in November, I have done so in every national election since 1962.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)desmiller
(747 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)you vote for war, fracking, keystone, TPP, No fight on min wage, no fight for single payer. A vote for Clinton removes your right to be called progressive. Like how that works?
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)That tired old "argument" has flies circling around it. Give it a rest.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)CentralMass
(16,971 posts)candidates who they do not support.
bjo59
(1,166 posts)felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)I think more and more people refuse to participate in fraud or vote for anyone willing to lie cheat or steal their way into office. We have had enough.
Thanks for the link
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)We will know in November am afraid
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)I don't see any reversal of this trend occurring.
CompanyFirstSergeant
(1,558 posts)A vote for Trump is a vote for Trump.
A vote for a 3rd candidate - or no vote at all - is exactly what it is.
It's NOT the "I will never vote for HRC" people that set this all up. They voted for Bernie....
....and DO NOT see Clinton as a viable second choice.
As a military dad - I could not vote for Clinton - period.
DO NOT say that I would be the reason Trump wins. I did not vote for him in the primary and will not do so in the GE.
How could I - and others like me - be at fault?????
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)Because it sure as hell doesn't belong here.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)CompanyFirstSergeant
(1,558 posts)...blaming the 'right wing' on these attacks is ludicrous at this point.
Sure, Cunard Lines was a rival of White Star Lines.
But blaming the RW at this point is like blaming Cunard for the sinking of the Titanic (White Star Lines)
The Titanic (corrupt members of the DNC) and the iceberg (HRC) have got this 'to the bottom of the ocean' thing all wrapped up, thank you.
enid602
(9,684 posts)It would appear that the berners simply reject the results of our primary process. Incredible.
CompanyFirstSergeant
(1,558 posts)....un-certified?
....have devolved into chaos?
....have been challenged as not legitimate?
.....have resulted in officials being fired?
People are supposed to take the results at face value? NO way.
enid602
(9,684 posts)Bernie is not capable of admitting defeat, so of course there will be a torrent of lawsuits and accusations of cheating and fraud.
Vinca
(53,993 posts)I really can't stand Hillary, but if the choices are a sane POTUS vs. a batshit crazy POTUS, I'll stand in line for hours to vote for her.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)It's much easier to have people "self-report".
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)...the less acceptable Princess Weathervane becomes.
senz
(11,945 posts)They have quite a way of alienating the people they need, don't they?
msongs
(73,752 posts)3 million votes.
Response to senz (Reply #91)
Cheese Sandwich This message was self-deleted by its author.
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)... if a third party would help us with down tickets. They hid the first time I posted it because they accused me of supporting a 3rd party. I was basically saying if these poeple stay home it could be worse than if a third party joins and pulls in tons of down ticket votes...but I think it would only work if the third party was not running down ticket as well.
greatauntoftriplets
(179,005 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(179,005 posts)* too fucking old. Like you, I'm not about to change my ways.
MelungeonWoman
(502 posts)Sign the pledge, come election day you will find that the board of elections was notified that you have moved. You'll still be able to fill out a provisional ballot.
djean111
(14,255 posts)If I recall, there were a couple of sites "for Bernie's supporters" that required a LOT more information than I was comfortable with. So I did not join.
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Thanks for posting this link so more can see it.
I voted Bernie today 5-15-16!!!
MineralMan
(151,268 posts)That's what I think. I also think someone is stirring it. I think that, too.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)a few people in an echo chamber?
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)Response to Cheese Sandwich (Original post)
Post removed
