Tue May 17, 2016, 09:53 AM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
Here we go - the beginning of the probable end. Clinton Foundation Audit
Still looming....
Shaky Foundations The Clintons’ so-called charitable enterprise has served as a vehicle to launder money and to enrich family friends. By Ken Silverstein After endless delays and excuses, the Clinton Foundation released its 2014 tax return as well as amended returns for the previous four years and an audit of its finances. That fulfilled a pledge made last April by Clinton Foundation acting CEO, Maura Pally, who acknowledged that the foundation had previously made a few unfortunate accounting “mistakes.” Journalists are going to be scouring through this new financial information and pumping out “balanced” stories that evade what is already evident, namely that the Clintons have used their foundation for crass profiteering and influence peddling. If the Justice Department and law enforcement agencies do their jobs, the foundation will be closed and its current and past trustees, who include Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton, will be indicted. That’s because their so-called charitable enterprise has served as a vehicle to launder money and to enrich Clinton family friends. It is beyond dispute that former President Clinton has been directly involved in helping foundation donors and his personal cronies get rich. Even worse, it is beyond dispute that these very same donors and the Clintons’ political allies have won the focused attention of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton when she served as Secretary of State. Democrats and Clinton apologists will write these accusations off as conspiracy mongering and right-wing propaganda, but it’s an open secret to anyone remotely familiar with accounting and regulatory requirements for charities that the financial records are deliberately misleading. And not coincidentally, those records were long filed by a Little Rock–based accounting firm called BKD, a regional auditor with little international experience. <snip> http://harpers.org/blog/2015/11/shaky-foundations/
|
64 replies, 5509 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
ViseGrip | May 2016 | OP |
SFnomad | May 2016 | #1 | |
ViseGrip | May 2016 | #25 | |
Jitter65 | May 2016 | #58 | |
YouDig | May 2016 | #2 | |
leftynyc | May 2016 | #3 | |
Cosmic Kitten | May 2016 | #6 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | May 2016 | #30 | |
leftynyc | May 2016 | #40 | |
Broward | May 2016 | #13 | |
leftynyc | May 2016 | #41 | |
Broward | May 2016 | #50 | |
Hiraeth | May 2016 | #17 | |
ViseGrip | May 2016 | #26 | |
uponit7771 | May 2016 | #27 | |
The Velveteen Ocelot | May 2016 | #36 | |
leftynyc | May 2016 | #42 | |
The Velveteen Ocelot | May 2016 | #45 | |
gainesvillenole | May 2016 | #56 | |
NorthCarolina | May 2016 | #57 | |
leftynyc | May 2016 | #60 | |
Name removed | May 2016 | #4 | |
BootinUp | May 2016 | #5 | |
Cosmic Kitten | May 2016 | #7 | |
BootinUp | May 2016 | #8 | |
Cosmic Kitten | May 2016 | #9 | |
BootinUp | May 2016 | #14 | |
ViseGrip | May 2016 | #28 | |
JudyM | May 2016 | #48 | |
bkkyosemite | May 2016 | #18 | |
libdem4life | May 2016 | #15 | |
ViseGrip | May 2016 | #29 | |
libdem4life | May 2016 | #31 | |
libdem4life | May 2016 | #11 | |
DebDoo | May 2016 | #20 | |
BootinUp | May 2016 | #23 | |
Cal Carpenter | May 2016 | #47 | |
BootinUp | May 2016 | #54 | |
SidDithers | May 2016 | #10 | |
JoePhilly | May 2016 | #12 | |
libdem4life | May 2016 | #24 | |
JoePhilly | May 2016 | #46 | |
enid602 | May 2016 | #16 | |
Hiraeth | May 2016 | #19 | |
JTFrog | May 2016 | #21 | |
sharp_stick | May 2016 | #22 | |
LexVegas | May 2016 | #32 | |
Name removed | May 2016 | #33 | |
MineralMan | May 2016 | #34 | |
Gavile | May 2016 | #35 | |
Doctor_J | May 2016 | #37 | |
rjsquirrel | May 2016 | #38 | |
BootinUp | May 2016 | #39 | |
Adrahil | May 2016 | #43 | |
leftynyc | May 2016 | #44 | |
basselope | May 2016 | #49 | |
Sheepshank | May 2016 | #51 | |
Name removed | May 2016 | #52 | |
NowSam | May 2016 | #53 | |
amborin | May 2016 | #55 | |
azurnoir | May 2016 | #59 | |
beaglelover | May 2016 | #61 | |
Herman4747 | May 2016 | #62 | |
randome | May 2016 | #63 | |
felix_numinous | May 2016 | #64 |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:55 AM
SFnomad (3,473 posts)
1. Couldn't find anything more current than a 6 month old article ... that has obviously gone nowhere
How about something from Breitbart? Or maybe Free Republic?
|
Response to SFnomad (Reply #1)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:21 AM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
25. Investigation is continuing and they just found BILL TOOK 500K FOR ARMS while Hillary was at State!
A violation. Do you think this is it?
|
Response to ViseGrip (Reply #25)
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:18 PM
Jitter65 (3,089 posts)
58. Not true. Try agains. nt
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:56 AM
YouDig (2,280 posts)
2. That was last November. Do you think those people who keep predicting the rapture
eventually realize there isn't going to be one, or do they just keep pushing the date back?
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:57 AM
leftynyc (26,060 posts)
3. Just who the fuck do you
think you're kidding by starting a thread "the beginning of the end" when you're posting an article 6 MONTHS OLD? The smell of desperation is getting pretty rancid.
|
Response to leftynyc (Reply #3)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:02 AM
Cosmic Kitten (3,498 posts)
6. Nice language. Better wipe the spittle of your monitor
Response to Cosmic Kitten (Reply #6)
DemocratSinceBirth This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Cosmic Kitten (Reply #6)
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:01 AM
leftynyc (26,060 posts)
40. Awwwww
I had no idea I was dealing with such delicate flowers.
|
Response to leftynyc (Reply #3)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:11 AM
Broward (1,976 posts)
13. Right-wing rage. Fuck yeah.
Response to Broward (Reply #13)
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:01 AM
leftynyc (26,060 posts)
41. Right wing crap posted
and it gets a yawn from you. How pathetic.
|
Response to leftynyc (Reply #41)
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:42 AM
Broward (1,976 posts)
50. Speak it. We need more like you fighting for the rich and powerful.
Response to leftynyc (Reply #3)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:12 AM
Hiraeth (4,805 posts)
17. Before the age of the internet, six months was nothing. Now, I feel old.
Response to leftynyc (Reply #3)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:24 AM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
26. The person who just read the Foundation took 100 million from MIDDLE EAST LEADERS
And I'm pissed! Do you not understand this? It appear the middle has paid us to fight a war for them....(200 troops just put on the ground in Yemen, 1 day after 250 more into Iraq!)
That is the people's money to fight a war, but it went to the Clinton's for profit foundation! Will the Clinton's fund the VA? Will they pay for the boots, gus, ammo, and the rest? Why would the money go there? Now do tell me.....just how much will they be representing us, after taking 100 million from middle east leaders? I'll tell you....they can't! |
Response to leftynyc (Reply #3)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:25 AM
uponit7771 (89,618 posts)
27. +1, more right wing tripe on DU
Response to uponit7771 (Reply #27)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:41 AM
The Velveteen Ocelot (111,694 posts)
36. Ken Silverstein is anything but a right-winger.
And Harper's is anything but a right-wing publication. Silverstein has also worked for Mother Jones, Washington Monthly, The Nation, Slate, and Salon. He did get himself fired from The Intercept, edited by Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, and Jeremy Scahill, who are also not right-wingers. Silverstein was accused of sloppy fact-checking, so there's that. But he's clearly not a right-winger in any sense of the word.
|
Response to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #36)
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:02 AM
leftynyc (26,060 posts)
42. Just a sloppy
journalist. Wonderful.
|
Response to leftynyc (Reply #42)
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:06 AM
The Velveteen Ocelot (111,694 posts)
45. Apparently, or at least allegedly. Just not a right-winger.
Response to leftynyc (Reply #3)
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:14 PM
gainesvillenole (121 posts)
56. OPINION Piece, Not A News Article....
And a besides being 6 months old, it's a poorly crafted, biased hit piece.... 🙄
|
Response to leftynyc (Reply #3)
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:15 PM
NorthCarolina (11,197 posts)
57. Quick, mobilize the Brown Shirts. -nt-
Response to NorthCarolina (Reply #57)
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:48 PM
leftynyc (26,060 posts)
60. Yawn
Looks like I don't have to mobilize anything. Bernie is never going to get the nomination.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 09:58 AM
BootinUp (44,973 posts)
5. Clinton hate is one of the constants in the political universe, not to worry
they have withstood the smears before and will do so again.
|
Response to BootinUp (Reply #5)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:03 AM
Cosmic Kitten (3,498 posts)
7. I wonder how the GOP will swiftboat Hillary???
I'm sure the voters won't fall
for that kind of politicking, again ![]() |
Response to Cosmic Kitten (Reply #7)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:05 AM
BootinUp (44,973 posts)
8. In the end the positive message will win.
Thats what the Clintons are good at.
|
Response to BootinUp (Reply #8)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:07 AM
Cosmic Kitten (3,498 posts)
9. BWahahah What *positive message*
That Bill will be in charge of
the economy he helped to undermine? |
Response to Cosmic Kitten (Reply #9)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:11 AM
BootinUp (44,973 posts)
14. Lets talk about it after the convention. nt
Response to Cosmic Kitten (Reply #9)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:25 AM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
28. Exactly....so who will actally be the prez? She thought this was good strategy?
Weak is as weak does.....
|
Response to Cosmic Kitten (Reply #9)
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:35 AM
JudyM (27,831 posts)
48. "Breaking down all the barriers"
![]() |
Response to BootinUp (Reply #8)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:13 AM
bkkyosemite (5,792 posts)
18. positive message...guess you haven't heard...the stuff....the stuff...
Response to Cosmic Kitten (Reply #7)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:12 AM
libdem4life (13,877 posts)
15. Swiftboating was taking a moral man and lying about him.
This is just the opposite. Taking a immoral person who tells lies and cheats and went from "broke" to fabuluosly wealthy in 15 years ... i.e. just telling the truth. Big difference.
|
Response to libdem4life (Reply #15)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:27 AM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
29. Dont' forget Clinton's sent their daughter out to lie...what parents do that?
Chelsea could have told many great stories about her parents, enduring stories. I heard them when I heard Bill speak privately. But they sent her out to lie about Bernie. Again I ask, what parents do that? THIS is where my mother who is 89 bailed on Hillary. She is a mother and said YOU DON'T DO THIS.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Reply #29)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:29 AM
libdem4life (13,877 posts)
31. Yes, and when her lies bounced back, her mother Did Not back her up.
Chelsea just isn't as polished a liar and laid low for a long time thereafter. I haven't heard much about or from her since.
|
Response to BootinUp (Reply #5)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:09 AM
libdem4life (13,877 posts)
11. Clinton Hate = Having the nerve to post the truth about HRH.
Everyone knows she's dirty, and so is Bill and Chelsea. But blinders are helpful against the light of day...reality.
Please be so kind as to back up your rebuttal to this article and the items within it that are false. It's 6 months old because this isn't an overnight Investigation. |
Response to BootinUp (Reply #5)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:14 AM
DebDoo (319 posts)
20. The only smear here is a result of the crap the Clintons have heaped on the rest of the country
Response to DebDoo (Reply #20)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:17 AM
BootinUp (44,973 posts)
23. It must be true because their enemies say it is!!!!!!!!! PTui!@
Response to BootinUp (Reply #5)
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:25 AM
Cal Carpenter (4,959 posts)
47. Dismissing any criticism of the Clintons, no matter how accurate and specific,
as "Clinton hate" does not make it look like you have a very good counter-argument.
|
Response to Cal Carpenter (Reply #47)
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:54 AM
BootinUp (44,973 posts)
54. The pukes are still waiting for those accurate criticisms to be found. (Edited)
Edited to add:
The next best thing to a real scandal is a phony one. How many millions of dollars have been spent to bring this couple down with nothing but a sex scandal to show. What don't you get? Where's a fucking shred of proof of conspiracy, crookery. Its in your mind because her enemies planted it there. |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:08 AM
SidDithers (44,228 posts)
10. ...
![]() Any updates since November? Sid |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:09 AM
JoePhilly (27,787 posts)
12. Old stale outrage.
Response to JoePhilly (Reply #12)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:21 AM
libdem4life (13,877 posts)
24. Facts don't get stale. They either get proven to be wrong, or stick
like glue. I think it's setting up for a GOP victory, myself.
Let her get the nomination...shoot herself in the foot a few more times...wither under Trump's barrage she's seen nothing like and these "facts" will continue to come out as a dropped shoe by dropped shoe...and blow the GE. The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy has nothing on Trump's angry mano-a-mano blistering tactics. Most of Trump's baggage he has put out there, and the Repulicans still love him. But I see The Clinton Foundation Pay for Play will likely surpass Emailgate. I wish she were clean, I really do, because I think she has many things that qualify her for President. But I can wait for the first female president to be one who can be a role model for not only Progressives, but young girls. She does not qualify for that particular role. |
Response to libdem4life (Reply #24)
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:11 AM
JoePhilly (27,787 posts)
46. So an even bigger Indictment Fairy is what you predict?
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:12 AM
enid602 (7,789 posts)
16. tRump
I would think there would be more concern on this board with the Trump Foundation. %age of funds that actually go to charity, IRS reporting irregularities, etc. Just saying.
|
Response to enid602 (Reply #16)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:13 AM
Hiraeth (4,805 posts)
19. him too. equal concern.
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:15 AM
JTFrog (14,274 posts)
21. .
Sure is sad to see so called progressive liberals cheering for this shit.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:16 AM
sharp_stick (14,400 posts)
22. Have you ever posted anything with actual content
or is it all as mindless as this and the rest of the stuff on your transparency page?
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:37 AM
MineralMan (145,718 posts)
34. If you're reduced to posting six month old blog articles,
you've run out of actual information to present, I think. This block from last November is an opinion by a blogger, not an actual analysis of anything. Yet, you post it as if it were actual factual material, rather than the heavily-biased screed that it really is.
It's too late and too little. This primary race is almost over, and the outcome is pretty darned clear. In less than a month, this website is going to undergo a major change, since it will be 100% certain who the Democratic nominee will be. At that time, it's very unlikely that the current amnesty for people with long lists of hidden posts will continue, I imagine. I'm sorry that you're disappointed in how the primary race is going. I hope you'll be able to find it in you to think about the consequences of a Trump presidency would be, and vote in November accordingly. If not, you'll be disappointed once again, I'm certain. |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:39 AM
Gavile (107 posts)
35. Hillary needs to stand down now
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 10:45 AM
Doctor_J (36,392 posts)
37. Four years of investigations into her email servers and her money laundering operation
While all the while she signs corporate friendly legislation, starts more war, and privatizes stuff. Can't wait.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
rjsquirrel This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:03 AM
Adrahil (13,340 posts)
43. Seriously! Any second now. This time for reals, yo! NT
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:05 AM
leftynyc (26,060 posts)
44. The smell of desperation
is making GD-P unbearably toxic. I'll be back with a hazmat suit next time. Perhaps you'll have posted an even OLDER article written by a sloppy journalist and label it breaking news.
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:37 AM
basselope (2,565 posts)
49. It's HER turn.. how dare you talk about things and stuff!!
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:47 AM
Sheepshank (12,504 posts)
51. Another beginning for another end?
*sigh* again.
BS can't win a majority of the public over on the merits of his message, so can only make the attempt to win by disqualifying the front runner. Pathetic. |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
NowSam This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 11:55 AM
amborin (16,631 posts)
55. unbelievable corruption
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:24 PM
azurnoir (45,850 posts)
59. well at least now we know why Clinton's campaign is trying to distract with Nevada
and possibly force Bernie out of the campaign between this and the FBI investigation it could get messy
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 12:51 PM
beaglelover (3,082 posts)
61. You must be so proud of yourself.
Spreading RWNJ lies on a Democratic website. Way to go!!
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 01:22 PM
Herman4747 (1,825 posts)
62. Another day, yet another Clinton scandal...
getting a bit nauseating
|
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 01:25 PM
randome (34,845 posts)
63. The Clinton threads by Sanders supporters greatly outnumber Sanders posts by Sanders supporters.
I wonder why they prefer to talk about Clinton rather than Sanders.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr] |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Tue May 17, 2016, 05:28 PM
felix_numinous (5,198 posts)
64. K&R Thank you
keeping our eye on the ball so to speak.
|