Louisville just came in: Hillary up by 2500 votes. That should be a wrap.

[brooklynite]

Steve Kornacki says, while the decision desk hasn't called it yet, there won't be enough votes for Sanders to make up the difference.

[virtualobserver]

1. Hillary sure did spend a lot of time and money to narrowly eke out a victory

[brooklynite]

4. Better than Sanders spending a lot of time and money in NY to get a loss...

[virtualobserver]

7. Bernie is the challenger....Hillary is the presumed nominee limping toward the finish.

[Surya Gayatri]

10. Sanders spent double the time and money to eke out a loss.

[virtualobserver]

11. Hillary beat Obama 65% -29% so Bernie did pretty well.

[Surya Gayatri]

12. He didn't meet his 65% threshold--and now has to pick up an even bigger % going forward.

He lost suffered a loss in relation to his necessary target.

[virtualobserver]

14. Plenty of delegates still out there.

[LoverOfLiberty]

16. He did

and congratulations!

[ThePhilosopher04]

2. Amazing how they hold it back to see how much is needed

[Skwmom]

3. I just notice this has been a pattern in several states.

[brooklynite]

9. Amazing how it takes districts with more votes more time to count them...

...if only Clinton could win more farmland and State Parks.

[Surya Gayatri]

13. Oh, give me a home where the buffalo roam...

[alcibiades_mystery]

5. Down goes Sanders! Oooooo, they were counting on this one

[Nanjeanne]

6. What a squeaker. Didn't she win in 2008 by about 35-40%? But a win is a win.

[StayFrosty]

8. Thats rich

Weren't Sandroids gloating about winning West Virginia?

[frylock]

17. Huge sigh of relief there I bet.