Over/under on whether we'll hear about how vote by mail is a corporatist trick on Wednesday?

[Recursion]

Just a way to mysteriously lose tons of ballots, etc...

[Skwmom]

1. It would hardly take a genius to substitute mail in ballots. Just money.

[joshcryer]

5. Um, mail in is the most secure you can get.

Oregon has led on it, and Colorado has had great success with it as an option. Gaming it is impossible, logistically speaking.

[scscholar]

9. And Washington state has it, and it's...

a disaster. Last election they admitted to calling most of the races when 7% of the ballots they admitted to receiving hadn't been counted. You just know there were many more than that "lost" before they acknowledged receiving them.

[firebrand80]

2. Hillary chances of winning are 50-50 nt

[Recursion]

3. I'd give an edge to Sanders, but who knows?

The way polling has been this cycle you might as well just throw a dart.

[firebrand80]

6. Probably a 1-2 delegate gain either way

Essentially a tie

[JI7]

4. depends on who wins

[sadoldgirl]

7. Depends on how the scanners are programmed.

[Starry Messenger]

8. I twirled my moustache while filling mine out for CA.

[Ohioblue22]

10. Of course no one loses an election, the loser's election was stolen or rigged

[larkrake]

11. I doubt it, we already get tons of flipped ballots with rigged machines

Mail is the only way, yet if mailed ballots are read by machines, what is the difference? Well, the difference is a person does the changing, not a soulless machine. Hacking is so easy and corporations do that daily. They determine the future anyway, not voters. Oregon voters can verify their vote- it is the only true system

[LWolf]

12. I love vote by mail.

It would piss me off to know end if there were efforts to undermine it.