Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:01 PM May 2016

Say it Hillary supporters. You don't think Americans deserve economic security...

You believe in economic stratification, heirarchies, and that some people deserve to live and have good lives whereas other people deserve to suffer just because they "didn't work hard enough to get a good education and rise up the economic ladder, and probably made a bunch of poor economic decisions." You would stick your middle finger to the idea of economic equality if you could.

144 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Say it Hillary supporters. You don't think Americans deserve economic security... (Original Post) AZ Progressive May 2016 OP
Most of them won't admit that, but a few will. BillZBubb May 2016 #1
Being liberal doesn't mean checking reality at the door. CrowCityDem May 2016 #7
Politically untenable because affluent Democrats say they are Armstead May 2016 #21
No, because there aren't enough votes, or the public appetite. CrowCityDem May 2016 #38
There is no proof there is no public appetite.... Armstead May 2016 #41
The proof is pretty straight forward.... Adrahil May 2016 #74
Look at Bernie Sanders's popularity. He hasn't had to lie to the public, at all. He is running on w4rma May 2016 #132
Your assertion has nothing at all to do with the point I made. NT Adrahil May 2016 #143
There aren't enough votes because until Bernie started to run, JDPriestly May 2016 #127
So basically: "Your suffering economically? Tough, there's more important issues out there to deal AZ Progressive May 2016 #22
And how does that jive with "Bernie or bust"? CrowCityDem May 2016 #36
Pssst! The word is "jibe," not "jive." RufusTFirefly May 2016 #78
How old are you ? puffy socks May 2016 #106
Ask yourself what must change to make these things politically tenable. lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #67
1. Majority support. 2. Smarter plans than Bernie's hack jobs. CrowCityDem May 2016 #87
you get the world you accept and I dont roguevalley May 2016 #125
That is like being for women's rights and against welfare. jwirr May 2016 #59
There are winners and losers...that is life...not saying that the system can't beachbumbob May 2016 #2
The Bernie Or Bust crowd doesnt actually care. JaneyVee May 2016 #118
No, it's the ignore Hillary's endless scandals crowd that doesn't actually care. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #133
You've guys played this "good cop, bad cop" game for a long time and don't expect consequences? AZ Progressive May 2016 #120
The problem StayFrosty May 2016 #3
You don't understand the problem BillZBubb May 2016 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Armstead May 2016 #27
How would it be any different for Hillary? Sejon May 2016 #29
For almost 8 years now we have watched President Obama jwirr May 2016 #63
No one has yet explained to me why Clinton would be better. lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #69
"we want Hillary because she won't get your hopes up" BillZBubb May 2016 #86
Vote Hillary: Hopeless. The exact opposite of Obama's slogan. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #134
A presidency built on low expectations, maybe loyalsister May 2016 #137
no.. no, Sanders said the "collective energy" of voters would change the minds of congress... uponit7771 May 2016 #108
Yep. The Clinton Machine's "Rainbow Oligarchy" marks a total betrayal of Democratic... NewImproved Deal May 2016 #4
"Amoral" is an apt word, in this context brentspeak May 2016 #23
Are you kidding me? gaspee May 2016 #44
Could you point out the "homophobic" part of that post SwampG8r May 2016 #88
I'd say a striking example ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #45
The 3rd Way Conservative Democrats are doing a good enough job undoing... bvar22 May 2016 #72
A good teaching post. Thanks. But notice no one seems to care. Loyalty trumps common sense. snowy owl May 2016 #129
And, yet, there was no cut. Hoyt May 2016 #142
Silver lining: With a Trump Presidency, Democrats have a good shot at winning Congress in 2 years. w4rma May 2016 #135
"Rainbow Oligarchy" -- A perfect encapsulation of what I have been feeling for months JonLeibowitz May 2016 #111
Gladly, Mr, Stewart! NewImproved Deal May 2016 #121
Agreed! LOL. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #123
Its not personal. Neoliberalism has winners and losers. It channels money to the winners. Baobab May 2016 #5
I don't believe... CrowCityDem May 2016 #6
Every person has the right to rise to their God-given potential - Hillary Clinton Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #8
She doesn't mention the part where they pull the ladder up behind them. corkhead May 2016 #19
Never? Adrahil May 2016 #83
Never. It always results in a bunch of people living in alleys and eating out of trashcans Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #89
Using the exception to prove the rule...so disingenuous. But it makes you feel better. snowy owl May 2016 #130
Its not clear to me what you are for and what I should be against. nt BootinUp May 2016 #9
Why should I say it... NCTraveler May 2016 #10
Damn you figured me out! CorkySt.Clair May 2016 #11
Why do you measure someone's worth only in terms of money? Why do you devalue humanity? Corporate666 May 2016 #12
Don't ask me, ask the capitalist system that determines this AZ Progressive May 2016 #20
Non sequitor Corporate666 May 2016 #94
The old corporatist dodge! Excellent. BillZBubb May 2016 #24
You missed the point big time Corporate666 May 2016 #95
That's... not remotely the case. There is disagreement about how best to provide economic security. Zynx May 2016 #13
Right back at you on looking at Hillary as she truly is... BillZBubb May 2016 #30
She opposed all of Bush's supply-side policies. Perhaps you've forgotten that. Zynx May 2016 #32
So did virtually every Democrat. That's not exactly a boon to the poor. BillZBubb May 2016 #33
When she was in office, the Democrats were usually in the minority. It was mainly about opposing Zynx May 2016 #37
"Once they took the majority she supported..." ablamj May 2016 #138
. corkhead May 2016 #14
That photo is a classic nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #17
It's representative of right-way thinking. This Party has been overrun by conservatives. Broward May 2016 #15
Bernie's magic wand will fix all! JaneyVee May 2016 #16
I think all Americans deserve economic security CreekDog May 2016 #25
But you'll vote for Hillary because we just can't do those things now! BillZBubb May 2016 #31
I'll vote for Hillary because she's the better candidate CreekDog May 2016 #39
Yep, because she'll make sure that the top 20% won't sink below to the level of "the common people" AZ Progressive May 2016 #54
Apparently you don't understand the word "everyone" CreekDog May 2016 #122
I'll vote for Hillary because... Adrahil May 2016 #66
Your cause maybe, not mine. BillZBubb May 2016 #77
That's your "opinion" NT Adrahil May 2016 #84
Clinton will give it, not Sanders. The point is, Clinton has better policies than Sanders. seabeyond May 2016 #26
Nobody even knows what her policies are she "evolves" that often Sejon May 2016 #34
How are free trade and for profit health insurance better? MrsKirkley May 2016 #40
So that's what they're repackaging socialism to be these days.....LOL Trust Buster May 2016 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author AZ Progressive May 2016 #35
are you crazy? gaspee May 2016 #42
Not me of course, Hillary supporters AZ Progressive May 2016 #47
Get help gaspee May 2016 #50
"I'll offer anybody here fifty dollars an hour if you'll go pick lettuce in Yuma this season" AZ Progressive May 2016 #53
Apparently he's psychic. JoePhilly May 2016 #56
Well, I did read a really insightful article... AZ Progressive May 2016 #64
And what research is that based on? JoePhilly May 2016 #70
And I guess your going to try to convince me that corporatism and the power grab by the 1% is all... AZ Progressive May 2016 #76
I'm not the one writing silly OPs trying to convience anyone of anything. JoePhilly May 2016 #80
Unfortunately for you, this thread is further exposing the aloofness and callousness AZ Progressive May 2016 #82
Have we met? kstewart33 May 2016 #43
Is that the best you can do? AZ Progressive May 2016 #49
Now come on, AZ. kstewart33 May 2016 #52
Fucking stupid is fucking stupid. Starry Messenger May 2016 #46
Those satisfied with the status quo and doing well themselves don't give a * polly7 May 2016 #48
Sociopathy is becoming an American value... AZ Progressive May 2016 #58
More bullshit. Based on a false premise. Lil Missy May 2016 #51
We're waiting for an olive branch from Camp Clinton Sejon May 2016 #62
an olive branch to who? to St Bernie supporters who Lil Missy May 2016 #115
Looks like someone here cares more about celebrity worship than the future of the country AZ Progressive May 2016 #119
That's ridiculous. no olive branch for you Lil Missy May 2016 #136
My.. my ... how the self-righteous pontificate. JoePhilly May 2016 #55
How the willfully ignorant whine! BillZBubb May 2016 #79
No need to admit it, just read their posts. coffeeAM May 2016 #57
JaneyVee says there will ALWAYS be a permanent underclass... cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #60
These people should go back to the Republican Party... AZ Progressive May 2016 #61
They aren't even socially liberal Hydra May 2016 #73
It's so SIMPLE in Hillaryland! BillZBubb May 2016 #81
That's what Republicans and right wingers always say ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #139
... MrWendel May 2016 #65
As other posters have pointed out Hydra May 2016 #68
Just to be clear, economic security is NOT the same as equality equality. Adrahil May 2016 #71
We are talking about economic equality in the sense of the rich not being too rich and the poor... AZ Progressive May 2016 #75
inflation enid602 May 2016 #85
Wow another right wing meme! You righties are always warning BillZBubb May 2016 #91
A classic case of ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #90
You support the Third Way candidate. You are a conservative. BillZBubb May 2016 #92
Do you honestly believe ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #96
I know you are a conservative, you don't. You need to deal with it. BillZBubb May 2016 #97
Again, all I can say is ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #98
Third Way is conservative. Hillary is Third Way. You support Hillary. BillZBubb May 2016 #101
Seriously, you're KILLIN' me!!! NanceGreggs May 2016 #104
The pain of hiding your true nature of conservativism is what's killing you. BillZBubb May 2016 #105
... NanceGreggs May 2016 #124
Who made you the arbiter of OTHER people's views Sparkly May 2016 #100
Basic logic. Hillary is Third Way. Third Way is conservative. BillZBubb May 2016 #102
"It's a fact." Sparkly May 2016 #109
of course Lil Missy May 2016 #117
Bernie supporter here. I don't think minorities and women who support Hillary believe pampango May 2016 #93
Unreal. Sparkly May 2016 #99
Very real. Deal with it. BillZBubb May 2016 #103
I will. Sparkly May 2016 #110
Got a link for that? wildeyed May 2016 #107
So. you think all Hillary supporters are economically better off and don't care about others? nini May 2016 #112
Pot calling the kettle black, look at you guys with the Berniebro thing. AZ Progressive May 2016 #113
If you actually believe this line of reasoning, you should seriously look into the fact that you may anotherproletariat May 2016 #114
I don't have to be brainwashed, I just have a history of experiences to reinforce my ideas AZ Progressive May 2016 #116
As if Bernie Sanders could fix anything. The_Casual_Observer May 2016 #126
You're insane or a Young Republican trolling n/t kevinmc May 2016 #128
kr Norrin Radd May 2016 #131
K&R -- Thanks. Needed to be said. senz May 2016 #140
I say to people here in the top 20%: AZ Progressive May 2016 #141
The 1% are entitled to all the money, don't cha know Cosmic Kitten May 2016 #144

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
1. Most of them won't admit that, but a few will.
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:06 PM
May 2016

Talk to them and they all tell you how liberal they are. Ask them about specific liberal initiatives and they become not so liberal after all. They are "for the general idea" but darn it we just can't do that right now. They've swallowed the corporate Kool Aid without even being aware.

 

CrowCityDem

(2,348 posts)
7. Being liberal doesn't mean checking reality at the door.
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:10 PM
May 2016

Certain things are politically untenable right now. That's a fact.

On other issues, maybe you Ned to learn that Bernie's way isn't the only one.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
41. There is no proof there is no public appetite....
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:52 PM
May 2016

Just what the defenders of the status quo have decided, as a way to stifle meaningful reform.

Been doing it for 35 years. Started with the Republicans, but the Democratic big wigs decided to parrot it.

NOTHING is attainable without an effort.



 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
74. The proof is pretty straight forward....
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:34 PM
May 2016

Despite opinion polls, the fact is that the people who show up to VOTE, especially in off year elections, are putting way too many Republicans in the Congress.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
132. Look at Bernie Sanders's popularity. He hasn't had to lie to the public, at all. He is running on
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:42 AM
May 2016

economic issues. The problem is that very wealthy Democrats are smearing him to keep him out of the general election and from winning the general election.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
127. There aren't enough votes because until Bernie started to run,
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:20 AM
May 2016

no one in the upper echelons or leadership of the Democratic Party talked much if at all about economic inequality. Yet economic inequality is everywhere. In the beer cans strewn on the lawns of the just-barely-making-it-and-working-50-hours-a-week guys in the Middle West and the homeless on the streets of Los Angeles and San Francisco to the mansions of Miami and the coast of California, you can see the economic disparity. It is unsustainable. It is a festering sore on the spine of America. Bernie is the only one to draw adequate attention to it.

The public appetite for doing something about it has been growing since John Edwards drew attention to the closed factories in 2008, since the Occupy movement drew attention to the bail-out of the banks and the selling out of ordinary Americans in 2011 and since the beginning of the Bernie campaign.

The public appetite for doing something about wages and income disparity, about the cost of healthcare insurance, about the security of Social Security, about violence in our society, about our expensive military, about our expensive colleges, about our poor schools, about the homeless, etc. is growing and will become a force to reckon with. Just wait. This is a grass-roots movement.

The very wealthy could do something to end the movement if they wished. We shall see whether they develop the sense of history and of right and wrong to step up to the plate.

There should not be one homeless person in the United States. Not one. Not as long as we spend what we do on military hardware and personnel.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
22. So basically: "Your suffering economically? Tough, there's more important issues out there to deal
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:35 PM
May 2016

with"...

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
78. Pssst! The word is "jibe," not "jive."
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:43 PM
May 2016

You'll thank me if you ever wind up talking to someone's who's literate.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
67. Ask yourself what must change to make these things politically tenable.
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:28 PM
May 2016

If the answer is you, return your liberal card.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
125. you get the world you accept and I dont
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:10 AM
May 2016

Accept bs that says things aren't right yet, time etc. Tell that shit to a hungry homeless child. I will work to help the only one who sees them and it isn't her. Fuck anyone who votes with their wallet.

 

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)
2. There are winners and losers...that is life...not saying that the system can't
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:06 PM
May 2016

be made better...but their is NO chance with conservatives calling the shots...

StayFrosty

(237 posts)
3. The problem
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:07 PM
May 2016

With you Bernie supporters is that you fail to realize that whoever the Democratic nominee is... They will have to work with Republicans and compromise.

Yall think Bernie has a magic wand that will magically give everyone free college and a 15 dollar minimum wage

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
18. You don't understand the problem
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:30 PM
May 2016

No one thinks Bernie will immediately get the things he is talking about. Everyone knows the republicans will block it. What Bernie will do is fight from day one to get those things passed into law. He won't be sidetracked or just give up. He is confident, as are his supporters, that over time it is a winning argument. It will differentiate the Democrats from the republicans (the exact opposite of the Third Way strategy). It will grow the party and strengthen us in midterm elections.

A majority of the people want what Bernie is proposing. If we fight for it, we will start whittling away at the republican power. The key is to be seen fighting for what you believe in and making the case and sticking to it.

Response to StayFrosty (Reply #3)

 

Sejon

(109 posts)
29. How would it be any different for Hillary?
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:42 PM
May 2016

Free college and a $15 minimum wage doesn't need a magic wand either.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
63. For almost 8 years now we have watched President Obama
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:21 PM
May 2016

negotiate by first offering to cut such things as food stamps etc. What we want is a negotiator who will start at the top and work down instead of giving away the bottom before even starting to negotiate.

Hillary starts the negotiation by saying "We cannot do it." Bernie starts with a list of items we want and fights for them. He may not get them but at least we know he is fighting for them not donating them to the opposition.

No one is unaware that we are going to have to deal with the Rs. What we understand is that we all need to work together to get them to agree. We are not expecting great change over night - we are expecting to have to work for that change - not just say "We cannot do it."

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
69. No one has yet explained to me why Clinton would be better.
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:30 PM
May 2016

As best I can figure, we want Hillary because she won't get your hopes up. Is that it?

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
137. A presidency built on low expectations, maybe
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:23 AM
May 2016

Electing her would be an embarrassment since she seems to be setting herself up to be measured a success only for getting elected.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
108. no.. no, Sanders said the "collective energy" of voters would change the minds of congress...
Sun May 15, 2016, 09:08 PM
May 2016

... cause that's worked the last couple of times

 

NewImproved Deal

(534 posts)
4. Yep. The Clinton Machine's "Rainbow Oligarchy" marks a total betrayal of Democratic...
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:07 PM
May 2016

...economic principles. The Party is now dominated by greedy, vicious, amoral Yuppies.

[link:|

brentspeak

(18,290 posts)
23. "Amoral" is an apt word, in this context
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:36 PM
May 2016

These are alleged Democrats who have "gotten theirs" but don't give a damn about anyone else. I know some Republicans who actually are more concerned about the declining economic fortunes of their fellow American citizens than do these contemptible effete latte liberals.

gaspee

(3,231 posts)
44. Are you kidding me?
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:58 PM
May 2016

I work 3 jobs and am the farthest thing from a "contemptible effete latte liberal" there is.

I havent been responding to this crap because I know it's almost over, but this post of yours is utter bullshit. Not to mention homophobic.

SwampG8r

(10,287 posts)
88. Could you point out the "homophobic" part of that post
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:11 PM
May 2016

Because i dont see it. I do see someone throwing out phrases trying to stifle.discussion but i dont see anything " homophobic" .

NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
45. I'd say a striking example ...
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:59 PM
May 2016

... of people "who've got theirs and don't care about anyone else" would be those who would rather risk a Trump presidency than vote for Hillary in the GE.

It's pretty much an attitude of "I know how bad a Trump administration would be, how it would work to undo the progress Democrats have made over the years, the middle class would suffer and the poor would be decimated - but tough shit."

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
72. The 3rd Way Conservative Democrats are doing a good enough job undoing...
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:31 PM
May 2016

...the progress we have made since the New Deal.
Just ask Bill "The Era of Big Government is OVER" Clinton,
and President Obama who put Social Security Cuts On-the-Table.


Rep. Conyers: Obama Demanded Social Security Cuts--Not GOP

"We've got to educate the American people at the same time we educate the President of the United States. The Republicans, Speaker Boehner or Majority Leader Cantor DID NOT call for Social Security cuts in the budget deal. THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES CALLED FOR THAT," declared US Representative John Conyers in a press conference held by members of the House "Out of Poverty' Caucus on 07/27/11."

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Rep-Conyers-Obama-Demand-by-Jeanine-Molloff-110729-352.html

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
135. Silver lining: With a Trump Presidency, Democrats have a good shot at winning Congress in 2 years.
Mon May 16, 2016, 01:52 AM
May 2016

Clinton's neoliberals are blowing our chance to win Congress this year.

And maybe Trump, being the wildcard that he is, will try to pass something positive that no establishment politician would touch.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
111. "Rainbow Oligarchy" -- A perfect encapsulation of what I have been feeling for months
Sun May 15, 2016, 09:14 PM
May 2016

If you don't mind, I do believe I will use that in the future! Thanks!

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
5. Its not personal. Neoliberalism has winners and losers. It channels money to the winners.
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:08 PM
May 2016

Since they already have made lots of money, it helps them make more.

Americans were told that they didn't need an advanced education to get ahead, but that was a lie to keep taxes down.

Americans make too much in the neoliberal viewpoint. It would rather use their jobs as bargaining chips to pay off the developing world for looting their raw materials. They have been promised to them for 20 years.

Again its not personal.

Americans, when are you leaving? You have to be out by the fifteenth.

 

CrowCityDem

(2,348 posts)
6. I don't believe...
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:08 PM
May 2016

My way is the only way. I don't believe anyone who disagrees with me is evil, or not worthy of being treated as a human being.

If you want to put false words in people's mouths, start by filling your own.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
8. Every person has the right to rise to their God-given potential - Hillary Clinton
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:11 PM
May 2016

Ladders of opportunity for all to get ahead.

Something like that.

A completely impossible myth of course. Fools a lot of people though. Sounds good in theory. Never works in practice.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
83. Never?
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:48 PM
May 2016

I grew up in a lower-middle-class family racked by debt. I got into college on a scholarship, graduated with an engineering degree, and am now in the top 5%.

I'm not going to say anybody can do it. And I benefited from a government schlarship. But it DOES happen.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
10. Why should I say it...
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:13 PM
May 2016

When you do so well speaking for millions of people on your own.

That list will soon contain Sanders name as well.

Corporate666

(587 posts)
12. Why do you measure someone's worth only in terms of money? Why do you devalue humanity?
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:16 PM
May 2016

It seems your measure of a person is financial, and it seems that you only care about someone's financial well being. Is money all that matters to you?

Is someone who CHOOSES to stay at home to raise a family less of a person? Is building a successful family not a worthy goal? Is building one's intellect not a worthy goal? Is helping the community or the elderly or the sick not a worthwhile life?

Why is it all about money in your post?


What's wrong with someone choosing to focus on financial success, or social success, or intellectual success, or family success? Should we guarantee results there too? If someone chooses to pursue financial success but has a hard time with social success or family success, should we try to legislate that they get the same outcome? Should a guy who is a bully to women or who eats and doesn't mind being 500lbs deserve a beautiful, devoted and loyal wife?


It seems you see everyone in terms of money - that's not very healthy. And it devalues people's humanity.

Corporate666

(587 posts)
94. Non sequitor
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:33 PM
May 2016

So are you saying a great artist is worthless? Or someone who gives their life to save another is a worthless person? Or a great intellectual is worthless?

Financial success is ONE kind of success, but it's separate from the other things listed above. It seems you only care about financial success. Why devalue the other things as irrelevant? What if someone isn't in love with money but helps out the homeless or injured animals? They are worthless in your eyes? Or are you saying anyone who isn't financially successful is worthless?

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
24. The old corporatist dodge! Excellent.
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:37 PM
May 2016

Pay no attention the shrinking middle class, the growing rolls of the poor. It's their CHOICE! There are happy being poor and seeing their opportunities shrink. It's their humanity that matters. Let them eat cake!

The rich are rich because of the excellent choices they made! The worked harder! They wanted it more! They are the makers! The job creators!

There is a class war going on in this country and you are backing the takers. You must be so proud.

Corporate666

(587 posts)
95. You missed the point big time
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:37 PM
May 2016

Why do you seem so in love with money? It seems that cold, hard cash is the only measure of worth to you. Why?

A great poet is worthless unless they become rich from it? What about non-capitalist endeavors, like helping the homeless? Are you saying someone who could earn lots of money but who chooses to help the homeless is worthless?

Why do you focus on someone's finances as the only measure of their worth? What's wrong with being a great thinker that uses their gift to teach inner city youth? Or being a great humanitarian who uses their skills to raise well rounded children? Why do you write those people off as failures?

Do we NEED a 3000sq-ft house, a Mercedes, a six-figure salary and seven-figure net worth to be considered successful to you?

Zynx

(21,328 posts)
13. That's... not remotely the case. There is disagreement about how best to provide economic security.
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:17 PM
May 2016

The basic liberal value is equality and I'm wholly committed to that as is every Hillary supporter I know.

That you would just lose your damn mind and write such a thing says a lot about you and not much about Hillary supporters.

If you would actually look at Hillary as she truly is rather than this monstrous parody you and other Sanders supporters have created, maybe you would feel differently.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
30. Right back at you on looking at Hillary as she truly is...
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:42 PM
May 2016

She's nothing close to the Saint Hillary you've made her out to be. She's a corporate money grubber who has supported some of the worst legislation against the poor and middle classes. There is no parody in how I see her, it is all backed by her actions.

What has she ever accomplished in government that was a big benefit to the poor?

Zynx

(21,328 posts)
32. She opposed all of Bush's supply-side policies. Perhaps you've forgotten that.
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:44 PM
May 2016

I bet you assume she voted for his giveaways to the rich.

I don't pretend she's a saint. I think people do actually portray Bernie in such a way.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
33. So did virtually every Democrat. That's not exactly a boon to the poor.
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:46 PM
May 2016

I asked what specifically SHE did to make life better for the poor.

Zynx

(21,328 posts)
37. When she was in office, the Democrats were usually in the minority. It was mainly about opposing
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:48 PM
May 2016

damaging policies. It's also relevant to your incorrect charge that her policies favor the rich. They don't, no have they ever. You've created a record that isn't accurate. Also, quite a number of Dems voted for those tax cuts in 2001: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=1&vote=00170

Once they took the majority, she supported the minimum wage increase in 2007.

ablamj

(333 posts)
138. "Once they took the majority she supported..."
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:43 AM
May 2016

So she was against a minimum wage increase before that?

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
25. I think all Americans deserve economic security
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:38 PM
May 2016

I think all people deserve economic security.

There, I said what I believe.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
39. I'll vote for Hillary because she's the better candidate
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:50 PM
May 2016

the better candidate to advance economic security for all.

and the better candidate in a host of other respects.

i don't think Bernie's agenda is fully cooked, nor is he trying to elect a congress to help him get it done.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
54. Yep, because she'll make sure that the top 20% won't sink below to the level of "the common people"
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:12 PM
May 2016

That's probably your idea of economic security.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
122. Apparently you don't understand the word "everyone"
Sun May 15, 2016, 10:25 PM
May 2016

is telling me what I think supposed to convince me who to fill out my vote by mail ballot, which is right here on my desk as we speak?

 

Sejon

(109 posts)
34. Nobody even knows what her policies are she "evolves" that often
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:46 PM
May 2016

Sanders was always the stronger candidate on the issues.

MrsKirkley

(180 posts)
40. How are free trade and for profit health insurance better?
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:51 PM
May 2016

How does free trade that sends jobs overseas and for profit health insurance with outrageous deductibles equal economic security?

Response to AZ Progressive (Original post)

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
53. "I'll offer anybody here fifty dollars an hour if you'll go pick lettuce in Yuma this season"
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:10 PM
May 2016

As out of touch as McCain...

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
64. Well, I did read a really insightful article...
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:23 PM
May 2016
http://billmoyers.com/story/author-thomas-frank-talks-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-and-his-new-book-listen-liberal/

What I decided after researching this problem and reading a lot of the sociological literature on professionalism is that there’s basically two hierarchies in America. One is the hierarchy of money and big business and that’s really where the Republicans are at: the one percent, the Koch brothers, that sort of thing. The hierarchy of status is a different one. The professionals are the apex of that hierarchy. And these two hierarchies live side by side. They share a lot of the same assumptions about the world and a lot of the same attitudes, but they also differ in important ways. So I’m not one of these people who says the Democrats and the Republicans are the same. I don’t think they are. But there are sometimes similarities between these two groups.

Among other things, professionals tend to be very liberal on essentially any issue other than workplaces issues. So on every matter of cultural issues, culture war issues, all the things that have been so prominent in the past, they can be very liberal. On economic questions, however, they tend not to be. (dishes clattering) They tend to be much more conservative. And their attitudes towards working-class people in general and organized labor specifically is very contemptuous.


Seeing the attitude of Hillary supporters as well as the dodging of economic issues by much of the professional Democrats just solidified this idea.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
70. And what research is that based on?
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:31 PM
May 2016

What you are doing is taking someone's rather limited view, and highly simplistic perspective, and then applying it to all Clinton supporters claiming you know what they think.

I might as well write an OP and claim that all Bernie supporters are anarchists. Because I can make the case that some of them might be.

This is the simplistic world some Bernie folks are in. There is no nuance, no complexity.

Honestly, it reminds me of the Tea Party. Same black and white world view.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
76. And I guess your going to try to convince me that corporatism and the power grab by the 1% is all...
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:40 PM
May 2016

in my mind? Tell that to other Bernie supporters!

I didn't say that that was the only source for the idea, but seeing the callousness of Hillary supporters does heavily reinforce it.

BTW the Author is not some joe schmoe, He's a published Historian and also is a part of the professional class, having a Ph.D in History, so he would know a thing or two about other members of his own class.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
80. I'm not the one writing silly OPs trying to convience anyone of anything.
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:44 PM
May 2016

You should stick to trying to speak for Bernie supporters.

You clearly know nothing about what Hillary supporters think or feel.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
82. Unfortunately for you, this thread is further exposing the aloofness and callousness
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:45 PM
May 2016

of Hillary supporters, as shown in their own responses.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
49. Is that the best you can do?
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:07 PM
May 2016

I would suspect that some Hillary supporters here are in fact Trump supporters or just Republicans because they just seem to want to antagonize Bernie supporters to the point of not voting for Hillary if she makes it to the GE.

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
52. Now come on, AZ.
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:10 PM
May 2016

A Republican or Trump supporter? I've been a member of the DU community since 2001.

And you?

polly7

(20,582 posts)
48. Those satisfied with the status quo and doing well themselves don't give a *
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:06 PM
May 2016

about fellow citizens who are suffering ............ as well as those in the rest of the world affected by the quest for more and more to the 1%. They just don't care.

 

Sejon

(109 posts)
62. We're waiting for an olive branch from Camp Clinton
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:19 PM
May 2016

So far, nothing. Just taunts and abuse. That's not the way to unify.

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
115. an olive branch to who? to St Bernie supporters who
Sun May 15, 2016, 10:01 PM
May 2016

Have trashed her and everything she has accomplished for decades? Called her every vile name in the book? Accused her of the most treacherous motives and actions possible? Who swear they will never ever vote for HRC no matter what? Extend an olive branch to those people?

If you are NOT of that ilk, then let me be the first to offer you a sincere extending of my hand to you, with an olive branch included. If you are the type I described above, then why should anyone from Camp Hillary give you so much as the time of day?

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
119. Looks like someone here cares more about celebrity worship than the future of the country
Sun May 15, 2016, 10:11 PM
May 2016

And no, I'm not a Bernie supporter because of Bernie, I'm a Bernie supporter largely because I fear the future of this country, especially with big corporations threatening to turn America into a third world country with massive economic inequality like Mexico and various other countries around the world.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
55. My.. my ... how the self-righteous pontificate.
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:12 PM
May 2016

Your nonsensical OPs are not helping your candidate in the least.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
60. JaneyVee says there will ALWAYS be a permanent underclass...
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:14 PM
May 2016

Of minimally paid people. She also says if they don't like it they're free to leave their jobs for higher pay.

"Of course there will always be a permanent underclass of...
Minimally compensated workers. But those workers are free to leave at any time for higher paying jobs."

Simple, really... some just haven't found their bootstraps yet.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
61. These people should go back to the Republican Party...
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:17 PM
May 2016

Really, they are just moderate Republicans who are socially liberal.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
73. They aren't even socially liberal
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:34 PM
May 2016

LBGT supporters only if they happen to be LBGT or have loved ones in that situation. BLM = the devil after questioning Hillary. Abortion rights as a bargaining chip. Sexism only a thing when it helps their candidate.

Did I miss any of Camp Weathervain's latest lovely stances?

 

ThePhilosopher04

(1,732 posts)
139. That's what Republicans and right wingers always say
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:46 AM
May 2016

and she's supporting a right winger for President so not much of a surprise

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
68. As other posters have pointed out
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:29 PM
May 2016

Many of Team Hill have taken the mask off and said this is the goal, don't expect something different, they are happy with the status quo.

It's late stage capitalism, and it's not sustainable. They are killing people at the bottom to get their 1% Welfare money up there, either as a direct subsidy or as wages for servicing the 1%...but who cares? Those people who are dying? Useless eaters like me.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
71. Just to be clear, economic security is NOT the same as equality equality.
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:31 PM
May 2016

I certainly favor economic security. I think everyone has a right to adequate housing, food,mhealth care, and education. But I do not think everybody should be economically equal.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
75. We are talking about economic equality in the sense of the rich not being too rich and the poor...
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:37 PM
May 2016

having some form of economic security. The most well off countries (in terms of quality of living) are the ones that are the most economically equal. CEO salaries back in the 90's in Europe were in the mere hundreds of thousands of dollars rather than multimillions in America.

America used to believe in economic equality, which is why it made it really hard for people to get rich in the form of tax brackets as high as 91% on people making more than several hundred thousand / a million at one point (yes, there were cheats, but still it was a significant barrier to having too much money.)

enid602

(8,613 posts)
85. inflation
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:48 PM
May 2016

How much economic security will bern deliver given the high inflation that will result from his proposals to greatly expand the role of Gov't, combined with his tendancy to loyally fund the military, and support military boondoggles that nenefit his state? Ask the people of Argentina and Venezuela how much fun inflation is.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
91. Wow another right wing meme! You righties are always warning
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:27 PM
May 2016

how liberals will cause inflation. Hillary's war with Iraq has cost trillions but no big inflation. And as if Hillary the Hawk will reduce military spending. You guys are so pathetic. It's almost funny if it weren't so sad.

NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
90. A classic case of ...
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:18 PM
May 2016

... "according to DU".

According to DU, ALL Hillary supporters are wealthy, war-loving, corporate-embracing elitists who don't care about their fellow citizens, or the fate of the country as a whole. We all own fabulous homes, drive expensive cars, wear designer clothes, and have careers that pay us in the high six-figures per annum. We send our children to private schools, and can easily afford to put them through college, medical school, law school - whatever they desire - without breaking a sweat.

We vacation at least six times a year, belong to exclusive country clubs, and dine in five-star restaurants while our staff of servants tend to our landscaped grounds, maintain the pool, and clean our 18-room house.

We have absolutely no empathy for anyone, and tend to look down our noses at people who have less than we do. We think the homeless should be jailed so they don't clutter-up our gated communities, and believe that welfare recipients are moochers who are living like royalty on our dime.

We never even turn our minds to those living in poverty, the working poor, the injustice of the "judicial" system, the plight of immigrants, or the prejudice that exists towards AAs, POCs, Muslims, gays/lesbians - or anyone other than ourselves.

We think donating to charity is a scam to wrest our hard-earned millions out of our pockets so that it can be handed over to the lazy and the undeserving. We don't care about unrest in the Middle East or elsewhere, because "those people" mean nothing to us - and if that unrest should lead to war, we know that it will be someone else's kids who will fight that war, not ours.

Economic security? No, we're not interested. Being as ALL HRC supporters are heartless, cruel, and indifferent to the welfare of anyone other than themselves, we are far too busy sipping champagne while cruising the Riviera on our yachts to bother ourselves with such trivialities.

THAT is how you - and many posters here - see HRC supporters. So why don't YOU just say it? Why not just admit that you have divided HRC supporters and BS supporters into two categories - the selfish, uncaring "elitists" on one side, and the giving, caring, pure of heart on the other?

As for "sticking your middle finger to the idea of economic equality", you might want to lecture the BS supporters here about how declaring they won't vote for HRC in November is sticking THEIR middle finger up high and unashamedly to the idea of economic security for Americans - and only because if they can't have things THEIR way, fuck everyone who will suffer under a Trump presidency.

The blatant hypocrisy of those who claim to care about their fellow citizens, but would risk a Republican in the White House, is as obvious as it gets.


BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
92. You support the Third Way candidate. You are a conservative.
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:29 PM
May 2016

Own it. On economic issues and foreign policy you are a conservative. Face it.

You aren't the "liberal" you think you are. Deal with it.

NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
96. Do you honestly believe ...
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:37 PM
May 2016

... that calling me a conservative - or anything else, for that matter - on a website makes it a fact?

And the really funny part about that is that you probably do believe that.


BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
97. I know you are a conservative, you don't. You need to deal with it.
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:48 PM
May 2016

Admitting your problem is the first step to healing.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
101. Third Way is conservative. Hillary is Third Way. You support Hillary.
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:58 PM
May 2016

You are a conservative. But keep your head in the sand if it makes you happy.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
105. The pain of hiding your true nature of conservativism is what's killing you.
Sun May 15, 2016, 09:05 PM
May 2016

Come out of that conservative closet! You know you want to.

The Third Way was established to turn the Democratic party to the right on economic and foreign policy issues. Hillary was at the vanguard of the Third Way.

Sparkly

(24,149 posts)
100. Who made you the arbiter of OTHER people's views
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:56 PM
May 2016

and self-identities and political classifications etc., not to mention the world's greatest mind-reader?

Just wondering. Was there a vote?

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
102. Basic logic. Hillary is Third Way. Third Way is conservative.
Sun May 15, 2016, 09:00 PM
May 2016

If you support Hillary, you support conservative policy. You are a conservative.

You may not want to admit it, you may deny it, it may bother you, but it is a fact.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
93. Bernie supporter here. I don't think minorities and women who support Hillary believe
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:30 PM
May 2016

that "other people deserve to suffer just because they "didn't work hard enough to get a good education and rise up the economic ladder, and probably made a bunch of poor economic decisions."

They are the "other people". Nor are they so gullible as to not see what you see.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
107. Got a link for that?
Sun May 15, 2016, 09:06 PM
May 2016

You can't just make things up then claim they represent the views of MILLIONS of Clinton supporters.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
114. If you actually believe this line of reasoning, you should seriously look into the fact that you may
Sun May 15, 2016, 09:36 PM
May 2016

be brainwashed.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
116. I don't have to be brainwashed, I just have a history of experiences to reinforce my ideas
Sun May 15, 2016, 10:06 PM
May 2016

Unfortunately for me I didn't born early enough to enjoy the postwar boom, not even the 90's boom. Yes I am one of those "under 45" Bernie supporters that have seen that Hillary's generation has an "I've got mine" attitude and has basically given the middle finger to the younger generations.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
140. K&R -- Thanks. Needed to be said.
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:52 AM
May 2016

It's what separates the old school Democrats/democrats from the DINO/DLC/Third Way pretenders.

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
141. I say to people here in the top 20%:
Mon May 16, 2016, 03:03 AM
May 2016

Should the bottom 80% have to suffer just to support the lifestyles of you people?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Say it Hillary supporters...