2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIn their own words "most of us cant bring ourselves to vote for Hillary"
That is what they are now saying.
jesus christ.
What a bunch of ...
Oh well, cant say it...but you know what.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)They are sowing the divide in this party by ignoring nearly half of Democrats and alienating new voters.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)try a mirror you search won't be near as hard.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)It's very difficult to hold an adult conversation.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)I wish my fellow Hillary supporters would remember that she didn't concede to Obama until after the final votes were cast in 2008.
Even after that, it may take a few more infuriating statements from Trump before people decide that anything's better than that orange troll in office. (Seriously, not only do several pictures of his hair look like those troll dolls, but he is probably the political version of an Internet troll.)
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)I've been on the fence about whether or not to vote for Hillary in the general if she's the nominee, but the events of the last couple of weeks have settled it. In my mind, my vote is wasted whether it goes to Hillary or Trump.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)They've been pushing Hillary this entire campaign to the detriment of everyone who's run against her. They're pushing a candidate with historical negatives when Bernie is there performing better in every GE poll. They're alienating new voters while disenfranchising half of their own party.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)dflprincess
(28,075 posts)the next day it's all our fault if Hillary loses.
They can't have it both ways.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)floriduck
(2,262 posts)Then the Democratic establishment will be left with a shattered party, not having learned anything.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)The DNC just needs one more fix and then they'll be alright.
Response to R. Daneel Olivaw (Reply #68)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
CobaltBlue
(1,122 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)with the burden of knowing your low opinion.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)That's what the real Dems did when lil Debbie helped lose the midterms.
The Dems put up crappy candidates then when they lose they point the blame everywhere except at themselves.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)these lovely folks want to ratf*** us all to make themselves feel all kinds of "pure" inside.
Dumbest shit ever.
kaleckim
(651 posts)Your party is set to run against the most unpopular major party nominee in polling history. So, you chose the second most unpopular nominee. She is not liked, not trusted, and polls worse versus Trump than Sanders. Her top donors are banks and corporate interests (she's gotten more money from Wall Street than all the other candidates combined), she has a center-right economic record, is hawkish. You elect that person and want to blame others? Why would anyone give a damn? It's nonsense. No one's fault but those that supported that weak candidate. If you lose, learn a lesson, don't blame everyone but yourself.
eggman67
(837 posts)I'll be sure to grieve over it on long winter evenings.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)The fact is that Hillary is a serious flawed candidate.
Who are you going to blame if she's the nominee and gets indicted for mishandling national security data?
Who are you going to blame is she's president and she attempts to means-test Social Security and gets all the Third Way and Republican support, effectively killing it?
Who are you going to blame when she gets us into several more wars, producing a Treasury-draining quagmire on this country?
Who are you going to blame when she signs off on TPP and sends what few good manufacturing jobs we have left overseas?
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)And they do not need us or want our votes. Live with that as I will oblige them.
MFM008
(19,808 posts)how have these 8 years been awful?
Sejon
(109 posts)Than "at least she's not Trump".
x1000
procon
(15,805 posts)Sejon
(109 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)Sejon
(109 posts)Like banning all Muslims from entering the US, but none of them are going to happen.
procon
(15,805 posts)what's to stop them?
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)It will never happen. Trump is all talk. He might look at procedures and that's it.
SpareribSP
(325 posts)And you're still blaming Bernie, then there clearly would need to be a LOT more soul-searching in the Democratic party. If Hillary loses and the blame somehow goes to Bernie supporters, that would be really sad. People are supporting Bernie because she's not acting in a way that's healing the rift, and if she pivots even more right for the general she might alienate them even further.
The main scary bit is the supreme court - which really is a problem, but still, having motivation to vote for someone besides fear is crucial. Hillary has a large number of policy positions which I extremely dislike, and I very much dislike how she's campaigned and her general conduct. Of course it would be better to have a Democrat in the oval office, but when it has been made it so clear that I'm not wanted, it's very easy to throw up my hands and say "well fine, screw you too!"
While that sentiment is a bit childish, I think there's a lot of truth in the fact that the party is going to have to move more left in the future, and getting those voices in now is crucial. Hillary would be a lot more palatable to me personally if she made more concessions... Something convincing, not just throwaway campaign rhetoric.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)It is already happening in red states...the GOP will merely take in national...all the gains made over 30 years gone.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2016/03/women-are-already-being-prosecuted-for-having-abortions.html
pacalo
(24,721 posts)I feel the same about those who are apathetic to the chicanery going on.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)pacalo
(24,721 posts)to what turned away so many potential Democratic voters.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)and you are going to wag your finger if she fails to win.
Gee...okay...
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)amazing
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)always doubted your support for Bernie and still do. Own the title.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)But question you, as stated.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)I was before you knew who he was
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)It's ok though if she wins then you can sell me on her many wonderful assets.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)And can be very insulting in your posts
Response to Jackie Wilson Said (Reply #7)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
amborin
(16,631 posts)CompanyFirstSergeant
(1,558 posts)"....she's winning, get over it."
Well, she's winning, good.
Then you don't need my vote.
So why all the fuss?
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
CompanyFirstSergeant
(1,558 posts)..not demanded.
Not via shame, ridicule, threats, or by saying "I just don't understand."
It has to be earned.
It has not.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
procon
(15,805 posts)Pizza at Dominos OK, or do you need chocolates, flowers and violins?
CompanyFirstSergeant
(1,558 posts)Try not lied to.
She's a sleazebag.
And your post is pretty low rent as well.
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedys chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifmans 17-year career.
Why?
Because she was a liar, Zeifman said in an interview last week. She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.
procon
(15,805 posts)FALSE
"Hillary Clinton was not fired from the House Judiciary Committee's Watergate investigation by Chief Counsel Jerry Zeifman."
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/zeifman.asp
Sorry. Do you need help finding another dastardly Hillary story on the Intertubes?
these leftists and them asking for something more than being less bad than the modern Republican Party. It's like they've been harmed by policies the Democratic Party is working hard to cement. I take pride in the fact that I don't demand anything from the Democrats, outside of being less bad than the Republicans. I'm also removed from the harm caused by the policies that the Clintons have supported, and I have no interest in putting myself in the shoes of those harmed.
I find it interesting that people are beside themselves because they have to now earn the left's vote. It's beneath so many Clinton and DWS supporter, I tell ya.
CompanyFirstSergeant
(1,558 posts)Thank you.
My future son-in law leaves for the Middle East soon.
I'm only voting for someone who's campaign logo has an arrow pointing home.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)fair actions by BOTH her campaign and THE DNC/DWS et al who are jamming her into the nomination slot using any means possible.
JesterCS
(1,827 posts)Trump over Hillary, is a troll, hillbot, or repub. There are no real democrats here that will vote for trump. Another baseless smear by Hillarians. And you want OUR support?
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Who is saying this, and about what group?
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Turin_C3PO
(13,975 posts)I doubt they're no more than 10% (maximum 20%) of Bernie supporters.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)No point in trying to argue about it and try to change someone's mind. Anybody who is so vehemently opposed to Hillary is not going to persuaded by any argument. Best to focus one's efforts on more fruitful endeavors.
bvf
(6,604 posts)In view of the prospect of an anoymous poster on the internet, blaming me personally for a candidate's alienation of a good portion of her already shaky base, well, I guess I'd just have to rethink my position.
Hm...
OK. Done. No change.
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)Me personally, I don't blame you for not voting for Hillary. I'm not going to try to change your mind, because, chances are, you've heard all the arguments before and they haven't convinced you. So I'd be wasting my time. On the other hand, telling me you'll never vote for her makes me wonder why you're telling me this. What am I supposed to do about that? If that's how you feel, then fine. Follow your conscience. Again, I don't cast blame. You do what you feel is right, and I'll do the same.
bvf
(6,604 posts)And it's pretty obvious to whom.
FWIW, I don't recall stating my personal intentions here either way.
You may be trying to read too deeply into things, but that's entirely up to you.
Probably time for yet another loyalty oath.
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)Basically I'm saying that I don't care who people vote for, nor do I require a loyalty oath. Vote for whomever you like. I just don't understand the purpose of flooding this board with emphatic statements of "I will never vote for Hillary". Hence my original post as to what my response to that would be: "Okay, then don't".
Incidentally, I've been on record as being on the fence. So all this animosity on both sides is pretty baffling.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I consider my vote secret... you don't.
Enjoy that... oh and by the way, votes are earned, not forced. Give people a reason to vote for, not against, Negative campaigns have low turnout, this is like poli sci 101.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)trump is willing to say anything and do anything to win. He identifies scapegoats and makes it all everyone else's fault.
Hillary talks about hard work and personal responsibility.
Anyone who votes for trump over Hillary is looking for a free handout - and will be disappointed in trump as he's going to give more money to the rich - himself included.
Hillary made her money the old fashioned way - through hard work. Even her speeches were paid for when she was in business for herself. Why do we have the right to see what her what she gave her clients.
Meanwhile, trump complains about china but does most of his manufacturing there. And people think he's going to look out for our manufacturing base? it's nonsensical and insulting to anyone with intelligence. Even Letterman pulled out a trump tie made in china when trump was ranting about our manufacturing going overseas.
Response to MariaThinks (Reply #33)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
runaway hero
(835 posts)reconsider this post...
Mike Nelson
(9,953 posts)...absolutely loath Hillary Clinton. To them, she's another GWB or Nixon... even worse... So, forget bringing them to vote for the eventual Democratic nominee. The belief that she is evil (or whatever word applies) is not reversible. Probably, it's wiser to concentrate on making sure the base gets to the polls and count on Independents and Republicans to either stay hope or vote against Trump. There will be some Sanders supporters who will crossover to Hillary, also. Still thinking it's a win for our side!
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Disjointed, strange post.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)It is a stupid fucking idea to nominate a candidate that people refuse to vote for.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)That should unify the party.
I voted for the guy in my state caucus but its over, let it go. I like his ideas too but he isn't Super Jesus here to save the world from evil. Nobody stole millions of votes from him or hundreds of delegates. There isn't going to be some bombshell Clinton arrest or leaked transcripts of Clinton telling a room full of bankers that she will gladly take bribes from them. He lost, that is what happens in a democracy. You don't win every time. Not everyone gets a trophy. Not everything is a vast conspiracy. Not everyone is ready to light the world on fire when every little thing doesn't go their way.
Don't expect that everyone is going to kiss your ass forever to get your vote. There are a lot of people in this country with a lot of view points, don't think you are deserving of extra special attention. If you are saying "Bernie or Bust" then your option is bust at this point. He isn't going to be president. Not through yelling at superdelegates, not by threatening to riot like '68 at the convention, not by writing in his name in November. He lost, it sucks, but he had his chance, stop trying to shove him down the throats of the people that didn't want him as the nominee.
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)(and possibly OTHER agencies) investigation, is an habitual LIAR and is KNOWN to be a loser against Drumpf has NO ONE but THEMSELVES to blame. It's not like you weren't WARNED.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)CompanyFirstSergeant
(1,558 posts)...is not the same as supporting Trump.
Consider me to be shouting.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)ASS. Blame those supporting a corrupt SHAM of a candidate... not people who recognize this and refuse to endorse her.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)I just think it is reprehensible to guilt others who are struggling though a very difficult choice with crap like "she's not Trump".
I vote for a candidate, not against one anymore. I'll be voting down the line for Dems on the undercard, and no one has to guilt me into that. The question that really needs to be asked is does this candidate offer us the best option to beat Trump? The answer in poll after poll is no. The question needs to be has this candidate's record represent the values you could be proud of voting for? For me, no.
Please vote for who you want to. But please show your respect in allowing people to make their own informed choice in candidates they can back.
If you feel HRC is the best choice, show me why, not that she's not as bad as the other guy. Don't threaten me with your fears over the supreme court, but with your hopes for the vision she brings to the coming years with her plan. Show me her record that tries to bring peace to the world and improvement in all our lives.
I think rather than castigating those who've looked at her record and found it lacking cou;d be persuaded without the better than the devil argument.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)Why don't you just tell me?
And please: leave "jesus" out of it.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)She doesn't need us, so no probs.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Depaysement
(1,835 posts)She only wants our votes and then only on her terms.
Sorry, we are potential constituents and each of our votes is just as good as your vote or anyone else's vote.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)admonish those wayward voters a little more with uncle gunnysack.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)We will win without them.
CherokeeDem
(3,709 posts)and they said most of them would be leaving DU after the GD was closed. My feeling is they can go now. They are not Democrats... and neither is Bernie.
coffeeAM
(180 posts)CherokeeDem
(3,709 posts)and... while the Clintons may be more conservative than you like, they are currently Registered Democrats... not pretenders only using the Party.
When Sanders registers as a Democrat... let me know.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Response to Jackie Wilson Said (Original post)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)tokenlib
(4,186 posts)...after all it has been over twenty years since the Clintons unleashed the infestation in the Democratic Party.
Over and over they've voted for the lesser of evils and been told they have nowhere else to go and watched the party lurch rightward...
...fool me once, twice, thrice,....
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Infestation is a good word. I've vote for the D's every election since Mondale/Ferraro, but the Clintons are like termites, chewing away at our liberal foundations. I'm about to run out of this house.
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)This is on HER, not ME or any other Bernie supporter.
SHE sold out to Wall Street
SHE voted for endless war
SHE decided to skirt the rules regarding he email server & the handling of classified materials
SHE has embraced corporations over people
SHE chose to use public office for personal enrichment
SHE supported welfare "reform" and mass incarceration of POC in the 1990s
Don't try to hang this crap on me. I've never gone over to the dark side and I'm sure as hell not going to because some Hillary apologist wants to make ME out to be the bad guy.
Sorry, I'm not selling out just so your beloved HRC can rule over the great unwashed while continuing to hoard cash. How much is enough? Her greed is appalling, and I will not endorse it or her 3rd Way policies by voting for her.
IT'S ON HER, NOT ME!!!
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)Why am I not surprised?
bvf
(6,604 posts)with a rationale for eventually losing to Trump, should she actually be the nominee.
There'd be too much dissonance involved in blaming her for being so beatable in the GE. They obviously can't blame themselves, despite the piss-poor case they've made for her (which largely amounts to "Sanders supporters suck" and "Don't expect much from her" since early on.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)You have spent far more time on this forum berating Sanders supporters than you do discussing issues. So go on, speak your mind. I have seen you troll the board to harass Sanders supporters, in the most obvious and obnoxious manner possible. So go on, spit it the fuck out.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)in November.
It is a small but big enough group who do otherwise, very embarrassing to Bernie and his supporters like myself and the majority.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)me b zola
(19,053 posts)Can you see me making obscene gestures in your general direction?
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)need to not post here anymore, at that point you wont be welcome here.
TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)When was that meeting?
Oh, wait: you have no control, you're just another loudmouthed authoritarian who wants to subvert democracy.
Splinter Cell
(703 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)Sooner sit it out than contribute to this farce .
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)The key word is "sit out" .... now keep up the strawmaning.
CompanyFirstSergeant
(1,558 posts)...it's hopeless.