How Hillary Clinton won the Democratic nomination.

[YouDig]

She used the very dishonest, underhanded, unethical strategy of getting a lot more votes than anyone else.

It's an outrage! Who does she think she is, convincing so many people to vote for her?

Since when do we let people who get more votes than anyone else win elections?

I don't see how any self-respecting progressive can just stand by while the Democratic party nominates the person who the voters chose by a large margin. What is this country coming to?

[Thinkingabout]

1. Then maybe you should look at the over three million more votes Hillary has over

Sanders, it is We the people speaking. She is the most qualified candidate running. All the RW talking points does nit change the fact she has more occasions to do progressive ideas than Sanders.

[YouDig]

2. I agree. I thought the sarcasm of my post was obvious.

But I guess with all the nonsense that gets posted here, it's hard to tell.

[Thinkingabout]

4. Sorry.

[kstewart33]

12. That's okay.

For a moment, he/she had me fooled, too.

[.99center]

31. She used the very dishonest, underhanded, unethical strategy of getting a lot more votes than anyone

It's ok, were all aware that you have a burning itch to spread a false talking point. Kinda says it all when you post memos without reading the first sentence. I'll let you get back to attacking people for using talking points

[Thinkingabout]

37. Link please

[ucrdem]

3. If she keep winning primaries like this something will have to be done.

Because #Bernie!

[peggysue2]

24. Yes!

Bring in the lawyers (clowns might work, too). She's won the nomination with more votes and more pledged delegates. How unfair; now undemocratic!

[Skink]

5. She bought the Super delegates

It was easy really

[RufusTFirefly]

23. Brock n' Roll!

[annavictorious]

6. This reminds me of something the

Onion wrote about Hillary's troubling presidential ambitions.

http://www.theonion.com/blogpost/hillary-clinton-is-too-ambitious-to-be-the-first-f-11229

[KingFlorez]

7. Retail campaiging trumps rallies

Clinton had a good ground game and built it up over time. That's how you win.

[7wo7rees]

8. Member since April 2016.

[YouDig]

10. Member since April 2011.

[7wo7rees]

14. Fair enough. We have been through several versions of DU.

We have been here since September of 2001.

But that really probably is not relevant.

[YouDig]

18. The royal "we"? You're right, it's not relevant. So why did you bring it up?

[Loudestlib]

20. Because you have no credibility?

[YouDig]

22. No more or less than anyone else on an anonymous internet board.

[Ed Suspicious]

28. A lot less, noob.

[YouDig]

35. Noob!

[Loudestlib]

30. I disagree.

Some of us didn't joint right after Correct the Record announced that they would spend $1 million for "Barrier Breakers 2016." These are employees that troll online critics of Hillary.

[YouDig]

33. You're suggesting I'm an employee of Correct the Record?

[BillZBubb]

40. Nah, could be any PPP outfit.

[YouDig]

41. So you really believe that I'm being paid for this. Wow.

I guess that explains how you could believe that Bernie is going to win the nomination.

I think you might be interested in a tour of Roswell NM.

[BillZBubb]

44. Either that our you picked up Brock's talking points by osmosis.

[YouDig]

45. Or else I'm just someone on the internet who disagrees with you.

Nah, too obvious. What's the fun in that?

[Loudestlib]

48. In all fairness, I don't believe that anyone would pay for what you post.

I'm certainly not buying what you're selling.

[YouDig]

53. So why the accusations?

[azmom]

9. She used dishonest, underhanded and unethical means to

get more votes. There fixed it for ya.

[YouDig]

11. The voters didn't think so. Bernie was the unethical one, stealing data, etc.

[7wo7rees]

16. Enough.

Bernie is not nor ever has been "unethical". Just not in his DNA. Did not steal data, etc.

Now, Please stop.

[YouDig]

19. Not in his DNA, huh. That's a laugh. And yeah, his team did steal data.

[bvar22]

25. And as soon as there was even the whiff of impropriety,

they were promptly fired by the Sanders campaign.

Did the Hillary Campaign fire Bill Clinton for campaigning INSIDE a voting station in Massachusetts and using a Bull horn to campaign at the front door of another?

[msongs]

15. say could you post some proof of those assertions. not opinions, actually legal proof nt

[azmom]

17. She is a slimy one. I'll give you that.

[NCTraveler]

13. That's it. I voted for her in the primaries but never again!!!!

[Jezebel Jackson]

21. And the people who support her opponent clearly don't care about majority votes.

It's not what the people want. It's what they want the people to want that matters, their own will be damned.

[Sejon]

26. It was rigged

[YouDig]

32. In a way, that's true. You have the most qualified person to run for president for many decades

versus a socialist who joined the Democratic party out of convenience with scant accomplishments. It wasn't really fair that Hillary was so much better of a candidate.

[Sejon]

34. Qualified how exactly?

[uponit7771]

36. yeap, she got more votes... that stinks

[Sejon]

39. It's how she got more votes that should concern us

[uponit7771]

43. She talked to the dem base, spoke to their concerns and posted some policies that she thought would

... work and that stinks too.

Cause listening is horrible

Sanders on the other hand told those same people that their REAL boogyman was was the same as the privileged and elites and they should be scared.

[Sejon]

46. She pandered, you mean

And some of them fell for it, even though they will all be thrown under the bus when Hillary no longer needs their vote.

[uponit7771]

47. IF by pandering you mean listening to peoples concerns then why yes. A lot more people didn't fall

... for a SP plan that said magic pixie dust would get the doctors, pharma and Hospital groups to accept half the money they're getting now

[Sejon]

49. Pretending to listen and care

And then making them promises she knows she won't keep.

[uponit7771]

50. a lot better than making promises that don't even logically add up no? tia

[Sejon]

51. Not particularly, no

[uponit7771]

52. Only on planet Unicornia is this even a rational response

[yuiyoshida]

60. and the results are in!

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Sun May 15, 2016, 09:07 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

You're a retarded fucking nigger, you know that?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1968981

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Racist troll, please hide.

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun May 15, 2016, 09:10 PM, and the Jury voted 7-0 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: That's pretty bad, no matter how you look at it. I wish that person could be banned. Way out of line for this or any other site. One of the very few alerts I agree with.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Disgusting.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This is a no brainer
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

[Nye Bevan]

61. Racist suicide run. Here's another from today:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1187&pid=51165

[yuiyoshida]

62. Thanks to Mirt

He/She is gone.

[Nye Bevan]

63. MIRT rocks. That was quick. (nt)

[yuiyoshida]

64. quick as a bunneh!

[Buzz cook]

65. No that's Sanders

He's making huge promises and doesn't have a track record of keeping them.

[bvar22]

27. Winning by getting more votes...

...by hook (DWS) or by crook (Nevada Caucus).

[coffeeAM]

29. Rigged election and the establishment still cannot close it out!

[youceyec]

38. democrats are not stupid like GOP primary voters.

Sanders is unelectable. GOP has not even started on branding him a deranged Socialist. GOP wet dream to see Sanders as nominee. Remember, Americans have 5 second attention span. They will turn on Sanders in an instant. Hillary has 25 years of attacks baked in. Plus she is the most qualified person to run for president in 50 years. I trust her to do what is good for America.

[BillZBubb]

42. "most qualified!"! That's the Brock PPP message of the day.

You guys need to get different material at least.

[coffeeAM]

54. If this was true then the dems would not be running a unelectable candidate that is

under investigation with the fbi and could be spending time behind bars. They could have easily propped up another corporate dem that actually may have had a chance in a ge, but party favors rule the day!

[youceyec]

56. wow

your dense. None of those things can happen. Youre just a Fox news parrot. Again, you Bernie folks have more in common with Trump voters than you realize.

[Thinkingabout]

55. Since when did getting the most votes and the most delegates, still getting votes and delegates

Become a rigged election? The only reasoning is Sanders talks about oligarchy and perhaps he has convinced himself we should be ruled by the few. No, doesn't work on the minority system.

[Waiting For Everyman]

57. You mean, cheating every step of the way

while being investigated by the FBI?

If she's such a great candidate, and has the most support, why the need to cheat?

And if she's so competent and qualified, why is the FBI investigating how badly she screwed up her email and for graft at her last job? Who gets promoted after a mess like that?

That adds up to LOSER.

[TheFarseer]

58. You know it's more complicated than that

The Hillary victory fund to basically bribe state officials for endorsements and super delegate pledges. Then the media was completely in the tank for her because she will keep the political ad dollars flowing. Not to mention DWS blatantly on her side and all the advantages that brought. I think what ultimately undid Bernie was the fact that he was an independent and not a D. But I could be wrong.

[AgerolanAmerican]

66. and whenever she REALLY needed to win, lo and behold massive election fraud

funny how that stuff happened exactly when she needed it to save her candidacy

and even in smaller things the fraud is obvious - the chance that her coin flip delegates are legit is no more than 1 in 128

This election was the embodiment of all the things that Bernie supporters are complaining about:

FRAUD

CORRUPTION

BRIBERY

That's who Hillary Clinton is, to the bottom of her soul. A corrupt fraud who rakes in and doles out bribery day in and day out.

Bernie supporters simply will not vote for that because it is exactly what we became Bernie supporters in the first place to oppose.