Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tonight on my twitter feed, I received 3 images of child porn from Hillary supporters. (Original Post) Luminous Animal May 2016 OP
Sure you did. JaneyVee May 2016 #1
Calling the police would be the proper action KingFlorez May 2016 #5
Yes. JanyVee. I did. And I am not the only Bernie supporter that has had Luminous Animal May 2016 #6
Good. Keep us posted on how the police investigation is proceeding. JaneyVee May 2016 #10
Eh, I don't know... Turin_C3PO May 2016 #9
There was a FB porno attack on Bernie supporters by Clinton supporters. senz May 2016 #15
You have PROOF they were Clinton supporters apcalc May 2016 #31
There is plenty of proof the porno attacks came from Clinton supporters. senz May 2016 #42
Are you calling Luminous a liar? Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #18
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. randome May 2016 #19
So you're calling Luminous a liar too. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #21
I'm implying that Luminous does NOT know the source of any images on the Internet. randome May 2016 #22
Longtime DUers deserve benefit of the doubt Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #23
Well.....LA once accused me of plagarizing. Falsely. She threatened me with msanthrope May 2016 #35
Like CoffeCat's perfectly-timed tale of Iowa registration woe, it has the ring of inauthenticity Tarc May 2016 #36
Well apparently that was good enough when Bernie supporters were accused Gavile May 2016 #27
Agree apcalc May 2016 #32
I am gobsmacked. CaliforniaPeggy May 2016 #2
Jesus, that is awful. One Black Sheep May 2016 #3
I doubt they'd be that stupid, or that you would not call the FBI. Why wouldn't you? bettyellen May 2016 #4
Holy crap I heard they were doing that. Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #7
This was done with the FB attacks too, from what I heard Hydra May 2016 #11
Yuck. Turin_C3PO May 2016 #8
and you know they are actual hillary supporters how? msongs May 2016 #12
The same way Bernie supporters get blamed for things they don't do. nt silvershadow May 2016 #14
Not surprising. That's how they got the Bernie FB groups shut down. nt silvershadow May 2016 #13
Of course you did Sky Masterson May 2016 #16
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #17
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service Capt. Obvious May 2016 #20
Thanks for informing us of what's happening. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #24
That is inane. Demnorth May 2016 #25
They've been doing it on Facebook too Gavile May 2016 #26
Do you have PROOF they were Hillary supporters ? apcalc May 2016 #28
I don't believe a word of this. nt auntpurl May 2016 #29
+1 obamanut2012 May 2016 #33
+2 betsuni May 2016 #38
Awful... Mike Nelson May 2016 #30
No one is saying anyone is FOR child porn. djean111 May 2016 #37
Paid to troll can be a double edged sword. nt nc4bo May 2016 #34
You are full of it. That is obvious. NCTraveler May 2016 #39
How do you know they were Hillary supporters? cwydro May 2016 #40
Kick...nt SidDithers May 2016 #41

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
6. Yes. JanyVee. I did. And I am not the only Bernie supporter that has had
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:34 AM
May 2016

child porn posted on our twitter feeds. But you keep going on your bad own self.

Turin_C3PO

(13,975 posts)
9. Eh, I don't know...
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:46 AM
May 2016

There's plenty of weirdos on social media and I'm sure each campaign has some pedophiles in their millions of supporters. Humanity can suck big time.

apcalc

(4,465 posts)
31. You have PROOF they were Clinton supporters
Tue May 17, 2016, 06:49 AM
May 2016

Or just more secondhand crap from the NYPost abd Heavy.com.

Ridiculous.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
19. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Tue May 17, 2016, 05:47 AM
May 2016

Let's see a redacted police report, shall we? Or, at the very least, something to substantiate that the images came from "Clinton supporters".

Come on, Luminous, tell us how you know the source of these images and the political leanings of those who sent them.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
21. So you're calling Luminous a liar too.
Tue May 17, 2016, 05:49 AM
May 2016

And no, LA has no need to prove a damn thing to you, or anybody else here.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
22. I'm implying that Luminous does NOT know the source of any images on the Internet.
Tue May 17, 2016, 05:52 AM
May 2016

Using the term 'Clinton supporters' without explanation is a poorly chosen smear. Why does he/she think these images came from "Clinton supporters"? Because an anonymous poster on a Twitter feed said so? It's a simple question.

I would never "accuse" someone without evidence, yet Luminous is clearly making a horrible implication.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
23. Longtime DUers deserve benefit of the doubt
Tue May 17, 2016, 05:57 AM
May 2016

at face value unless YOU have specific proof that what LA said is not true.

People write posts here every day that are taken under that presumption, including YOU, and including JV above.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
35. Well.....LA once accused me of plagarizing. Falsely. She threatened me with
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:02 AM
May 2016

"exposure" and ridicule. And when her claim was proven false, she didn't apologize in the thread.

So yes, she's a long-time DUer. Who has a track record of very serious xlaims....proven false.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
36. Like CoffeCat's perfectly-timed tale of Iowa registration woe, it has the ring of inauthenticity
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:06 AM
May 2016

No, I do not at all believe in the anecdotes of Sanders supporters at this stage of the game.. They are timed to have just the right amount of impact.

 

Gavile

(107 posts)
27. Well apparently that was good enough when Bernie supporters were accused
Tue May 17, 2016, 06:39 AM
May 2016

Of throwing chairs and throwing bottles. Oh, and threatening people's grandchildren.

apcalc

(4,465 posts)
32. Agree
Tue May 17, 2016, 06:50 AM
May 2016

This is all secondhand hearsay... More " inciters" and those willing to believe anything....

One Black Sheep

(458 posts)
3. Jesus, that is awful.
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:28 AM
May 2016

I have a twitter account, but have never faced that kind of garbage before. Those Hillary supporters should be reported to the FBI, that is a crime.


Updated: here is the FBI official website to report a complaint about internet child porn:

http://www.ic3.gov/complaint/default.aspx

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
4. I doubt they'd be that stupid, or that you would not call the FBI. Why wouldn't you?
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:28 AM
May 2016

There are some freaks out there, sorry if this happened.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
11. This was done with the FB attacks too, from what I heard
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:52 AM
May 2016

It's just Brock being himself, sending his peeps out to smear any way they can.

Turin_C3PO

(13,975 posts)
8. Yuck.
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:43 AM
May 2016

Hope they get investigated. I don't care if he's a Hill voter, Bernie voter, Trump voter, or a Ham Sandwich supporter, he/she should get arrested.

Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
20. AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Tue May 17, 2016, 05:49 AM
May 2016

Last edited Tue May 17, 2016, 06:38 AM - Edit history (1)

On Tue May 17, 2016, 02:41 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Sad loser claims crime committed by those he deems his 'enemies'.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1977940

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Personal attack. Calling a DUer "a sad loser" is over the top, and unnecessary. Please hide this.

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue May 17, 2016, 03:19 AM, and the Jury voted 5-2 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Personal insult is never OK
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Not crazy about the accusations made in this thread, or about the willingness of so many here to accept as truth any negative thing said about the other side, no matter how outrageous. That said, we really need to be civil to one another, and calling people names is not civil. The DU Community Standards state: "It is the responsibility of all DU members to participate in a manner that promotes a positive atmosphere and encourages good discussions among a diverse community of people holding a broad range of center-to-left viewpoints."
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Personal attack from one of DU's worst-behaved members.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Sad loser gets a hide
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
24. Thanks for informing us of what's happening.
Tue May 17, 2016, 06:01 AM
May 2016

Apparently child porn is the hobby of those who do this sort of thing.

Demnorth

(68 posts)
25. That is inane.
Tue May 17, 2016, 06:34 AM
May 2016

A link between child porn and who a disseminator-of supports politically?
The two just don't go hand in hand.

Mike Nelson

(9,953 posts)
30. Awful...
Tue May 17, 2016, 06:48 AM
May 2016

...you should have reported the posts to the police and Twitter. As far as the implicit reference to "Clinton supporters...child porn" - I've not heard Hillaryor her supporters are pro-child porn. Neither are Bernie or his supporters. Or even Trump.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
37. No one is saying anyone is FOR child porn.
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:17 AM
May 2016

What is happening is attempted smearing of others, to say that others are for child porn. Putting child porn in someone's twitter feed and then pointing to it.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
40. How do you know they were Hillary supporters?
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:24 AM
May 2016

Whoever they are,, they should be reported to the police.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Tonight on my twitter fee...