Election fraud in MA,IL,NY,DE,MD,AZ,NV now make Hillary an illegitimate nominee

[ViseGrip]

Nothing more.

Stopping her at the convention is no longer about 'sour grapes'. Cheaters are not legitimate. Remember Bush? They threw eggs at his inauguration limo! He had to get back in the limo, and could not do the walk. The bleachers were half empty. It was a sad affair.

There is nothing inspiring about Hillary's campaign. She breeds anger with her arrogance and disrespect for our rule of law. This really pisses attorneys off!

Editing to add the links, as Hillary's supporters say this is a bullshit OP. So here are the facts....the opinion part, is that I believe she is no longer a legitimate nominee.

Links:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/maryland-decertifies-baltimore-election-results-investigates-irregularities/2016/05/12/fca6e128-1861-11e6-9e16-2e5a123aac62_story.html

and....
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/13/chicago-election-official-admits-numbers-didnt-match-hillary-clinton-vs-bernie-sanders-election-fraud-allegations/

She is no longer a legitimate nominee with all the found, documented fraud.

GO BERNIE!

Winners don't quit....and quitters don't win.

[ViseGrip]

1. PS. Documented news is not rude or disruptive. So don't alert. Process the truth.

[CompanyFirstSergeant]

11. Agreed

110%

[Viva_La_Revolution]

65. results from alert - leave it 2-5

[CorporatistNation]

120. AGREED, I Am Sick Of Alerts On TRUTH AND FACT! Hillary (AND Her Crew) Are Her Worst Enemies!

Let the TRUTH ring free and clear... This primary has been "tainted" from the very outset.

The time for TRUTH IS NOW!

[MariaThinks]

2. absolute crap.

[puffy socks]

83. As usual

[840high]

107. ....

lol

[Agschmid]

3. Bullshit OP.

[still_one]

9. Absolutely

[ExtraGriz]

137. +27...n/t

[riversedge]

4. LOL. Another duzy for the day from Sanders fans

[Jackie Wilson Said]

51. Another day where Drumpf is fully supported on DU.

[azurnoir]

60. still playing zero sum are we? -interesting I had a Trump supporter tell me

that a write in vote for Sanders aka Bernie or Bust is the very exact same as a vote for ........ wait for it ...... HILLARY

tells me everything I need to know

[Jackie Wilson Said]

61. Liberals will show up and vote for the Democrat in November even if it is Mickey Mouse

I am not concerned with liberals, they always do the right thing.

[azurnoir]

63. Liberals vote for Dems even if it's Mickey Mouse - I see

if that is case you must think Liberals are stupid enough to vote for an imaginary character created by a Nazi sympathizer - interesting indeed

[Jackie Wilson Said]

66. So you want this person

to have these

[azurnoir]

68. again with the zero sum- odd that both Hillary's and The Donald's supporters

are making the same claim if you don't vote your ME your voting for my opponent no matter who's name is on your ballot

[Jackie Wilson Said]

71. As a Bernie voter, I will do what Bernie does. You appear unwilling to do what Bernie will do.

And yet you spend all day here pretending to support him.

[azurnoir]

74. I have not stated anything about my vote I have pointed out the problem with the zero sum game

and no I do not take orders from candidates-but rest assured I'm confident Hillary has your vote

[Jackie Wilson Said]

75. Only in Nov, I have already cast my vote for Bernie.

But I was wanting to do that before you knew who he was, I bet.

I dont know who you are voting for, but I do know if enough Bob stay home, Drumpf will get his hands on nukes.

[Ferd Berfel]

81. so we're back to the lesser of two evils argument.

[Jackie Wilson Said]

82. So that is a yes, you want Drumpf with nuclear weapons. Thanks for admitting it.

[Ferd Berfel]

84. I'm still waiting for some positive arguments for vote FOR her.

The lesser of two evils and (that old RIGHT WING stand-by) FEAR just don't work anymore. It's been used way too often. and all it does is continue the slide into the rightwing hell we are in now.

[Jackie Wilson Said]

89. oh YOU are , are you. Sorry, dont have time, I am working full time to stop

this nut case



from getting his tiny hands on these

[bunchofpenguins]

109. How would that be any different than this person getting their hands on missiles?

[img][/img]

[Jackie Wilson Said]

111. GOP alert

[bunchofpenguins]

112. Yes, Hillary and Kissinger together is a GOP alert.

You don't find it worrisome? Pro Iraq, Pro Syria, Pro Libya, Pro Afghanistan, Pro Middle East Militarisation, Pro Military spending, More pro Israel than Donald Trump, Pro Obama drone policy.

[Jackie Wilson Said]

113. As long as people know here where this sentiment comes from. This is GOP promotion.

If you like Drumpf then this is what you will be reading.

[bunchofpenguins]

114. Wait, what?

Linking to a picture to point out a real event of somebody embracing a genocidal warmonger is GOP promotion? Do you think it was Photoshopped or something? Or are you just ashamed that the liberal party is pushing a pro military industrial complex / pro drone / pro NSA candidate? /boggle

[runaway hero]

5. She won.

This is unnecessarily divisive and wrong. She has won already. There is no way Bernie can catch up.

[arcane1]

27. Welcome back!

I hope this go-round isn't as bad as the last one

[runaway hero]

28. lol

come on man. How will Bernie break though here?

[pdsimdars]

55. As the good guy always does.

[Maedhros]

39. She 'won' - with collusion from the DNC, vote caging, and procedural shenanigans.[n/t]

[DemocratSinceBirth]

6. LOL

[tritsofme]

7. LOL...if this is all so evident, and not conspiracy theory BS

Why doesn't Bernie hold a press conference this afternoon to expose the "truth"?

If Bernie doesn't do this, I can think of only two explanations. Either he is a smart man who doesn't buy your conspiracy theory nonsense, or he is wholly complicit in the "stealing" of the elections.

If he is not complicit why wouldn't he expose the oh so obvious truth? The answer is obvious, he's in on it!1!1!

[JDPriestly]

35. He doesn't need to hold a press conference. He is bringing lawsuits

in some appropriate cases.

[scscholar]

69. Or just doesn't care

He hasn't been nearly as passionate lately as someone in his position needs to be. It's ironic that someone who is so toning down his campaign to nothing has supporters that are upping their game to violence. To violence.

[SammyWinstonJack]

78. ...

[yourpaljoey]

8. Yep. We were here and watched the dirty tricks in real time.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

10. I believe you meant to post it in this forum.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1135

[alcibiades_mystery]

12. LOL

Bernie:

[NorthCarolina]

13. Doesn't matter, she will never be 45. -nt-

[Agschmid]

21. Bookmarked.

[NorthCarolina]

24. By all means, go right ahead. -nt-

[Demsrule86]

100. She will and your sorry candidate

might win re-election... for the Senate.

[CrowCityDem]

14. Losing the primaries makes Bernie an illegitimate nominee.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

17. He only lost in the vote count.

[Agnosticsherbet]

15. LOL

[lunamagica]

16. I remember Bush, and you bringing him up just proves the fallacy of your claim

The reason that Bush got away with fraud was because the election was *thisclose*. The difference in votes amounted to hundreds...That's how you can get away with election fraud.

But to claim that there is fraud when Hillary is MILLIONS (yes, plural) MILLIONS of votes ahead? That's beyond absurd!

[firebrand80]

19. randomconspiracynewsblog.com disagrees nt

[JDPriestly]

34. She claims to be millions ahead because she does not count votes

in caucus states, many of which Bernie won by large margins.

She also won Texas and New York, two large states. California has not yet voted. You really can't talk about millions of votes until California has voted.

[lunamagica]

49. That has been debunked. The people attendig caucases wouldn't add up to a million, combined

And SO FAR, she is ahead by millions. I mentioned CA

[ViseGrip]

59. But now we have electric counts, and the source code is vendor proprietary information.

We are not allowed to look to see 'how it counts'.

that was over ballots.

Now, as far as it being close....in several states, and in the hearings last week, we are seeing a 12 point deviation spread from exit polling.

The U.S. deems anything over 2% to be fraudulent. In 2004 it was unlike 2000, as Florida got rid of the paper ballots.

180,000 votes were removed electronically from Florida, while they moved the shit show to Ohio. The Sec. of State for elections in Ohio was also the co chair of the Bush Cheney campaign, no longer allowed in FLA. So you see....there are many ways.

This time, it's within counties. Bernie still wins, but they change the counties....where more delegates are awarded. See how she keeps pace? I mention 2000, to show you the deflation of the country's mood. You don't think after the convention, with a nominee this always favors, who is under investigation won't do this? Bush was already (s)elected in 04. This is a primary where Hillary needs people to be excited to GOTV. What part are you missing....

There are more votes than voters. Why is that okay with Hillary supporters? She will not win. In the general a 12 point deviation swing will not fly. You can't fix it that much without it being seen. It's seen. But this is the 'democratic' primary that the party controls.
Wait to see if this flies in the GE? Go ahead...keep saying none of this matters. Bush cheating was different. Sure. NY is different from MD and DE and IL. Lots of ways to cheat. You have a lot to learn on this topic. Start here and do get back to me!

[bobbobbins01]

18. This primary needs a full audit

I don't have faith in our election system at all anymore.

[JDPriestly]

33. It was poorly organized.

You don't hold a voice vote when you know that the likely voters on each side are about half on one and half on the other. You need some sort of vote count: raised hands, written ballots, some means to insure a fair count.

That is the most stupid thing that Hillary supporters at the Nevada convention could have done: hold voice votes when they knew based on the caucus results and earlier results that the Party was almost evenly divided.

They were asking for trouble and they knew it.

[joshcryer]

52. I agree with that.

Technically, though, that's what they did. The vote went the way those who were there were going for. IE, there were more Clinton supporters present at every point in the process and Clinton and Sanders officials agreed that this was the case.

However, because caucases are absolutely insane, they should have done a voice vote, one by one, allowing anyone with a piece of paper to do a tally. Of course, that wouldn't stop people from fucking up their own tallys and calling it corrupt, but at least everyone would be involved in the process rather than the handful of people registering them and tallying who was there.

[JDPriestly]

57. And representatives of both sides of the nomination process

should have had a chance to have their say at the convention.

To silence people because they disagree with you or are in the minority does not build cohesion or harmony.

The event organizers bungled terribly. They were Hillary supporters, and their bungling reflects badly on Hillary's competence. That's just the way it is.

Talk about hurting the candidate's chances in the general election. All an opposing candidate has to do is to bring up the mismanagement of that convention.

I can't believe that. It was embarrassing beyond belief.

Like a bunch of old ladies arguing about how to run the rummage sale. Looked really bad.

I am a woman. I am not sexist. Men at football, soccer and other sports events who fight and argue are just as stupid.

[joshcryer]

64. The chaos started when they did the preliminary vote.

They failed incredibly hard to clarify what was happening, but it was on the agenda (to get the process going). They also should have had a voice count on the agenda as well, because when it's that close the losers are going to be crazy.

As far as hurting the party, I think anyone who doesn't sit back and assess what happened probably never intended to support the nominee anyway if it was Clinton.

Sanders sent out a letter before the convention calling for civility. They got 900 signatures to amend the rules. They had 8-9 petitions that they were going to submit. The people in his campaign, worked for weeks on it. But the chaos prevented them from submitting. The amendments probably would have failed, but they were shut out because people couldn't be calm. One of the amendments actually called for a head count. It's possible, if they were calm and respectful Clinton people would have gone with it.

The people who ignored Sanders own letter are not supporters, they are more band wagoning, and just anti Clinton.

[JDPriestly]

85. I really like Sanders' stances on the issues. That is true of most

Sanders' supporters.

But, the convention organizers should have worked with the Sanders group BEFORE THE CONVENTION.

Any good organizer knows that the ground rules for a convention or other meeting at which there will be a) a large crowd and b) differences, serious differences of opinion is to meet with all the groups representing different opinions before the event to agree on ground rules.

Anyone who has ever organized a church social knows that you can't just spring rules on people. You can't just tell people to shut up. Groups just don't work that way.

If the dissenters are a very small group, you might get by with ignoring them. But when the dissenters are a large group -- nearly half of those assembled -- as at the Nevada convention, and YOU KNOW IN ADVANCE that they will disagree with you and want to have a say, then you meet with them in advance to agree on ground rules.

The chaos at that convention was either the result of incompetence or of planning -- planning to exclude others based on their different opinion.

Neither is a good sign when it comes to the likely outcome of a Hillary presidency.

The dissent on the part of Bernie supporters was predictable and should have been avoided through cooperation.

Hillary has an exaggerated view of her numerical and support advantage in this campaign. The object in her rear view mirror is larger than she realizes. Even if she is the nominee, even if she is elected, the Bernie contingent (of which I am a proud part) will not just fade away. She is going to have to learn to respect and work with it.

Hillary needs to deal with Bernie supporters. If she can't deal with us, how in the world will she deal with Republicans?

As for Bernie, he has been successfully dealing with Republicans since 1980 when he became mayor of Burlington, Vermont. He knows how to do it. That is one of the reasons I support him so strongly. He knows how to work with others even if they don't agree with him.

Hillary???? So far I don't see that she does.

[joshcryer]

90. They did!

Everyone in the process knew that Sanders side had amendments they were working on! They had to get signatures AT the convention from delegates on the floor. But people started fighting before they could submit them!

The credentials committee was staffed by both Sanders and Clinton people...

And you should know no rules were sprung on anyone, those actually involved knew the rules and followed them. They could not have gotten those signatures if they didn't know what to do.

In reality anyone could've been removed for yelling out of turn, because to be a delegate they would've had to sign that they read and understood the rules. And one of the biggest rules is not to speak out of turn.

[reddread]

86. are Republicans experiencing similar or equivalent failures?

[SwampG8r]

119. Actually no with 2 exceptions gop.exit polling matches results.

[Todays_Illusion]

142. It was organized to confirm the chosen candidate, not organized for the voters to choose a candidate

sorry no room for the nt or even a period.

[JDPriestly]

143. It was organized to exclude and frustrate the many, many people who support Bernie

and want and should be heard.

Hillary will regret this in November.

[Lil Missy]

20. Why don't you just pull something outta yer ass and post it as fact?

Oh wait ....

[ViseGrip]

22. I did! I just added the links for you.

[LexVegas]

23. ...

[snort]

25. Eggs on the way in

and nah nah nah hey hey hey on the way out. Tons of respect for that one.

[SidDithers]

26. ...

Sid

[seabeyond]

29. Sanders stole. Clinton has lost voters with the suppression of votes.

[JDPriestly]

30. The Nevada convention was a chaotic farce.

And it was organized by Hillary's folks.

It is proof that Hillary's supporters do not know how to organize.

You do not hold a voice vote when the voter congregated are only 30 votes out of over 500 + apart on the issue. You do not hold a voice vote when you know that the numbers of those on one side of the issue are nearly equal to those on the other side.

Talk about setting up an arbitrary vote count?

Unsophisticated, ignorant and disorganized. Hillary's supporters.

[pdsimdars]

58. They know they can't win without cheating. And they don' t care about what the people want

They just want to "win". Nothing else matters to them.
Sick. What is right, what's wrong, what's good for the country, NOTHING matters to them but their winning. Warped.

[jalan48]

31. Hillary will likely be impeached even if she is elected President.

Who she chooses for her VP is the real issue now.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

44. That is one coping mechanism to deal with your disappointment.

Not the most effective coping mechanism though.

[jalan48]

46. Don't wake up-it's ugly out here.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

50. I learned more from the streets than I ever did from a book so that will never be a problem.

[jalan48]

53. Uh huh.

[ViseGrip]

62. You cannot impeach a president for crimes committed before they took office.

This is why she knows she'll get away with it. And just like Bush, she does not care about citizens. Period.

[onecaliberal]

87. She jeopardized national security, her server was hacked.

The republican house will have impeachment papers ready on day 1. The sad thing is they have plenty of legit things to use against her.

[brooklynite]

76. ...and she'd remain President...

...you forgot that it takes 2/3 of the Senate to vote to remove a President?

[jalan48]

94. Enjoy the charade.

[Beacool]

101. Sure, keep pushing that meme.

I sometimes wonder if I'm on a RW site when I come to DU.

[jalan48]

103. What do you think awaits a President Hillary Clinton?

Rainbows and flowers? It will be one big drama for at least four years. Enjoy.

[Beacool]

105. I would expect no less drama if Sanders had won the presidency.

So this is a moot point.

[jalan48]

108. Oh, you must have missed out on all the drama from Clinton I

Clinton II will be even bigger and better. But, maybe she can keep the Republicans at bay by agreeing to work with them on Big Trade deals or cutting Medicare, etc.-you know, reaching across the aisle to find compromise. That should make them nicer.

[redstateblues]

130. Bernie will endorse Hillary before the convention

Start getting used to it

[KingFlorez]

32. Guards!

[MineralMan]

36. I'm pretty sure you'll find that, at the convention,

she will be a legitimate nominee, after all. It will be her name on people's ballots in November, not Bernie's.

Some people won't like that, but we'll still have the general election and decide who will be President, starting in 2017.

You'll have a choice, too, to make then. I hope you make the better choice.

[Android3.14]

79. And all she had to do was cheat, sell her soul, and help take us into an illegitimate war

She will never be legitimate after this farce of a primary.

God, what a waste of resources and enthusiasm. We had it in the bag, and now this angry war-mongering DINO tool is going to clear the path for a Trump Presidency.

[mindwalker_i]

37. You sure drew out the cackles with this post

And the chorus of "She's Winning (tm)" without addressing why she's "winning." W "won" too.

Shortly, someone why cry sexism, but as Hillary and her supporters have been sexist this entire campaign, you have lost the right to be taken seriously.

[Maedhros]

40. The more they post, the more they establish themselves as the enemies of democracy.[n/t]

[DemocratSinceBirth]

42. Only in a parallel universe could someone say the popular will should be disregarded.

[mindwalker_i]

80. Are you a human?

It looks like, again, you didn't read the actual words, just responded with "She's Winning (tm)", which is exactly what I said would happen. You don't even address the issues brought up about election fraud, indicating either you didn't read that and are blathering at the mouth rather than engaging in discussion (likely), or don't even comprehend the possibility of your chosen one being dishonest/cheating. Or don't care as long as she's winning.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

95. Allegations of fraud are not tantamount to fraud.

Are you a human?

Are you?

[mindwalker_i]

96. So you respond with a cackle

Just like with all of Hillary's problems.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

97. You are only getting more ad hom.

Temper, temper...

[DemocratSinceBirth]

41. She is winning because she has garnered more votes. What part of that don't you sic not understand ?

[Blue_Adept]

38. Some Bernie supporters will call it bullshit as well

Cause it is.

[Scuba]

43. K&R

[Cheese Sandwich]

45. I would say Illinois is the biggest one. There is evidence of actual vote switching on the machines

And the state was very close.

[hellofromreddit]

47. So many similar responses!

?w=377&h=169

[pdsimdars]

48. The Coronation has been postponed . . . . .

Some one posted this earlier. Seems approporate.



.

[apcalc]

54. Ridiculous.

[virgogal]

56. I'm in MA---where is the documentation of fraud in MA?

[ViseGrip]

67. Bill breaking the law, stopping voters for hours, many left and it was close.

I was removed from a polling place for Hillary in 2008 because my FOOT was on the orange painted line.

But Bill? He broke the law.

Here are a couple of links to help you:

https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2016/03/02/ma-primary-unadjusted-exit-poll-indicates-bernie-won/

Again, you are not to 'adjust' exit polls to fit the result. Study this.

Here: Bill Clinton sued:
https://pivotamerica.com/bill-clinton-officially-sued-election-fraud-massachusetts/

Election shenanigans in MA:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/riley-waggaman/its-not-just-arizona-elec_b_9550670.html

More fraud like AZ in MA?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/3/1/1494106/-More-Possible-Voter-Fraud-Now-in-Massachusetts


Here ya go!

[virgogal]

144. Thanks a lot----much appreciated.

[One Black Sheep]

70. Looks like we're gonna need a bigger truck

[stevenleser]

72. I know, all these voters denying Bernie the nomination is frustrating. How dare they.

[brooklynite]

73. I stand solidly with Bernie Sanders...

...who hasn't challenged the outcome in any of these States.

[Waiting For Everyman]

77. She's an illegitimate candidate, and running under false pretenses.

She has lied about every detail of the FBI investigation. leading people to vote for her who absolutely would not if they knew the truth. And this whole campaign has been a series of frauds.

Everything that follows from a fraud is void.

[Demsrule86]

99. She trounced your candidate

And there was no cheating...can't admit people just aren't that into Bernie...just aren't.

[Binkie The Clown]

88. George W. Bush was an illegitimate president, but he was still a president.

And look at the disaster that brought. Illegitimate leaders always seem to bring disaster in their wake.

[jamese777]

91. Every state needs...

permanent absentee ballot status. I haven't been to a polling station on Election Day in a decade. I fill out my ballot in the comfort of my home and I either drop it off in a mailbox or take it to election headquarters, which is drive through.
The only states that currently offer Permanent Absenteee Ballot status to all registered voters are: Arizona, California, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Montana, New Jersey and Utah.

[ViseGrip]

125. Florida now has permanent AB voting too. But they changed something...

In a county I know they used an outside vendor to print ballots. The printing machine and company was audited each time.

Well the elections supervisor wanted her own ballot printers, 'in case we run out, it's faster to print our own'. They say her machine is audited too.

Here is something else that I know. I worked on a campaign in 2002, where we had a copy machine from a supporter/company. Of course we paid them per copy, they would come and audit the machine and leave us a bill. Sometimes he would chuckle and say, I'll just put so many copies down, and save you some money. I heard that. So I don't think the elections supervisor should have a machine.

Mail ballots go out and come back 45 days in advance. Envelopes with the names and bar coding must be kept. They can open them, take out the opposing candidate, color in bubbles in new ballots and scan those....get it? The building they now use is new, huge, and no windows. The public observation area is now behind glass and you can't hear or see shit. Ballots should be printed elsewhere as they always were, and audited.

I agree with another post here in DU, if we truly audited a primary state, at only 3%, (not even 5% as Chicago just did and found fraud), Hillary's campaign would fall apart like a house of cards, just like the post said. Spot on!

[2cannan]

129. Just curious--do you have to pay postage to send the ballot? nt

[AzDar]

92. If You Have To Cheat To Win... You DIDN'T.

[LoverOfLiberty]

93. Since you are absolutely positive that there is cheating going on

and it is helping (rather than hurting) Democrats, perhaps it was the Bernie camp who was cheating but just didn't cheat hard enough to make up his huge deficit. After all, weren't most of those areas where there were problems areas that mostly supported Clinton?

While Rome burns DU fiddles.

[nemo137]

98. The Maryland one sounds like yet another fuckup with provisional ballots

Which was a (large) part of what was discussed in Illinois as well.

I understand the idea of them, but they seem to do more harm than good. Better to just move to same day registration.

(And in closing, going to hit on my current hobbyhorse that having 50 state by state election systems/requirements/etc is a recipe for disaster).

[Tess49]

102. Yawn

[dchill]

104. Great, factual post.

[B Calm]

106. K&R So true!

[johnp3907]

110. CHEMTRAILS!!!!!!!1!!11!!!!!

[FlatBaroque]

116. Congrats!!

I could not have thought of a more vapid and inane reply to what has become a national, political crisis.

[GulfCoast66]

118. National, political crisis...

Bernie supporter lingo for "an ass kicking of my candidate by the voters of the Democratic Party".

[Renew Deal]

127. They can't accept that voters would choose someone else.

"If only people get to know Bernie." They did and picked someone else

[RBInMaine]

115. Thanks for the insane conspiracy theories from planet Nonsense World.

[ViseGrip]

117. This is reported via Washington Post, Baltimore Sun, Huff Post, Daily Kos, NYT.

You're welcome!

[pdsimdars]

121. Her campaign didn't need voter fraud to make her the illigitimate candidate.

She did that all by herself. Ask the FBI.

[ViseGrip]

141. Oh I did not call her 'illegitimate candidate', I called her 'illegitimate NOMINEE'!

[Tarc]

122. Sanders fans still cannot accept that more voters prefer Clinton to him

[reformist2]

123. I no longer believe that.

[Tarc]

124. No one really cares what you believe

Outside of Arizona, where the GOP deliberately closed many polling stations, there has been no substantiated prof of wrongdoing. What is more telling is that Sanders and his legal team have filed no challenges in any state. It's safe to say that, unlike his supporters, they do not fall for every blog and twitter claim they read.

[ViseGrip]

131. That's fair. That's why I also put the links, and the fact of numbers not adding up.

It's stunning this matters to no Hillary supporters.

Democracy should come first. A leader stands up and calls it out.

Crickets......

[Tarc]

138. All this alleged fraud, and nary a challenge by Sanders' legal team?

Why is that?

[redstateblues]

132. I no longer believe the world is round

[Gavile]

128. If any of those voters could give a rational explanation for why they

Prefer Clinton, I'd be more inclined to accept it.

[redstateblues]

134. If you had paid attention we have done that hundreds of times

And BSS always respond with ad Homs and personal attacks

[Gavile]

135. Something RATIONAL

Ie. not "It's her turn", "It's time we had a woman", "I just don't like Bernie", "I'm not buying what Bernie's selling" or "Hillary has a relationship with us".

Or anything that involves the phrases "pie in the sky" or "unicorns".

[Gavile]

136. Oh, and not to mention

"Bernie is a grumpy old man and his supporters are angry people who shout and say mean things".

Those are not legitimate reasons to prefer Hillary.

[Renew Deal]

126. You can believe that and she is still the nominee

[Gavile]

139. You sound ok with that

[Renew Deal]

140. It's BS

[dbackjon]

133. When you add Arizona in there

It is perfectly clear that you do not know what you were talking about


Arizona and it's voting processes are all controlled by anti-Clinton GOP members

And Clinton was hurt worse than Sanders by the shenanigans there




There's no point in looking at the rest of your post because it is clear that you are a conspiracy theorist who does not understand the voting process or elections