2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRalph Nader: Trump’s Done Some Good, Clinton’s Winning By ‘Dictatorship'
The liberal activist says Trump has brought some important issues to the fore.
"He's questioned the trade agreements. He's done some challenging of Wall Street I don't know how authentic that is. He said he's against the carried interest racket, for hedge funds. He's funded himself and therefore attacked special interest money, which is very important," Nader says. "But he's lowered the level of political debate to unheard-of depths of salacious, slanderous and vacuousness, garnished with massive self-boosterism and repetition."
"And that's not good, because that brought a lot of money into the media and that's the kind of debates they're going to want to goad."
When asked what positive contributions Clinton has made to the 2016 campaign, Nader called her a "corporatist, militarist Democrat" who would have been defeated by Sanders if every state held an open primary.
"She's going to win by dictatorship. Twenty-five percent of superdelegates are cronies, mostly. They weren't elected. They were there in order to stop somebody like Bernie Sanders, who would win by the vote," he says.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-05-13/ralph-nader-donald-trump-has-done-some-good-hillary-clintons-winning-by-dictatorship
Mr. Nadir should really drop the pretense of giving a shit about Democrats getting elected.
WhiteTara
(31,158 posts)he is delighted to see the world crashing down...he told his supporters that "they deserve it"
speaktruthtopower
(800 posts)YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)Why waster your time here? I'm legitimately curious - and it's not you I'm talking about.
Response to YoungDemCA (Reply #4)
Name removed Message auto-removed
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)blm
(114,412 posts)he, like Shel Adelson.
OilemFirchen
(7,288 posts)msongs
(73,019 posts)Bill USA
(6,436 posts)CobaltBlue
(1,122 posts)mcar
(45,600 posts)And people who purport to be progressive actually defend this mook?
baldguy
(36,649 posts)PDittie
(8,322 posts)is troll the fuck out of establishment Democrats.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Trump's been speaking out against the trade deals and since he has more coverage than Bernie, has been getting the word out a lot more than Bernie.
And the trade deals matter to me because I don't want big corporations to have sovereignty over American governments. Anyone who is loyal to this country would reject these trade deals. I also want to trust the air I breathe and the food I eat. Not everyone has the money to buy stuff at Whole Foods (or your local Co-op.)
anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)Whatever you're smoking is a lot stronger than what I've got.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)I don't trust him either, but at least word has gotten out about those damn trade deals, which the corporate media was doing an effort to hide.
joshcryer
(62,534 posts)He's all for tariffs because they wouldn't affect his bottom line.
The fact of the matter is American consumers want cheap goods, which Trump's tariffs would obliterate. He wouldn't have the votes to do it if he got elected, for that reason alone. And I expect him to back off that rhetoric once the studies come out showing the American consumer just how bad it'd be for them.
barrow-wight
(744 posts)So we should trust the man who has products made in third world countries as a result of these trade deals?
NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)I thought she was winning by millions of votes
oasis
(53,311 posts)joshcryer
(62,534 posts)Justice
(7,242 posts)RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)DonJohnson
(9 posts)Distrusting the structural elite, not bowing to authority, and avoiding borderline-"homicidal" urges against humanity, not catering to the 0.001% makes you a "looney tune"? Well, I'll gladly accept that label if it differentiates me from sadistic misanthropic sociopaths who openly express sheer hatred towards humanity and worship of the corporate/political elite... you know, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev types?