Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:38 AM May 2016

The Superdelegates to Bernie's Supporters: We Will NOT be Bullied

Last edited Tue May 17, 2016, 04:10 PM - Edit history (1)

Superdelegates are getting profanity laced messages with threats of violence for their support of Hillary Clinton. Lots of messages abound referencing the 1968 Democratic Convention and alluding to a violent confrontation.

They are in their last throes. With each passing primary/caucus, he is NOT reaching his goal. If you notice, he is actually changing his rhetoric a bit, because the time will come for him to throw his support behind the presumptive nominee. As he tones it down, some of his "supporters" are ratcheting up. I put supporters in quotes because I really think a lot of this trouble comes from interlopers pretending to be Bernie supporters. They *act* too much like Trump people for me to think otherwise.

**REAL** Democrats don't pull this shit. This is why the superdelegates are being *VERY* clear: they will not be bullied.

And *WE* won't be either.


(edit: typo)

166 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Superdelegates to Bernie's Supporters: We Will NOT be Bullied (Original Post) LaydeeBug May 2016 OP
Sanders supporters to LWolf May 2016 #1
You *aren't* being bullied. You are being *beaten*. There's a difference. nt LaydeeBug May 2016 #4
Ah yes JackInGreen May 2016 #9
It's democracy. Being outvoted is not being bullied. Hortensis May 2016 #47
NO! it is NOT democracy. That is the issue... pangaia May 2016 #126
Your place is to do your part to make sure underthematrix May 2016 #153
Oh, bullshit. LWolf May 2016 #10
The Oklahoma City Thunder "beat" the Golden State Warriors 108-102 last night. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #18
No. It does not. You're welcome. nt LWolf May 2016 #24
Electing a president is not a fucking basketball game. Dawgs May 2016 #48
Non sequitur. We were discussing the meaning of the word "beat" DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #49
Hey Everyone: here you have the very example of "manufactured outrage", we read about all the time. Sheepshank May 2016 #127
How about, your candidate is losing WhiteTara May 2016 #51
While the polls aren't closed here at home, LWolf May 2016 #88
Are there 500 delegates to be divided in Kentucky? WhiteTara May 2016 #90
A win is a win, LWolf May 2016 #91
oops. This one is a loss. nt WhiteTara May 2016 #93
Spare me your sanctimony. LaydeeBug May 2016 #59
It's all in your tone. LWolf May 2016 #89
I see you sought nuance when you should have focused on basic math skills. LaydeeBug May 2016 #98
so if Hillary is winning so decisively lapfog_1 May 2016 #54
I do not contort to "if/then" scenarios. I won't be bullied into that sort of parameter. LaydeeBug May 2016 #60
you are trying so hard to believe that, aren't you? lapfog_1 May 2016 #63
I don't need to *try*, the TRUTH does suffice. LaydeeBug May 2016 #64
So Sanders supporters don't believe anything they post? puffy socks May 2016 #76
pretty much lapfog_1 May 2016 #77
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #103
90% of success is showing up. Too bad Bernie's delegates didn't show. nt LaydeeBug May 2016 #105
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #106
No. I'm not LaydeeBug May 2016 #110
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #111
No. Really. And the math does indeed favor her. Too bad that upsets you LaydeeBug May 2016 #113
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #115
Oh, yes the math *does*. LaydeeBug May 2016 #117
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #122
Math is math...and you BEST BELIEVE I'll see you there LaydeeBug May 2016 #123
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #124
Not a problem sweets. So will we. LaydeeBug May 2016 #125
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #134
Oh, I'm NOT dreaming. In *reality*, I am PREPARED. LaydeeBug May 2016 #135
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #136
LOL! Look who's dreaming now? LaydeeBug May 2016 #137
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #138
...going absolutely nowhere. LaydeeBug May 2016 #139
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #140
Yes I do. LaydeeBug May 2016 #141
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #142
I am glad you are entertained...that's about as far as it's gonna go LaydeeBug May 2016 #145
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #146
No need. She's already won nt LaydeeBug May 2016 #147
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #148
I like that you keep kicking my *awesome* thread about the WINNER LaydeeBug May 2016 #160
Filthy, scummy Nixonian behavior. nt Bonobo May 2016 #150
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #151
Agreed. nt Bonobo May 2016 #152
Good luck in the GE JackInGreen May 2016 #2
Thanks. I take it the Dem nominee won't have your support? nt LaydeeBug May 2016 #5
My support is mine to provide or withold JackInGreen May 2016 #6
Nunya?? LOL! GulfCoast66 May 2016 #34
You're tell me JackInGreen May 2016 #42
LOL GulfCoast66 May 2016 #44
so *that's* why you brought up your jock strap? LaydeeBug May 2016 #67
Perhaps you should review this website's rules. nt LaydeeBug May 2016 #66
The websites rules say that I need to tell you? JackInGreen May 2016 #92
Perhaps just tell yourself that math is math. LaydeeBug May 2016 #95
I doubt anyone cares about your "measurement" enough to ask rbrnmw May 2016 #82
Depends who they are. basselope May 2016 #86
They keep trying the same failed tactics over and over ... NurseJackie May 2016 #3
I don't believe it. nt Snotcicles May 2016 #7
Yeah, they can't be bullied. spinbaby May 2016 #8
Oh *I* know...if she wins, it's fraud, and if he wins, it's a revolution. nt LaydeeBug May 2016 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #104
90% of success is showing up. Too bad Bernie's delegates didn't bother. nt LaydeeBug May 2016 #107
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #109
This November, I am happy to support the DEMOCRATIC nominee. Too bad you won't LaydeeBug May 2016 #112
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #114
Mmm Hmmm MATH is why Bernie won't be the one. nt LaydeeBug May 2016 #120
Cool story... BlueLouisville May 2016 #11
True story LaydeeBug May 2016 #15
You assume far too much from a simple post... BlueLouisville May 2016 #27
Honey, I didn't assume a single thing, but that didn't stop YOU LaydeeBug May 2016 #61
All snark no substance. BlueLouisville May 2016 #84
and how. LaydeeBug May 2016 #100
I think your last post proved my point... BlueLouisville May 2016 #118
as I think YOUR last post proved mine. nt LaydeeBug May 2016 #119
Do you enjoy living under bridges? BlueLouisville May 2016 #149
I am not sure why where I live is relevant to the discussion LaydeeBug May 2016 #164
They're probably receiving them from camp Hillary...for "insurance". -nt- NorthCarolina May 2016 #13
Brock/Rovian Insurance Co. est. 1994. nt Snotcicles May 2016 #22
The Establishment complaining about being bullied by the little people Gavile May 2016 #14
except the establishment is what tried to ruin her LaydeeBug May 2016 #16
HA HA, now you're trying to pretend Hillary is not establishment? notadmblnd May 2016 #21
Why yes, her people do have original thoughts...see how their delegate LaydeeBug May 2016 #62
Cheating isn't winning notadmblnd May 2016 #71
Oh *I* know...if she wins, it's fraud, and if he wins, it's a revolution. nt LaydeeBug May 2016 #73
If you say so. notadmblnd May 2016 #74
+1 Orsino May 2016 #163
Who's being the bully? B Calm May 2016 #17
Bullshit. HRC has lready bullied and threatened you all for her support notadmblnd May 2016 #19
Do you actually believe the nonsense you just wrote? stevenleser May 2016 #50
Right. Hillary is such a poor poor vicitm notadmblnd May 2016 #72
What you wrote does not apply to my response. My question stands. Do you actually believe the stevenleser May 2016 #99
K&R Bobbie Jo May 2016 #20
How many of those 'Superdelegates' voted for DOMA, a bully's vote if ever there was one? Bluenorthwest May 2016 #23
Not all of those delegates are elected members of Congress. LiberalFighter May 2016 #26
Did I say that they are? No. So why not respond to what I said? Evasion is a form of Bluenorthwest May 2016 #31
So I am suppose to give you a response you want with your attitude? LiberalFighter May 2016 #32
My attitude? Check your verbiage. I said my piece and your response was to lecture me Bluenorthwest May 2016 #41
Why are you focusing on one issue? LiberalFighter May 2016 #52
Continue to bully the superdelegates and see how Sanders will win. LiberalFighter May 2016 #25
Can you provide on link to a confirmed Sanders supporter threating violence? BlueLouisville May 2016 #28
Here is one LiberalFighter May 2016 #30
That's not confirmation... it's more supposition from the Clinton camp. BlueLouisville May 2016 #37
They won't be bullied with different opinions ( the horror )... TheFarS1de May 2016 #29
Threats are dangerous and some people wonder why SDs are not Iliyah May 2016 #33
What do you expect when lobbyists are Superdelegates? pinebox May 2016 #35
election in the can larkrake May 2016 #131
They will not be bullied into supporting the VOTERS CHOICE? Who's the bully? ViseGrip May 2016 #36
Clinton by almost a 1000 delegates, over 3 million votes. You get that right? Oh wait, no you don't seabeyond May 2016 #39
Good. A bunch of little kid tantrums. Do not give in to this absurdity of a collective national seabeyond May 2016 #38
They should tell Brock to cease and desist then NorthCarolina May 2016 #40
It's "bullying" when we fight back. Got it. n/t Jester Messiah May 2016 #43
That's because they are bought and paid for. RATM435 May 2016 #45
Crystal clear... HumanityExperiment May 2016 #46
Their issue is with David Brock then, not Bernie supporters. -nt- NorthCarolina May 2016 #53
No link of course.... HooptieWagon May 2016 #55
The supers from my state are saying loud and clear "we don't give a sh*t who you voted for" azurnoir May 2016 #56
sorry to disappoint you, but Sanders is behind by EVERY standard LaydeeBug May 2016 #78
as I said the supers in my state are voting against the people of my state azurnoir May 2016 #79
Well, I live in a purple state, which voted sadoldgirl May 2016 #57
Real Democrats don't pull this shit? SheenaR May 2016 #58
And the Clinton spin machine keeps on spinning spinning spinning. insta8er May 2016 #65
Dearest superedelegates. F.O. frylock May 2016 #68
Sure, hiding behind jackboots and brown shirted armed guards VulgarPoet May 2016 #69
We are not hiding behind ANYTHING, we are STANDING UP LaydeeBug May 2016 #70
What are the qulifications for "real" Democrats? DNA testing? Secret decoder rings? Loyalty Oaths? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #75
K & R Maru Kitteh May 2016 #80
"real Democrats don't pull this shit" .......COULDN'T AGREE MORE!! Bill USA May 2016 #81
"Superdelegates" are undemocratic bullshit. Splinter Cell May 2016 #83
Couldnt agree more, its cheating larkrake May 2016 #130
When you hold the power of 3000 actual voters, you ARE the bullies. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #85
If you all are "real" Democrats LiberalElite May 2016 #87
Thank you sander supporters!!!! No super delegates will switch from beachbumbob May 2016 #94
"**REAL** Democrats don't pull this shit." Surya Gayatri May 2016 #96
That's a joke, right? MrMickeysMom May 2016 #97
No perhaps not but they can be bought AuntPatsy May 2016 #101
They're not very bright are they? I hope the feel the consequences of their unhinged cirminal synergie May 2016 #102
just keep banging that gavel... whirlygigspin May 2016 #108
You will be hearing gavels being banged, death threats and other BS antics are criminal. synergie May 2016 #116
The consent of the governed can be withdrawn. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #121
Maybe if they didnt sell out to the DNC before any primaries, they wouldnt be so larkrake May 2016 #128
Who gives a rat's ass about an institution that should not have been created in the first place? merrily May 2016 #129
but then how will the neo-cons keep power if you remove lobbyist supers? larkrake May 2016 #132
"We were elected to be...oh, never mind." CanadaexPat May 2016 #133
That's cool...They WILL NOT get my vote either. Joe the Revelator May 2016 #143
Meh. It's their funeral. frylock May 2016 #144
Super. We don't expect you to be. According to what 7wo7rees May 2016 #154
Two just flipped for Bernie. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #155
Awesome! Didn't hear that. jillan May 2016 #157
And to the superdelegates from Bernie supporters: We Will NOT vote for you when it's time for jillan May 2016 #156
Have fun in Nov hereforthevoting May 2016 #158
We will! And I hope you'll join us LaydeeBug May 2016 #162
"I feel your pain"--- John Poet May 2016 #159
No...REAL DEMOCRATS help elect Democrats when it is clear LaydeeBug May 2016 #166
Sanders will not be successful in appealing to super delegates Gothmog May 2016 #161
No, but they will be bought, and be happy about it LondonReign2 May 2016 #165

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
1. Sanders supporters to
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:41 AM
May 2016

the neo-liberal establishment, the Clinton campaign, and her supporters:

We will NOT be bullied. And we ARE "REAL" Democrats.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
9. Ah yes
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:49 AM
May 2016

I remember the difference now...
I'll remember that next time I'm being beaten that it's not bullying, just a good old fashioned country ass whooping and I should remember my place.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
47. It's democracy. Being outvoted is not being bullied.
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:15 AM
May 2016

And those don't like getting sprayed with criticism should back away from those who are behaving badly.

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)
153. Your place is to do your part to make sure
Thu May 19, 2016, 01:39 AM
May 2016

we get a DEM in the WH and retake the House and Senate. Your place is to VOTE BLUE no matter what.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
10. Oh, bullshit.
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:50 AM
May 2016

I notice you chose to use a word with violent connotations.

I will clearly tell you that this woman is not a victim, and does not get "beaten."

But your efforts to "beat" me verbally are noted, as they are tossed to the round file for junk mail.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
127. Hey Everyone: here you have the very example of "manufactured outrage", we read about all the time.
Wed May 18, 2016, 05:44 PM
May 2016

looking for offense, is an art. Well, not really and art, but an art form. Well, not really an art form as much as a pain in the ass.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
88. While the polls aren't closed here at home,
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:16 PM
May 2016

and there's still a lot to be counted in Kentucky, I believe my candidate is doing just fine today.

WhiteTara

(29,692 posts)
90. Are there 500 delegates to be divided in Kentucky?
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:25 PM
May 2016

that's how many are needed for your candidate to win. Even if he wins Kentucky, he is still losing.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
59. Spare me your sanctimony.
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:40 PM
May 2016

Being *beaten* in an election is not the same as violence against women, and you damn well know it,

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
98. I see you sought nuance when you should have focused on basic math skills.
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:47 PM
May 2016

but good luck with that

lapfog_1

(29,189 posts)
54. so if Hillary is winning so decisively
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:12 PM
May 2016

why bother posting anything about superdelegates?

Seriously, are you secretly jealous of Bernie Sanders support?

Let the primaries finish, have the vote at the convention, move on to the general.

If you are so confident of victory, you might have even counseled the Nevada Democratic party to seat all of the Bernie delegates and not changed the rules... let Bernie win an extra 4 delegates (or whatever the number might have been) and simply moved on without all the fuss. After all, since Hillary is so far ahead and Bernie is so beaten (your phrase), why not be magnanimous in winning?

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
60. I do not contort to "if/then" scenarios. I won't be bullied into that sort of parameter.
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:41 PM
May 2016

Math is math. Hillary will be the nominee.

lapfog_1

(29,189 posts)
63. you are trying so hard to believe that, aren't you?
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:50 PM
May 2016

if you really believed it, there would be no reason to state it.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
64. I don't need to *try*, the TRUTH does suffice.
Tue May 17, 2016, 01:07 PM
May 2016

If you really believed your statement, you have no reason to reply at all, but if you reply, I can tell that you are having a hard time with what you say you believe.

LMFAO.

 

puffy socks

(1,473 posts)
76. So Sanders supporters don't believe anything they post?
Tue May 17, 2016, 04:08 PM
May 2016

Because "if you really believed it, there would be no reason to state it."
right?

lapfog_1

(29,189 posts)
77. pretty much
Tue May 17, 2016, 04:12 PM
May 2016

You won't find posts from me about whether or not Bernie should stay in the race. That's up to Bernie and his campaign.

Response to LaydeeBug (Reply #4)

Response to LaydeeBug (Reply #105)

Response to LaydeeBug (Reply #110)

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
113. No. Really. And the math does indeed favor her. Too bad that upsets you
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:03 PM
May 2016

I wish you well with that.

Response to LaydeeBug (Reply #113)

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
117. Oh, yes the math *does*.
Wed May 18, 2016, 12:07 AM
May 2016

A good start for you *might* be to try not to conflate delegate math with polling ratios.

As you may or may not have gleaned from this primary process, the *only* poll that matters is the one on election day.

Good luck with that.

Response to LaydeeBug (Reply #117)

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
123. Math is math...and you BEST BELIEVE I'll see you there
Wed May 18, 2016, 03:54 PM
May 2016

me and mine *wouldn't* *miss* it.

And we're ready.

Response to LaydeeBug (Reply #123)

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
125. Not a problem sweets. So will we.
Wed May 18, 2016, 05:34 PM
May 2016

He lost this thing a while ago, and now it's gonna BURN. LOL

Response to LaydeeBug (Reply #125)

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
135. Oh, I'm NOT dreaming. In *reality*, I am PREPARED.
Wed May 18, 2016, 07:47 PM
May 2016

See you at the convention. Really.

No.

REALLY.

Because we've won, and we are NOT backing down. So, see you there

Response to LaydeeBug (Reply #135)

Response to LaydeeBug (Reply #137)

Response to LaydeeBug (Reply #139)

Response to LaydeeBug (Reply #141)

Response to LaydeeBug (Reply #145)

Response to LaydeeBug (Reply #147)

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
160. I like that you keep kicking my *awesome* thread about the WINNER
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:11 AM
May 2016

because come November, the Democratic nominee will NOT be Bernie. Feel it.

Response to Bonobo (Reply #150)

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
2. Good luck in the GE
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:42 AM
May 2016

It'll be a hell of a loss. Take that to your super-delegates, put it in your pipe, and sit on it.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
42. You're tell me
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:54 AM
May 2016

I'm the one fielding the 'you say you love Miss Hilly, or you love Donald doody head and want us all to have his cooties' school yard purity questions.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
3. They keep trying the same failed tactics over and over ...
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:45 AM
May 2016

... and appear to be genuinely surprised that the outcome isn't as they expected. Interesting.



(Alerter: This is my personal opinion and my personal observation.)

spinbaby

(15,088 posts)
8. Yeah, they can't be bullied.
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:48 AM
May 2016

But they sure can be bought, and were bought and paid for before the primaries even started.

Response to LaydeeBug (Reply #12)

Response to LaydeeBug (Reply #107)

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
112. This November, I am happy to support the DEMOCRATIC nominee. Too bad you won't
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:02 PM
May 2016

but that isn't my concern. "Math" is.

Response to LaydeeBug (Reply #112)

 

BlueLouisville

(28 posts)
11. Cool story...
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:50 AM
May 2016

Clinton fans GOOD, Sanders fans EVIL. Super delegates are on the way out so enjoy them while you can.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
15. True story
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:53 AM
May 2016

I even went so far as to say I don't think the worst examples are really Bernie supporters, but interlopers.

But hey, if you need an "either/or" or an "if/then", and everything is black or white to you, that shows where your problem is, and I wish you luck in the growth needed to fix it.



(on edit: I decided not to be profane for once)

 

BlueLouisville

(28 posts)
27. You assume far too much from a simple post...
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:12 AM
May 2016

Continue pontificating about superdelegates and the inner fortitude they display by supporting Hillary Clinton against those mean Bernie Sanders supporters.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
61. Honey, I didn't assume a single thing, but that didn't stop YOU
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:42 PM
May 2016

from thinking you could assign things.

Funny that.

 

BlueLouisville

(28 posts)
118. I think your last post proved my point...
Wed May 18, 2016, 01:57 AM
May 2016

You claim superdelegates are being bullied by average Joe Voter, which is absurd. Superdelegates are quite literally some of the most powerful people in this country. For example Bill Clinton is a superdelegate along with countless other politicians and power players. Are you seriously trying say Bernie Sanders voters are bullying the most powerful people in this country? It's an absurd claim on its face. If there were constant death threats against elected officials why hasn't one person been arrested. Are people leaving messages with burner phones or sophisticated software that's allowed them to go undetected. Are they using super secret e-mail accounts that law enforcement can't trace back to an I.P. address? If there's such a fear of Sanders supporters why hasn't at least one of them been arrested? The truth is the only people truly bullying anyone are Clinton and her surrogates, state party leaders, national party leaders, etc. They speak in flippant and condescending tone towards Sanders supporters. Party leaders institute last minute rule changes without following proper protocol which unfairly favor Sec. Clinton. They ignore valid motions, they pretend voice votes favored their motion even though they clearly they don't and lastly they jam pack rules committees with officials who favor a certain candidate. They constantly berate and chide Sanders voters as sexist, racist, young, stupid, angry and violent without anything but innuendo and supposition. Sanders supporters boo an undemocratic process and say nasty things to highly paid professionals and politicians for their part in said undemocratic process. Sending death threats is over the line but I find it odd that nobody has been arrested with all these reports of people threatening to kill publicly elected officials. Maybe it's Sanders fans making those calls to the Nevada Chair but it's also possible it's not Sanders supporters. Sanders campaign has been constantly gaslit during this primary. The entire 'unqualified' thing was a product of the Clinton campaign using semantics to avoid calling Sanders 'unqualified' directly but it was the clear insinuation. Hell Hillary did the same thing in 2008 only she said Obama was unqualified herself. They've distorted Sanders record on guns, the auto bailout and numerous other issues. Clinton has gone so far as to dump dead children on Bernie for not voting to allow Sandy Hook victims to sue gun manufactures. Of course Adam Lanza stole weapons from a lawful gun owner and the guns worked properly, so what exactly is the basis of the lawsuit. All of these things I've brought up are straight bullying tactics. You blithely ignore bullying tactics from your side while condemn the other side. Bullying required power to be an effective strategy. Sanders voters are frustrated because they're basically powerless, which is the hallmark of almost all victims of bullying. The only people capable of bullying anyone are people with power and that resides with the very people you claim are being bullied. Power people are almost never the victims of a bully but in fact they're almost always the bully. You aren't standing up to bullies you're actually supporting bullies. You seem oblivious to this fact and you can post all sorts of witty and snarky comments but color me unimpressed by your whole sch tick

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
164. I am not sure why where I live is relevant to the discussion
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:59 PM
May 2016

But I *know* you weren't trying to imply anything with that.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
21. HA HA, now you're trying to pretend Hillary is not establishment?
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:58 AM
May 2016

Do any of her campaign people have even one original thought of their own?

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
62. Why yes, her people do have original thoughts...see how their delegate
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:43 PM
May 2016

strategy is beating your guy? No? Oh, you *will*. lol

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
163. +1
Thu May 19, 2016, 01:17 PM
May 2016

The Citizens United circle is complete. Now Democrats are echoing the Right's eternal victimhood narrative.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
19. Bullshit. HRC has lready bullied and threatened you all for her support
Tue May 17, 2016, 08:57 AM
May 2016

Promised some of you all money, then reneged on too-it I hear. Buying votes, threatening non support in their elections, being put on her enemy hit list. No wonder you all support her.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
50. Do you actually believe the nonsense you just wrote?
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:47 AM
May 2016

I get many of you are angry that you are losing but I can't believe you have actually convinced yourselves that the ridiculous stuff you post is true.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
72. Right. Hillary is such a poor poor vicitm
Tue May 17, 2016, 02:37 PM
May 2016

Innocent as the day she was born. Pure as the driven snow

My ass. She's nothing but a devious shyster.

shy·ster
ˈSHīstər/
nouninformal
noun: shyster; plural noun: shysters

a person, especially a lawyer, who uses unscrupulous, fraudulent, or deceptive methods in business.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
99. What you wrote does not apply to my response. My question stands. Do you actually believe the
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:48 PM
May 2016

nonsense you wrote?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
23. How many of those 'Superdelegates' voted for DOMA, a bully's vote if ever there was one?
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:05 AM
May 2016

Many of them cast that bigoted vote. Camp Clinton has touted the DOMA voters who endorse her. They stand proudly with them.
Several more of these delegates voted for the Iraq War, in which our country bullied Iraq over 9-11 which Iraq did not do.

It's odd that such persons think they are being bullied, with all the bullying they have done and all their money and status. 'Yes I voted that some minorities have no civil rights, but I'm the one being bullied!!!'

Also, those delegates are actually called unpledged or uncommitted delegates in the language of the Party regulations. The fact that they want to call themselves 'Supers' indicates part of the problem with their abuse of that role.

I understand that Clinton supporters are the DOMA branch of the Party, back in the day they are the brand of Democrats that opposed LGBT rights along with the Republicans and so to them those bigoted voters are heroes, much like they lionize Ron and Nancy Reagan, wrongfully but so passionately.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
31. Did I say that they are? No. So why not respond to what I said? Evasion is a form of
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:22 AM
May 2016

dishonesty. I know exactly what positions are held by the unpledged delegates in our Party. 193 Representatives, 47 Senators, 21 Governors, 20 'distinguished members' such as ex Presidents and VPs and former Congressional leaders.
That's 281 persons who could have and in many cases did vote for DOMA who now whine about being 'bullied'.

Did you think you were teaching me something with your condescending snark?

LiberalFighter

(50,767 posts)
32. So I am suppose to give you a response you want with your attitude?
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:26 AM
May 2016

BTW not all of them were in office when DOMA was passed. That also includes President Obama who is also one of those delegates.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
41. My attitude? Check your verbiage. I said my piece and your response was to lecture me
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:38 AM
May 2016

that not all the 'supers' are Members of Congress. All I'm asking is for a response to what I actually said, not lessons on the nature of Democratic delegates.

My question: How many of those delegates voted for DOMA? There is an answer as many of them did, bullies that they are, bigoted actions are what they took. Many of them. You obviously do not know how many, and as I said I assume that the Reagan Democrats of the DOMA branch of the Party don't care. And you have demonstrated that you don't care even enough to make an honest response.
Your attempt to bully me for not supporting your bullies is shallow stuff.

How many of the delegates you are promoting voted for DOMA? You don't know because you don't care, and the fact that I mention their actual nature, flawed, partisan self serving and often bigoted bothers you and causes you to lash out at me. And that's my point. You can't bully me into silence, will not happen.

LiberalFighter

(50,767 posts)
52. Why are you focusing on one issue?
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:10 PM
May 2016

And why are you focusing on that issue when a larger group of Democrats came out back in 2013 to overturn DOMA? Would you rather they had not fought to overturn it?

Since you are so concerned about how many voted for DOMA it is on you to gather the data and provide the source. But again what is important is where they stand now on that issue. Not back when DOMA was passed. Most of those congressional members from that time period are no longer members of Congress. Yet it appears you want to lump the current ones altogether as one because they are supporting Clinton.

BTW I did not bully you. I have also not been promoting any delegates. You are making a lot of accusations against me without any support of it. Your concept of bullies is astounding.

 

BlueLouisville

(28 posts)
28. Can you provide on link to a confirmed Sanders supporter threating violence?
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:14 AM
May 2016

Surely they were arrested and it's part of public record.

LiberalFighter

(50,767 posts)
30. Here is one
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:19 AM
May 2016
Several Sanders backers have condemned some of the threats against Lange and other actions Saturday. Former state assemblywoman Lucy Flores, a current congressional candidate, said in a statement: "There were actions over the weekend and at the Democratic convention that very clearly crossed the line. Progressives need to speak out against those: Making threats against someone's life, defacing private property, and hurling vulgar language at our female leaders." [link:http://abcnews.go.com/Politics


Lange said she'd been receiving hundreds of profanity-laced calls and texts from inside and outside of the U.S., threatening her life and her family. Lange said the restaurant where she works has received so many calls it had to unplug the phone.

ABC News
 

BlueLouisville

(28 posts)
37. That's not confirmation... it's more supposition from the Clinton camp.
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:32 AM
May 2016

I'm not disputing Sanders fans and how annoying they can be. If death threats are being sent via phone, e-mail, etc. it would have been tracked and somebody would have been arrested; especially if they are threatening elected officials. I'm skeptical until there's a confirmed arrest. Yes, they yelled at Barbara Boxer but that's not a crime, is it proper decorum... no of course not, but it comes with the territory when you're an elected official. This looks like gaslighting to me.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
33. Threats are dangerous and some people wonder why SDs are not
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:30 AM
May 2016

flocking to BS? Some comments on DU reflects how horrid bullying can be.

It's not a matter of good vs. evil, it's a matter of respect for people who support another Democratic Party's candidate. Liberals/progressive understand that.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
39. Clinton by almost a 1000 delegates, over 3 million votes. You get that right? Oh wait, no you don't
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:34 AM
May 2016
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
38. Good. A bunch of little kid tantrums. Do not give in to this absurdity of a collective national
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:33 AM
May 2016

tantrum.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
40. They should tell Brock to cease and desist then
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:35 AM
May 2016

and have his minions concentrate just on the social media front instead.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
46. Crystal clear...
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:32 AM
May 2016

The national convention will be in the very bright public spotlight with MSM covering it non stop, now consider what went down in NV and how establishment went about trashing the rules to push their agenda... take that moment and factor in neither candidate will have enough delegates to earn nomination without SDs...

SDs are hyper sensitive to public pressure so what you call 'bully' is actually the more vocal and active contingent coming at ya during the convention... care to guess which side that will be and whom they support?

grab your popcorn folks, this is about to get very interesting and there's NOTHING the establishment can do to STOP it

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
56. The supers from my state are saying loud and clear "we don't give a sh*t who you voted for"
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:15 PM
May 2016

14 out of 17 for Hillary in a state that voted 62% for Bernie 38% for Hillary

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
79. as I said the supers in my state are voting against the people of my state
Tue May 17, 2016, 04:17 PM
May 2016

you can cite all the math in the world it doesn't change the fact this process is corrupt, in fact it re enforces that

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10594756

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
57. Well, I live in a purple state, which voted
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:36 PM
May 2016

heavily for Bernie. My vote for rep and Senator
depend on how they vote at the convention.
I don't threaten, I don't bully, but I just may refuse
them my vote.

SheenaR

(2,052 posts)
58. Real Democrats don't pull this shit?
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:39 PM
May 2016

Yes, usually we just sit back and take it

Not anymore.

And before you think I am some crazed Independent Trump supporter, I have always been a Democrat and worked closely with a Presidential candidate during a previous campaign. You know, how real Democrats do it.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
69. Sure, hiding behind jackboots and brown shirted armed guards
Tue May 17, 2016, 01:53 PM
May 2016

So much for being against gun control and for democracy. This party can screw off once the GE's done-- I don't consort with fascists.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
70. We are not hiding behind ANYTHING, we are STANDING UP
Tue May 17, 2016, 02:10 PM
May 2016

and refusing to be bullied. Hillary won this thing. Math is math.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
75. What are the qulifications for "real" Democrats? DNA testing? Secret decoder rings? Loyalty Oaths?
Tue May 17, 2016, 04:01 PM
May 2016

DNC logos on their underwear?

Is it like "Real Men"? "Real Coke"? "Real Tough"? "Real Nice"? "Real Loyal"?

Do tell.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
97. That's a joke, right?
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:35 PM
May 2016

Super-Delegates not being bullies themselves?

The REAL Democratic party wouldn't HAVE stooped to the un-democratic rule OF Super-Delegates. There is no logic there in your post.

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
102. They're not very bright are they? I hope the feel the consequences of their unhinged cirminal
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:51 PM
May 2016

actions. What twisted distorted notions of how democracy works. When you don't get your way, stalk, threaten and harass people and target their children! Utterly psychotic.

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
116. You will be hearing gavels being banged, death threats and other BS antics are criminal.
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:20 PM
May 2016

All that losing doesn't make you a winner, baby, no matter what you insist on banging.

Facts are hard, and reality can't actually be denied. Own up to what the BS campaign is about violence and threatening women and children.

 

larkrake

(1,674 posts)
128. Maybe if they didnt sell out to the DNC before any primaries, they wouldnt be so
Wed May 18, 2016, 05:48 PM
May 2016

blatantly corrupt. Corrupt folk get targeted by REAL Democrats

merrily

(45,251 posts)
129. Who gives a rat's ass about an institution that should not have been created in the first place?
Wed May 18, 2016, 05:49 PM
May 2016

They should all resign from that incredibly undemocratic body and dissolve it.

7wo7rees

(5,128 posts)
154. Super. We don't expect you to be. According to what
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:02 AM
May 2016

I've been reading you superdelegates exist to cast your vote for the candidate that will win opposed to the Republican candidate. Good luck with the choice you all make.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
156. And to the superdelegates from Bernie supporters: We Will NOT vote for you when it's time for
Thu May 19, 2016, 05:18 AM
May 2016

re-election.

It's a two-way street.

 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
159. "I feel your pain"---
Thu May 19, 2016, 07:22 AM
May 2016

I think a lot of the problem with the Democratic party abandoning orthodox liberalism for conservatism, and neo-conservative foreign policy, comes from interlopers pretending to be Democrats, who put people like Hillary Clinton into office.

REAL DEMOCRATS don't pull this shit.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Superdelegates to Ber...