Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:53 PM May 2016

Regardless of who you support for the nom, do you agree with this statement from Bernie?

"Nobody who works 40 hours a week should be living in poverty."

33 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
Yes, I agree with that.
33 (100%)
No, I don't agree with that.
0 (0%)
I'm not sure if I agree with that or not.
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Regardless of who you support for the nom, do you agree with this statement from Bernie? (Original Post) Ken Burch May 2016 OP
I wouldn't mind seeing a few Wall Street traders and hedge fund managers living in poverty tularetom May 2016 #1
Picking up a phone and screaming at underlings doesn't count as work in my book. Ken Burch May 2016 #2
The "works 40 hours a week" part bothers me. Nobody should be living in poverty. Recursion May 2016 #3
Good points there. Ken Burch May 2016 #4
Sounds great creeksneakers2 May 2016 #5

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
1. I wouldn't mind seeing a few Wall Street traders and hedge fund managers living in poverty
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:57 PM
May 2016

But then I doubt that they work 40 hours a week so I guess they do not qualify.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
2. Picking up a phone and screaming at underlings doesn't count as work in my book.
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:58 PM
May 2016

And basically, that's the only thing bank presidents and CEO's do.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
3. The "works 40 hours a week" part bothers me. Nobody should be living in poverty.
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:59 PM
May 2016

For that matter we should probably be working 20 hour weeks.

But, a person working 40 hours for the Federal minimum wage is a good bit above the poverty line. ($15K vs. $12K)

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
4. Good points there.
Mon May 16, 2016, 11:04 PM
May 2016

Still, if you DO work full-time, no matter what the job, you should never be having to struggle to just hang on. And tens of millions of people who do work 40-hour weeks(and longer) do have to struggle like that.

We've got to get out of this "the 99% have to 'take one for the team'" mindset those on top have imposed on this country since 1981. None of that arrogance and none of the sacrifices imposed on the many below by the few above were never justified or necessary.

Thank you for your post.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Regardless of who you sup...